|
Pick posted:lmao at the men who get obsessed with a woman they don't even know and think she must be perfect and obsess over her for the rest of their lives, never even knowing that she bounces checks and loves anime wow, I can't wait to show her my Fullmetal Alchemist fan fiction
|
#
?
Jul 30, 2017 18:57
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 28, 2024 01:14 |
|
|
Be cremated and baked into the food served at the wake. At the wake's conclusion play a prerecorded message wherein I explain that I'll be with them forever, and why. Cackle madly from beyond the grave.
|
|
#
?
Jul 30, 2017 18:57
|
|
|
"i love this random girl!!!" random girl: *drawing detailed graphic of dog penises in the 'omegaverse' supernatural fan fiction alternate reality* "cloacal womb"
|
|
#
?
Jul 30, 2017 19:00
|
|
|
"shake my lower abdomen" C'mon dude, you're not fooling anyone with that phrasing.
|
|
#
?
Jul 30, 2017 19:02
|
|
Cat Army
|
dudeness posted:"shake my lower abdomen" technically it's a panniculus bet that perfect and undoubtedly beautiful 22 year old woman would be all over that panniculus she'd love me, and the panniculus our child shall be named Gunty
|
|
#
?
Jul 30, 2017 19:03
|
|
|
The baby thing is weird and would put me off as well
|
|
#
?
Jul 30, 2017 19:06
|
|
|
Pick posted:technically it's a panniculus "Guntilda" if it's a girl
|
|
#
?
Jul 30, 2017 19:10
|
|
|
Pick posted:technically it's a panniculus This is somehow grosser than your dog dick fan fic post, well done. He does describe the 22 year old as a better friend than his wife though, so maybe they actually do know each other? Surely no one would use that phrasing for someone he barely knows.
|
|
#
?
Jul 30, 2017 19:10
|
|
|
dudeness posted:This is somehow grosser than your dog dick fan fic post, well done. yes, surely no one has ever been deluded about their level of connectedness with a person they very much wanted to pork
|
|
#
?
Jul 30, 2017 19:12
|
|
|
Pick posted:funeral homes do cremations. where do you think it is done. crematories are part of funeral homes man. margin on cremations is like 1/5-half that of burial so even the family funeral homes will try to upsell you
|
|
#
?
Jul 30, 2017 19:21
|
|
|
Outrail posted:Dude lost his virginity at age 27 to his long distance girlfriend. Relevent? it's phrased in a confusing way but I'm reasonably sure the long distance bit was four years ago when he was 23 what you're implying is still probably relevant
|
|
#
?
Jul 30, 2017 19:25
|
|
|
He was 22 in love with a 17 year old, but takes issue with his current girlfriend trying to legally gently caress him as a baby.
|
|
#
?
Jul 30, 2017 19:30
|
|
|
Short and sweet. (New York) Girlfriend is pregnant. I want the baby, she wants to give up for adoption. What does the law say? quote:My girlfriend is 5 months pregnant and we can't seem to be able to agree on what to do with the baby. I absolutely want this child and want to be a father however she wants to give up the child for adoption to a couple that she has found. (New York) Girlfriend is pregnant. I want the baby, she wants to give up for adoption. What does the law say? (Update) quote:I guess it's time for me to post an update to this post. I don't have a happy update however. So much has happened.
|
|
#
?
Jul 30, 2017 20:16
|
|
|
Dunning Krugerrand posted:Short and sweet. I need to know how old the other guy and his wife are. Any takes on 'Guy is late 30's, wife is late 20's/early 30's and they got married about 5 years previously?
|
|
#
?
Jul 30, 2017 20:25
|
|
|
Dunning Krugerrand posted:(New York) Girlfriend is pregnant. I want the baby, she wants to give up for adoption. What does the law say? (Update)  What is it with these entitled womb-jackers, anyway?
|
|
#
?
Jul 30, 2017 20:29
|
|
|
Absurd Alhazred posted:
Are you angry at the girl, the guy or the other guy in this scenario?
|
|
#
?
Jul 30, 2017 20:30
|
|
|
Outrail posted:Are you angry at the girl, the guy or the other guy in this scenario? The guy. I mean, good thing in this case it didn't work out for him because it turns out he wasn't the father after all, but you know after they'd break up he'd file for custody and then child support. For all I know the other guy was why she wasn't just getting an abortion, but if they ended up moving in together I guess it's different.
|
|
#
?
Jul 30, 2017 20:33
|
|
|
Absurd Alhazred posted:The guy. I mean, good thing in this case it didn't work out for him because it turns out he wasn't the father after all, but you know after they'd break up he'd file for custody and then child support. Wow.
|
|
#
?
Jul 30, 2017 20:42
|
|
|
"I'm using a lawyer to force this woman I think I impregnated to do what I want with this fetus she's bringing to term" is never going to have my sympathy. 
|
|
#
?
Jul 30, 2017 20:43
|
|
|
what? is it a bad thing if the father wants it instead of it being adopted? e: oh wait didnt read the whole thing and believed they where already broken up datajugend fucked around with this message at 20:48 on Jul 30, 2017 |
|
#
?
Jul 30, 2017 20:45
|
|
|
datajugend posted:what? is it a bad thing if the father wants it instead of it being adopted? Yeah, unless he adopts it. Otherwise the next update is going to be "well, I need all this financial help, so I'm going to file for child support, thanks Reddit!"
|
|
#
?
Jul 30, 2017 20:46
|
|
|
Absurd Alhazred posted:"I'm using a lawyer to force this woman I think I impregnated to do what I want with this fetus she's bringing to term" is never going to have my sympathy. Adoption is not abortion and he is one of the parents. It would be an extremely hosed up state of affairs if one parent could unilaterally put a child up for adoption.
|
|
#
?
