Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
Tom Perez B/K/M?
This poll is closed.
B 77 25.50%
K 160 52.98%
M 65 21.52%
Total: 229 votes
[Edit Poll (moderators only)]

 
  • Locked thread
WampaLord
Jan 14, 2010

WhiskeyJuvenile posted:

I'm fine with starting there, but I've heard and continue to hear people suggest that it's an end not a beginning and that makes me really question where their heads are at

It's absolutely just a starting point. I would hope most Bernie supporters are smart enough to continue demanding things even after we get some basic concessions like $15/hr and single payer. I know I will be.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Spuckuk
Aug 11, 2009

Being a bastard works



WhiskeyJuvenile posted:

The idea that universal healthcare solves the pocketbook issues facing Americans flies in the face of the evidence from etc. etc.

Then maybe they should do something about those means of production.

WhiskeyJuvenile
Feb 15, 2002

by Nyc_Tattoo
Like I would look at something like affordable housing as a primary focus. You see people foregoing medical care to afford rent, not so much the other way around

WhiskeyJuvenile
Feb 15, 2002

by Nyc_Tattoo

Spuckuk posted:

Then maybe they should do something about those means of production.

Yes! The platform should be socialism, not welfare liberalism!

steinrokkan
Apr 2, 2011



Soiled Meat

Main Paineframe posted:

19.4 million people were under 50 percent of the poverty line in 2015. Not "under the poverty line", but under half the poverty line. Maybe fixing that would help people struggling with both medical bills and mortgage payments? :shrug:

Ah yeah, the old "You can only do one thing at a time" law, and the equally factual "people who want accessible healthcare are actually the ones pushing millions into poverry" theorem

WampaLord
Jan 14, 2010

WhiskeyJuvenile posted:

Like I would look at something like affordable housing as a primary focus. You see people foregoing medical care to afford rent, not so much the other way around

That's such a harder problem to tackle, though, with less obvious solutions. Rent control? Subsidized housing? Dredd-style MegaCities?

Also considering a significant amount of Americans are landlords, it's not going to be a very popular thing, whereas single payer is hugely popular. It's about picking your battles.

I agree that rent is a higher pain point for most people, but rent is also a much much stickier problem.

readingatwork
Jan 8, 2009

Hello Fatty!


Fun Shoe
Single payer is 100% the perfect thing to be pushing right now. It's legit good policy that's insanely popular in addition to being a perfect litmus test to weed out people that should really just go be Republicans. Don't let anyone convince you otherwise.

Groovelord Neato
Dec 6, 2014


WhiskeyJuvenile posted:

Absolutely do single payer for the 25% of Americans who say they struggle with medical bills, but realize that you're not addressing what the other 75% say they're struggling with

if we had uhc wages would go up because if you have an employer plan your boss pays you like 10k less than he should since it's considered part of your compensation.

Mister Facetious
Apr 21, 2007

I think I died and woke up in L.A.,
I don't know how I wound up in this place...

:canada:

WampaLord posted:

Are you loving kidding me with this? Medical debt is a major reason for bankruptcy in America.



Wait until Hillary makes it as hard to discharge as school debt. :unsmigghh:

call to action
Jun 10, 2016

by FactsAreUseless

WampaLord posted:

That's such a harder problem to tackle, though, with less obvious solutions. Rent control? Subsidized housing? Dredd-style MegaCities?

Good point. That's a classic concern troll technique, isn't it? "Well, we have a big problem that we know how to solve, but there's an even BIGGER problem that we don't know how to solve, therefore do nothing"?

FuriousxGeorge
Aug 8, 2007

We've been the best team all year.

They're just finding out.
So is this thing out yet? Will they support legalizing it?

WhiskeyJuvenile
Feb 15, 2002

by Nyc_Tattoo

Groovelord Neato posted:

if we had uhc wages would go up because if you have an employer plan your boss pays you like 10k less than he should since it's considered part of your compensation.

:laugh:

Mister Facetious
Apr 21, 2007

I think I died and woke up in L.A.,
I don't know how I wound up in this place...

:canada:

Groovelord Neato posted:

if we had uhc wages would go up because if you have an employer plan your boss pays you like 10k less than he should since it's considered part of your compensation.

