Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
(Thread IKs: fatherboxx)
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Dandywalken
Feb 11, 2014

Kraftwerk posted:

The part that gets me is how much men and material the Russians lost and yet they reconstituted their military and are double (triple?) the size they were at the start of the conflict while Ukraine is running out of troops and having a hard time finding new ones. At this rate Russia could take Kharkhiv if they work fast enough vs the aid.

It's very possible that Russia could defeat Ukraine or at least reduce it by fully annexing and locking in Crimea, Donetsk and Luhansk. I just don't see how Ukraine can reconstitute itself and basically have 10:1 kill ratios when western support is so fragile and only sufficient enough to sustain Ukraine when it's on the defensive. It almost feels like we're delaying the inevitable rather than fighting for victory. It's frustrating to watch when we could've nipped this conflict in the bud back in 2022-2023 if we just had the political will to do so. Putin is resting comfortably and China seems to be backing Russia to the hilt and gaining some sort of geopolitical upper hand against America in future struggles. These threats just aren't being taken seriously enough for my liking.

You and Wilo should hang out some time. The nuke guy.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

GhostofJohnMuir
Aug 14, 2014

anime is not good
:nws: :nms:

saw a newsweek blurb with drone footage of a cluster round (claimed to be atacms) hitting an alleged russian troop concentration point

the observing drone is very far back so the footage is not graphic and no deaths or injuries are visible, but it is probably footage of a moment that killed and maimed a lot of people so please avoid if you think that's going to negatively effect you

https://twitter.com/JohnB_Schneider/status/1785614608444674128

i only post it because it's the first time i've seen the actual use of cluster rounds and not satellite images of the after effects. seeing the sheer size of the area of effect is terrifying, i'm terrible at estimating scale but it seems to me like a circle with a radius of roughly 200m at least. to have an observation drone simply call in a single strike that was claimed to have basically erased an entire company dozens of miles behind the lines continues to highlight just how efficiently lethal modern war has become. the new atacms aren't a substitute for tube artillery, but the russians will have to think hard about larger troop concentrations anywhere close to the front, which will at least make it harder to rapidly exploit breakthroughs

OddObserver
Apr 3, 2009

GhostofJohnMuir posted:

:nws: :nms:



the observing drone is very far back so the footage is not graphic and no deaths or injuries are visible, but it is probably footage of a moment that killed and maimed a lot of people so please avoid if you think that's going to negatively effect you

https://twitter.com/JohnB_Schneider/status/1785614608444674128

i only post it because it's the first time i've seen the actual use of cluster rounds and not satellite images of the after effects.



I guess you missed this? Likewise :nms:, long-distance footage of a Russian cluster strike on a city park hundreds of km behind the Frontline.

https://twitter.com/yarotrof/status/1785242253797081221#m

(Which didn't get nearly enough reaction, IMHO)

GhostofJohnMuir
Aug 14, 2014

anime is not good

OddObserver posted:

I guess you missed this? Likewise :nms:, long-distance footage of a Russian cluster strike on a city park hundreds of km behind the Frontline.

https://twitter.com/yarotrof/status/1785242253797081221#m

(Which didn't get nearly enough reaction, IMHO)

i saw the headline that there was a deadly strike on a city park in odessa, i didn't realize it was a cluster bomb. russia can't even claim that it was a strike on a nearby building with a legitimate target that missed, they used a round that's specifically for large open spaces to hit the park

another of the innumerable tragic aspects of this war is that i can make a list of the number of times the russians have bombed popular ukrainian parks

Flavahbeast
Jul 21, 2001


OddObserver posted:

I guess you missed this? Likewise :nms:, long-distance footage of a Russian cluster strike on a city park hundreds of km behind the Frontline.

https://twitter.com/yarotrof/status/1785242253797081221#m

(Which didn't get nearly enough reaction, IMHO)

Well that's hosed, I just assumed the Odessa park strike was debris from a shootdown but that's clearly cluster artillery working as intended

Quixzlizx
Jan 7, 2007
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-68941220.amp

quote:

The US has accused Russia of deploying chemical weapons as a "method of warfare" in Ukraine, in violation of international laws banning their use.

