|
Excessive Secretions What are these secretions, and how much does it take to officially classify as excessive amounts?
|
# ? Feb 3, 2017 01:24 |
|
|
# ? Jun 8, 2024 09:05 |
|
Slime posted:Excessive Secretions
|
# ? Feb 3, 2017 01:29 |
|
Hirayuki posted:Drooly vagina?
|
# ? Feb 3, 2017 02:15 |
|
If you're just too moist.
|
# ? Feb 3, 2017 02:20 |
|
Opiates can keep you from pooping.
|
# ? Feb 3, 2017 02:33 |
|
My favorite product placement is on American idol type shows in China. Instead of Pepsi cups on the judge table it's cooking oil or laundry detergent. I'm pretty sure it was once a bucket of gravel
Fauxtool has a new favorite as of 03:11 on Feb 3, 2017 |
# ? Feb 3, 2017 03:03 |
|
I'm bummed they didn't include the classic radium ad.
|
# ? Feb 3, 2017 05:12 |
|
hyperhazard posted:I'm bummed they didn't include the classic radium ad. Ah, so that's how I increase my sex power.
|
# ? Feb 3, 2017 05:32 |
|
|
# ? Feb 3, 2017 05:40 |
|
Platystemon posted:*Pictures of Radium-based contraception* To be fair, exposing your genitals to ionizing radiation is a quick and easy way to ensure sterility. (If you disregard the whole cancer and acute radiation sickness thing.)
|
# ? Feb 3, 2017 05:53 |
|
I'm sure it was pronounced 'nute-x' But I can only read it as nut-ex .... which makes sense given what it is
|
# ? Feb 3, 2017 06:07 |
|
I'm in this dumb IT program and all the transcender questions for the microsoft portions are based on a domain called nutex.com
|
# ? Feb 3, 2017 06:11 |
|
Portmanteau of “NUCLEAR LATEX” is my guess, but I think “nuclear” was technical jargon at the time. The wording of “put through special processes to grain greater sensitiveness” makes me think of the condom becoming empathetic and painting watercolours. Surely you want the genitals to be more sensitive, not the prophylactic.
|
# ? Feb 3, 2017 06:15 |
|
Did they glow in the dark, like other radium products?
|
# ? Feb 3, 2017 06:24 |
|
hyperhazard posted:I'm bummed they didn't include the classic radium ad. Hey, it's what the forums used to use.
|
# ? Feb 3, 2017 06:38 |
|
Platystemon posted:Portmanteau of “NUCLEAR LATEX” is my guess, but I think “nuclear” was technical jargon at the time. These days, the condoms say 'electronically tested' and I can't help but think that means they've been tested by two robots loving.
|
# ? Feb 3, 2017 10:11 |
|
hyperhazard posted:I'm bummed they didn't include the classic radium ad. Radium went in a lot of stuff. I came across this a few months ago while cleaning out my grandparents flat: Really wasn't sure how to best dispose of it...
|
# ? Feb 3, 2017 10:21 |
|
Degenerate Star posted:Did they glow in the dark, like other radium products?
|
# ? Feb 3, 2017 10:22 |
|
jojoinnit posted:
On ebay?
|
# ? Feb 3, 2017 10:25 |
|
Wait, I get the dyes and magic suppositories as Radium products, but wouldn't Radium burn holes in the latex? Presumably also your DNA, your partner's DNA, and the DNA of your germ cells, but most pressing for the very concept of a barrier contraceptive is the integrity of said barrier. I'm no physicist, but I don't know how ionizing radiation would help maintain a seal in an organic material sensitive to heat, friction, and UV
|
# ? Feb 3, 2017 10:34 |
|
The Door Frame posted:Wait, I get the dyes and magic suppositories as Radium products, but wouldn't Radium burn holes in the latex? Presumably also your DNA, your partner's DNA, and the DNA of your germ cells, but most pressing for the very concept of a barrier contraceptive is the integrity of said barrier. I'm no physicist, but I don't know how ionizing radiation would help maintain a seal in an organic material sensitive to heat, friction, and UV Hey, they tested the condoms extensively. Nobody got pregnant* while they were being used, so they clearly worked! * Pregnancy may have been prevented by sterilization via radiation.
