|
Electric Wrigglies posted:The point is that one runway can already handle a lot of air traffic. Any cross runway you see at other airports doesn't count when you are comparing this airport to those (can't be used at the same time). Terminals have a lifespan as well and I would think that it would need major rebuild in 2050's in any event. Second (and third, etc) would (all) be parallel runways for the same logic as why a single is sufficient and likely don't need to move or rebuild the terminal anyway. Aight cool fair enough, thanks. Yes I'm talking parallel. Seven gates still seems short-sighted, even on an immediate time-span. And the architecture is dreadful. Completley uninspiring.
|
# ? Feb 15, 2024 08:01 |
|
|
# ? May 24, 2024 18:07 |
|
Well just get the army reserve in for 2050 and get them to do it for free, it’s what they’re training for anyway.
|
# ? Feb 15, 2024 08:11 |
|
Yeast posted:Well just get the army reserve in for 2050 and get them to do it for free, it’s what they’re training for anyway. Are you still talking about an airport or LZ Red Rooster?
|
# ? Feb 15, 2024 08:19 |
|
Bucky go on Well There's Your Problem
|
# ? Feb 15, 2024 08:44 |
|
who had airports on their bucky bingo card? also how relevant will the current airline model be in 2050
|
# ? Feb 15, 2024 08:54 |
|
Spookydonut posted:how relevant will the current airline model be in 2050 That’s an interesting question. Notwithstanding a global collapse of some kind, it’s not going anywhere but up is it?
|
# ? Feb 15, 2024 09:01 |
|
They're planes, they have to come down eventually.
|
# ? Feb 15, 2024 09:03 |
|
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2024-02-15/politicians-call-for-changes-to-unfair-hecs-repayment-system/103472284 The ALP is so incredibly poo poo this or yet another own goal.
|
# ? Feb 15, 2024 09:11 |
|
I had years of gently caress all indexation it was grand.
|
# ? Feb 15, 2024 09:40 |
|
Recoome posted:https://www.abc.net.au/news/2024-02-15/politicians-call-for-changes-to-unfair-hecs-repayment-system/103472284 Eh, it looks to me the APS have no interest in doing it because so have told their minister to tell the public to gently caress off (with all the ministerial smarmy talk required). Maybe the minister should insist upon more effort from their department but conservative ministers don't care any more than the APS does about a few hundred bux for a reasonably well earning graduate. If you are earning median salary (about $67k) this extra tax is about $150 if I done my sums right ($2.1k automatically paid back, 7% of that). The amount in question is that year's index amount on the amount paid that year. If you paid off 10k (implying an income of >$120k) that year, the 7% indexation would mean $700 extra. CPI is already heading back down and will ideally get down within the target range around 2.5% which would be $250 on $10k paid off for the year (or about a pineapple of extra tax at target CPI and median salary). Still, enough of a kerfuffle gets raised and I am sure the Minister is asking for scopes, costings and risk assessments to be drawn up.
|
# ? Feb 15, 2024 09:56 |
|
what does albo getting engaged mean for shortens leadership ambitions
|
# ? Feb 15, 2024 10:01 |
|
it needs to be indexed after your compulsory payments are subtracted not before lmao
|
# ? Feb 15, 2024 11:20 |
|
sick of Applebees posted:Create the perfect airport It's basically Denver + 1, with a more centralised and evenly distributed terminal
|
# ? Feb 15, 2024 11:25 |
|
how do you get into the airport
|
# ? Feb 15, 2024 11:26 |
|
Non Compos Mentis posted:how do you get into the airport Fly in fly out
|
# ? Feb 15, 2024 11:28 |
|
can someone overlay buckys cycle map and the map of sydney asbestos locations i feel like theres something there
|
# ? Feb 15, 2024 11:30 |
|
Non Compos Mentis posted:how do you get into the airport Maglev pods, in a 4-5 km tunnel
|
# ? Feb 15, 2024 11:38 |
|
Non Compos Mentis posted:how do you get into the airport Cycleways across the active runways.
|
# ? Feb 15, 2024 11:43 |
|
Non Compos Mentis posted:how do you get into the airport Can I interest you in a nice bike path?
