Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
(Thread IKs: OwlFancier, crispix)
 
  • Post
  • Reply
BalloonFish
Jun 30, 2013



Fun Shoe
Pre-computer office chat:

In my first journalism job there were some old-timers in the office who had been with the publisher/its predecessors since the 1970s and it was amazing to hear about how the process of putting together a magazine worked in the non-digital age.

Nowadays you write the words in a word processor, take the photos on a DSLR, send those two files to a graphic designer who lays them out in InDesign, then generates a .pdf from that file, which gets sent to the printer and then you have a magazine.

Without computers - firstly it was a more labour-intensive and specialised process. The writers just wrote words. On typewriters or, latterly, pure word processors. Without spell checkers these words had to be subbed at least once, usually twice, before the words were sent to someone who converted the typewritten copy into the actual layout (the columns of text, where the images would go, the size and spacing of different sections etc.), although the real pro writers learned how to set out their copy on the typewriter.

Images were obviously physical photographs, either as negatives or prints. These had to be made printable by the halftone offset printing process (turning the photo into a sort of dot-matrix print plate reproduction). Image archives existed physically in huge amounts of shelving and cabinets, looked after by a full-time archivist to deal with incoming images and to maintain the archive reference, which existed as a massive roller index that was updated weekly. The company had several regional offices and the image archiv reference for each was distributed weekly to all the other offices.

Proofs were mocked up and sent for initial approval by a sub-editor using some antedeluvian form of photocopier that essentially took photos of the layout on a big plate glass camera and then printed it on a big photostatic plate - like a modern photocopier but it took up an entire small room and all the steps had to be done manually.

The company had a small in-house printing department but mostly used external printers. The print was still set out by hand using movable type and the aforementioned acid-etched photo plates.

Film, images, proofs etc. were moved between offices and printers using the British Rail Red Star system, which could also be used if journos were out 'in the field' and had to get material back to the office while they stayed out. If not within striking distance of a Red Star office they'd use motorcycle couriers.

No emails of course, so communication was via telephone (with an internal switchboard), telex and telegram and letters sent in and out on the morning and evening post. All managed by an in-house post room and distributed to literally inboxes and pigeonholes around the office. Editors and publishers had their own secretaries to keep their diaries and type their correspondence, and each paper/magazine had one or two secretaries for all the other staff and to keep track of non-production paperwork.

Of course there was also a corporate typing pool for company matters, an accounting department, a personnel department, a fleet department (including in-house mechanics to look after the company vans/cars) etc. And, like some sort of publishing homonculus, a department that existed to produce the in-house newsletter and other corporate documents.

In the 2010s it was rare for a title to have more than three people on staff. We wrote our own copy, took our own photos and, between us, did our own proofing. Nothing physically existed until we (laserjet) printed an A3 version of a fully-realised PDF proof. The image archive was just a folder on a network. Communication was by email and phone, with files sent by DropBox.

In short: The computer massively enabled multi-functionality and cut down on physical movement of material. No more junior post clerk making the hourly trip to the station to get photo prints at the parcel office. No more typesetters. No more secretaries. No more writers who just pull a sheet of copy out of their typewriter and hand it to a sub-editor.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Darth Walrus
Feb 13, 2012
Palestine Action talks about their vandalism of Balfour's portrait:

https://x.com/newsocialistns/status/1766214507582382204?s=46&t=ARI_L-v32Oind1-d9B3a3Q

frytechnician
Jan 8, 2004

Happy to see me?

killerwhat posted:

Thanks for this, assuming it was you posting a couple of weeks ago too. I probably wouldn’t have been aware of it otherwise. On my way there now :)

Good on you mate, heading there right now as I type this. Stay safe!

ThomasPaine
Feb 4, 2009

We have no compassion and we ask no compassion from you. When our turn comes, we shall not make excuses for the terror.
One of my more wanky opinions is that destroying art for political purposes is in itself art :smugbert:

Runcible Cat
May 28, 2007

Ignoring this post

frytechnician posted:

Good on you mate, heading there right now as I type this. Stay safe!

Too full of chemo to make it, but I wish I could. Best to all marching!

