|
rotor posted:in 1998 or whatever getting apache running on windows was not the simplest thing ever istr running o'reilly website on win95 without reading whitepapers or emulating cisco routers around 1998
|
# ? May 1, 2024 20:04 |
|
|
# ? Jun 9, 2024 14:03 |
|
rotor posted:which is the real reason he couldn't stand up a simple webservice without a lot of effort, leading him to just roll his own telnet clone He also did not do that.
|
# ? May 1, 2024 20:06 |
|
rotor posted:in 1998 or whatever getting apache running on windows was not the simplest thing ever no but you could use frontpage (which iirc came with office at the time) to spin up a pseudo-IIS instance lol, even on 9x i wonder if they were using NT (knowing elon, probably not). but if so NT 4 had a pretty easy to use server edition too
|
# ? May 1, 2024 20:09 |
|
gschmidl posted:He also did not do that. yep i don't believe elon did any of those things. maybe he told other people to do them, but i really doubt he did it himself
|
# ? May 1, 2024 20:09 |
|
reminder: elon couldn't set up windows 11 on his own
|
# ? May 1, 2024 20:10 |
|
Beeftweeter posted:no but you could use frontpage (which iirc came with office at the time) to spin up a pseudo-IIS instance lol, even on 9x didn't he get ousted from paypal because he insisted on running the backend on Windows NT instead of Linux?
|
# ? May 1, 2024 20:13 |
|
DarkSol posted:didn't he get ousted from paypal because he insisted on running the backend on Windows NT instead of Linux? not sure it was nt specifically but he did insist windows to be supreme because all the games ran on windows therefore it was the better os
|
# ? May 1, 2024 20:18 |
|
but it... is a dumpster
|
# ? May 1, 2024 20:19 |
|
4lokos basilisk posted:not sure it was nt specifically but he did insist windows to be supreme because all the games ran on windows therefore it was the better os it was because he couldn't find any key crackers for linux
|
# ? May 1, 2024 20:23 |
|
I know this is a wild, controversial take - and may get me in trouble - but I do not in fact think elon is 'good with computers' at all.
|
# ? May 1, 2024 20:24 |
|
some kinda jackal posted:but it... is a dumpster
|
# ? May 1, 2024 20:24 |
|
Jonny 290 posted:I know this is a wild, controversial take - and may get me in trouble - but I do not in fact think elon is 'good with computers' at all.
|
# ? May 1, 2024 20:28 |
|
is boeris carbomb still playing his mummy on twitter
|
# ? May 1, 2024 20:30 |
|
Jonny 290 posted:I know this is a wild, controversial take - and may get me in trouble - but I do not in fact think elon is 'good with computers' at all. you have said the actual truth
|
# ? May 1, 2024 20:32 |
|
FAUXTON posted:is boeris carbomb still playing his mummy on twitter Maybe! We'll find out during this Meltdown Maye. I hope this is the last time I can make this joke because he won't be here next May.
|
# ? May 1, 2024 20:32 |
|
Jonny 290 posted:I know this is a wild, controversial take - and may get me in trouble - but I do not in fact think elon is 'good with computers' at all.
|
# ? May 1, 2024 20:46 |
|
4lokos basilisk posted:not sure it was nt specifically but he did insist windows to be supreme because all the games ran on windows therefore it was the better os I suspect it's because it was interesting at the time and relatively easy to use. But like pretty much all the kinda people who would have worked at paypal in those days would have told him no. One anecdote is out there that he annoyed an engineer into agreeing to an armwrestling match to settle the issue, won, was still told no and then did it anyhow. He somehow thought an 8 year old OS that was just catching on was supposed to do better than an 18 year old OS (solaris) running on tailored hardware that he already paid for. It's so dumb that if it wasn't about Elon Musk and wasn't confirmed by multiple sources, you'd assume to be the typical "the idiot MBA thought it was a cup holder!" story that nerds like to make up.
|
# ? May 1, 2024 20:52 |
|
rotor posted:in 1998 or whatever getting apache running on windows was not the simplest thing ever i actually ran an apache server on windows in 1998, as a 13 year old. assuming you were functionally literate and had a grade school education, it was possible to do on 9x and nt4 it just wasn't point and click and you had to manually edit your httpd.conf
|
# ? May 1, 2024 20:58 |
|
Beeftweeter posted:no but you could use frontpage (which iirc came with office at the time) to spin up a pseudo-IIS instance lol, even on 9x iirc it was actually a bit harder to get a public facing webserver running on iis using 9x, but nt4 was easier. the licensing sucked though
|
# ? May 1, 2024 21:00 |
|
DaTroof posted:istr running o'reilly website on win95 without reading whitepapers or emulating cisco routers around 1998 yeah no that is horseshit, i'm just sayin that at that point in time it was easier to just write thing that listened on a port than it was to set up a real webserver gschmidl posted:He also did not do that. implementing a lovely telnet is insanely easy Beeftweeter posted:no but you could use frontpage (which iirc came with office at the time) to spin up a pseudo-IIS instance lol, even on 9x yeah but he wanted it do actually DO THINGS not just serve pages so i can imagine that just writing a lovely little network client is easier.
|
# ? May 1, 2024 21:01 |
|
infernal machines posted:i actually ran an apache server on windows in 1998, as a 13 year old. assuming you were functionally literate and had a grade school education, it was possible to do on 9x and nt4 really? maybe i'm remembering dates wrong.
