|
Boxturret posted:he looks like he's bashfully standing on the edge of the dance floor waiting to get asked to dance the guy on his right looks pissed off like "god why does Positive Expected Value guy have to hang around me all the time"
|
# ? Feb 20, 2024 15:39 |
|
|
# ? Jun 8, 2024 08:35 |
|
beetkoynah
|
# ? Feb 20, 2024 15:41 |
|
FAUXTON posted:beetkoynah bit cognac? e: bit cognaAAAAAAACCC!!!
|
# ? Feb 20, 2024 21:19 |
|
Plank Walker posted:bit cognac? bits-cognac
|
# ? Feb 20, 2024 21:52 |
|
i bet he's still trying to get with Tiffany Fong. "look i'm a badass now."
|
# ? Feb 20, 2024 22:33 |
|
who's that guy next to him. just some random guy who doesn't get his face censored?
|
# ? Feb 20, 2024 22:55 |
|
aardvaard posted:who's that guy next to him. just some random guy who doesn't get his face censored? The ex gang member Tiffany Fong interviewed after his recent release from prison, and from whom she obtained the photo.
|
# ? Feb 20, 2024 23:04 |
|
kalensc posted:The ex gang member Tiffany Fong interviewed after his recent release from prison, and from whom she obtained the photo. His name is "G Lock".
|
# ? Feb 20, 2024 23:17 |
|
shackleford posted:sounds like guy burgess did alright
|
# ? Feb 21, 2024 00:17 |
|
kalensc posted:The ex gang member Tiffany Fong interviewed after his recent release from prison, and from whom she obtained the photo. so you get a photo after prison, just like a rollercoaster!
|
# ? Feb 21, 2024 01:11 |
|
where is that nerd anyway is he awaiting surrender to a penitentiary or is he already locked up
|
# ? Feb 21, 2024 01:21 |
|
Boxturret posted:so you get a photo after prison, just like a rollercoaster! has this been roger verified?
|
# ? Feb 21, 2024 01:23 |
|
Potato Salad posted:where is that nerd anyway in jail awaiting his sentencing on march 28th
|
# ? Feb 21, 2024 01:30 |
|
ponzicar posted:in jail awaiting his sentencing on march 28th looks like his canned fish arbitrage scheme isn't clearing enough for him to continue affording haircuts
|
# ? Feb 21, 2024 01:39 |
|
should consider minting more fishcoin
|
# ? Feb 21, 2024 01:47 |
|
qirex posted:looks like his canned fish arbitrage scheme isn't clearing enough for him to continue affording haircuts He can afford haircuts. However, ever since he broke kosher by accidentally eating tens of thousands of shrimp, his uncut hair is now his only remaining covenant with the lord that lets him keep his superhuman crime abilities.
|
# ? Feb 21, 2024 01:48 |
|
his hair allows him to continue committing fashion crimes when no other option exists
|
# ? Feb 21, 2024 01:51 |
|
it looks like he lost a lot of weight
|
# ? Feb 21, 2024 17:42 |
|
Eeyo posted:it looks like he lost a lot of weight no shrimp in prison
|
# ? Feb 21, 2024 17:54 |
|
first person in history to stop using amphetamines and lose weight.
|
# ? Feb 21, 2024 18:01 |
|
here, have a piece on the halveneneneningingingnnggggggg i also have book reviews in Foreign Policy (and archive)
|
# ? Feb 22, 2024 10:08 |
|
divabot posted:here, have a piece on the halveneneneningingingnnggggggg Thanks for the FP link...I wanted to read them (from your newsletter links) but was stymied by the paywall. Keep up the good work!