OwlFancier
Aug 22, 2013

ThomasPaine posted:

One of my more wanky opinions is that destroying art for political purposes is in itself art :smugbert:

Is that wanky? We have basically infinite portraits of old dead dudes nobody gives a poo poo about, defacing one makes it somewhat interesting at least.

kecske
Feb 28, 2011

it's round, like always

isn't that the whole point of the Banksy with a shredder thing

ThomasPaine
Feb 4, 2009

We have no compassion and we ask no compassion from you. When our turn comes, we shall not make excuses for the terror.

OwlFancier posted:

Is that wanky? We have basically infinite portraits of old dead dudes nobody gives a poo poo about, defacing one makes it somewhat interesting at least.

Not really but it's quite close to getting all 'destruction and creation are one and the same, the act of destroying is the act of creating'. Which is true, but sounds, shall we say, very French. :chord:

BalloonFish
Jun 30, 2013



Fun Shoe

ThomasPaine posted:

One of my more wanky opinions is that destroying art for political purposes is in itself art :smugbert:

I don't think it's that wanky. Especially when the target is unexceptional public/commemorative art that exists to provide a distorted or incomplete view.

The Colston statue had far more value as both a piece of public art and as something representing Bristol's history with the slave trade after its spell in the Floating Harbour than it did before (which is what the "we learnt history from Victorian statues" crowd can't/won't grasp).

The Balfour portrait arguably embodies more artistic expression now than it did. It certainly represents a more complete (or at least thought-provking) representation of Balfour's career and its effects.

All the British colonial statues in Delhi being moved into a semi-abandoned park full of feral dogs and kids playing street cricket is more (inadvertently) artistic, and tells a much better story, than if they were left in situ or if they were ground up into road topping.

E: Either that or we've all got really wanky Opinions About Art itt

BalloonFish fucked around with this message at 13:45 on Mar 9, 2024

Z the IVth
Jan 28, 2009

The trouble with your "expendable machines"
Fun Shoe

BalloonFish posted:

Pre-computer office chat:

The computer also made it a snap to author a thousand "10 things you didn't know about XYZ" articles so it's hard to know if it's good or bad.

fuctifino
Jun 11, 2001

Councillors warn of ‘threat to local democracy’ in England after budget cuts forced on Nottingham

quote:

David Mellen, the Labour leader of Nottingham city council, said elected members did not have the final say over “devastating” funding gap that led to them approving more than 500 redundancies, council tax rises and millions of pounds of cuts last week.

The levelling up secretary, Michael Gove, last month sent commissioners into the struggling east Midlands authority, which declared itself effectively bankrupt in November.

“[Last year,] we banished the Tory party because no Conservative councillors were elected and yet somehow, by the backdoor, people appointed by the Conservative government have considerable levels of power in our city,” said Mellen. “Our mandate has been impinged upon. These commissioners, and by extension our officers, have more power currently.”

The commissioners arrived after a government-appointed improvement board spent seven months overseeing the council’s efforts to balance its books. The last act of the board was to give the authority’s unelected senior officers the power to effectively write the budget.

“We tried to amend the budget but we weren’t given permission,” said Mellen. “Usually, officers and council members work together. We come up with an agreed set of [budget] proposals to be brought forward to consultation. This year that didn’t happen. [The budget] included things we could live with and things we absolutely opposed.”

The budget included cutting funding for all voluntary organisations and community centres in the city, stopping lunch clubs for the elderly, closing the last two remaining youth centres, potentially closing libraries, and charging for toilets used by homeless people in the city centre.

quote:

One in five councils in England say they are most likely to follow Nottingham and issue a section 114 notice, which means they cannot balance their budget, this year or next.
...
All but one Labour councillor in Nottingham voted for the cuts last week. Mellen said the alternative would have been even worse: “We were strongly advised that the duty to set a legal budget was paramount – that if we didn’t, staff wouldn’t get paid, services wouldn’t get delivered.”

Labour party officials also appear to have exerted influence over councillors behind the scenes. Mellen said the party’s regional office and Keir Starmer’s office indicated that councillors would be thrown out of the party if they opposed the budget, as Labour is trying to project an image of economic responsibility.

“We were advised that [voting against the budget] wouldn’t be beneficial for continuing membership of the Labour party,” Mellen said.

The next round of austerity is going to be brutal... more so...

Mebh
May 10, 2010


I mean we're basically going to exchange a conservative majority for an even bigger conservative majority just with a different colour.

