Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
etalian
Mar 20, 2006

lol

https://www.wsj.com/articles/silicon-valley-explores-a-new-investment-your-home-1518955201

quote:

Some well-funded startups have an unusual pitch for homeowners strapped for cash: Let’s own this house together.

A handful of companies, including those backed by marquee Silicon Valley names such as Andreessen Horowitz and Mark Zuckerberg’s philanthropic organization, are experimenting with a product that essentially lets them take an ownership position in a house along with the homeowner. The agreements, called shared-equity contracts, provide a new way for investors to get exposure to rising home prices across the U.S.

Shared-equity products are aimed at new buyers who need help with a down payment, or current homeowners looking for an alternative to a cash-out mortgage refinancing or a home-equity loan. The first use has caught the attention of mortgage-finance giant Freddie Mac , which recently agreed to buy loans on properties where one firm, Unison Agreement Corp. , contributes to the down payment.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Lightning Lord
Feb 21, 2013

$200 a day, plus expenses

How to lose a home in ten days

Shear Modulus
Jun 9, 2010




wait how exactly is this different from a mortgage

logikv9
Mar 5, 2009


Ham Wrangler

Shear Modulus posted:

wait how exactly is this different from a mortgage

*puts on turtleneck and glasses, stands up on a large stage with a powerpoint slide of happy white people looking at a smartphone in a brightly lit living room* apps

Charles 2 of Spain
Nov 7, 2017

Also, blockchain.

Prav
Oct 29, 2011

Shear Modulus posted:

wait how exactly is this different from a mortgage

banks fail to disrupt the regulatory paradigm

Prav
Oct 29, 2011

Prav posted:

banks fail to disrupt the regulatory paradigm

lol no they don't

dont be mean to me
May 2, 2007

I'm interplanetary, bitch
Let's go to Mars


Shear Modulus posted:

wait how exactly is this different from a mortgage

i ain't paying for no wall street journal, but i'm guessing that this way there isn't even the pretext that you'll eventually own and control your house

etalian
Mar 20, 2006

dont be mean to me posted:

i ain't paying for no wall street journal, but i'm guessing that this way there isn't even the pretext that you'll eventually own and control your house

instead of wall street bankers kicking you out of your house it will Russ Hanneman

Epic High Five
Jun 5, 2004



wrong drat thread again

Egg Moron
Jul 21, 2003

the dreams of the delighting void

Isn't there some way to implode all of this blockchain and mortgage backed securities and tesla batteries and rockets to mars into some kind of self-sustaining financial singularity? Like the kind of thing that powers a Romulan star ship? Has anyone been looking into that?

Dawncloack
Nov 26, 2007
ECKS DEE!
Nap Ghost
Does anyone know enough about the Open Banking directive in the EU to tell me what it will look like in practice?

As in, it's the EU, I know the result will be an ultracapitalist hell. I want to know how to protect my self and my not tech-savvy parents.

Sheng-Ji Yang
Mar 5, 2014



https://twitter.com/a16z_intern/status/726135648843907072

Fat-Lip-Sum-41.mp3
Nov 15, 2003

Larry Parrish posted:

Imo Gov. Brown should mobilize the CA NG to go burn all the almond plantations. Especially that one rear end in a top hat who owns so many he uses more water than LA

And Gray Davis should have mobilized the CA NG to keep the power plants from shutting down for no reason.

CA consistently turns down golden opportunities for socialism.

nah
Mar 16, 2009

when Silicon Valley isn't reinventing the bus every week, they're going after mortgages

Cinnamon Bear
Aug 29, 2016

by FactsAreUseless
I thought their newest scam was pushing for a return of company towns

Pick
Jul 19, 2009
Nap Ghost

Cinnamon Bear posted:

I thought their newest scam was pushing for a return of company towns

they can multitask!