|
# ? Feb 22, 2024 14:03 |
|
fuckin' lmao so craig wright, the guy pretending to be satoshi, just got completely corncobbed in some lawsuit https://www.opencrypto.org/2024-01-23_Schedule_of_Dr_Wrights_Further_Forgeries-COPAvWright.pdf ... This file is a LaTeX source file, taken from a folder on Dr Wright’s Overleaf account. Dr Wright has stated that, as Satoshi Nakamoto, he wrote the Bitcoin White Paper using LaTeX. He has also stated that this document “uniquely codes for the Bitcoin White Paper”, and that when compiled in Overleaf, produce a copy of the Bitcoin White Paper “in the same form as” and “materially identical to” that published by Satoshi Nakamoto. [Wright 6 {E/21/3}; Field 1 at 27 {P3/13/10}] The Bitcoin White Paper was not written in LaTeX. It was written and produced in OpenOffice 2.4. Its metadata record that it was produced by that means. Examination by both parties’ experts has led them both to conclude, and agree, that it was produced by that means based on every level of the pdf from the fine details of its typographical presentation, down to the binary digits of the PDF. [Rosendahl 1 at 66-68 {G/7/23}] [Rosendahl 1 at 191 {G/7/58}] [Lynch 1 at 117-120 and 122.c-d {I/5/36}] [Rosendahl / Lynch 1 at 2 {Q/5/1}]. Dr Wright’s LaTeX files from the TC folder are not original to 2008 or 2009. Using LaTeX software that is up to date for 2009, none of them compiles properly, instead producing errors and warnings. The files L and C could not be compiled at all. In order to compile them at all, it is necessary to fix the files or use a much more modern version of LaTeX software [Rosendahl 1 at 106-112 {G/7/38}]. This is because Dr Wright’s LaTeX files include software packages and options which could not have been used in 2009 [Rosendahl 1 at 158 {G/7/50}]. ... The original BDO Image was created from a computer running Windows XP. Windows XP does not record Transaction Log metadata, which was introduced in later operating system. However, BDOPC.raw does include Transaction Log data, indicating that it was used with a later version of Windows. Those Transaction logs contains extensive records editing of BDOPC.raw on 17 September 2023. Further, those Transaction Logs indicate other irregularities, such as files being backdated to appear as if created after they were last modified and accessed. [Madden 4 at 84, - 85 {G/6/28}] [Lynch 1 at 73-75 {I/5/19}] Windows NTFS file systems record an identifier, the Security ID or “SID”, connected with the user that edits the files. Of the user documents present on BDOPC.raw, over 99% (over 165,000 files) were apparently created with the correct Security IDs for the original BDO PC from which the original image was captured in 2007. By contrast, 71 of Dr Wright’s New Reliance documents were added later, using a different user account with a different SID (the “Manipulation User”) [Madden 4 at 93-98 {G/6/30}] [Madden / Lynch 1 at 12 {Q/6/5}]. These include all the documents among the New Reliance Documents which actually support Dr Wright’s claim to be Satoshi Nakamoto. There are multiple iterations of the drive image stored on the same Samsung Drive. Mr Madden has recovered two more which were deleted in September 2023, but which he has managed to recover: InfoDef09.raw and Image.raw. These are identical in content to 99.5% of BDOPC.raw. The remaining 0.5% is made up of data pertaining to New Reliance Documents, and previous edits of New Reliance Documents. These drive images are among hundreds of GB of data deleted from the Samsung Drive in September 2023. [Madden 4 at 13.d-e, {G/6/8}] ... 17.2.When asked for the password. Dr Wright stated that “he was hacked in 2020 and his password files were lost” [Shoosmiths’ letter of 11 January 2024]. That is implausible. 17.3.When asked for details of the alleged hack, Dr Wright stated that he had actually been hacked at least 10 times [Shoosmiths’ letter of 15 January 2024]. That is at least 10 times more implausible. ... 4. These documents have been created with the Pandoc document conversion software. Pandoc is an open-source piece of software that can convert documents between different formats. It can generate LaTeX documents automatically [Macfarlane 1 at 3 {C/19/1}]. In particular: 4.1. {ID_004687} contains a line which states that it was created as LaTeX via Pandoc, which is characteristic of the use of Pandoc. [Macfarlane 1 at 5 {C/19/1}]. Although {ID_004648} does not include that line “LaTeX via Pandoc”, it includes the other code from the same October template. 4.2. The template for conversion to LaTeX was not introduced into Pandoc at all until 2010 [Macfarlane 1 at 5 {C/19/1}]. 5. The documents have been created during the course of these proceedings: 5.1. Inspection of the (open-source) source code of Pandoc allows for more precise dating. The document was created after October 2022. The version of Pandoc used for creation of this document uses code that was not committed to Pandoc until October 2022. [Macfarlane 1 at 9 {C/19/2}]. ... The document has been backdated. It is a Rich Text File created with the editor version Riched20.dll v10.0.19041. That version of Riched20 is the version associated with the May 2020 update of Windows 10. [Madden 3 at 86-91 {G/5/34}] ... 