|
the best player is still on the board. he's up for grabs on the biggest board in the world
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2024 19:02
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 24, 2024 03:46 |
|
|
I thought about taking another DB here. But the Packers want no more run-gashing. Jeff Hafley would be delighted to have Kris Jenkins on that Front 7.
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2024 19:33
|
|
|
I was thinking about taking Jenkins or another DT but everything I read about the second tier DTs was sooooo underwhelming. Like, the Jenkins writeup in The Beast (which has him as the #36 overall prospect!) is all "Well, he's not that big, had unremarkable stats in college, doesn't handle double teams particularly well, doesn't have an advanced pass rush game, and he might not ever have good production in the NFL, but he's got a good motor and an NFL pedigree and he generally knows what he's supposed to be doing"
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2024 19:42
|
|
|
xbilkis posted:I was thinking about taking Jenkins or another DT but everything I read about the second tier DTs was sooooo underwhelming. Like, the Jenkins writeup in The Beast (which has him as the #36 overall prospect!) is all "Well, he's not that big, had unremarkable stats in college, doesn't handle double teams particularly well, doesn't have an advanced pass rush game, and he might not ever have good production in the NFL, but he's got a good motor and an NFL pedigree and he generally knows what he's supposed to be doing" Green Bay loves to take guys who know what they are supposed to do and start developing them immediately (Lukas Van Ness, Carrington Vallentine, etc). A Packers pick.
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2024 19:45
|
|
|
Yeah I guess that's a situation where it helps to know more about the team you're picking for than a vague sense that they need a DT
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2024 19:45
|
|
|
xbilkis posted:I was thinking about taking Jenkins or another DT but everything I read about the second tier DTs was sooooo underwhelming. Like, the Jenkins writeup in The Beast (which has him as the #36 overall prospect!) is all "Well, he's not that big, had unremarkable stats in college, doesn't handle double teams particularly well, doesn't have an advanced pass rush game, and he might not ever have good production in the NFL, but he's got a good motor and an NFL pedigree and he generally knows what he's supposed to be doing" Yeah it is a very rough DT and Edge class. I read that entry too and I was like man, someone's trying really hard to convince themselves here. Not that he's a bad player, just that in most years there would be more promising/productive prospects at DT3 or wherever they have him. fwiw I like the Morgan pick, he's a good player and in the opposite way to the DTs, I think he would be further towards the top but there's a lot of good tackle prospects this year Cavauro posted:the best player is still on the board. he's up for grabs on the biggest board in the world are you referring to our lord and savior jesus christ
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2024 20:28
|
|
|
Oh dang Kris is a lot smaller than I thought he was.
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2024 20:31
|
|
|
Ornery and Hornery posted:Oh dang Kris is a lot smaller than I thought he was. How big is he? That's partly why I grabbed Sweat, in retrospect it was probably a reach, but I liked his size.
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2024 20:41
|
|
|
Third round order has been added to the picks thread OP
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2024 20:45
|
|
|
I really like the Polk pick, I think he's being overlooked because of how good Odunze is.
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2024 21:59
|
|
|
IcePhoenix posted:I really like the Polk pick, I think he's being overlooked because of how good Odunze is. Polk will be a monster. A very, veryyyy good WR2 who you can throw fades too.
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2024 22:14
|
|
|
A Sneaker Broker posted:Polk will be a monster. A very, veryyyy good WR2 who you can throw fades too. He can learn behind Evans and Godwin and takeover as WR2 when Godwin leaves next year.
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2024 22:49
|
|
|
I love Renardo Green.
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2024 23:03
|
|
|
Great picks. Pearsall I really like and although I haven't watched Beebe I've heard good things
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2024 17:12
|
|
|
2nd round didn't fall great for Baltimore. Based on who was available Melton is a good pick. I might've gone Malachi Corley, but that's a lot riskier proposition. Melton seems like a contributing depth CB at his absolute floor.
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2024 19:54
|
|
|
Melton, Beebe and Polk were the three I was looking at picking with the Bucs pick.
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2024 20:30
|
|
|
The Puppy Bowl posted:2nd round didn't fall great for Baltimore. Based on who was available Melton is a good pick. I might've gone Malachi Corley, but that's a lot riskier proposition. Melton seems like a contributing depth CB at his absolute floor. Thanks. I was also looking hard at Beebe until the Lions snaked him.
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2024 20:43
|
|
|
The Vikings have two picks in the first round and then nothing in the second and third. It really is all about who they get at the top of the draft.
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2024 22:07
|
|
|
Darth Brooks posted:The Vikings have two picks in the first round and then nothing in the second and third. It really is all about who they get at the top of the draft. I think I saw that the Jets and Broncos also don't have a second round pick. Do you think the Vikings will trade back to get more picks?
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2024 22:22
|
|
|
Darth Brooks posted:The Vikings have two picks in the first round and then nothing in the second and third. It really is all about who they get at the top of the draft. Which honesty isn't a bad position if you remove the pressure of having to draft a QB with one of those first-rounders
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2024 22:26
|
|
|
If I had the option, I would be on the phone lines trying to trade Christian Watson to the Chiefs for their second and 2025 fourth.
