Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Esran
Apr 28, 2008

Oh look, it's Raz Cohen, quotes from the IDF, ZAKA and sourcing of that loving Anat Schwartz article again. It's been 2 entire days since we covered these.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

punishedkissinger
Sep 20, 2017

Illmade posted:

Literally nothing will satisfy you sickos except direct video of the rape taking place with signed testimony and id numbers of the Hamas members involved, and even then you will just say it is deepfake Joo propaganda.

You've provided zero evidence. Please, give us a single witness name and quote.

Illmade
Jan 17, 2024

D&D: HASBARA SQUAD
PSYCORPS

Nothing is worth dying for, except Palestinians for Israel

punishedkissinger posted:

You've provided zero evidence. Please, give us a single witness name and quote.

Read the loving articles.

(USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)

cat botherer
Jan 6, 2022

I am interested in most phases of data processing.

Illmade posted:

Read the loving articles.
We have, you genocide-loving piece of garbage.

(USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)

Randalor
Sep 4, 2011



Illmade posted:

Read the loving articles.

Should the IDF and the coalition government in charge of Israel also be obliterated?

Illmade
Jan 17, 2024

D&D: HASBARA SQUAD
PSYCORPS

Nothing is worth dying for, except Palestinians for Israel

cat botherer posted:

We have, you genocide-loving piece of garbage.

Please provide your evidence that Israel is committing genocide. What is the name and direct quote from the Israeli official in charge of the ethnic cleansing campaign stating that their intention to commit genocide?

(USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)

cat botherer
Jan 6, 2022

I am interested in most phases of data processing.

Illmade posted:

Please provide your evidence that Israel is committing genocide. What is the name and direct quote from the Israeli official in charge of the ethnic cleansing campaign stating that their intention to commit genocide?
Ah yes, as with all other crimes, one must admit to genocide to be guilty of it.

e: Under this standard of proof, can you supply quotes from Hamas leaders stating that they encourage rape?

cat botherer fucked around with this message at 00:39 on Feb 29, 2024

Esran
Apr 28, 2008

Illmade posted:

Read the loving articles.

Your claims about Aaron Bushnell were shown to be lies, your poll showing support for Israel was shown to be misleading.

Now you're trying your luck with "But do you condemn Hamas".

It's pathetic.

punishedkissinger
Sep 20, 2017

quote:

'I will punish the Amalekites for what they did to Israel when they waylaid them as they came up from Egypt. Now go, attack the Amalekites and totally destroy all that belongs to them. Do not spare them; put to death men and women, children and infants, cattle and sheep, camels and donkeys.

hadji murad
Apr 18, 2006
Here we go again!!

Kagrenak
Sep 8, 2010

Illmade posted:

Please provide your evidence that Israel is committing genocide. What is the name and direct quote from the Israeli official in charge of the ethnic cleansing campaign stating that their intention to commit genocide?

Somehow you've managed to enter new depths of terrible loving posting on top of being an unabashed supporter of the slaughter of Innocents.

Anyway, by the rules of D&D you've gotta reply to points people raise, so I'll ask you again also should the IDF and the Israeli government be "obliterated" because of their slaughter of 25k+ civilians? If Hamas should be because of 600-800 and a better ratio of hitting soldiers vs civilians, surely the IDF should face a similar reckoning.

fool of sound
Oct 10, 2012
Could y’all stop giving absurd alhazred’s rereg the time of day

Marenghi
Oct 16, 2008

Don't trust the liberals,
they will betray you

Illmade posted:

Read the loving articles.

We literally just went over all this.Can you please read the previous 2 pages before you go posting about debunked sources that have been discussed to death.

National Parks posted:

Reminder that there are still not named victums for any of the mass organized rape allegations from October 7th.

Every single mass rape allegation is second or third hand from some person or organization who definately saw it happen but doesn't actually have any evidence or even identify specific victims.

This is important because Israel is still using these allegations to justify the Genocide of Palestinians in Gaza and settler reprisals in the West Bank.

Chemtrailologist posted:

Those first responders were most likely from ZAKA.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ZAKA#Controversies

Esran posted:

That Guardian article is a mess, and mostly doesn't do its own work, but instead appears to be often repeating claims provided by sources with an obvious agenda, including the problematic NYT article we just talked about.

I'm not going to go over everything in the article, but here are some examples:

Zaka's deficiencies as a source were just covered. They account for a substantial portion of the claims in the article.

Sourcing the IDF.



The NYT article isn't trustworthy, as we covered a few posts up. I think it's very likely the Guardian is just repeating claims from that article here, given the similarities ("more than 30").