State department officials said Russia used the choking agent chloropicrin to win "battlefield gains" over Ukraine.

The allegations, which US officials said were not an "isolated" incident, would contravene the Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC), which Russia signed.

The Kremlin rejected the accusations, calling them "baseless".

Shells from NK, drones from Iran, and now Assad has something to contribute when needed.

BigRoman
Jun 19, 2005

GhostofJohnMuir posted:

i saw the headline that there was a deadly strike on a city park in odessa, i didn't realize it was a cluster bomb. russia can't even claim that it was a strike on a nearby building with a legitimate target that missed, they used a round that's specifically for large open spaces to hit the park

another of the innumerable tragic aspects of this war is that i can make a list of the number of times the russians have bombed popular ukrainian parks

Pretty sure that attack on Odessa was all about punishing the city for the Trade Union fire.

beer_war
Mar 10, 2005

quote:

Ukraine: Russian Forces Executed Surrendering Ukraine Soldiers

Russian forces appear to have executed at least 15 Ukrainian soldiers as they attempted to surrender, and possibly six more who were surrendering or who had surrendered, since early December 2023, Human Rights Watch said today. These incidents should be investigated as war crimes.

“Since Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine, its forces have committed many heinous war crimes,” said Belkis Wille, associate crisis and conflict director at Human Rights Watch. “The summary execution – or murder – of surrendering and injured Ukrainian soldiers, gunned down in cold blood, expressly forbidden under international humanitarian law, is also included in that shameful legacy.”

quote:

The apparent executions do not appear to be isolated instances. Human Rights Watch also identified Russian drone footage posted on February 5, 2024, capturing a separate battlefield moment. In that incident, Human Rights Watch could not determine whether the Ukrainian soldiers surrendered, but a male voice heard in the clip, which appears to be credible, apparently provides commands to Russian soldiers on the battlefield in the Donetska region. The voice says in Russian, “take no prisoners, shoot everyone.” Audiovisual analysis of the footage supports the conclusion that the drone is Russian.

A report published in March 2023 by the United Nations Human Rights Monitoring Mission in Ukraine documented Russian armed forces and Wagner Group executions of 15 Ukrainian prisoners of war (POWs) during the first year of the full-scale invasion. In its February to July 2023 periodic report, the UN documented the summary execution of six Ukrainian POWs. A follow-up report published in March 2024, covering the three previous months, identified 12 reported episodes of executions of at least 32 captured POWs or people hors de combat. The UN independently verified three of the latter incidents, involving seven Ukrainian soldiers.

https://www.hrw.org/news/2024/05/02/ukraine-russian-forces-executed-surrendering-ukraine-soldiers

Mokotow
Apr 16, 2012

Russia is winning so hard it needs to cluster-bomb a city park on a warm afternoon. How do you even begin to justify this poo poo? Upcoming victory day?

Warbadger
Jun 17, 2006

Mokotow posted:

Russia is winning so hard it needs to cluster-bomb a city park on a warm afternoon. How do you even begin to justify this poo poo? Upcoming victory day?

Historically speaking you say they meant to hit an abandoned shack 2 blocks away somebody once repaired an armored car in 8 years ago.

To be fair...
Feb 3, 2006
Film Producer
I keep seeing articles of F16s in Ukraine, anything confirmed?

Raenir Salazar
Nov 5, 2010

College Slice

To be fair... posted:

I keep seeing articles of F16s in Ukraine, anything confirmed?

Probably we'll see something confirmed when they do something that would make Tom Clancy blush.

