|
rotor posted:insipid nerd fantasy dialogues leave my posting history out of this
|
# ? Sep 6, 2012 15:41 |
|
|
# ? Jun 12, 2024 06:21 |
|
tef posted:to fullfil what seems to my gimmick of bulk posting, they found the video of my talk, and are transcoding them pls post this or tweet this or something when it's up
|
# ? Sep 6, 2012 15:41 |
|
Shaggar posted:heres the point:
|
# ? Sep 6, 2012 15:44 |
|
rotor posted:im a busy, handsome man with no time for insipid nerd fantasy dialogues, get to the point chucklefucks THIS THIS THIS THIS FOREVER.
|
# ? Sep 6, 2012 16:00 |
|
syntaxrigger posted:this so hard! tbf i could listen to you and rotor talk about anything programming related for a substantial length of time Tiny Bug Child posted:pls post this or tweet this or something when it's up as if I'd miss an opportunity to go 'look at me, I have opinions'
|
# ? Sep 6, 2012 16:02 |
|
tef posted:basically I thought godël escher bach was a wanky book it's a bit wanky but i liked it; it inspired me to actually study computer science instead of just eat poo poo and do php html janitorial services
|
# ? Sep 6, 2012 17:10 |
|
Shaggar posted:heres the point: what do you mean by p languages?
|
# ? Sep 6, 2012 17:29 |
|
python, php, ruby
|
# ? Sep 6, 2012 17:29 |
|
syntaxrigger posted:what do you mean by p languages? languages that are better than java
|
# ? Sep 6, 2012 17:32 |
|
syntaxrigger posted:what do you mean by p languages? Jonny 290 posted:python, php, ruby
|
# ? Sep 6, 2012 17:37 |
|
what does the p stand for then? or do you think it is spelled pruby?
|
# ? Sep 6, 2012 18:19 |
syntaxrigger posted:what does the p stand for then? or do you think it is spelled pruby? "ruby is an honorary p language." --shaggar
|
|
# ? Sep 6, 2012 18:21 |
|
an R is a P with a crutch
|
# ? Sep 6, 2012 18:21 |
|
gucci void main posted:"ruby is an honorary p language." i heard a lecture on iTunes U where the professor called ruby a p-language. so i guess shaggar was right?
|
# ? Sep 6, 2012 18:22 |
|
Pardot posted:an R is a P with a crutch lmao, the best explanation. Ok I am up to speed carry on
|
# ? Sep 6, 2012 18:23 |
mjs6643 posted:i heard a lecture on iTunes U where the professor called ruby a p-language. so i guess shaggar was right? Professor Shaggar, PhD.
|
|
# ? Sep 6, 2012 18:30 |
|
Pardot posted:an R is a P with a crutch nicely done
|
# ? Sep 6, 2012 18:31 |
|
Pardot posted:an R is a P with a crutch
|
# ? Sep 6, 2012 18:31 |
|
syntaxrigger posted:lmao, the best explanation. Ok I am up to speed carry on https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lsWKjS6Vufw
|
# ? Sep 6, 2012 18:32 |
|
|
# ? Sep 6, 2012 18:35 |
|
|
# ? Sep 6, 2012 18:38 |
|
gucci void main posted:Professor Shaggar, PhD. i dunno, he then proceeded to start a php and say php was better than compiled languages cause it's "fast enough" and "gets the job done quicker"
|
# ? Sep 6, 2012 18:41 |
|
mjs6643 posted:i dunno, he then proceeded to start a php and say php was better than compiled languages cause it's "fast enough" and "gets the job done quicker" a... a non-useless academic?
|
# ? Sep 6, 2012 18:58 |
|
php's fast if you shotgun out spaghetti code and don't have to maintain it later, yes. if you need to actually edit something and possibly pass it along to another person you can't get much more readability than sensibly-written Perl. you might want to investigate it
|
# ? Sep 6, 2012 19:01 |
|
perl is only slightly more readable than Linear B
|
# ? Sep 6, 2012 19:06 |
|
quote:Hello monks,
|
# ? Sep 6, 2012 19:07 |
|
Say it ain't so jonny
|
# ? Sep 6, 2012 19:09 |
|
Jonny 290 posted:
what the gently caress is this
|
# ? Sep 6, 2012 19:13 |
|
Jonny 290 posted:php's fast if you shotgun out spaghetti code and don't have to maintain it later, yes. i don't think i've ever written production code that wasn't in java or c#
|
# ? Sep 6, 2012 19:13 |
|
python is really good at being readable imo, but then again readability in any language increases as you get better at it so w/e
|
# ? Sep 6, 2012 19:23 |
|
mjs6643 posted:i don't think i've ever written production code that wasn't in java or c# thats b/c you cant do it in other languages (except maybe old dead ones like c/c++)
|
# ? Sep 6, 2012 19:24 |
|
yaoi prophet posted:what the gently caress is this trash, thats what it is
|
# ? Sep 6, 2012 19:26 |
|
Shaggar posted:thats b/c you cant do it in other languages (except maybe old dead ones like c/c++) a gimp calling normal people zombies. classic shaggarposting
|
# ? Sep 6, 2012 19:30 |
|
i dunno, java and c# are pretty cool and we only use stored procs on our team.
|
# ? Sep 6, 2012 19:31 |
|
|
# ? Sep 6, 2012 19:31 |
|
oh great, more people whose code is so fragile they have to prop it up with the type system
|
# ? Sep 6, 2012 19:50 |
|
it would make more sense if it were at least a good type system
|
# ? Sep 6, 2012 19:56 |
|
tef posted:oh great, more people whose code is so fragile they have to prop it up with the type system it's cool tho. we have eclipse and intellij for autocomplete
|
# ? Sep 6, 2012 20:01 |
|
Otto Skorzeny posted:it would make more sense if it were at least a good type system for me, more clevery type thingys like generics seem to add type safety at the expense of simplicity. i guess it's from watching the erlang camp with a priority on fault tolerance over correctness, and also an optional type checker for offline analysis. i'm beginning to think that types should just be arbitrary code. essentially, pre/post conditions. it's kinda useful to say 'this sort of pattern', like a regex for a string. or a constraint on a number (within a range). you can do clever things like eliminating these at compile time, and leaving them as runtime checks otherwise. as if the compiler removed assertions, only when it could show they held. http://sage.soe.ucsc.edu/sage-tr.pdf or maybe I just want a language with prolog as the type system
|
# ? Sep 6, 2012 20:04 |
|
|
# ? Jun 12, 2024 06:21 |
|
mjs6643 posted:i dunno, java and c# are pretty cool and we only use stored procs on our team. SHAGGAR ALT ACCOUNT SPOTTED!!
|
# ? Sep 6, 2012 20:08 |