The witness account of the woman hiding in a bush is also taken from there. The NYT interviewed this woman as part of their article. The Guardian didn't interview her ("she told police in a video reviewed by the Guardian"), so they are relying on a police interview video and the NYT coverage.

The article then goes on to uncritically repeat some more poo poo they got from sources with an obvious agenda:





I think sourcing the State Department and Israeli intelligence without challenging their claims at all speaks for itself.

Note that I'm not making the claim that there was no sexual violence. There may well have been. But this coverage is incredibly credulous, especially in light of the fact that we know Israel has fabricated atrocity propaganda in the recent past (the beheaded babies).

Hong XiuQuan
Feb 19, 2008

"Without justice for the Palestinians there will be no peace in the Middle East."

Illmade posted:

Please provide your evidence that Israel is committing genocide. What is the name and direct quote from the Israeli official in charge of the ethnic cleansing campaign stating that their intention to commit genocide?

Your bullshit framing aside - "What is the name and direct quote from the German official in charge of the Holocaust?" - there are *plenty* of quotes from Israeli ministers and members of the armed forces that are genocidal. Governments rarely release statements saying "lol I'mma commit a genocide' so we have to look at the mesh of statements and actions and see if that amounts to genocide. Happily, South Africa has an easily-accessible submission making exactly this case. Suggest that while you're fuming about being probated, you take a look at it: https://www.icj-cij.org/sites/default/files/case-related/192/192-20231228-app-01-00-en.pdf

pp59-70 are your friends. Go wild.

Zedhe Khoja
Nov 10, 2017

sürgünden selamlar
yıkıcılar ulusuna

idontpost69 posted:

could've picked it up listening to radio war nerd.

Ah yes notorious antisemite Mark Ames, the Brooklyn Jew who spends like an hour every episode hyperventilating about his kids allergies to the audience. Real storm front kinda guy lol

Goa Tse-tung
Feb 11, 2008

;3

Yams Fan

Zedhe Khoja posted:

Ah yes notorious antisemite Mark Ames. Real storm front kinda guy lol

first time I'm hearing this, do you have anything concrete?

Kchama
Jul 25, 2007

Goa Tse-tung posted:

first time I'm hearing this, do you have anything concrete?

I think he is being sarcastic.

Mark Ames super sucks though, but not in this way at least.

Zedhe Khoja
Nov 10, 2017

sürgünden selamlar
yıkıcılar ulusuna
Rumor has it he’s been seen in the same spaces as figures like Yasha Levine and Felix Biederman, notorious members of Adam Friedlands antisemitic podcast empire.

Neurolimal
Nov 3, 2012
Returning to the subject of Oct 7 sexual violence, The Intercept's put out a new article and...It's a bit of a doozy.

"BETWEEN THE HAMMER AND THE ANVIL" The Story Behind the New York Times October 7 Exposé

Essentially, the article orbits around Israeli interviews with Anat Schwartz; Discrediting the Exposé would be the optimistic take, she basically lays out the framework for an entirely opposite Exposé arguing against the existence of systemic sexual violence on October 7th. Not intentionally of course, rather that having no serious Journalism training means Anat doesn't realize how bad this looks for both her and the New York Times.

The case against:

Hospital testimony posted:

In the interview, Schwartz, who did not respond to requests for comment, details her extensive efforts to get confirmation from Israeli hospitals, rape crisis centers, trauma recovery facilities, and sex assault hotlines in Israel, as well as her inability to get a single confirmation from any of them. “She was told there had been no complaints made of sexual assaults,” the Times spokesperson acknowledged after The Intercept brought the Channel 12 podcast episode to the paper’s attention. “This however was just the very first step of her research."

Sexual Violence Ward testimony posted:

Schwartz began her work on the violence of October 7 where one would expect, by calling around to the designated “Room 4” facilities in 11 Israeli hospitals that examine and treat potential victims of sexual violence, including rape. “First thing I called them all, and they told me, ‘No, no complaint of sexual assault was received,’" she recalled in the podcast interview. “I had a lot of interviews which didn’t lead anywhere. Like, I would go to all kinds of psychiatric hospitals, sit in front of the staff, all of them are fully committed to the mission and no one had met a victim of sexual assault.”

Sexual Assault Hotline testimony posted:

The next step was to call the manager of the sexual assault hotline in Israel’s south, which proved equally fruitless. The manager told her they had no reports of sexual violence. She described the call as a “crazy in-depth conversation” where she pressed for specific cases. “Did anyone call you? Did you hear anything?” she recalled asking. “How could it be that you didn’t?”