|
# ? Feb 15, 2024 11:46 |
|
They’re practically free
|
# ? Feb 15, 2024 11:48 |
|
if you're making new runways may as well put in a cyclepath next to it
|
# ? Feb 15, 2024 11:49 |
|
Think of how fast you’ll ride with jet wash to push you along
|
# ? Feb 15, 2024 11:50 |
|
There’s actually 10 terminals surrounding a 5 armed runway. It’s genius
|
# ? Feb 15, 2024 11:52 |
|
Bucky Fullminster posted:
Looks like another imagining of the circular runway idea. It was studied by the EU and conceptually it sucks because it a huge amount of pavement is laid to slightly optimize the cross wind component of take offs and landings. Three runways in parallel pretty much scale linearly in capacity. Runways at different angles to each other scale in ever diminishing returns on investment because how they interfere with each other.
|
# ? Feb 15, 2024 11:52 |
|
Bucky Fullminster posted:
Get this to the Premier's office ASAP
|
# ? Feb 15, 2024 12:02 |
|
Electric Wrigglies posted:The point is that one runway can already handle a lot of air traffic. Any cross runway you see at other airports doesn't count when you are comparing this airport to those (can't be used at the same time). Terminals have a lifespan as well and I would think that it would need major rebuild in 2050's in any event. Second (and third, etc) would (all) be parallel runways for the same logic as why a single is sufficient and likely don't need to move or rebuild the terminal anyway. Crossing runways are used at the same time
|
# ? Feb 15, 2024 12:05 |
|
It's pretty different to the circular idea. And these don't really have to interfere with each other at all, if you're coming in and out from the open end. But yeah you'd have to do a lot of modelling with wind data to see how many you could run and if it'd be worth it. Here's Denver:
|
# ? Feb 15, 2024 12:24 |
|
Bucky Fullminster posted:It's pretty different to the circular idea. And these don't really have to interfere with each other at all, if you're coming in and out from the open end. Do you understand that the missed approach path has to be protected?
|
# ? Feb 15, 2024 12:26 |
|
thats a hosed up swastika
|
# ? Feb 15, 2024 12:28 |
|
Bucky Fullminster posted:It's pretty different to the circular idea. And these don't really have to interfere with each other at all, if you're coming in and out from the open end. Four sets of parallels rather than your five would be better. Having the approach and/or departure paths intersecting is not ideal. Edit: actually, why not six sets? Go for the hexagon
|
# ? Feb 15, 2024 12:31 |
|
Cross runways suck and parallel runways take up a lot of land... my proposal is the stacked runway, three or four runways high.
|
# ? Feb 15, 2024 12:36 |
|
Capt.Whorebags posted:Cross runways suck and parallel runways take up a lot of land... my proposal is the stacked runway, three or four runways high. In space!
|
# ? Feb 15, 2024 12:53 |
|
nocturama posted:Four sets of parallels rather than your five would be better. Having the approach and/or departure paths intersecting is not ideal. That's where it started: Actually it started with this terminal: I reckon that's gotta be close the most planes you can fit per m^2, in a shape that's not just a carpark like ATL. Maybe they're all Os or all Ts, I don't know. But the key is you want the terminal centralised for the passengers and between the runways for the pilots. And I do like the pentagon. And yeah I was wondering about a hexagon, or even octagon, but that's where I think we need more maths and architectural software, and we'd pretty quickly exceed any theoretical demand. Even 5 is pushing it. Bucky Fullminster fucked around with this message at 12:59 on Feb 15, 2024 |
# ? Feb 15, 2024 12:53 |
|
Bucky mate,
|
# ? Feb 15, 2024 13:46 |
|
Snowglobe of Doom posted:In space! it's 1000th the size it needs to be
|
# ? Feb 15, 2024 13:54 |
|
Maybe we should all just chip together and get Bucky a bunch of those European Sim games
|
# ? Feb 15, 2024 14:00 |
|
Man why do idiots go to school for this Shits easy as
|
# ? Feb 15, 2024 14:00 |
|
Hell yeah.
|
# ? Feb 15, 2024 14:02 |
|
What is this? A multi-level space airport for ants????
|
# ? Feb 15, 2024 14:51 |
|
|
# ? May 24, 2024 18:07 |
|
so we've gone from doodling on maps to crop circles...
|
# ? Feb 15, 2024 21:16 |