I only moved one zero, but it's still paraphrasing:

“Senior management's job is to pay people,” he'd say. “If they gently caress a thousand guys out of ten grand each, that's ten million more for them."
- Greg Lippman, 'The Big Short'

call to action
Jun 10, 2016

by FactsAreUseless
I'm 100% OK with Sergey Brin having the money he would have paid on behalf of his Googler's health insurance transformed into a golden yacht, as long as it means that health insurance folks and hospital conglomerates eat poo poo, tbqh

Jizz Festival
Oct 30, 2012
Lipstick Apathy

WhiskeyJuvenile posted:

Yes! The platform should be socialism, not welfare liberalism!

gently caress off with this bullshit. Nobody believes that you actually give a poo poo about socialism because you only ever bring it up to argue for why we shouldn't be doing something to help people.

Paolomania
Apr 26, 2006

WhiskeyJuvenile posted:

Absolutely do single payer for the 25% of Americans who say they struggle with medical bills, but realize that you're not addressing what the other 75% say they're struggling with

Ah the old "but will it solve..." defense. Well played. Maybe we should give it a better name like the "not a silver bullet" fallacy or something.

JeffersonClay
Jun 17, 2003

by R. Guyovich

Jizz Festival posted:

gently caress off with this bullshit. Nobody believes that you actually give a poo poo about socialism because you only ever bring it up to argue for why we shouldn't be doing something to help people.

This but for paid family leave, maternity and childcare, Medicare buy in at 55 and a 12.50 minimum wage.

Condiv
May 7, 2008

Sorry to undo the effort of paying a domestic abuser $10 to own this poster, but I am going to lose my dang mind if I keep seeing multiple posters who appear to be Baloogan.

With love,
a mod


JeffersonClay posted:

This but for paid family leave, maternity and childcare, Medicare buy in at 55 and a 12.50 minimum wage.

sorry hillary forgot to campaign jefferson. maybe she fell asleep cause she's too old?

WampaLord
Jan 14, 2010

JeffersonClay posted:

This but for paid family leave, maternity and childcare, Medicare buy in at 55 and a 12.50 minimum wage.

Why $12.50? Is that extra $2.50 an hour going to kill the economy or are you just being anti leftist for anti leftism's sake?

White Rock
Jul 14, 2007
Creativity flows in the bored and the angry!

WhiskeyJuvenile posted:

Absolutely do single payer for the 25% of Americans who say they struggle with medical bills, but realize that you're not addressing what the other 75% say they're struggling with

This is like saying that insurance is useless unless your house burns down.

Single payer is universally popular and will help people immensely, as well as reduce waste spending. It will literally save lives. What concrete alternative proposition matches it in popularity and impact?

Jizz Festival
Oct 30, 2012
Lipstick Apathy

JeffersonClay posted:

This but for paid family leave, maternity and childcare, Medicare buy in at 55 and a 12.50 minimum wage.

WJ argues that we should forget doing UHC in favor of doing other stuff not at all related to health. Socialists, on the other hand, criticize Hillary's a medicare buy-in and a $12.50 min wage for not going far enough but would still support those things happening as an improvement, which is why most of us voted for Hillary.

JeffersonClay
Jun 17, 2003

by R. Guyovich
I'm pretty sure WJ is suggesting single payer is good, but fails to address the most significant causes of poverty. He's making exactly the same argument about not going far enough. And the answers are, ironically, exactly the same. No, single payer and $15 minimum won't end poverty, but they're a step in the right direction and, more importantly, they're popular.

Playstation 4
Apr 25, 2014
Unlockable Ben

JeffersonClay posted:

I'm pretty sure WJ is suggesting single payer is good, but fails to address the most significant causes of poverty. He's making exactly the same argument about not going far enough. And the answers are, ironically, exactly the same. No, single payer and $15 minimum won't end poverty, but they're a step in the right direction and, more importantly, they're popular.

Holy poo poo guys, he finally loving gets it

WhiskeyJuvenile
Feb 15, 2002

by Nyc_Tattoo

White Rock posted:

This is like saying that insurance is useless unless your house burns down.