Not even Zaka posted:

Schwartz said she then began a series of extensive conversations with Israeli officials from Zaka, a private ultra-Orthodox rescue organization that has been documented to have mishandled evidence and spread multiple false stories about the events of October 7, including debunked allegations of Hamas operatives beheading babies and cutting the fetus from a pregnant woman’s body. Its workers are not trained forensic scientists or crime scene experts. “When we go into a house, we use our imagination,” said Yossi Landau, a senior Zaka official, describing the group’s work at the October 7 attack sites. “The bodies were telling us what happened, that’s what happened.” Landau is featured in the Times report, though no mention is made of his well-documented track record of disseminating sensational stories of atrocities that were later proven false. Schwartz said that in her initial interviews, Zaka members did not make any specific allegations of rape, but described the general condition of bodies they said they saw. “They told me, ‘Yes, we saw naked women,’ or ‘We saw a woman without underwear.’ Both naked without underwear, and tied with zip ties. And sometimes not zip ties, sometimes a rope or a string of a hoodie.”

Kibbutz testimony posted:

Schwartz continued to look for evidence at various sites of attack and found no witnesses to corroborate stories of rape. “And so I searched a lot in the kibbutzim, and apart from this testimony of [the Israeli military paramedic] and additionally, here and there, Zaka people — the stories, like, didn’t emerge from there,” she said.

Holistic Care testimony posted:

On the podcast, Schwartz said her next step was to go to a new holistic therapy facility established to address the trauma of October 7 victims, particularly those who endured the carnage at the Nova music festival. Opened a week after the attacks, the facility began welcoming hundreds of survivors where they could seek counseling, do yoga, and receive alternative medicine, as well as acupuncture, sound healing, and reflexology treatments. They called it Merhav Marpe, or Healing Space.

In multiple visits to Merhav Marpe, Schwartz again said in the podcast interview that she found no direct evidence of rapes or sexual violence. She expressed frustration with the therapists and counselors at the facility, saying they engaged in “a conspiracy of silence.” “Everyone, even those who heard these kinds of things from people, they felt very committed to their patients, or even just to people who assisted their patients, not to reveal things,” she said.

"Schwartz doesn't buy this one posted:

According to the published Times article, “Two therapists said they were working with a woman who was gang raped at the rave and was in no condition to talk to investigators or reporters.”

Schwartz said she had focused on the kibbutzim because she had initially determined it was unlikely sexual assaults had occurred at the Nova music festival. “I was very skeptical that it happened at the area of the party, because everyone I spoke to among the survivors told me about a chase, a race, like, about moving from place to place,” she recalled. “How would they [have had the time] to mess with a woman, like — it is impossible. Either you hide, or you — or you die. Also it’s public, the Nova … such an open space.”

Firsthand testimony posted:

In the Channel 12 podcast, Schwartz is asked if firsthand testimonies of women who survived rape on October 7 exist. “I can’t really speak about this, but the vast majority of women who have been sexually assaulted on October 7 were shot immediately after, and that’s [where] the big numbers [are],” she replied. “The majority are corpses. Some women managed to escape and survive.” She added, “I do know that there is a very significant element of dissociation when it comes to sexual assault. So a lot of times they don’t remember. They don’t remember everything. They remember fragments of the events, and they can’t always describe how they ended up on the road and [how they were] rescued.”

"There is nothing." posted:

At some story meetings, Schwartz said on the Channel 12 podcast, guests with Middle East expertise were there to offer probing questions. “We had a weekly meeting, and you bring out the status of your work on your project,” she said. “And Times writers and guests who are concerned with Middle Eastern affairs coming from all kinds of places in the world, they ask you questions that challenge you, and it’s excellent that they do that, because you yourself, all the time, like — you don’t believe yourself for a moment.”

Those questions were challenging to answer, she said: “One of the questions you get asked — and it’s the hardest ones to not be able to answer — if this has happened in so many places, how can it be that there is no forensic evidence? How can it be that there is no documentation? How can it be that there are no records? A report? An Excel spreadsheet? You are telling me about Shari [Mendes]? That’s someone who saw with her own eyes, and is now speaking to you — is there no [written] report to make what she’s saying authoritative?”

The host interjected. “And you went at that stage to those official Israeli authorities, and asked that they give you — something, anything. And how did they respond?”

“‘There is nothing,’” Schwartz said she was told. “‘There was no collection of evidence from the scene.’”

What she/Gettleman decided to actually base the article on:

Inconsistent Medic posted:

As Schwartz began her own efforts to find evidence of sexual assault, the first specific allegations of rape began to emerge. A person identified in anonymous media interviews as a paramedic from the Israeli Air Force medical unit 669 claimed he saw evidence that two teenage girls at Kibbutz Nahal Oz had been raped and murdered in their bedroom. The man made other outrageous claims, however, that called his report into question. He claimed another rescuer “pulled out of the garbage” a baby who’d been stabbed multiple times. He also said he had seen “Arabic sentences that were written on entrances to houses … with the blood of the people that were living in the houses.” No such messages exist, and the story of the baby in the trashcan has been debunked. The bigger problem was that no two girls at the kibbutz fit the source’s description. In future interviews, he changed the location to Kibbutz Be’eri. But no victims killed there matched the description either, as Mondoweiss reported.