|
# ? Feb 3, 2017 12:09 |
|
It'll drag your sperm countg down so lo it won't matter anymore. The best prevention for pregnancy is infertility.
|
# ? Feb 3, 2017 12:10 |
|
The Door Frame posted:Wait, I get the dyes and magic suppositories as Radium products, but wouldn't Radium burn holes in the latex? Presumably also your DNA, your partner's DNA, and the DNA of your germ cells, but most pressing for the very concept of a barrier contraceptive is the integrity of said barrier. I'm no physicist, but I don't know how ionizing radiation would help maintain a seal in an organic material sensitive to heat, friction, and UV Not holes as such, but if there was a significant amount it would make the latex brittle and friable over time. Similar to exposure to UV light.
|
# ? Feb 3, 2017 12:21 |
|
Krispy Kareem posted:There was a question on Quora asking how long it'd take for your pets to eat your slowly putrefying body. I am not in a hurry to get killed, but I see nothing wrong with being eaten after I die. Larry Hagman posted:I want to be spread over a field and have marijuana and wheat planted and harvest it in a couple of years and then have a big marijuana cake, enough for 200 or 300 people. People eat a little of Larry.
|
# ? Feb 3, 2017 13:19 |
|
Pastry of the Year posted:I am not in a hurry to get killed, but I see nothing wrong with being eaten after I die. Live fast, die young, leave a delicious corpse.
|
# ? Feb 3, 2017 15:42 |
|
Laudanum was a basic druggist preparation and advertising it (without dressing it up as a patent medicine) would have been like advertising iodine. Even for a fake ad, though, this is a terrible execution.
|
# ? Feb 3, 2017 20:27 |
|
A HUNGRY MOUTH posted:Laudanum was a basic druggist preparation and advertising it (without dressing it up as a patent medicine) would have been like advertising iodine. Even for a fake ad, though, this is a terrible execution. You do understand that it's from a catalog, right? The fakest looking thing about the ad is how big it is, Sears & Roebuck catalogs were packed stupid-full of copy. I've seen a few sources claiming they sold laudanum (alongside cocaine and heroin) though so they must have had a little advertising blurb somewhere, even if it was just a paragraph of text.
|
# ? Feb 3, 2017 20:51 |
|
A HUNGRY MOUTH posted:Laudanum was a basic druggist preparation and advertising it (without dressing it up as a patent medicine) would have been like advertising iodine. Even for a fake ad, though, this is a terrible execution. Wikipedia posted:Laudanum was used in home remedies and prescriptions, as well as a single medication. Are you sure? I don't know if the ad is fake or not, but it seems plausible. I'd think the failure in execution, if it were fake, would be going for something the average person would have to look up instead of obviously being "we need vegetables for the war effort so if you want to give your children something healthy give them cocaine instead!".
|
# ? Feb 3, 2017 20:54 |
|
Platystemon posted:http://www.latimes.com/local/california/la-me-california-commute-20150106-story.html In less than an hour, more than 150 cars went by? So that's what, one every 15-20 seconds? I didn't care about that problem when I first heard about it and I care even less now.
|
# ? Feb 3, 2017 21:25 |
|
After really thinking hard about it, yes, I'm sure the ad with several different modern typefaces in multiple point sizes with razor-sharp resolution, an awkwardly-placed small logo of the catalog it's supposedly from, massive amounts of whitespace (one page for a single [e: generic] product?!), and multiple spelling errors is fake. edit: laudanum's in the bottom left corner (S,R&Co. Catalogue No.112). Again, generic laudanum wasn't advertised; everyone knew what it was and what it was for. Here it's alongside epsom salts and borax, turpentine and ammonia. edit a billion: I'm not taking great exception to the content (except "excessive secretions," which is included just to be ridiculous), I object to it being made up and presented among other real-life examples of advertising so that people will look at it and go "wow they really printed this totally real period-accurate ad for opium for babies???? lol people sure were dumb then" A HUNGRY MOUTH has a new favorite as of 22:00 on Feb 3, 2017 |
# ? Feb 3, 2017 21:29 |
|
As an apology, have the Princess Bust Developer and Bust Cream or Food ($1.50) from page 457 of the previously linked catalogue.