I do genuinely wonder how much of public politics is theatre for the masses. I just don't see the leadership of both parties ideologically that far apart.

Labour wants to be the money and gets there by toadying up to it, conservatives need a middle manager class to distance themselves from the unwashed masses and take the heat for them. They're both aligned to me. Even if vastly different.

NotJustANumber99
Feb 15, 2012

somehow that last av was even worse than your posting
I think destroying a painting does little to advance the Palestinian cause but having said that, nothing matters very much and few things matter at all.

Fumble
Sep 4, 2006
Probation
Can't post for 16 days!

NotJustANumber99 posted:

I think destroying a painting does little to advance the Palestinian cause but having said that, nothing matters very much and few things matter at all.

Things like this are so stupid its like 7 brit pops on the op scale.

Failed Imagineer
Sep 22, 2018

NotJustANumber99 posted:

I think destroying a painting does little to advance the Palestinian cause but having said that, nothing matters very much and few things matter at all.

You're having one of those weekends then

The Saviour
Feb 19, 2006

I'm not sure Isis destroying the statues at thoae ancient sites in Syria was artistic or a good idea.

Failed Imagineer
Sep 22, 2018

The Saviour posted:

I'm not sure Isis destroying the statues at thoae ancient sites in Syria was artistic or a good idea.

I bet if Banksy did it you'd love it

crispix
Mar 28, 2015

Grand-Maman m'a raconté
(Les éditions des amitiés franco-québécoises)

Hello, dear
taliban did that too, the big beardy killjoys

OwlFancier
Aug 22, 2013

I mean a lot of historical statues were defaced because people were afraid of them having their dicks out, and I do think that makes them interesting.

Also when Akhenaten had his little strop and then got basically nuked out of Egyptian history.

Darth Walrus
Feb 13, 2012
Timely further context to the Balfour defacement:

https://x.com/ramabdu/status/1766458940118769799?s=46&t=ARI_L-v32Oind1-d9B3a3Q

Z the IVth
Jan 28, 2009

The trouble with your "expendable machines"
Fun Shoe
I wonder if they'll try to restore it or just get a replacement printed out.

dadrips
Jan 8, 2010

everything you do is a balloon
College Slice

The Saviour posted:

I'm not sure Isis destroying the statues at thoae ancient sites in Syria was artistic or a good idea.

In all honesty - you really can't compare the irreplaceable Syrian archaeological treasures with an unremarkable painting of some random gurning imperialist. We've got plenty of those.

OwlFancier
Aug 22, 2013

I also think there is a difference between destroying something and defacing it.

Failed Imagineer
Sep 22, 2018

Z the IVth posted:

I wonder if they'll try to restore it or just get a replacement printed out.

I don't think you can print a whole Castle

smellmycheese
Feb 1, 2016

NotJustANumber99 posted:

I think destroying a painting does little to advance the Palestinian cause but having said that, nothing matters very much and few things matter at all.

Reported for Freddie Mercury posting

Nenonen
Oct 22, 2009

Mulla on aina kolkyt donaa taskussa

dadrips posted:

In all honesty - you really can't compare the irreplaceable Syrian archaeological treasures with an unremarkable painting of some random gurning imperialist. We've got plenty of those.

The big difference is that if you go to a museum and destroy an old piece of art, they will make you pay for its restoration for the rest of your days. Meanwhile if you order a war crime against historical artifacts then you are not held responsible.

Dead Goon
Dec 13, 2002

No Obvious Flaws



Failed Imagineer posted:

I don't think you can print a whole Castle

YOU WOULDN'T DOWNLOAD A CASTLE

Mebh
May 10, 2010


On an aside I didn't realise all extrusion based 3d printing basically has huge structural problems because it basically doesn't interleave the layers. https://youtu.be/5hGm6cubFVs

Down the rabbit hole of modding your 3D printer I go...

I don't even own a 3d printer.

OwlFancier
Aug 22, 2013

Obviously somebody needs to combine the 3d printer and the sewing machine.

Z the IVth
Jan 28, 2009

The trouble with your "expendable machines"
Fun Shoe

Failed Imagineer posted:

I don't think you can print a whole Castle

Have you seen what they post about in the 3D printing threads?