IDF Rabbi, Pelvis Whisperer posted:

As she continued to work the phones with rescue officials, Schwartz then saw interviews that international news channels began airing with Shari Mendes, an American architect who serves in a rabbinical unit of the Israel Defense Forces. Mendes, who was deployed to a morgue to prepare bodies for burial after the October 7 attacks, claimed to have seen voluminous evidence of sexual assaults.

“We saw evidence of rape,” Mendes stated in one interview. “Pelvises were broken, and it probably takes a lot to break a pelvis … and this was also among grandmothers down to small children. This is not just something we saw on the internet, we saw these bodies with our own eyes.” Mendes has been a ubiquitous figure in the Israeli government and major media narratives on sexual violence on October 7, despite the fact that she has no medical or forensic credentials to legally determine rape. She had also spoken about other violence on October 7, telling the Daily Mail in October, “A baby was cut out of a pregnant woman and beheaded and then the mother was beheaded.” No pregnant woman died that day, according to the official Israeli list of those killed in the attacks, and the independent research collective October 7 Fact Check said Mendes’s story was false.
...
By the time Schwartz interviewed Mendes, the IDF reservist’s story had ricocheted around the world and been conclusively debunked: No baby was cut from a mother and beheaded. Yet Schwartz and the New York Times would go on to rely on Mendes’s testimony, as well as those of other witnesses with track records of making unreliable claims and lacking forensic credentials. No mention was made of questions about Mendes’s credibility.

We'll get right back to you with all that evidence posted:

“Israeli police officials shared more evidence on Tuesday of atrocities committed during the Oct. 7 Hamas-led attacks, saying they had collected testimonies from more than a thousand witnesses and survivors about sexual violence and other abuses,” Schwartz reported. The story went on to quote Israel’s police chief, Kobi Shabtai, explaining a litany of evidence of gruesome killings and sexual assaults on October 7.

“This is the most extensive investigation the State of Israel has ever known,” Shabtai said in the Schwartz article, promising ample evidence would soon be provided.

When the Times later produced its definitive “Screams Without Words” investigation, however, Schwartz and her partners reported that, contrary to Shabtai’s claim, forensic evidence of sexual violence was non-existent. Without acknowledging the past statements by Shabtai in the Times, the paper reported that quick funerals in accordance with Jewish tradition meant evidence was not preserved. Unnamed experts told the Times that sexual violence in wars often leaves “limited forensic evidence.”

I'm aware of the goofy memes about Israel being a haven for sex offenders, but I'm sure Israel has rape kits, right? And they wouldn't have those if the burial rites for nearly the entirety of their state didn't give them enough time to be used, right? I seriously hope we're not talking about a country that does not investigate post-mortem rape.

This alleged attack wasn't done by Hamas, but it would make for a killer headline, that's the important part, right? posted:

Schwartz watched interviews given to international media outlets by Raz Cohen, who attended the Nova festival. A veteran of Israel’s special forces, Cohen did multiple interviews about a rape he claimed to have witnessed. During his first media interview after the October 7 attacks, he said that from his hiding spot, he couldn’t see what was going on, only hear it. A few days later, he told PBS NewsHour that he had witnessed multiple rapes. “The terrorists, people from Gaza, raped girls. And after they raped them, they killed them, murdered them with knives, or the opposite, killed — and after they raped, they — they did that,” he said. At an appearance on CNN on January 4, he described seeing one rape and said the assailants were “five guys — five civilians from Gaza, normal guys, not soldiers, not Nukhba,” referring to Hamas’s elite commando force. “It was regular people from Gaza with normal clothes.”

In Cohen’s interview with Schwartz for the Times he said he then saw five men, wearing civilian clothes, all carrying knives and one carrying a hammer, dragging a woman across the ground. She was young, naked and screaming.

‘They all gather around her,’ Mr. Cohen said. ‘She’s standing up. They start raping her. I saw the men standing in a half circle around her. One penetrates her. She screams. I still remember her voice, screams without words.”

“Then one of them raises a knife,” he said, “and they just slaughtered her.”

It was this interview that gave the Times its title: “‘Screams Without Words’: How Hamas Weaponized Sexual Violence on Oct. 7.” That Cohen had described alleged assailants as not being members of Hamas undermines the headline, but it remains unchanged. The Times did not address Cohen’s earlier claims that he witnessed multiple rapes.