|
# ? Feb 3, 2017 22:25 |
|
A HUNGRY MOUTH posted:As an apology, have the Princess Bust Developer and Bust Cream or Food ($1.50) from page 457 of the previously linked catalogue. Breast cream or food? People be rubbin Miracle Whip all over their titties.
|
# ? Feb 4, 2017 00:25 |
|
Achernar posted:Breast cream or food? People be rubbin Miracle Whip all over their titties. Rock on.
|
# ? Feb 4, 2017 00:28 |
|
Atmus posted:In less than an hour, more than 150 cars went by? So that's what, one every 15-20 seconds? I didn't care about that problem when I first heard about it and I care even less now. Yes? When you buy a house in a subdivision specifically because of the low traffic so you dont have to worry about your kids getting ran over by some distracted rear end in a top hat commuter staring at his phone trying to save 45 seconds on his trip while facebooking and spamming skip on spotify, yeah, id be pissed. Granted i live in a low traffice area in loving kansas but i can tell you if my neighborhoods traffic suddenly skyrocketed because of a google algorithim id be pissed, especially because the number one selling point for us was the lack of traffic and safety. But seriously, gently caress those people who arent me, they should have foreseen this would happen amiright!
|
# ? Feb 4, 2017 02:30 |
|
I can't remember what it's for, a drug store or a drug itself, but there's a raido ad I hear at least once an hour with a sick guy coughing bad, and saying he has to call out sick tomorrow. One commercial has his wife asking, all pissy, if he wants to call out sick to his daughter's birthday. The other has a whiny kid whimpering about him missing a dance recital. YES. YES loving YES. You should not be around loving kids if you are sick beyond the loving common cold! The flu, bronchitis? Yes, you loving call out sick! Or, no, wait, you go and expose a ton of people to whatever has you coughing nonstop. Great idea.
|
# ? Feb 4, 2017 02:51 |
|
Cowslips Warren posted:Or, no, wait, you go and expose a ton of people to whatever has you coughing nonstop. Great idea. That's what the director of the day care I worked at believed. She made me work running a fever of 101 and throwing up and one of the girls there had to come in with pink eye.
|
# ? Feb 4, 2017 03:01 |
|
Cowslips Warren posted:I can't remember what it's for, a drug store or a drug itself, but there's a raido ad I hear at least once an hour with a sick guy coughing bad, and saying he has to call out sick tomorrow. One commercial has his wife asking, all pissy, if he wants to call out sick to his daughter's birthday. The other has a whiny kid whimpering about him missing a dance recital. I think this is DayQuil.
|
# ? Feb 4, 2017 03:02 |
|
Len posted:That's what the director of the day care I worked at believed. She made me work running a fever of 101 and throwing up and one of the girls there had to come in with pink eye. That's when you "accidently" go out of your way to cough as close to them and as often as you can without raising suspicion.
|
# ? Feb 4, 2017 03:30 |
|
Sic Semper Goon posted:That's when you "accidently" go out of your way to cough as close to them and as often as you can without raising suspicion. I called the state instead and she packed her desk and left a week after they showed up because she didn't want her reputation tarnished because of all the many health and safety issues the center had and she refused to fix.
|
# ? Feb 4, 2017 03:36 |
|
|
# ? Jun 8, 2024 09:05 |
|
Len posted:I called the state instead and she packed her desk and left a week after they showed up because she didn't want her reputation tarnished because of all the many health and safety issues the center had and she refused to fix. A better way. Sadly, she'll just get off scot free and go elsewhere, as did my previous manager.
|
# ? Feb 4, 2017 03:40 |