PIZZA.BAT
Nov 12, 2016


:cheers:


Over Easy posted:

Isn't there some way to implode all of this blockchain and mortgage backed securities and tesla batteries and rockets to mars into some kind of self-sustaining financial singularity? Like the kind of thing that powers a Romulan star ship? Has anyone been looking into that?

the fed continuing to raise rates basically does this, yeah

Karl Barks
Jan 21, 1981

Shear Modulus posted:

wait how exactly is this different from a mortgage

you don't own the full percentage of the house even when it's paid off. the bank or whatever presumably will still have some percentage ownership of the house. if it's sold, they get a cut

Shear Modulus
Jun 9, 2010



Karl Barks posted:

you don't own the full percentage of the house even when it's paid off. the bank or whatever presumably will still have some percentage ownership of the house. if it's sold, they get a cut

lol that owns

logikv9
Mar 5, 2009


Ham Wrangler
mortgages, but worse

Karl Barks
Jan 21, 1981

not sure how funding start ups that make financial products qualifies as philanthropic

rudatron
May 31, 2011

by Fluffdaddy
They'll probably charge rent forever on their half as well, so basically you take out a mortgage, and you're still renting when you finish

rudatron
May 31, 2011

by Fluffdaddy
Next up: kickstarter but its your landlord

Sheng-Ji Yang
Mar 5, 2014


Karl Barks posted:

not sure how funding start ups that make financial products qualifies as philanthropic

i mean they managed to make microloans come across as charitable so

Karl Barks
Jan 21, 1981

maybe, i can't get the details because i won't give wsj a penny

PIZZA.BAT
Nov 12, 2016


:cheers:


Sheng-Ji Yang posted:

i mean they managed to make microloans come across as charitable so

lol i forgot about this

SSJ_naruto_2003
Oct 12, 2012



What are you talking about? The whole Zidashi thing or

Ruzihm
Aug 11, 2010

Group up and push mid, proletariat!


Kiva I think. Although afaik everyone does 0% interest on kiva these days

VitalSigns
Sep 3, 2011

Shear Modulus posted:

wait how exactly is this different from a mortgage

When you sell the house in a few decades you have to pay the bank/SV/whoever a chunk of your equity. Since home prices have probably appreciated a lot since you bought the house, you now owe many times the original loan amount and can't afford to buy another one. You are now trapped and can't move.

VitalSigns fucked around with this message at 12:23 on Feb 19, 2018

NightGyr
Mar 7, 2005
I � Unicode

Ruzihm posted:

Kiva I think. Although afaik everyone does 0% interest on kiva these days

The people contributing to kiva ask for 0%. Kiva takes 15-30% from the recipients.

Duscat
Jan 4, 2009
Fun Shoe

VitalSigns posted:

When you sell the house in a few decades you have to pay the bank/SV/whoever a chunk of your equity. Since home prices have probably appreciated a lot since you bought the house, you now owe many times the original loan amount and can't afford to buy another one. You are now trapped and can't move.

wtf why in god's name would anybody do this

helocs are one thing, but why would you effectively short your own house

Ghost Leviathan
Mar 2, 2017

Exploration is ill-advised.

Duscat posted:

wtf why in god's name would anybody do this

helocs are one thing, but why would you effectively short your own house

Someone who sounded very smart told you it would make you money.

Rustybear
Nov 16, 2006
what the thunder said
Shared mortgages have been a thing in the UK for a while now and like a lot of financial products for certain specific circumstances* they make a lot of sense.

The idea is that for a first time buyer on a leasehold property (ie. an apartment) paying off the principal and taking full ownership of the property is not the real objective; the objective is to get out of the rent trap and take advantage of a rising market so as to flip a ‘starter’ property into it into a family home etc.

With a shared mortgage split 70:30 between some financial organisation and the occupier, the occupier makes the interest only payment on the 70% (the ‘rent’)* and then makes full capital repayment (or not as they choose) on the 30%. This set up therefore should* yield a considerably smaller monthly repayment on the same property than a ‘full’ mortgage.

The other upside for the occupier is that they have a proportionally smaller mortgage deposit* (and therefore can get out of the rent trap much sooner) and can complete the capital repayment much faster both meaning that they then have much more capital/saving power available to flip into their next mortgage.

The notional downsides for the occupier are minimal* as they are taking on the same risks (interest rate rise, market slowdown etc.) as any other mortgage holder; the hidden downside is that if you’re unable to leave the property for any reason you’re stuck paying ‘rent’ forever (likely at above market rates if the bottom falls out altogether).

Most people are willing to chance the latter ‘market collapse’ risk in the UK as the bottom falling out of our housing market would be the end of civil society here; in the US where markets are both more volatile and more resilient you'd need to be much more wary.

The whole thing only works for the occupier if they’re not planning on staying in the property for any significant length of time and if the ‘rent’ payment is managed and regulated in a way that is equitable. Without being extensively and aggressively regulated (!) it’s open to about a million possible avenues for abuse.



*in a properly regulated market.

Rustybear
Nov 16, 2006
what the thunder said
What I'm really saying is you can expect to see elderly widowed grandmothers being encouraged onto these products as a precursor to their bank accounts being cracked like an egg.

MODS CURE JOKES
Nov 11, 2009

OFFICIAL SAS 90s REMEMBERER
Dead cat bounce time y'all

Egg Moron
Jul 21, 2003

the dreams of the delighting void

Rex-Goliath posted:

the fed continuing to raise rates basically does this, yeah

So the "containment field" is the set of policies which keep money out of the hands of the working class?

Larry Parrish
Jul 9, 2012

by Jeffrey of YOSPOS

Rustybear posted:

Shared mortgages have been a thing in the UK for a while now and like a lot of financial products for certain specific circumstances* they make a lot of sense.

The idea is that for a first time buyer on a leasehold property (ie. an apartment) paying off the principal and taking full ownership of the property is not the real objective; the objective is to get out of the rent trap and take advantage of a rising market so as to flip a ‘starter’ property into it into a family home etc.

With a shared mortgage split 70:30 between some financial organisation and the occupier, the occupier makes the interest only payment on the 70% (the ‘rent’)* and then makes full capital repayment (or not as they choose) on the 30%. This set up therefore should* yield a considerably smaller monthly repayment on the same property than a ‘full’ mortgage.

The other upside for the occupier is that they have a proportionally smaller mortgage deposit* (and therefore can get out of the rent trap much sooner) and can complete the capital repayment much faster both meaning that they then have much more capital/saving power available to flip into their next mortgage.

The notional downsides for the occupier are minimal* as they are taking on the same risks (interest rate rise, market slowdown etc.) as any other mortgage holder; the hidden downside is that if you’re unable to leave the property for any reason you’re stuck paying ‘rent’ forever (likely at above market rates if the bottom falls out altogether).

Most people are willing to chance the latter ‘market collapse’ risk in the UK as the bottom falling out of our housing market would be the end of civil society here; in the US where markets are both more volatile and more resilient you'd need to be much more wary.

The whole thing only works for the occupier if they’re not planning on staying in the property for any significant length of time and if the ‘rent’ payment is managed and regulated in a way that is equitable. Without being extensively and aggressively regulated (!) it’s open to about a million possible avenues for abuse.



*in a properly regulated market.

Ah, the typical Ponzi scheme then

Larry Parrish
Jul 9, 2012

by Jeffrey of YOSPOS
Its really funny how many financial products really only work for the early adopters and are a debt trap for anyone else. Hmm. Makes you think

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

ikanreed
Sep 25, 2009

I honestly I have no idea who cannibal[SIC] is and I do not know why I should know.

syq dude, just syq!

MODS CURE JOKES posted:

Dead cat bounce time y'all

As has been pointed out a billion times, dead cat bounce refers to the small upward correction after losing all the value it's going to lose.

As in even a dead cat will go up a bit if you drop it out a ten story window

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5