GhostofJohnMuir
Aug 14, 2014

anime is not good

To be fair... posted:

I keep seeing articles of F16s in Ukraine, anything confirmed?

i saw a recent statement from the ukranians that they're expecting delivery after easter, but it's something i doubt they'd ever give a straight answer on because why risk it

To be fair...
Feb 3, 2006
Film Producer

GhostofJohnMuir posted:

i saw a recent statement from the ukranians that they're expecting delivery after easter, but it's something i doubt they'd ever give a straight answer on because why risk it

Orthodox Easter? Roman Catholics already did their egg hunts.

Deteriorata
Feb 6, 2005

To be fair... posted:

Orthodox Easter? Roman Catholics already did their egg hunts.

Yes. This Sunday is Orthodox Easter.

Hannibal Rex
Feb 13, 2010
https://www.foreignaffairs.com/ukraine/american-aid-alone-wont-save-ukraine

Jack Watling has a new article in FA.

Charliegrs
Aug 10, 2009
Ukraine still has a lot of Soviet era hardware. Did they get any of this stuff post Soviet times or is it all literally 30-35 years old at minimum? So like all their T64s and BMP2s etc are they all ancient stuff they've kept running or did they somehow buy some stuff in 90s-2000s?

Popete
Oct 6, 2009

This will make sure you don't suggest to the KDz
That he should grow greens instead of crushing on MCs

Grimey Drawer
They domestically manufacture a lot of their own equipment.

Tuna-Fish
Sep 13, 2017

Charliegrs posted:

Ukraine still has a lot of Soviet era hardware. Did they get any of this stuff post Soviet times or is it all literally 30-35 years old at minimum? So like all their T64s and BMP2s etc are they all ancient stuff they've kept running or did they somehow buy some stuff in 90s-2000s?

For example, every T-64 ever built was made in Ukraine (Ukrainian SSR or the independent state). They kept the factory and the workforce, and kept upgrading them. They similarly had a lot of missile manufacturing knowledge, and other stuff.

Popete
Oct 6, 2009

This will make sure you don't suggest to the KDz
That he should grow greens instead of crushing on MCs

Grimey Drawer
It's also not that strange to have older tanks and vehicles. They recieve upgrade packages over time so something like a T-72 built in the 80s likely has had numerous upgrades/overhauls over the years.

I would guess a lot of the U.S. Abrams tanks are pretty old too.

Raenir Salazar
Nov 5, 2010

College Slice
Also Ukraine was a pretty major arms exporter post-breakup so its probably safe to assume they replaced some things that needed it.

Morrow
Oct 31, 2010
A huge element of the motivation for the initial invasion was to gain control over Ukraine's economy, including its arms manufacturing.

Szarrukin
Sep 29, 2021

Mokotow posted:

Russia is winning so hard it needs to cluster-bomb a city park on a warm afternoon. How do you even begin to justify this poo poo? Upcoming victory day?

"there were no civilians there, just Hamas Azov terrorists"

Blue Footed Booby
Oct 4, 2006

got those happy feet

Raenir Salazar posted:

Also Ukraine was a pretty major arms exporter post-breakup so its probably safe to assume they replaced some things that needed it.

As demonstrated by the documentary Lord of War.

Raenir Salazar
Nov 5, 2010

College Slice

Blue Footed Booby posted:

As demonstrated by the documentary Lord of War.

It certainly tells a lot of lore about Nick Cage, or John Travolta, ever since Face Off I can't really tell them apart.