Maybe he peeked through his hands, maybe he left the NYT holding the bag posted:

Schwartz said in the podcast interview that, since the Times insisted on at least two sources, she asked Cohen to give her the contact information of the other people he was hiding with in the bush, so she could corroborate his story of the rape. She recalled, “Raz hides. In the bush next to him lies his friend Shoam. They get to this bush. There are two other people on the other side looking to the other direction, and another, fifth, person. Five people in the same bush. Only Raz sees all the things he sees, everyone else is looking in a different direction.”

Despite saying on the podcast that only Cohen witnessed the event and the others were looking in different directions, in the Times story Shoam Gueta is presented as a corroborating witness to the rape: “He said he saw at least four men step out of the van and attack the woman, who ended up ‘between their legs.’ He said that they were ‘talking, giggling and shouting,’ and that one of them stabbed her with a knife repeatedly, ‘literally butchering her.’” Gueta did not mention witnessing a rape in an interview he did with NBC News on October 8, a day after the attack, but he did describe seeing a woman murdered with a knife. “We saw terrorists killing people, burning cars, shouting everywhere,” Gueta told NBC. “If you just say something, if you make any noise, you’ll be murdered.” Gueta subsequently deployed to Gaza with the IDF and has posted many videos on TikTok of himself rummaging through Palestinian homes. Cohen and Gueta did not respond to requests for comment.

The independent site October 7 Fact Check, Mondoweiss, and journalists Ali Abunimah of Electronic Intifada and Max Blumenthal of The Grayzone have flagged numerous inconsistencies and contradictions in the stories told in the Times report, including the account of Cohen, who had initially said “he chose not to look, but he could hear them laughing constantly.”

Under pressure internally to defend the veracity of the story, the Times reassigned Gettleman, Schwartz, and Sella to effectively re-report the story, resulting in an article published on January 29. Cohen declined to speak to them, they reported: “Asked this month why he had not mentioned rape at first, Mr. Cohen cited the stress of his experience, and said in a text message that he had not realized then that he was one of the few surviving witnesses. He declined to be interviewed again, saying he was working to recover from the trauma he suffered.”

Torture is the wellspring of Truth posted:

In addition to Cohen’s testimony, Schwartz said on the Channel 12 podcast that she also watched video of an interrogation of a Palestinian prisoner taken by the IDF whom she said described “girls” being dragged by Palestinian attackers into the woods near the Nova festival. She was also moved, she said, by a clip of an interview she watched in November at a press conference hosted by Israeli officials, the one that became the focus of her first Times article.

Too many breast-less corpses to find the raped one posted:

The Times report states they interviewed Sapir for two hours at a cafe in southern Israel, and she described witnessing multiple rapes, including an incident where one attacker rapes a woman as another cuts off her breastwith a box cutter.

At the press conference in November, Israeli authorities said they were collecting and examining forensic materials that would confirm Sapir’s specifically detailed accounts. “Police say they are still gathering evidence (DNA etc) from rape victims in addition to eyewitnesses to build the strongest case possible,” said a correspondent who covered the press event. Such a scene would produce significant amounts of physical evidence, yet Israeli officials have, to date, been unable to provide it. “I have circumstantial evidence, but in the end, it’s my duty to find supporting evidence for her story and discover the victims’ identities,” said Superintendent Adi Edri, the Israeli official leading the investigation into sexual violence on October 7, a week after the Times report went online. “At this stage, I have no specific bodies.”

Bonus Round - Phantom Eyewitnesses posted:

Sandberg was also quoted attacking women’s rights organizations in a December 4 New York Times article, headlined “What We Know About Sexual Violence During the Oct. 7 Attacks on Israel” and whose publication coincided with the launch of the PR campaign at the U.N. The article, also reported by Gettleman, Schwartz, and Sella, relied on claims made by Israeli officials and acknowledged the Times had not yet been able to corroborate the allegations. A revealing correction was subsequently appended to the story: “An earlier version of this article misstated the kind of evidence Israeli police have gathered in investigating accusations of sexual violence committed on Oct. 7 in the attack by Hamas against Israel. The police are relying mainly on witness testimony, not on autopsies or forensic evidence.”

Israel promised it had extraordinary amounts of eyewitness testimony. “Investigators have gathered ‘tens of thousands’ of testimonies of sexual violence committed by Hamas on Oct. 7, according to the Israeli police, including at the site of a music festival that was attacked,” Schwartz, Gettleman, and Stella reported on December 4. Those testimonies never materialized.

