What is the most powerful flying bug? This poll is closed. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
🦋 | 15 | 3.71% | |
🦇 | 115 | 28.47% | |
🪰 | 12 | 2.97% | |
🐦 | 67 | 16.58% | |
dragonfly | 94 | 23.27% | |
🦟 | 14 | 3.47% | |
🐝 | 87 | 21.53% | |
Total: | 404 votes |
|
stephenthinkpad posted:I just found out about this today, is this true? yep it is true. Canada was the preferred source for export-controlled products and CIA/NSA/FBI and so on would use that as a vector for literal terrorism whenever they could
|
# ? Apr 12, 2024 15:55 |
|
|
# ? May 25, 2024 15:34 |
|
Ah yeah I kinda forgot about INS. I think the 1000 pounder is actually the smallest they use too, no? There's FAB1000 and 1500 and those numbers are in kg rather than burger
|
# ? Apr 12, 2024 16:00 |
|
stephenthinkpad posted:I just found out about this today, is this true? I posted about this poo poo like 10 times in this thread
|
# ? Apr 12, 2024 16:01 |
|
fizziester posted:Source: Politico very clearly recall that Russia's vehicle reserves and the Russian ability to repair, modernize, and send into the field those vehicles was explicitly identified as a Russian weakness
|
# ? Apr 12, 2024 16:34 |
|
INFINITE TANKS
|
# ? Apr 12, 2024 16:47 |
|
ModernMajorGeneral posted:Congratulations to the international freedom fighters many people have tried to prevent the speech of Brown Moses...
|
# ? Apr 12, 2024 16:48 |
|
Leandros posted:Ah yeah I kinda forgot about INS. I think the 1000 pounder is actually the smallest they use too, no? There's FAB1000 and 1500 and those numbers are in kg rather than burger Current lineup in use seem to be 250, 500, 1000 and 1500. The 500 family has also been used in thermobaric and cluster variant.
|
# ? Apr 12, 2024 16:50 |
|
How many poods is 500kg??
|
# ? Apr 12, 2024 18:01 |
|
ContinuityNewTimes posted:How many poods is 500kg?? Well if you use the current rounded value used for weight lifting measurement, it would be 31.25 poods. With the older historical pood, it's 30.52503052503053 pood or about 1221 funt.
|
# ? Apr 12, 2024 18:22 |
|
Lostconfused posted:Same, but because people insist on using imperial system. that's what i meant yes, the weight is in the loving name lmao
|
# ? Apr 12, 2024 18:29 |
|
really should be in metric, as in, a 1000kg bomb
|
# ? Apr 12, 2024 19:41 |
|
Apparently they will be unveiling a 3000 kg version of the glide bomb soon, experts are speculating that it will be roughly twice as devastating as the 1500 kg bomb they are currently using.
|
# ? Apr 12, 2024 20:22 |
|
Starsfan posted:Apparently they will be unveiling a 3000 kg version of the glide bomb soon, experts are speculating that it will be roughly twice as devastating as the 1500 kg bomb they are currently using. They will definitely test it but the aerodynamics of a 3000KG bomb might be too lovely to be practical in a glide deployment.
|
# ? Apr 12, 2024 20:39 |
|
supersnowman posted:They will definitely test it but the aerodynamics of a 3000KG bomb might be too lovely to be practical in a glide deployment. just give it bigger wings
|
# ? Apr 12, 2024 20:41 |
|
You'd be surprised. A narrow body airliner weighs ~70 tons, a widebody ~200 tons, and they can often spend most of their descent gliding on a three degree glide path. That's assuming a maximally efficient glide though, which is going to be quite slow relatively speaking (like 450 knots true air speed decelerating to 250ish at sea level due to increasing air density). And glider aircraft are far more efficient still. It really depends on how big a pair of wings you want to put on it.
|
# ? Apr 12, 2024 20:57 |
|
euphronius posted:those vital elements in the life of Western civilisation which have been the secrets of its strength, and the greatest of its gifts to the world: the sovereignty of a just and rational system of law, liberty of person, of thought, and of speech, and, finally, where the conditions are favourable, the practice of self-government and the growth of that sentiment of common interest which we call the national spirit. These are the features of Western civilisation which have justified its conquest of the world; I’m a conference today, where the winning bid for the Afghan war monument was discussed - it’s going to be a woman in a Niqab. They’re just not sure if it’s gonna be an abstract representation, like a veil hanging over the monument with a horizontal slit exposed letting light in, or more a more literal statue of a woman in a niqab.
|
# ? Apr 12, 2024 21:02 |
|
Megamissen posted:just give it bigger wings You still have to hitch it under a SU-34/SU-35 to be of real tactical use and while the plane can carry a load that heavy, it usually consist of multiple smaller bombs.
|
# ? Apr 12, 2024 21:05 |
|
Megamissen posted:just give it bigger wings slap putlers XXXL table onto that bad boy and you could glide halfway around the world
|
# ? Apr 12, 2024 21:31 |
|
sullat posted:Yeah it came out just before Nordstream in some CIA guy's memoirs. the Siberian pipeline explosion has been a known CIA op for quite a while. I don't recall which book I read it in first but it's been public for many years prior to Nordstream blowing up
|
# ? Apr 12, 2024 22:00 |
|
DJJIB-DJDCT posted:I’m a conference today, where the winning bid for the Afghan war monument was discussed - it’s going to be a woman in a Niqab. They’re just not sure if it’s gonna be an abstract representation, like a veil hanging over the monument with a horizontal slit exposed letting light in, or more a more literal statue of a woman in a niqab. a solemn reminder of all the ones our special forces missed
|
# ? Apr 12, 2024 22:00 |
|
supersnowman posted:You still have to hitch it under a SU-34/SU-35 to be of real tactical use and while the plane can carry a load that heavy, it usually consist of multiple smaller bombs. just give the jet bigger wings too dumbass
|
# ? Apr 12, 2024 22:03 |
supersnowman posted:You still have to hitch it under a SU-34/SU-35 to be of real tactical use and while the plane can carry a load that heavy, it usually consist of multiple smaller bombs. why wouldn't they just use a tu-160?
|
|
# ? Apr 12, 2024 22:14 |
|
FirstnameLastname posted:just give the jet bigger wings too dumbass
|
# ? Apr 12, 2024 22:36 |
|
If your jet is not fat enough to hang a FAB3000, just hang 2 FAB1500.
|
# ? Apr 12, 2024 22:45 |
|
DJJIB-DJDCT posted:I’m a conference today, where the winning bid for the Afghan war monument was discussed - it’s going to be a woman in a Niqab. They’re just not sure if it’s gonna be an abstract representation, like a veil hanging over the monument with a horizontal slit exposed letting light in, or more a more literal statue of a woman in a niqab. That's insane and perverse
|
# ? Apr 12, 2024 22:46 |
|
Torpor posted:That's insane and perverse and the rest of it is pretty loony tunes as well
|
# ? Apr 12, 2024 22:59 |
|
lmao the west is just collectively losing their loving minds
|
# ? Apr 12, 2024 23:01 |
|
Cao Ni Ma posted:lmao the west is just collectively losing their loving minds
|
# ? Apr 12, 2024 23:04 |
|
DJJIB-DJDCT posted:
(muttering) jesus christ
|
# ? Apr 12, 2024 23:06 |
|
supersnowman posted:They will definitely test it but the aerodynamics of a 3000KG bomb might be too lovely to be practical in a glide deployment. Close enough only matters in horseshoes and 3000kg bombs
|
# ? Apr 12, 2024 23:14 |
|
They should add a slide pointing out the whole thing is also a tortured metaphor with a picture of Bagram Air Base beneath it.
|
# ? Apr 12, 2024 23:21 |
|
Hatebag posted:why wouldn't they just use a tu-160? Putting strategic bombers 40-70km from the frontline will probably be a bet too risky for the Russians. The Ukrainians always notice when large bombers take off.
|
# ? Apr 12, 2024 23:28 |
DJJIB-DJDCT posted:I’m a conference today, where the winning bid for the Afghan war monument was discussed - it’s going to be a woman in a Niqab. They’re just not sure if it’s gonna be an abstract representation, like a veil hanging over the monument with a horizontal slit exposed letting light in, or more a more literal statue of a woman in a niqab. when you describe it like that, it sounds like a victory monument for the taliban lmao
|
|
# ? Apr 12, 2024 23:29 |
|
DJJIB-DJDCT posted:
Is there any background on the thought process here? Delta-Wye posted:when you describe it like that, it sounds like a victory monument for the taliban lmao
|
# ? Apr 12, 2024 23:41 |
Officer Sandvich posted:Is there any background on the thought process here? just countries posting their Ls
|
|
# ? Apr 12, 2024 23:46 |
|
Officer Sandvich posted:Is there any background on the thought process here? Excellent question. No, none. I have no idea what anyone involved was thinking. I suggested we just contemporize the South African War Monument, since the visual language is more clear and straight forward. If we're going to pretend we won, as you say, we may as well actually do it, instead of retroactively saying we went there for women's rights, and then lost.
|
# ? Apr 12, 2024 23:52 |
|
DJJIB-DJDCT posted:
Does the army really say we went to Afghanistan for women's right? WTF???
|
# ? Apr 12, 2024 23:58 |
|
supersnowman posted:Does the army really say we went to Afghanistan for women's right? No, the army does not, the liberal government does. It's been a contentious issue since 2002, the army resented the poo poo out of the war.
|
# ? Apr 12, 2024 23:59 |
|
Putin keeps trying to kill BBC journalists!
|
# ? Apr 13, 2024 00:26 |
|
|
# ? May 25, 2024 15:34 |
|
Yeah, what ever happened to a nice statue of a guy on a horse. Isn't Canada one of the biggest producers of softwood lumber worldwide? If not the biggest? DJJIB-DJDCT posted:The Expansion of Europe: The Culmination of Modern History, Seeley Thankfully, much like the Ukrainian counter offensive, Europe's expansion culminated too soon. Ardennes posted:Btw, supposedly the amount of apartment buildings that have been hit by the Russians has declined to pretty much nil along with the strength of Ukrainian AD. It is so weird! Glad to hear Russia has improved the accuracy of their S300s in ground attack mode
|
# ? Apr 13, 2024 00:35 |