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2024 22:43
|
|
|
why would we want that if there are 17 receivers in the top 100
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2024 22:46
|
|
|
kiimo posted:why would we want that if there are 17 receivers in the top 100 Because, for whatever reason, KC has a good S&C program. Get CWat back to full strength and get a top 15 WR when healthy.
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2024 22:50
|
|
|
solarjetman posted:Thanks. I was also looking hard at Beebe until the Lions snaked him. That would have been too good to be true. Totally revitalize the line with the first two picks. Honestly think Melton was the clear guy to get with the way the board fell. I'm just terminally Raven brained when it comes to the desire to finally draft unqualified hits at WR.
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2024 22:56
|
|
|
kiimo posted:why would we want that if there are 17 receivers in the top 100 Not that the Chiefs would want him but it's not a bad idea for Green Bay to see if they can get something for him. Watson is starting to feel like an afterthought in that offense.
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2024 22:57
|
|
|
Quiet Feet posted:Not that the Chiefs would want him but it's not a bad idea for Green Bay to see if they can get something for him. Watson is starting to feel like an afterthought in that offense. X: Wicks Slot: Reed TE1A: Kraft TE1B: Musgrave Z: Doubs Tail Back: Sims Watson is losing his place. Also, we have Malik Heath, Bo Melton, and our developmental WR Grant DuBose. We need a speedster who can stay healthy.
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2024 22:59
|
|
|
God I hope the seahawks trade back and pick up a 2nd in the real draft. Due to the covid year stuff this.drdft has such a great glutton of talent in th 2nd that I've just had to watch go to.teams I hate
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2024 23:15
|
|
|
kiimo posted:why would we want that if there are 17 receivers in the top 100 This is always the issue when people start floating how team X should trade a receiver. Unless it’s a AJ Brown tier receiver, there’s no way I’d trade away a pick from the first couple rounds. I’ll just gamble on a rookie pick.
|
|
#
?
Apr 13, 2024 00:01
|
|
|
wandler20 posted:Melton, Beebe and Polk were the three I was looking at picking with the Bucs pick. Beebe is incredible, I hope he ends up on the Bucs. I also don't think he'll last past the top of the 2nd.
|
|
#
?
Apr 13, 2024 00:35
|
|
|
If the 49ers pick in the next hour or so we can wrap up round two tonight.
|
|
#
?
Apr 13, 2024 03:26
|
|
|
Ornery and Hornery posted:This is always the issue when people start floating how team X should trade a receiver. With more controllable years/contract
|
|
#
?
Apr 13, 2024 03:29
|
|
|
Quiet Feet posted:Not that the Chiefs would want him but it's not a bad idea for Green Bay to see if they can get something for him. Watson is starting to feel like an afterthought in that offense. I think he'd have a very prominent place if the dude could stay healthy. The fact that he's going around to every expert he can find begging them to fix his hamstrings with his own money is about the reddest flag I have ever seen That said if the Chiefs traded for him he would play 8 total snaps but every single one would be converting a crucial down in the playoffs because they have a horseshoe that far up their rear end right now
|
|
#
?
Apr 13, 2024 03:46
|
|
|
Chiefs should trade Skyy Moore for a 3rd all he needs is a new setting
|
|
#
?
Apr 13, 2024 03:51
|
|
|
He’d go for a 5 in this draft
|
|
#
?
Apr 13, 2024 04:03
|
|
|
Current players and future picks are two of the major reasons I don't include trades as a part of this whole thing, on top of the inevitable delays where people wait for trade offers. Future picks are basically just ephemera since the same people might not be drafting for the teams the next year, and thus have no reason to not just offer their next four full drafts to move up 3 spots, and same deal with current players. I've entertained the idea of allowing trades of picks within a single draft, but ultimately couldn't figure out a reliable way to fix the delay problem and also I'm too lazy to adjust the draft order to reflect those trades in later rounds.
|
|
#
?
Apr 13, 2024 04:11
|
|
|
if trades ever became allowed i'd have to boycott the wonderful game.
|
|
#
?
Apr 13, 2024 04:44
|
|
|
No trades keeps it sane.
|
|
#
?
Apr 13, 2024 04:47
|
|
|
ShakeZula posted:Current players and future picks are two of the major reasons I don't include trades as a part of this whole thing, on top of the inevitable delays where people wait for trade offers. Future picks are basically just ephemera since the same people might not be drafting for the teams the next year, and thus have no reason to not just offer their next four full drafts to move up 3 spots, and same deal with current players. I've entertained the idea of allowing trades of picks within a single draft, but ultimately couldn't figure out a reliable way to fix the delay problem and also I'm too lazy to adjust the draft order to reflect those trades in later rounds. It's almost like you have spent a lot of time thinking about this  It's fun to fantasize about a full all options on the table draft, but the way you run it keeps things on the rails and it's an offseason highlight every year
|
|
#
?
Apr 13, 2024 05:21
|
|
|
I don't want trades in this. I do love theory-crafting my draft plan tho if their were trades.
|
|
#
?
Apr 13, 2024 05:29
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 24, 2024 03:46 |
|
|
Trades would be fun but all the things you brought up are excellent reasons to keep it tradeless on their own merit much less combining them together.
|
|
#
?
Apr 13, 2024 05:49
|
|