Single payer is universally popular and will help people immensely, as well as reduce waste spending. It will literally save lives. What concrete alternative proposition matches it in popularity and impact?

single payer is good and is absolutely a winning message against establishment democrats, who have no message

I worry that if running against Republicans becomes "healthcare" vs. "jobs", jobs is gonna win. In which case the primary winning strategy boils down to being better on jobs than the Republicans, in which case single payer is cool and good but shouldn't be the focus.

e: this is, if anything, a concern about tunnel vision

call to action
Jun 10, 2016

by FactsAreUseless

WhiskeyJuvenile posted:

single payer is good and is absolutely a winning message against establishment democrats, who have no message

I worry that if running against Republicans becomes "healthcare" vs. "jobs", jobs is gonna win. In which case the primary winning strategy boils down to being better on jobs than the Republicans, in which case single payer is cool and good but shouldn't be the focus.

e: this is, if anything, a concern about tunnel vision

"I worry..."
"this is, if anything, a concern..."

You don't get to keep having concerns or worries about stuff when you've proven yourself to be so wrong about it. Bend the knee

Groovelord Neato
Dec 6, 2014


Mister Facetious posted:

I only moved one zero, but it's still paraphrasing:

“Senior management's job is to pay people,” he'd say. “If they gently caress a thousand guys out of ten grand each, that's ten million more for them."
- Greg Lippman, 'The Big Short'

aight at least where i work i'd be 10k richer.

JeffersonClay posted:

This but for paid family leave, maternity and childcare, Medicare buy in at 55 and a 12.50 minimum wage.

15 is lowballing y'know.

TROIKA CURES GREEK
Jun 30, 2015

by R. Guyovich

WampaLord posted:

Why $12.50? Is that extra $2.50 an hour going to kill the economy or are you just being anti leftist for anti leftism's sake?

Why not 20?

TROIKA CURES GREEK
Jun 30, 2015

by R. Guyovich
Why not 50?

No one here really has a clue what they are talking about when they throw out these numbers.

Groovelord Neato
Dec 6, 2014


wrong.

WampaLord
Jan 14, 2010


Actually, I'd be fine with that too-

TROIKA CURES GREEK posted:

Why not 50?

No one here really has a clue what they are talking about when they throw out these numbers.

Oh, I see. Kindly gently caress off with this slippery slope bullshit.

:ohdear: "What if we pay poor people too much money?" is not a reasonable fear to have in this country.

Groovelord Neato
Dec 6, 2014


since wages should grow with productivity, the minimum wage should be somewhere around 18-22. so 15 is lowballing and it was dumb to lowball that.

Crowsbeak
Oct 9, 2012

by Azathoth
Lipstick Apathy
So is wj now trying to pretend to be a left com?

JeffersonClay
Jun 17, 2003

by R. Guyovich

Playstation 4 posted:

Holy poo poo guys, he finally loving gets it

Do you get that those arguments are equally valid against the criticisms of democratic policy levied in this thread?

Polygynous
Dec 13, 2006
welp

Well, why not?

peengers
Jun 6, 2003

toot toot
So, been a bit since i checked in on this thread but are there any compelling arguments to vote dem yet other than they aren't republican?

Crows Turn Off
Jan 7, 2008


peengers posted:

So, been a bit since i checked in on this thread but are there any compelling arguments to vote dem yet other than they aren't republican?
Depends. Do you support any of the policies in their platform?

Condiv
May 7, 2008

Sorry to undo the effort of paying a domestic abuser $10 to own this poster, but I am going to lose my dang mind if I keep seeing multiple posters who appear to be Baloogan.

With love,
a mod


peengers posted:

So, been a bit since i checked in on this thread but are there any compelling arguments to vote dem yet other than they aren't republican?

do you like tax cuts for businesses to stimulate job growth? then the dem party is for you!

SSJ_naruto_2003
Oct 12, 2012



Actually that's both parties.

Do you love business but hate gay people? Vote Republican!

Do you love business but not hate gay people (usually)? Vote Democrat!

C. Everett Koop
Aug 18, 2008

peengers posted:

So, been a bit since i checked in on this thread but are there any compelling arguments to vote dem yet other than they aren't republican?

never have been never will

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Mister Facetious
Apr 21, 2007

I think I died and woke up in L.A.,
I don't know how I wound up in this place...

:canada:

Crows Turn Off posted:

Depends. Do you support any of the policies in their platform?

have they ever passed any of the policies on their platform that aren't right-wing neoliberalism

  • Locked thread