Jul 30, 2017 20:47
|
|
|
Did I misread something? She wasn't pushing for an abortion in the first place. It's her right to choose whether to carry a fetus to term but I don't know of any places that allow a mother to terminate the father's parental rights after the baby is born without his consent. I guess she could have said "irrevocably give up your rights in advance or I'm getting an abortion" but that's not what the story claimed.
|
|
#
?
Jul 30, 2017 20:49
|
|
|
Getting deja vu here
|
|
#
?
Jul 30, 2017 20:49
|
|
Tater Love 
|
Nowhere can you legally force a woman to take a baby to term. She was trying to adopt the baby out, without his consent.
|
|
#
?
Jul 30, 2017 20:49
|
|
|
TOOT BOOT posted:Adoption is not abortion and he is one of the parents. It would be an extremely hosed up state of affairs if one parent could unilaterally put a child up for adoption. He just provided the semen (or, rather, thought he did). She's the one carrying this fetus into a baby and taking on all the medical risk this entails.
|
|
#
?
Jul 30, 2017 20:49
|
|
|
andrew smash posted:Did I misread something? She wasn't pushing for an abortion in the first place. It's her right to choose whether to carry a fetus to term but I don't know of any places that allow a mother to terminate the father's parental rights after the baby is born without his consent. I guess she could have said "irrevocably give up your rights in advance or I'm getting an abortion" but that's not what the story claimed. That's the opposite of what I'm saying.
|
|
#
?
Jul 30, 2017 20:50
|
|
|
Absurd Alhazred posted:He just provided the semen (or, rather, thought he did). She's the one carrying this fetus into a baby and taking on all the medical risk this entails. That's irrelevant once the baby is born. You can't bypass the other parent and give the baby to a third party if you're the mother.
|
|
#
?
Jul 30, 2017 20:52
|
|
|
What are you saying then?
|
|
#
?
Jul 30, 2017 20:52
|
|
|
Absurd Alhazred posted:He just provided the semen (or, rather, thought he did). She's the one carrying this fetus into a baby and taking on all the medical risk this entails. If you got to rewrite the legal system, at what point in the child's life should this risk stop being a trump card that let's her unilaterally terminate the father's parental rights? 6 mos? A year? 18?
|
|
#
?
Jul 30, 2017 20:53
|
|
|
coin operated spermbank boy shoo shoo
|
|
#
?
Jul 30, 2017 20:53
|
|
|
TOOT BOOT posted:That's irrelevant once the baby is born. You can't bypass the other parent and give the baby to a third party if you're the mother. That's not what I'm saying. I'm saying if he wants to have parental rights, he should adopt the baby. He, who thought he provided the semen for this pregnancy, wanted to force her hand as to whether she has parental duties toward this child. That's my problem. It's lopsided. Pac-Manioc Root posted:If you got to rewrite the legal system, at what point in the child's life should this risk stop being a trump card that let's her unilaterally terminate the father's parental rights? 6 mos? A year? 18? Whatever it is should prevent that bullshit we had a few dozens of pages ago where this rear end in a top hat forced his ex to keep the baby rather than give it out for adoption, and after she gave him full custody sued her for child support.
|
|
#
?
Jul 30, 2017 20:54
|
|
|
andrew smash posted:Did I misread something? She wasn't pushing for an abortion in the first place. It's her right to choose whether to carry a fetus to term but I don't know of any places that allow a mother to terminate the father's parental rights after the baby is born without his consent. I guess she could have said "irrevocably give up your rights in advance or I'm getting an abortion" but that's not what the story claimed. Like to me it seems like deciding 1 month in that you wanna terminate the baby or adopt it out is basically the same thing, and it's kinda weird that the father gets a say in one situation but not the other. It's not like if she chooses adopt he has to spend the next 8 months carrying the baby himself or do anything differently, yet suddenly he gets more rights.
|
|
#
?
Jul 30, 2017 20:57
|
|
|
I think this dude did the right thing through and through
|
|
#
?
Jul 30, 2017 21:00
|
|
|
More like Absurd Adoptodad
|
|
#
?
Jul 30, 2017 21:01
|
|
|
Wonder how many pro-lifers understand that adoption is literally not an option for women if your drunken 1 night stand digs his heels in lol.
|
|
#
?
Jul 30, 2017 21:02
|
|
|
ArbitraryC posted:I feel like this should be an option but legally it is not. I think you're forgetting that at one point it's not a human being, and then later it becomes an actual human being.
|
|
#
?
Jul 30, 2017 21:03
|
|
|
Absurd Alhazred posted:That's not what I'm saying. I'm saying if he wants to have parental rights, he should adopt the baby. He, who thought he provided the semen for this pregnancy, wanted to force her hand as to whether she has parental duties toward this child. That's my problem. It's lopsided. Is this for real? I'm not familiar with the prior conversation. That kid deserves child support you doofus. Just like if the roles were reversed.
|
|
#
?
Jul 30, 2017 21:03
|
|
|
Absurd Alhazred posted:That's not what I'm saying. I'm saying if he wants to have parental rights, he should adopt the baby. He, who thought he provided the semen for this pregnancy, wanted to force her hand as to whether she has parental duties toward this child. That's my problem. It's lopsided. At what age should the woman lose the ability to unilaterally terminate both his and her parental rights? Or should it go all the way to 18? Also when I die, don't put me in the ground. Either do something useful with my body, or do something hilarious. I would prefer that you not gently caress my body, but eh, what do I care?
|
|
#
?
Jul 30, 2017 21:08
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 28, 2024 01:14 |
|
|
ArbitraryC posted:I feel like this should be an option but legally it is not. Biology is unfair. Her body, her choice.
|
|
#
?
Jul 30, 2017 21:08
|
|