Hamas harnesses the Speed Force posted:

The December 28 article “Screams Without Words” opened with the story of Gal Abdush, described by the Times as “the woman in the black dress.” Video of her charred body appeared to show her bottomless. “Israeli police officials said they believed that Ms. Abdush was raped,” the Times reported. The article labeled Abdush “a symbol of the horrors visited upon Israeli women and girls during the October 7 attacks.” The Times report mentions WhatsApp messages from Abdush and her husband to their family, but doesn’t mention that some family members believe that the crucial messages make the Israeli officials’ claims implausible. As Mondoweiss later reported, Abdush texted the family at 6:51 a.m., saying they were in trouble at the border. At 7:00, her husband messaged to say she’d been killed. Her family said the charring came from a grenade.

“It doesn’t make any sense,”said Abdush’s sister, that in a short timespan “they raped her, slaughtered her, and burned her [in 9 minutes]?” Speaking about the rape allegation, her brother-in-law said: “The media invented it.”

Thousands of eyewitnesses, four rapes posted:

On the Channel 12 podcast, Schwartz said the last remaining piece she needed for the story was a solid number from the Israeli authorities about any possible survivors of sexual violence. “We have four and we can stand behind that number,” she said she was told by the Ministry of Welfare and Social Affairs. No details were provided. The Times story ultimately reported there were “at least three women and one man who were sexually assaulted and survived.”

The coordinated effort to create this article:

Genesis: New York Times posted:

Schwartz said as much in an interview with Israeli Army Radio on December 31. “The New York Times said, ‘Let’s do an investigation into sexual violence’ — it was more a case of them having to convince me,” she said. Her host cut her off: “It was a proposal of The New York Times, the entire thing?”

“Unequivocally. Unequivocally. Obviously. Of course,” she said. “The paper stood behind us 200 percent and gave us the time, the investment, the resources to go in-depth with this investigation as much as needed.”

Police pressure posted:

She also said that Israeli police sources were pressuring her to move quickly to publish. She said they asked her, “What, does the New York Times not believe there were sexual assaults here?” Schwartz felt like she was in the middle.

“I’m also in this place, I’m also an Israeli, but I also work for New York Times,” she said. “So all the time I’m like in this place between the hammer and the anvil.”

False Pretenses posted:

Another relative [of Gal Abdush] suggested the family was pressured, under false pretenses, to speak with the reporters. Abdush’s sister wrote on Instagram that the Times reporters “mentioned they want to write a report in memory of Gal, and that’s it. If we knew that the title would be about rape and butchery, we’d never accept that.” In its follow-up story, the Times sought to discredit her initial comment, quoting Abdush’s sister as saying she “had been ‘confused about what happened’ and was trying to ‘protect my sister.’”

Admission of propaganda posted:

The woman who filmed Abdush on October 7 told the Israeli site YNet that Schwartz and Sella had pressured her into giving the paper access to her photos and videos for the purposes of serving Israeli propaganda. “They called me again and again and explained how important it is to Israeli hasbara,” she recalled, using the term for public diplomacy, which in practice refers to Israeli propaganda efforts directed at international audiences.

It's positively insane, she lays this journey out like some sort of triumph of dogged determination & savvy investigation, unaware that it looks incredibly bad. We should honestly be grateful that Gettleman decided to help out some family friends, because if any actually professional investigative journalist had been on this thing, we absolutely wouldn't have first-hand testimony on how terrible the article is, and on the NYT's drive to make the article.

Neurolimal fucked around with this message at 11:06 on Feb 29, 2024

Zedhe Khoja
Nov 10, 2017

sürgünden selamlar
yıkıcılar ulusuna
She does the classic NYT warmongering thing of using an absence of evidence as evidence in and of itself. "Look at how sinister this complete silence on the subject is, it must be so horrible no one wants to talk about it"

Your Brain on Hugs
Aug 20, 2006
In a sane world the people responsible for knowingly printing vile atrocity propaganda that's used to justify a genocide would be put on trial, but they will never face any consequences for this.

Marenghi
Oct 16, 2008

Don't trust the liberals,
they will betray you
At the very least people who keep pushing atrocity propaganda that's already been debunked in this thread should face some consequences to get them to stop.

hooman
Oct 11, 2007

This guy seems legit.
Fun Shoe

Neurolimal posted:

It's positively insane, she lays this journey out like some sort of triumph of dogged determination & savvy investigation, unaware that it looks incredibly bad. We should honestly be grateful that Gettleman decided to help out some family friends, because if any actually professional investigative journalist had been on this thing, we absolutely wouldn't have first-hand testimony on how terrible the article is, and on the NYT's drive to make the article.