The question is gonna be "with boobs or not?"

frytechnician
Jan 8, 2004

Happy to see me?
Well done everyone who turned out today if you made it. It was a long old protest from Hyde Park Corner to Battersea! Nothing but good vibes from everyone, really respectful and peaceful march. Once again, massive, massive loving respect for the Jewish community who joined, especially the people standing about halfway through the protest that were sons and daughters of Holocaust survivors - those guys got serious love from all that passed.

NotJustANumber99
Feb 15, 2012

somehow that last av was even worse than your posting

frytechnician posted:

Well done everyone who turned out today if you made it. It was a long old protest from Hyde Park Corner to Battersea! Nothing but good vibes from everyone, really respectful and peaceful march. Once again, massive, massive loving respect for the Jewish community who joined, especially the people standing about halfway through the protest that were sons and daughters of Holocaust survivors - those guys got serious love from all that passed.

That's really good to hear. Doubt they'll be any coverage of it in the MSM alright Donald

Rappaport
Oct 2, 2013

frytechnician posted:

Well done everyone who turned out today if you made it. It was a long old protest from Hyde Park Corner to Battersea! Nothing but good vibes from everyone, really respectful and peaceful march. Once again, massive, massive loving respect for the Jewish community who joined, especially the people standing about halfway through the protest that were sons and daughters of Holocaust survivors - those guys got serious love from all that passed.

The protest made the main newscast on the Finnish Broadcasting Company tonight, so at least someone noticed

SixFigureSandwich
Oct 30, 2004
Exciting Lemon

Dead Goon posted:

YOU WOULDN'T DOWNLOAD A CASTLE

That reminds me, wasn't there a goon in this very thread who worked in an actual castle? Can't remember any details of who they were or what they did though

kingturnip
Apr 18, 2008
He got pegged. Possibly by a minor aristo

Mebh
May 10, 2010


SixFigureSandwich posted:

That reminds me, wasn't there a goon in this very thread who worked in an actual castle? Can't remember any details of who they were or what they did though

I've been to castles where goons could totally work. Beeston and Peckforton Castle in Cheshire specifically.

I used to run around the ruins of Beeston as a kid with my sister and pretend to be the "Screaming Welsh hordes" then go to the dairy farm nearby and eat my body weight in ice cream.

OwlFancier
Aug 22, 2013

SixFigureSandwich posted:

That reminds me, wasn't there a goon in this very thread who worked in an actual castle? Can't remember any details of who they were or what they did though

That was oberleutnant (changed his name to something else I can never remember) and yeah, might have cucked the duke which is very funny.

fuctifino
Jun 11, 2001

Revealed: legal fears over Michael Gove’s new definition of ‘extremism’

quote:

Michael Gove is set to announce a controversial plan this week to ban individuals and groups who “undermine the UK’s system of liberal democracy” from public life, despite fears inside government that the scheme is at risk of a legal challenge, leaked documents reveal.

Officials working for Gove, the secretary of state for levelling up, housing and communities, have drawn up plans for “trailblazer” departments to pilot the scheme, according to documents that have been circulated to the Home Office and Downing Street and seen by the Observer.

Organisations and individuals that breach a new official definition of extremism will be excluded from meetings or any engagement with ministers, senior civil servants, government advisory boards and funding.

Councils will be expected to follow the government’s lead, cutting any financial ties or support to individuals or groups that have been categorised as extremist.

The proposed new definition of extremism – first revealed by the Observer in November – says “core behaviours” that could constitute extremism include attempts to “overturn, exploit or undermine the UK’s system of liberal democracy to confer advantages or disadvantages on specific groups” or threatening ­individual rights or enabling the spread of extremism.

In internal briefing papers, Gove’s officials admit there is a risk of a legal challenge. Gove already faces strong opposition to the plans, including from civil liberties groups, officials and some senior Tory MPs.

“The government wants to launch this without a public consultation on the definition, or proper engagement with faith leaders,” said one official who has seen the proposals. “It’s never going to work.”

Yay, more fascism :toot:

forkboy84
Jun 13, 2012

Corgis love bread. And Puro



Should be banning anyone who doesn't want to overthrow the "British way of life". Dogshit country

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

NotJustANumber99
Feb 15, 2012

somehow that last av was even worse than your posting
Which countries are better? And how so?

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply