|
Diqnol posted:Pigs? Didn't realise the Netherlands was that overpoliced (also it can't be, Brittany would be bright red)
|
# ? Apr 2, 2024 16:43 |
|
|
# ? Jun 6, 2024 17:32 |
|
Diqnol posted:Pigs? I'm the solid chain of pigs cutting Bosnia in half
|
# ? Apr 2, 2024 16:50 |
|
Given how outside Germanic Europe it seems to look like roads. I think it’s roads that are above a certain speed limit
|
# ? Apr 2, 2024 17:03 |
|
Yeah if you look at France it's obvious that it's something to do with routes or transport of some kind. After image search: it's bike lanes
|
# ? Apr 2, 2024 17:10 |
|
It’s sightings of Dutch people
|
# ? Apr 2, 2024 17:22 |
|
PittTheElder posted:Yeah if you look at France it's obvious that it's something to do with routes or transport of some kind. Huh... seems dubious to me. I think there are inconsistencies in what OpenStreetMaps is considering "Bike Lanes". NL, yeah. Wallonia? Switzerland? Montenegro? In Montenegro, their map is showing like every paved road in the country, few if any of which have bike lanes. Switzerland also is pretty lovely for bike lanes. Yeah it has a little striped side on the side of the road often, but the striped area gives so little space that two cars passing would always have to eat into the pseudo-bike lane. In Switzerland it is showing the Furka Pass road (from Valais to central Switzerland) as having a bike lane - which it absolutely does not. It's narrow enough in spots that two cars will slow down to pass, and there's no nearby paved bike path either.
|
# ? Apr 2, 2024 17:33 |
|
chadbear posted:It’s sightings of Dutch people
|
# ? Apr 2, 2024 17:44 |
|
PittTheElder posted:Yeah if you look at France it's obvious that it's something to do with routes or transport of some kind. Ah... That is cheating
|
# ? Apr 2, 2024 17:53 |
|
Guavanaut posted:Where are the ones on the sea for the ghost ships? They're flying, so it doesn't count.
|
# ? Apr 2, 2024 18:00 |
|
Letmebefrank posted:Ah... That is cheating Guess the map is dumb. If you don't label your map, all it does is makes more work for others to reverse image search.
|
# ? Apr 2, 2024 18:06 |
|
Bicycle paths on Openstreetmap.
|
# ? Apr 2, 2024 19:01 |
|
Cutting off the incandescence of Copenhagen feels like cheating
|
# ? Apr 2, 2024 19:49 |
|
Jehde posted:Guess the map is dumb. I enjoy guess the map, reading people's guesses for a handful of posts before the real answer is revealed. It's usually interesting to briefly think about those possibilities and why they may or may not fit.
|
# ? Apr 2, 2024 20:15 |
|
Ditocoaf posted:I enjoy guess the map, reading people's guesses for a handful of posts before the real answer is revealed. It's usually interesting to briefly think about those possibilities and why they may or may not fit. Same, it can be a fun test of useless world fact knowledge. It's not like there's a ton of serious content here. Depends on the map though, sometimes it's near impossible to figure it out or make any funny guesses.
|
# ? Apr 2, 2024 20:52 |
|
luckily there is a solution, which is to include the answer/source in spoiler tags, so people who like guessing can guess and people who don't don't have to and then people don't have to be annoyed about it in either case
|
# ? Apr 2, 2024 21:12 |
|
Tree Goat posted:luckily there is a solution, which is to include the answer/source in spoiler tags, so people who like guessing can guess and people who don't don't have to and then people don't have to be annoyed about it in either case You know nobody guesses when the answer is already there in spoiler tags. As long as the answer shows up not too long after, it's fine. If it bothers you just don't engage with the post until it's named.
|
# ? Apr 2, 2024 21:54 |
|
Lemniscate Blue posted:You can drive from Texline in the upper corner of the Texas panhandle to Port Isabel at the mouth of the Rio Grande in 14 hours, and you can do it without bouncing back and forth across your state like a dumbass Yankee ping pong ball. They were trolling for Texans. Looks like they caught one!
|
# ? Apr 3, 2024 04:38 |
|
|
# ? Apr 3, 2024 05:20 |
|
DeadlyMuffin posted:They were trolling for Texans. Looks like they caught one! Yeah, I'll eat that crow.
|
# ? Apr 3, 2024 06:26 |
|
Negostrike posted:Kind of comforting knowing that I live in the 7% hemisphere even though it makes zero difference 6% of that is ur mum lmao.
|
# ? Apr 3, 2024 06:28 |
|
|
# ? Apr 3, 2024 10:36 |
|
The Florida Alliance is less stupid than it sounds. I looked it up a while back, and it's actually a really populous state. I think it's 20+ million by now. None of the other states in the alliance even come close, I think Georgia would be second.
