spacetoaster posted:

It's May already.

Where are our NOJOE tags?

Excelzior posted:

I don't think they have ogre-sized gallows though

very problematic

Ytlaya posted:

The "harm reduction" stuff is funny, because this is like someone saying that "using two dirty needles to inject heroin is harm reduction, because you could be using three dirty needles instead."

spacetoaster posted:

Imagine a super hard right-wing c-spam starting a country, those are the founding fathers.

But the only one i really hate is Jefferson. Jefferson would probably fit in with c-spam though.

WampaLord posted:

lol bad thread already changed their title and are acting like A) it already happened and B) this will make weed fully legal

quote:

https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/IF/IF10023

The CRA (codified at 5 U.S.C. §§801-808) is a tool Congress can use to overturn certain federal agency actions. The CRA was enacted as part of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act in 1996
...
What happens if Congress adjourns before the CRA
introduction or action periods end? If, within 60 session (Senate) or legislative (House) days after a rule is submitted, Congress adjourns its session sine die, the
periods to introduce and act on a disapproval resolution described above reoccur in their entirety in the next session of Congress, beginning in each chamber on the 15th day of Senate session and the 15th House legislative day. This “lookback” provision is intended to ensure that Congress
will have the full periods contemplated by the act to disapprove a rule regardless of when it is received. The lookback provision may hold particular import in years in which there is a change in party control of the presidency.

What happens when a CRA joint resolution of disapproval is enacted? A rule that is the subject of an enacted CRA joint resolution of disapproval goes out of effect immediately if the rule has already taken effect when the resolution of disapproval is enacted and “shall be treated as though such rule had never taken effect.” If the rule has not yet gone into effect when the resolution of disapproval is enacted, it will not take effect.

In addition, a rule subject to an enacted joint resolution of disapproval “may not be reissued in substantially the same form, and a new rule that is substantially the same … may not be issued, unless the reissued or new rule is specifically authorized by a law enacted after the date of the joint resolution.” The CRA does not define the scope of substantially the same or state who should make such a determination. To date, two rules have been reissued following disapproval under the CRA. In both cases, the agencies looked to the legislative history of the disapproval resolution that overturned the rule to understand Congress’s specific objections. The agencies then focused on changing those aspects of each rule when reissuing them.

Al! posted:

theyre going to have to deal with him like topsy the elephant

Trabisnikof posted:

also by the time the rule is actually published in the federal register it will be well within the period that will let the next congress undo it through the CRA:

So because the Biden-Harris Administration has dragged their feet on this for so long. they've not only made it trivial for it to get undone if Biden loses, but if it does get undone, the DEA will never be able to reschedule weed again without an act of Congress.

Nichael posted:

It's also funny they were out there not for any just cause but for one of the two dumbest people in the country, Donald Trump, losing against the other dumbest person, Joe Biden.

Trabisnikof posted:

also by the time the rule is actually published in the federal register it will be well within the period that will let the next congress undo it through the CRA:

So because the Biden-Harris Administration has dragged their feet on this for so long. they've not only made it trivial for it to get undone if Biden loses, but if it does get undone, the DEA will never be able to reschedule weed again without an act of Congress.

gimme the GOD drat candy posted:

they can't execute fetterman because no method known to man can kill the misshapen beast. hanging, poison, guns, blades, fire, water, etc. nothing can penetrate his lumpy hide. the only thing that came close was when congress passed a rule to make him wear a suit.

F_Shit_Fitzgerald posted:

gimme the GOD drat candy posted:

they can't execute fetterman because no method known to man can kill the misshapen beast. hanging, poison, guns, blades, fire, water, etc. nothing can penetrate his lumpy hide. the only thing that came close was when congress passed a rule to make him wear a suit.

VitalSigns posted:

And also that both candidates are pretty much the same.

The inverse of "I'm voting for Joe Biden in 24 so all the terrible things that are going on don't happen"

"I'm storming the capitol for Trump so all the terrible things that will keep happening under Biden anyway will continue"

Nichael posted:

I know, it's funny all around. I can't get hung up on the specifics of the event or its "deeper meaning" because lmao at all of it holy poo poo. Funniest day in American history... Maybe history period? There's not a single lesson from it.

spacetoaster posted:

It's May already.

Where are our NOJOE tags?

Nichael posted:

guys... this is like the most sacred place

Trabisnikof posted:

also by the time the rule is actually published in the federal register it will be well within the period that will let the next congress undo it through the CRA:

So because the Biden-Harris Administration has dragged their feet on this for so long. they've not only made it trivial for it to get undone if Biden loses, but if it does get undone, the DEA will never be able to reschedule weed again without an act of Congress.

Pepe Silvia Browne posted:

go home. i love you, you're very special, go home

HallelujahLee posted:

the funnier timeline trump wins and actually legalizes weed

VitalSigns posted:

He was already president and he doubled down on law and order bullshit

This is the other side of the coin from libs imagining he's going to declare himself dictator this time

Pepe Silvia Browne posted:

no it isn't it's not anyone saying they actually believe that will happen its "hey wouldn't this be funny" and yeah, it would be

Pepe Silvia Browne posted:

yeah

like it would be one thing if he actually did the stuff they wanted but he didn't lock her up nor did he build the wall. absolute dullards to go to the mat for him. but then, that's his whole thing: being charismatic enough that dullards go to the mat for him even when it makes no sense.

Pepe Silvia Browne posted:

go home. i love you, you're very special, go home

Nichael posted:

guys... this is like the most sacred place

VitalSigns posted:

He was already president and he doubled down on law and order bullshit

This is the other side of the coin from libs imagining he's going to declare himself dictator this time

E: you are 100% correct about how funny it would be though

gradenko_2000 posted:

https://twitter.com/kenklippenstein/status/1785334354157113666?t=mbdMTAkPIpKGXvD6lDMBaA&s=19

https://twitter.com/kenklippenstein/status/1785346666184290778?t=nn_9zHSwUffTFKaIvkMqww&s=19

Nichael posted:

Trump part 2 will just be another reagan administration, like everyone else. none of this loving matters.

in regards to Palestine, I just particularly loathe Biden and resent that he acts like he's empathetic while at least Trump is honest that he's a monster. none of this actually matters though.

KomradeX posted:

Does he act empathetic or is it the useless fan base that keeps saying he is while he eats another ice cream and feels up an 8 year old

KomradeX posted:

Does he act empathetic or is it the useless fan base that keeps saying he is while he eats another ice cream and feels up an 8 year old

gradenko_2000 posted:

https://twitter.com/MikeBalsamo1/status/1785354649123295562?t=btctG6eUWHhvkGdUGaDLsQ&s=19

insane clown pussy posted:

*banging fists on table* SCHEDULE III! SCHEDULE III!