3. These documents have been backdated. They refer to the use of C++ elements that were not in existence at their purported date of October 2007. In particular, 3.1 They call on the use of the libraries “<chrono>”, <thread>” and “<random”. These libraries are part of the C++11 standard, first released in 2011. [Stroustrup 1 at [4] {C/23/1}] 3.2 <chrono> was not first proposed until 11 June 2008. [Hinnant 1 at 4 {C/18/1}] 3.3 The first discussion of what became <chrono> was not published until 19 January 2008, and was not at that time called <chrono>. [Hinnant 1 at 5 {C/18/2}] 3.4 Within <chrono>, these documents call for the use of the function “sleep_for”. By 19 January 2008, the function was referred to as ‘sleep’ (not yet ‘sleep_for’). [Hinnant 1 at 5 {C/18/2}] 3.5 By that time, neither <chrono> nor “sleep_for” yet existed, even on the personal computer of its developer. [Hinnant 1 at 5 {C/18/2}] ... 5.1. A deleted file containing part of the content of {ID_004715} was recovered from InfoDef09.raw. The file was named “Section7.tex”: [PM46 at 92-99 {H/278/25}]. The content of the deleted “Section7.tex” begins with the words: “Certainly, here’s the LaTeX code for Section 7, which covers Recommendations. ``` latex 5.2. The content of the deleted “Section7.tex” ends with the words: This section presents a set of recommendations based on the research findings, targeting both practitioners and academic researchers. The citations are… 5.3. That content is entirely consistent with and indicative of responses provided by an unconditioned ChatGPT to the question “Are you able to output some template latex code for section 7 which relates to recommendations?” including the structure, length of response, the use of “Certainly”, and the use of syntax “``` latex” to introduce LaTeX code. [PM46 at 92-99 {H/278/25}] 5.4. That content was deleted from the version of the equivalent document disclosed within BDOPC.raw. {ID_004715} however does include the proposed code generated by ChatGPT within the body of the document. 5.5. ChatGPT did not exist in 2007. ... 5. Hash Based Shadowing.TIF contains metadata with the following information [PM46 at 126-128 {H/278/44}]: a. it was created on 12 March 2018; b. it was created with MS Windows Photo Viewer 10.0.14393.0, software associated with Windows 10 version 1607, which was released in August 2016; and c. it was scanned with a Xerox DocuMate 5540 scanner. 6. The Xerox DocuMate 5540 model of scanner was not produced until 18 February 2015 [Sherrell 19 at 12 {P1/19/3}]. ... 8.3. References to the font Calibri Light [PM46 at 18 {H/278/6}], a font which had not yet been designed in 2007.
|
# ? Feb 22, 2024 20:13 |
|
shackleford posted:fuckin' lmao oh wow the loving list of poo poo that didn't exist at the time
|
# ? Feb 22, 2024 20:26 |
|
the laffs just keep coming. totally and utterly destroyed
|
# ? Feb 22, 2024 20:32 |
|
Whoever is the expert font witness has been doing good business these past few years.
|
# ? Feb 22, 2024 20:35 |
|
lies! those things were all hacked into the computer via bittorrent by mark karples
|
# ? Feb 22, 2024 20:50 |
|
what a fuckin stooge
|
# ? Feb 22, 2024 20:53 |
|
this guy has spent like a decade trying and failing to make this grift happen. i admire the commitment
|
# ? Feb 22, 2024 20:56 |
|
I believe him. Satoshi would never lie, ergo he is Satoshi.
|
# ? Feb 22, 2024 21:00 |
|
using fonts to date things is so quaint. rip that bozo
|
# ? Feb 22, 2024 21:10 |
|
It's hilarious that he wanted to style himself as a cool hacker who uses LaTeX, even though he didn't even need to and it was trivial to tell that the original wasn't created in LaTeX, and then he was too dumb to do it anyway and relied on a format converter and ChatGPT. I haven't opened LaTeX in 13 years and even I could produce a more believable fake in a couple of days.
|
# ? Feb 22, 2024 21:15 |
|
This just means he has a time machine.
|
# ? Feb 22, 2024 21:18 |
|
tk posted:Whoever is the expert font witness has been doing good business these past few years. wow a real knowledge of font
|
# ? Feb 22, 2024 21:20 |
|
shackleford posted:17.2.When asked for the password. Dr Wright stated that “he was hacked in 2020 and his lmbo
|
# ? Feb 22, 2024 21:25 |
|
I'm trying to remember what possible thing Wright could gain from being recognized as Nakamoto and coming up blank.
|
# ? Feb 22, 2024 21:27 |
|
The maths is off. Implausibility increases exponentially with every hack.gschmidl posted:I'm trying to remember what possible thing Wright could gain from being recognized as Nakamoto and coming up blank. He could market his own Biitcoint.Cash.App as the true Bitcoin vision and make a lot of money.
|
# ? Feb 22, 2024 21:27 |
|
raminasi posted:lmbo Dr Wright, can you tell us if you’re being hacked right now?
|
# ? Feb 22, 2024 21:42 |
|
Paladinus posted:The maths is off. Implausibility increases exponentially with every hack. They do say "at least"
|
# ? Feb 22, 2024 22:23 |
|
|
# ? Jun 8, 2024 08:35 |
|
Xakura posted:They do say "at least" which is reasonable as it's gross negligence and perhaps criminal negligence to allow lawyers to do math more difficult than multiplication
|
# ? Feb 22, 2024 22:55 |