Holy loving poo poo, she just comes right out and says it all. Thank you for posting this.

punishedkissinger
Sep 20, 2017

IDF reports that they shot a bunch of civilians who were trying to get aid from a truck

https://www.timesofisrael.com/liveb...openwebComments

quote:

An officer stationed in the area ordered to fire warning shots in the air as the Palestinians were within a few dozen meters, as well as gunfire at the legs of those who continued to move toward the troops, the probe says.

sebzilla
Mar 17, 2009

Kid's blasting everything in sight with that new-fangled musket.


punishedkissinger posted:

IDF reports that they shot a bunch of civilians who were trying to get aid from a truck

https://www.timesofisrael.com/liveb...openwebComments

"There are no civilians in Gaza" - one of the comments on that article

Fidelitious
Apr 17, 2018

MY BIRTH CRY WILL BE THE SOUND OF EVERY WALLET ON THIS PLANET OPENING IN UNISON.

Neurolimal posted:

Returning to the subject of Oct 7 sexual violence, The Intercept's put out a new article and...It's a bit of a doozy.

"BETWEEN THE HAMMER AND THE ANVIL" The Story Behind the New York Times October 7 Exposé

Essentially, the article orbits around Israeli interviews with Anat Schwartz; Discrediting the Exposé would be the optimistic take, she basically lays out the framework for an entirely opposite Exposé arguing against the existence of systemic sexual violence on October 7th. Not intentionally of course, rather that having no serious Journalism training means Anat doesn't realize how bad this looks for both her and the New York Times.

The case against:

















What she/Gettleman decided to actually base the article on:





I'm aware of the goofy memes about Israel being a haven for sex offenders, but I'm sure Israel has rape kits, right? And they wouldn't have those if the burial rites for nearly the entirety of their state didn't give them enough time to be used, right? I seriously hope we're not talking about a country that does not investigate post-mortem rape.













The coordinated effort to create this article:







It's positively insane, she lays this journey out like some sort of triumph of dogged determination & savvy investigation, unaware that it looks incredibly bad. We should honestly be grateful that Gettleman decided to help out some family friends, because if any actually professional investigative journalist had been on this thing, we absolutely wouldn't have first-hand testimony on how terrible the article is, and on the NYT's drive to make the article.

Wow, this is a lot.



In response to the latest propagandist in here. Trying to lay out a gotcha in here with the request of proof of Israeli genocide is quite hilarious in light of the dozens of quotes from Israeli government figures in favour of genocide. Like did you even read the South Africa ICJ case?

Lovely Joe Stalin
Jun 12, 2007

Our Lovely Wang
Moderators:

Given that Intercerpt article, unless actual credible anything comes to light to indicate that the mass rapes etc did happen, I think people using them as an excuse, justification, or distraction for Israel's actions should probably just be banned. Because at this point it is just repeating lies in service to genocide, and we don't really need that in our Debates & Discussions, do we?

Darth Walrus
Feb 13, 2012

punishedkissinger posted:

IDF reports that they shot a bunch of civilians who were trying to get aid from a truck

https://www.timesofisrael.com/liveb...openwebComments

Casualty estimates are possibly in the triple-digits, and here's what Ben-Gvir had to say about it, since someone was asking for clearly-stated genocidal intent:

https://x.com/owenjones84/status/1763230393250046430?s=46&t=ARI_L-v32Oind1-d9B3a3Q

Sephyr
Aug 28, 2012
I'm seeing buzz of Biden backtracking on the whole "truce by the weekend" statement, but nothing official yet. Has anyone seen anything concrete?

Esran
Apr 28, 2008

Sephyr posted:

I'm seeing buzz of Biden backtracking on the whole "truce by the weekend" statement, but nothing official yet. Has anyone seen anything concrete?

Both Hamas and Israel have publicly said they don't know what Biden's talking about.

He lied.

https://www.timesofisrael.com/biden-a-longtime-friend-israel-critic-of-settlements-may-be-at-odds-over-iran/ posted:

In June 1982, a few days after the start of the Lebanon War, known as Operation Peace for the Galilee, Begin met with the Senate Foreign Relations Committee in Washington. Several lawmakers grilled him over Israel’s alleged disproportionate use of force.
(...)
The senator — Biden — said he would go even further than Israel, adding that he’d forcefully fend off anyone who sought to invade his country, even if that meant killing women or children.

Biden is the worst possible president for this moment in time.

selec
Sep 6, 2003

NYT has started an internal investigation in the Intercept story about the atrocious rape propaganda.

Naturally, to uncover why their editorial processes broke down and why the published such dreck, right?