To be fair...
Feb 3, 2006
Film Producer

Szarrukin posted:

"there were no civilians there, just Hamas Azov terrorists"

I thought putin was pro hamas

Kchama
Jul 25, 2007

To be fair... posted:

I thought putin was pro hamas

He's pro-Hamas as far as Hamas is anti-US. Israel backed Russia on Ukraine but didn't like that Russia was backing Hamas for PR.

jaete
Jun 21, 2009


Nap Ghost
Another interview with Kotkin the historian, who talks about Russia's recent past and present and future:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zaJ9VZorgjM

He has this thesis that things were simpler during the cold war. And in the present, USA et al. haven't quite figured out what situation we all "should" be in, but the best available option is another cold war - which has actually already started, so we need to realise that. Interesting arguments.

e: there's an article/interview with/of Kotkin in Foreign Affairs just now with more stuff but I can't be bothered to try to bypass the paywall on it

jaete fucked around with this message at 11:22 on May 4, 2024

Raenir Salazar
Nov 5, 2010

College Slice

jaete posted:

Another interview with Kotkin the historian, who talks about Russia's recent past and present and future:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zaJ9VZorgjM

He has this thesis that things were simpler during the cold war. And in the present, USA et al. haven't quite figured out what situation we all "should" be in, but the best available option is another cold war - which has actually already started, so we need to realise that. Interesting arguments.

e: there's an article/interview with/of Kotkin in Foreign Affairs just now with more stuff but I can't be bothered to try to bypass the paywall on it

Its 50 minutes long, can you summarize the key points? What is meant by "situation", the geopolitical status quo?

Qtotonibudinibudet
Nov 7, 2011



Omich poluyobok, skazhi ty narkoman? ya prosto tozhe gde to tam zhivu, mogli by vmeste uyobyvat' narkotiki

Raenir Salazar posted:

Its 50 minutes long, can you summarize the key points? What is meant by "situation", the geopolitical status quo?

only 50m? come on now, that's pretty short for an international relations podcast! idk why youtube removed their searchable auto-transcript feature though, that poo poo was useful.

absent that pretty much any podcast is gonna still be intelligible at 1.75x speed and youtube has that built in. 2x is a bit difficult if you're not used to it, but kotkin speaks slow enough for it to be fine (interviewer is a bit hard)

anyway archive.today is the standard paywall bypass of the day, beep bop drop URL in so simple https://archive.is/UdX0d

i assume it's that one since i can't find a more recent one

Vivian Darkbloom
Jul 14, 2004


Qtotonibudinibudet posted:

only 50m? come on now, that's pretty short for an international relations podcast! idk why youtube removed their searchable auto-transcript feature though, that poo poo was useful.

absent that pretty much any podcast is gonna still be intelligible at 1.75x speed and youtube has that built in. 2x is a bit difficult if you're not used to it, but kotkin speaks slow enough for it to be fine (interviewer is a bit hard)

anyway archive.today is the standard paywall bypass of the day, beep bop drop URL in so simple https://archive.is/UdX0d

i assume it's that one since i can't find a more recent one

This guy is dumb as hell and it couldn’t be more obvious. Aside from all the corny remarks about nefarious environmental regulations and these darn kids today, he clearly views history like a video game, arguing that Japan might occupy the Russian Far East. Overall though the main problem with his reasoning is he desperately wants to believe concepts like “Western” and “Jeffersonian” mean anything at all.

Dick Ripple
May 19, 2021

Vivian Darkbloom posted:

This guy is dumb as hell and it couldn’t be more obvious. Aside from all the corny remarks about nefarious environmental regulations and these darn kids today, he clearly views history like a video game, arguing that Japan might occupy the Russian Far East. Overall though the main problem with his reasoning is he desperately wants to believe concepts like “Western” and “Jeffersonian” mean anything at all.

He could work on his jokes a little more, and I think the environmental and kid stuff are part of that. The rest of what he has to say is nothing really new (from him and other academics/scholars on Russian history) and he just gives multiple scenarios of where this current war might lead Russia, but as he says, he has no idea what will happen and is just giving his ideas based on Russia's recent and past history. The problem he has is it is difficult to put a lifetime of learning about Russia into a less than 1 hour podcast/youtube that a general audience can understand or will sit and listen to.

Fish of hemp
Apr 1, 2011

A friendly little mouse!
He could write books or articles. Youtube podcasts are one of the worst mediums for complex political ideas.