|
# ? Apr 3, 2024 10:48 |
|
why is California allied with Texas though
|
# ? Apr 3, 2024 10:53 |
|
What's the New People's Army?
|
# ? Apr 3, 2024 10:53 |
|
All shall cower before the geriatric battalions of florida.
|
# ? Apr 3, 2024 10:53 |
|
Gravitas Shortfall posted:why is California allied with Texas though - Located to the west of most other states - Huge Mexican American populations -
|
# ? Apr 3, 2024 10:57 |
|
- Arid - Oil industry - Lots of billionaires - Coastal - Chauvinistic Californians will object until the cows come home but they're not that different.
|
# ? Apr 3, 2024 11:16 |
|
California is probably like 40% chud by volume
|
# ? Apr 3, 2024 11:27 |
|
distortion park posted:- Arid California is basically Texas with some more liberal coastal cities and Hollywood, and the LAPD and other police departments could easily swing the state to align with Texas with threats of letting "thugs" run wild.
|
# ? Apr 3, 2024 11:38 |
|
South Carolina being loyalist is rather more iffy I'd say.
|
# ? Apr 3, 2024 11:43 |
|
cali went 63-34 in the last election, texas went 52-46. it's way more likely for texas to swing blue than cali to swing red. Therefore the civil war plotline is obviously that Trump wins without Texas. He declares war on Texas because of the obvious fraud, he definitely won that big beautiful state. Newly elected Gov. Beto allies with California and the the south secedes under Ron Desantis. The northwestern states are studying the issue in committee and don't feel enough time has been given to come to a conclusion one way or the other.
|
# ? Apr 3, 2024 11:53 |
|
Gravitas Shortfall posted:why is California allied with Texas though Cuz both are full of californians
|
# ? Apr 3, 2024 12:56 |
|
TheDeadlyShoe posted:cali went 63-34 in the last election, texas went 52-46. it's way more likely for texas to swing blue than cali to swing red. In any case, given the non-democratic nature of American elections, it seems especially silly to base political allegiances on voting. Like, if you live in a state that you perceive as not having a shot at going to your candidate, you might well decide to just not vote. The people with the opposite issue can at least run up the score and feel like they're winners too.
|
# ? Apr 3, 2024 14:09 |
|
president nick offerman was really divisive
|
# ? Apr 3, 2024 14:19 |
|
Gravitas Shortfall posted:why is California allied with Texas though Because the author is a coward
|
# ? Apr 3, 2024 14:54 |
|
jeebus bob posted:Because the author is a coward yeah it's this
|
# ? Apr 3, 2024 15:08 |
|
My theory has been that they very consciously don't want to tap into specifics of current political alignment, which is why the factions don't really make that much sense on those grounds. From the trailers it seems like the movie's going to be about a bunch of journos who don't really know what's happening but awkwardly trying to wade through dangerous situations, kind of evoking the chaos of conflicts in like the Balkans, Syra, or Sudan, but in a familiar setting. Although I do keep constantly thinking back to this XKCD map SlothfulCobra posted:
|
# ? Apr 3, 2024 15:20 |
|
SlothfulCobra posted:There are more Trump voters in California than Texas, more Biden voters in Texas than New York, more Trump voters in New York than Ohio, more Biden voters in Ohio than Massachusetts, more Trump voters in Massachusetts than Mississippi, and more Biden voters in Mississippi than Vermont.[/spoiler] Meaningless without percentages, since there are more people in California than there are in Texas, more people in Texas than there are in New York, etc etc. The only place the pattern doesn't hold is New York (8.3 million) vs Ohio (11.76 million).
|
# ? Apr 3, 2024 15:27 |
|
SlothfulCobra posted:My theory has been that they very consciously don't want to tap into specifics of current political alignment, which is why the factions don't really make that much sense on those grounds. the director's position per interviews is, to paraphrase, "polarization is bad, and stuff that makes us polarized is bad", "gee, wartime violence is not so fun when it happens in the imperial core, how would that make you feel?", and "journalists are courageous heroic truth tellers and we need to support them" while intentionally avoiding giving any ideological or political cohesion to the civil war per se which, is, sure, a choice, even a defensible one. i just think it's a cowardly choice and would make the stakes and setting of the movie feel weightless. but maybe i will be wrong, who knows.
|
# ? Apr 3, 2024 15:36 |
|
|
# ? Jun 6, 2024 17:32 |
|
Gravitas Shortfall posted:Meaningless without percentages, since there are more people in California than there are in Texas, more people in Texas than there are in New York, etc etc. The only place the pattern doesn't hold is New York (8.3 million) vs Ohio (11.76 million). But the whole point of that comparison is to avoid percentages. It's an interesting way of describing it (and a pretty cool map)
|
# ? Apr 3, 2024 16:54 |