|
# ? May 1, 2024 21:02 |
|
rotor posted:implementing a lovely telnet is insanely easy I know. He implemented nothing.
|
# ? May 1, 2024 21:03 |
|
4lokos basilisk posted:isn’t http on port 80 by default/convention though? this was back in the HTTP/0.9 / HTTP/1.0-draft days when the early commercial internet was the total wild west, people can and did run production web poo poo on port 8080. you just stick the :8080 in the URL and it works especially since name-based virtual hosting (Host header is HTTP/1.1) and Server Name Indication didn't come until much later that reminds me, this was also years before people figured out you could do crazy poo poo like use browsers to send spam by connecting directly to port 25 https://www-archive.mozilla.org/projects/netlib/portbanning
|
# ? May 1, 2024 21:04 |
|
rotor posted:really? maybe i'm remembering dates wrong. apache 1.x and up to i think 2.2 supported 9x and nt. i didn't try it on 95, but 98 and nt4 both worked, you did need to rtfm though
|
# ? May 1, 2024 21:05 |
|
shackleford posted:this was back in the HTTP/0.9 / HTTP/1.0-draft days when the early commercial internet was the total wild west, people can and did run production web poo poo on port 8080. you just stick the :8080 in the URL and it works right, but you did not go to google.com:8080, you went to google.com, meaning that there was a thing - some kind of web thing, that served your computer a response based on the http request it sent out, listening on port 80 somewhere in the google datacenter not sure elons made up brag stories are worth this much attention to detail, though
|
# ? May 1, 2024 21:20 |
|
4lokos basilisk posted:right, but you did not go to google.com:8080, you went to google.com, meaning that there was a thing - some kind of web thing, that served your computer a response based on the http request it sent out, listening on port 80 somewhere in the google datacenter yeah but like maybe you went to maps.google.com and it loaded a bunch of images from maps1.google.com:8080 or whatever
|
# ? May 1, 2024 21:23 |
|
shackleford posted:this was back in the HTTP/0.9 / HTTP/1.0-draft days when the early commercial internet was the total wild west, people can and did run production web poo poo on port 8080. you just stick the :8080 in the URL and it works Those days were sweet because you could come up with an exploit as a random intrusive thought. I wish I could tunnel packets through time and terrorize midlife boomers in the 90s.
|
# ? May 1, 2024 21:34 |
|
quote:Exclusive: Tesla retreats from next-generation ‘gigacasting’ manufacturing process https://www.reuters.com/business/autos-transportation/tesla-retreats-next-generation-gigacasting-manufacturing-process-2024-05-01/
|
# ? May 1, 2024 21:35 |
|
4lokos basilisk posted:right, but you did not go to google.com:8080, you went to google.com, meaning that there was a thing - some kind of web thing, that served your computer a response based on the http request it sent out, listening on port 80 somewhere in the google datacenter a few sites did. i remember some big corporation, maybe ibm? using :8080 addresses for a lot of poo poo
|
# ? May 1, 2024 21:37 |
|
Pinterest Mom posted:https://www.reuters.com/business/autos-transportation/tesla-retreats-next-generation-gigacasting-manufacturing-process-2024-05-01/ hahahaha no "unboxed" production huh
|
# ? May 1, 2024 21:38 |
|
I believe him that he wrote a lovely web server in 95 or whatever because it is an Elon signature optimization at the wrong level; whatever you gained from making GBS threads out a few bytes faster than ncsa httpd by yeeting syscalls is not gonna pay for the egr time to build or maintain that.
|
# ? May 1, 2024 21:39 |
|
i had not heard of this process before and maybe you hadnt either so heres a thing https://www.spglobal.com/mobility/en/research-analysis/gigacasting-the-hottest-trend-in-car-manufacturing.html tl;dr basically huge, really complex aluminum castings instead of a bunch of subassemblies. sounds neat until you think of what happens if part of the casting is damaged.
|
# ? May 1, 2024 21:39 |
|
[*LATEST FAD]
|
# ? May 1, 2024 21:41 |
|
rotor posted:i had not heard of this process before and maybe you hadnt either so heres a thing surprise surprise there's a reason no one has bothered
|
# ? May 1, 2024 21:42 |
|
Seems like a great way to tip over insurance claims into totals when they otherwise wouldn't be, in a time where there's waiting lists for cars a mile long.
|
# ? May 1, 2024 21:44 |
|
Endless Mike posted:surprise surprise there's a reason no one has bothered idk the article says that a lot of chinese mfgrs are adopting it. not sure if thats a good sign or what tho i guess
|
# ? May 1, 2024 21:44 |
|
tesla's been an american ploy to bait china into poor manufacturing techniques all along, masterful
|
# ? May 1, 2024 21:45 |
|
Nfcknblvbl posted:tesla's been an american ploy to bait china into poor manufacturing techniques all along, masterful epic puppetmast'ry on a global scale
|
# ? May 1, 2024 21:47 |
|
rotor posted:i had not heard of this process before and maybe you hadnt either so heres a thing wtf Lego cars
|
# ? May 1, 2024 21:49 |
|
|
# ? Jun 9, 2024 14:03 |
|
rotor posted:
eh just back into the feed hopper. remelt and recast it. i'm sure aluminum isnt energy intensive to re-cast
|
# ? May 1, 2024 21:57 |