Nope, it’s a leak investigation to find out who is contributing to their humiliation by airing out the details. Their instincts are impeccable.

https://twitter.com/charlottetklein/status/1763258371925217709

Oscar Wilde Bunch
Jun 12, 2012

Grimey Drawer

Esran posted:

Both Hamas and Israel have publicly said they don't know what Biden's talking about.

He lied.

Biden is the worst possible president for this moment in time.

Biden doesn't know what Biden is talking about.

I still posit that there's way worse than Biden. Remember the GOP and Trump position isn't to even attempt a mealy mouthed half hearted statement of please stop murdering people. It's give all the weapons we were giving to Ukraine to you, please genocide harder and cleanse the holy land.

Caros
May 14, 2008

Esran posted:

Both Hamas and Israel have publicly said they don't know what Biden's talking about.

He lied.

Biden is the worst possible president for this moment in time.

You realize Donald trump exists, right?

Son of Thunderbeast
Sep 21, 2002

Caros posted:

You realize Donald trump exists, right?

If he was president, the Democrats would have to at least pretend to try and oppose him.

(USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)

The Sean
Apr 17, 2005

Am I handsome now?


Oscar Wilde Bunch posted:

Biden doesn't know what Biden is talking about.

I still posit that there's way worse than Biden. Remember the GOP and Trump [...]

Biden not knowing about what he's talking about is a completely important issue that should not be ignored (or lying purposefully, even, as the OP you quoted said). I also don't think it's important to have Badder Guys to compare to having a really bad president who endorses genocides and, as you say, doesn't even know what he himself is talking about or is consciously lying.

Like if a friend told you they had cancer a bad response would be "there are worse diseases out there." It doesn't help the really bad condition that they are in at all and does not actually make it a good condition.

Esran
Apr 28, 2008

Oscar Wilde Bunch posted:

Biden doesn't know what Biden is talking about.

I still posit that there's way worse than Biden. Remember the GOP and Trump position isn't to even attempt a mealy mouthed half hearted statement of please stop murdering people. It's give all the weapons we were giving to Ukraine to you, please genocide harder and cleanse the holy land.

Caros posted:

You realize Donald trump exists, right?

"Trump would do the things Biden is also doing, but wouldn't bother with the PR" isn't a strong pitch, and I think it's weird you felt the need to jump to Biden's defense.

Are there even red lines?

Esran fucked around with this message at 20:25 on Feb 29, 2024

Darth Walrus
Feb 13, 2012
I think it's fair to say that Trump would be equally bad to Biden, if in subtly different ways, and that this is not a consolation because (a) we're now well into the worst-case scenario for Gaza, and (b) the fact that support for a fully genocidal Israel is completely bipartisan is more terrifying, not less.

National Parks
Apr 6, 2016

Caros posted:

You realize Donald trump exists, right?

It's hard to imagine how much worse every single american decision in this genocide could be.

What could Trump possibly do that exceeds how poorly the Biden administration has handled this?

Circumvent congress to keep arming Israel so they can continue to bomb civilians?
Authorize airstrikes on other regional powers solely because they are aligned with Iran?
Dispute the Palestinian death toll?
Lie about seeing pictures of beheaded babies that don't exist and then just kinda shrug when they are proven to not exist?

Orthanc6
Nov 4, 2009

National Parks posted:

Circumvent congress to keep arming Israel so they can continue to bomb civilians?
Authorize airstrikes on other regional powers solely because they are aligned with Iran?
Dispute the Palestinian death toll?
Lie about seeing pictures of beheaded babies that don't exist and then just kinda shrug when they are proven to not exist?

Legit I could see him try to push for #1, he might not succeed in making much difference but he'd try. And definitely he'd do more sporadic bombing, especially in response to Houthis attacks on shipping. It's honestly possible he'd help Israel attack specific targets in Lebanon.

I don't think Trump would do much in Gaza directly, mostly cause Israel's already doing about the maximum that a modern military can do in the area. He would not try to send troops anywhere, but no US President would these last 4 years.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

The Sean
Apr 17, 2005

Am I handsome now?


National Parks posted:

What could Trump possibly do that exceeds how poorly the Biden administration has handled this?

(#1) Circumvent congress to keep arming Israel so they can continue to bomb civilians?


Orthanc6 posted:

Legit I could see him try to push for #1, he might not succeed in making much difference but he'd try.

Orthan: This is something that Biden did. So, your hypothetical Trump (try for) is less bad than actual Biden (did that).

That you (and others with similar sentiment) didn't know that and also attributed it to the Big Bad Guy We Must Stop is the whole problem with how liberals are defending Biden's genocide. The made up scenario that's "worse" is the actual scenario right now but "it could be worse" becomes an excuse to ignore reality.

The Sean fucked around with this message at 21:20 on Feb 29, 2024

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply