|
Drone posted:Hey better get on Air Force One quick because uhhh: If anyone's interested: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gyIoPJoja5s&t=540s Hard to hear with the sound of the helicopter and nothing too surprising said, from what I heard. He first complained about big tech, responded to a reporter's question about what he said last Wednesday was totally appropriate, then took off. E: Have a baby ocelot for the new page: Kalit fucked around with this message at 16:54 on Jan 12, 2021 |
# ? Jan 12, 2021 16:49 |
|
|
# ? May 29, 2024 14:35 |
|
Jealous Cow posted:This would make such a fun derail but I’ll avoid kicking off a debate. Your position is interesting and I’d love to argue through it and see what shakes out. That's a good opportunity for me to create my first thread: https://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?threadid=3955262
|
# ? Jan 12, 2021 16:50 |
|
VitalSigns posted:Holy poo poo I'm sure their conscience tells them to retain power no matter what and the best way to do that is to placate Trump's base. I would love to be wrong though.
|
# ? Jan 12, 2021 16:50 |
|
VitalSigns posted:Holy poo poo I mean, it's significant in the fact that the last time showed an ironclad wall of Republican defense. It's basically allowing Rs the ability to make their own choice regarding whether they go down with the ship.
|
# ? Jan 12, 2021 16:50 |
|
Aramis posted:Anti-hacking laws are weird, but this is not outlandish. The law doesn't care how good of a job you do at securing your system, it only cares about whether someone intentionally bypasses whatever measures you have in place. It's kind of stupid from a technical level, but it at least makes things very clear from a legal standpoint. This was literally the case that established the precedent question about whether public URLs that were easily available but not linked consisted of enough of a security system to pass that test. weev became a cause celebrate because of it with a lot of EFF types signing on to defend him because of the precedent the case was setting. He lost and so now it is!
|
# ? Jan 12, 2021 16:50 |
|
LeeMajors posted:His whole loving life has been on Easy Mode and he can't help but just pat himself on the head like a Good Boy™ at all times. He has to find it wherever he can because Fred never hugged him or told Donnie he loved him, ever.
|
# ? Jan 12, 2021 16:51 |
|
How is this possible? I was under the impression that anytime the president travels anywhere there’s an advance team, lots of preparations are made, etc. I realize the current administration is not exactly a well oiled machine, but I would think that institutions around it, such as the secret service, would take care of some of this.
|
# ? Jan 12, 2021 16:51 |
|
SocketWrench posted:I'd take this with a grain of salt. It's from August, Trump hadn't launched a coup yet. Trump and the Republican Party has been gutting benefits to service members but just awful, terrible, myopic rear end backwards foreign policy decisions that absolutely no one likes from the dumbest marines to the oldest crustiest Generals. There's some good reddit threads on more specifics but the military is absolutely not a fan of Trump.
|
# ? Jan 12, 2021 16:53 |
|
Crini posted:I realize the current administration is not exactly a well oiled machine, but I would think that institutions around it, such as the secret service, would take care of some of this. Nothing is well oiled under Trump and its unsurprising that even the Secret Service is feeling the crunch of Trumpism breaking everything.
|
# ? Jan 12, 2021 16:53 |
|
Tibalt posted:I still doubt the Senate convicts at this point unless Trump keeps starting poo poo. I expect McConnell will stall things out until after inauguration, which will then give republican senators cover to argue that it's moot and vote against, thereby not enraging the chuds but also having a socially acceptable excuse
|
# ? Jan 12, 2021 16:53 |
|
Xaerael posted:IDK if it's been posted, but a second bank is with Trump & chums Yes, Trump and his supporters basically made him plutonium. No one wants to handle him...well except for Republicans because this is team politics. I mean really, what is sedition and a failed coup attempt in the grand scheme of things anyways?
|
# ? Jan 12, 2021 16:54 |
|
...how can you vote on something you don't have?
|
# ? Jan 12, 2021 16:57 |
|
Tibalt posted:It does indicate a general decision by Republican congressional leaders that trying to shield Trump isn't worthwhile. A lot depends on whether there's another attack at any of these state-level nazi rallies or if there's innocent blood spilled at the inauguration. If they blow up a school bus or something, I can see republicans voting to convict.
|
# ? Jan 12, 2021 16:57 |
|
SocketWrench posted:Yes, Trump and his supporters basically made him plutonium. No one wants to handle him...well except for Republicans because this is team politics. I mean really, what is sedition and a failed coup attempt in the grand scheme of things anyways? When your entire party is basically a rehash of the last seditionist movement that cursed the country, why should sedition matter? The Party of Lincoln is also The Party of the Confederacy.
|
# ? Jan 12, 2021 16:57 |
|
Freudian slippers posted:It sure looks like him and Norris is a confirmed ultraconservative. Anyone who hasn't should go to youtube and search for 'Chuck Norris 1000 years of darkness' It's an infomercial that aired nationally where he says that electing Obama as president will bring on the end times and destroy the world. That's pretty much when I stopped considering conservatives rational.
|
# ? Jan 12, 2021 16:58 |
|
CommieGIR posted:When your entire party is basically a rehash of the last seditionist movement that cursed the country, why should sedition matter? The Party of Lincoln is also The Party of the Confederacy. Today they are, yes, but the Confederacy was largely Democratic and Lincoln was the only good Republican ever. Edit: maaaaaaaybe Eisenhower.
|
# ? Jan 12, 2021 16:58 |
|
https://twitter.com/samstein/status/1349022175731318784?s=09
|
# ? Jan 12, 2021 16:58 |
|
https://twitter.com/JanNWolfe/status/1349016018191081475 chud who killed the cop with a fire extinguisher has on a nice fire department beanie
|
# ? Jan 12, 2021 16:59 |
|
DarkCrawler posted:...how can you vote on something you don't have? You try to approximate it after research.
|
# ? Jan 12, 2021 16:59 |
|
Goons love to assume that all troops are chuds but the evidence suggests Trump's been bleeding military support since like mid 2017 or some poo poo The military sucks but it's it's own thing and the top brass have repeatedly blown Trump off.
|
# ? Jan 12, 2021 16:59 |
|
drat, this might reach Pelosi after all
|
# ? Jan 12, 2021 17:00 |
|
Quixotic1 posted:Anyone know where to look at what previous presidents did in their last weeks/lame duck period before new administrations take office? If it were me, I'd be achieving my goal of having sex in every room of the white house.
|
# ? Jan 12, 2021 17:00 |
|
BiggerBoat posted:Next it will be how we really shouldn't politicize this attack in the US Capitol something something both sides. Nothing like watching them march on the capitol to beat, gas, possibly capture, and kill people while chanting "TRUMP IS PRESIDENT, CHRIST IS KING!". In the long run, if there is a Christian god, I take enjoyment in knowing these fuckers are going straight to hell
|
# ? Jan 12, 2021 17:02 |
|
Qwertycoatl posted:I expect McConnell will stall things out until after inauguration, which will then give republican senators cover to argue that it's moot and vote against, thereby not enraging the chuds but also having a socially acceptable excuse Maybe? It's hard to say. Once inauguration passes, this trial becomes the ultra focus of the entire planet; with everything else going on, there may actually be less attention on the trial prior to inauguration, and McConnell would have no control afterwards.
|
# ? Jan 12, 2021 17:02 |
|
Chuck Fleischmann, our own Congressnazi (TN-3), has it as well. https://www.timesfreepress.com/news/local/story/2021/jan/10/fleischmann-covid-politics/539443/
|
# ? Jan 12, 2021 17:02 |
|
Groovelord Neato posted:Republicans are all whiny loving babies who need their diapers changed. You know, it's almost like if your boy and his gaggle of idiots hadn't tried to coup the US government you'd likely still have your honorary bullshit title
|
# ? Jan 12, 2021 17:04 |
|
Can't Pelosi just... remove all members who refuse to wear a mask? Bar entry to them? They removed people for wearing hoodies why not this?
|
# ? Jan 12, 2021 17:04 |
|
"If you continue to impeach me there will be violence." In the middle of an impeachment for launching a violent mob at Congress he, uh, threatens to launch a violent mob at Congress.
|
# ? Jan 12, 2021 17:05 |
|
Murgos posted:"If you continue to impeach me there will be violence." In the middle of an impeachment for launching a violent mob at Congress he, uh, threatens to launch a violent mob at Congress. There's going to be violence by alt right fucks matter what happens.
|
# ? Jan 12, 2021 17:08 |
|
Push El Burrito posted:Can't Pelosi just... remove all members who refuse to wear a mask? Bar entry to them? Temporarily bar entry on health and safety grounds maybe, but it takes 2/3 of the House or Senate to permanently remove someone from either body
|
# ? Jan 12, 2021 17:09 |
|
https://twitter.com/kaitlancollins/status/1349017323458453510?s=21
|
# ? Jan 12, 2021 17:10 |
|
This man is an existential threat to the loving planet jesus christ.
|
# ? Jan 12, 2021 17:11 |
|
Wait, has he never said that it was wrong for people to storm the capitol?
|
# ? Jan 12, 2021 17:11 |
|
Doctor Butts posted:Wait, has he never said that it was wrong for people to storm the capitol?
|
# ? Jan 12, 2021 17:12 |
|
Doctor Butts posted:Wait, has he never said that it was wrong for people to storm the capitol? He did basically by force but now he's walking it all back on whatever channels he has left before he strokes out at some point
|
# ? Jan 12, 2021 17:12 |
|
He can never be wrong. If he every shows contrition for anything he always walks it back moments later. Can we end the gaslighting. Why doesn't this tweet just, 'reporting' his words include a statement saying he's full of poo poo? So, loving exhausted of amplifying lies and hatred by giving it equal weight.
|
# ? Jan 12, 2021 17:14 |
|
BigBallChunkyTime posted:Today they are, yes, but the Confederacy was largely Democratic and Lincoln was the only good Republican ever. Yes and no. The party swap in the 1960s made that untrue: The Dems of the Civil War are the Republicans of today. This was the same argument that the GOP likes to throw around, but they themselves largely know where they came from.
|
# ? Jan 12, 2021 17:15 |
|
I swear, if any elected official ever again utters the words "Many people" as an excuse for their actions without a single citation... It's the one thing that's been pissing me off throughout the past 4 years. Why press haven't been just constantly following up every "many people" excuse with a loving simple "Like who, exactly?" will be forever beyond me.
|
# ? Jan 12, 2021 17:15 |
|
Xaerael posted:I swear, if any elected official ever again utters the words "Many people" as an excuse for their actions without a single citation... They have. He repeats "Many people. Experts. The best people, really" and then the cavalcade of bullshit continues unabated.
|
# ? Jan 12, 2021 17:18 |
|
|
# ? May 29, 2024 14:35 |
|
So far like 3-4 Democratic reps in the house have COVID right? Isn't this going to make the majority even more precarious due to their absence?
|
# ? Jan 12, 2021 17:20 |