PittTheElder
Feb 13, 2012

:geno: Yes, it's like a lava lamp.

I mean, he does also do that.

fatherboxx
Mar 25, 2013

Kraftwerk posted:

I just don't see how Ukraine can reconstitute itself and basically have 10:1 kill ratios

Do you have a source on that one?

Cpt_Obvious
Jun 18, 2007

You want someone to prove that a 10:1 kill ratio against a peer adversary is unlikely at best? Shouldn't such a statement be the baseline assumption and the opposite be the one to require proof?

Keisari
May 24, 2011

Cpt_Obvious posted:

You want someone to prove that a 10:1 kill ratio against a peer adversary is unlikely at best? Shouldn't such a statement be the baseline assumption and the opposite be the one to require proof?

I mean, with good enough gear and training it's more than possible... https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gulf_War

Yes, I know this isn't US and Iraq, but if the West finally pulled their heads out of their asses and gave Ukraine a lot of the good stuff, we could wrap this up in [training time for gear] + 3-6 months.

Kraftwerk
Aug 13, 2011
i do not have 10,000 bircoins, please stop asking

Keisari posted:

I mean, with good enough gear and training it's more than possible... https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gulf_War

Yes, I know this isn't US and Iraq, but if the West finally pulled their heads out of their asses and gave Ukraine a lot of the good stuff, we could wrap this up in [training time for gear] + 3-6 months.

Yeah if the west wanted to end this they should’ve ended it when Ukraine took back Kharkiv. Instead they had Ukraine fight this war with one hand tied behind their back then cut them off from any support for 6 months. In the meantime Russia adapted to almost every tactic and is now slowly and methodically inflicting casualties on Ukraine that it can ill afford to replace while mounting a 400k strong army that can spread out across a vast frontier.

Setting aside ideology for a moment that whole counter attack last summer was highly telegraphed and ill advised. Russia had heavily prepared positions and had a turkey shoot on western equipment.

It’s not the Ukrainians’ fault they couldn’t pierce the Surovkin line. It’s the West’s fault for pressuring Ukraine into some kind of decisive battle everyone knew they’d lose because they had like 1/4th the equipment they needed to execute on it. They were given an ultimatum to show results and they simply lost a lot of a good men instead. Since then they’ve continuously taken casualties. Yes those casualties favoured Ukraine while they still had ammunition. But when Russia can just send more meat into the grinder while Ukraine ostensibly will run out of troops before Russia does wtf good does that do you?


Now Ukraine risks a battlefield defeat because they can’t even hold their lines anymore because the support came too late and you can’t raise multiple brigades from civilians over night and nobody wants to fight anymore. We’ll see if France is even gonna bother trying to relieve Kiyiv if it comes to that but the way I see it the country is getting partitioned in half and everyone’s just gonna have to make their peace with that. Putin played us all. His lovely army rebuilt itself into a slightly less lovely army and he moonwalked past all the sanctions to rebuild some kind of standoff capability while the west still can’t keep up.

It could if it wanted to. But they obviously don’t wanna risk escalation by doing the needful and allowing Ukraine to decisively win this conflict. Clearly there is a red line here somewhere and they won’t cross it out of fear or selfishness. The blood of every dead Ukrainian is on the hands of all of NATO and particular on the hands of Trump and his GOP stooges.

d64
Jan 15, 2003
Will we be seeing more calls for sending troops to Ukraine in some function? At this point even starting to talk about it more and more seriously could be a risky move, since I think there's a lot of people who support material aid but would see that as a step way too far.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Dick Ripple
May 19, 2021
Besides special forces/advisors/observers, there is a zero chance we will see US or EU country combat units on the ground in Ukraine. It just will not happen unless Russia is officially at war with NATO. The only plausible scenario I could see of NATO personel in Ukraine performing combat roles would be 'volunteer' pilots in 'donated' planes, similar to Soviet volunteer pilots during the Korean war.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply