|
paul_soccer10 posted:They're all gunna be into incest
|
#
?
Jan 15, 2018 16:34
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 26, 2024 02:57 |
|
|
It owns is what's up with it
|
|
#
?
Jan 15, 2018 16:41
|
|
|
people wanna gently caress their mom and sisters aint nothing wrong with that
|
|
#
?
Jan 15, 2018 16:42
|
|
|
Fartbox posted:people wanna gently caress their mom and sisters aint nothing wrong with that Hey now, I think you mean stepmothers and stepsisters.
|
|
#
?
Jan 15, 2018 16:49
|
|
|
Dr. Gojo Shioji posted:Hey now, I think you mean NOT stepmothers and NOT stepsisters.
|
|
#
?
Jan 15, 2018 16:51
|
|
|
And people scoffed at the slippery slope argument...
|
|
#
?
Jan 15, 2018 17:06
|
|
|
Milky Moor posted:if you know any teachers who teach sex ed or general health classes, ask them the kind of questions they're getting asked by teenagers. it's insane. True. People who don't work with teenagers on a daily basis really don't understand how weird and unpleasant things are getting.
|
|
#
?
Jan 15, 2018 17:08
|
|
|
Moxxis Endowment posted:Yeah what is up with all the incest porn?! pornhub is really pushing black thot porn \
|
|
#
?
Jan 15, 2018 17:16
|
|
|
cda posted:how weird and unpleasant things are getting. Please keep going
|
|
#
?
Jan 15, 2018 17:24
|
|
|
Bacon Terrorist posted:I read an article where some institute had surveyed teenagers about their sexual experiences compared to porn and all the girls basically said ‘the dicks are a lot smaller in real life, the guys don’t last very long but it does always finish with cum on my face like the movies’ so basically we’ve created a generation of women wanting donkey dicked supermen accepting of non-vanilla kinks destined to spend their lives unfulfilled Mission accomplish
|
|
#
?
Jan 15, 2018 17:27
|
|
|
cda posted:True. People who don't work with teenagers on a daily basis really don't understand how weird and unpleasant things are getting. Id rather not I hated myself as a teenager and also hated other teenagers Teenagers suck
|
|
#
?
Jan 15, 2018 17:28
|
|
|
Moxxis Endowment posted:Yeah what is up with all the incest porn?! People are turned on by forbidden sex, and incest is the only forbidden sex left. Gay sex, adultery, transsexuals, interracial, all that stuff is passe now.
|
|
#
?
Jan 15, 2018 17:45
|
|
|
cda posted:True. People who don't work with teenagers on a daily basis really don't understand how weird and unpleasant things are getting. Can you elaborate? Do you have any stories?
|
|
#
?
Jan 15, 2018 17:52
|
|
|
Comfy Fleece Sweater posted:I Suck cock
|
|
#
?
Jan 15, 2018 18:51
|
|
|
The ‘teen’ porn that purposely uses short, flat-chested women and tall men is really creepy. The ads for that & the weird 3D animation porn freaks me out.
|
|
#
?
Jan 15, 2018 19:01
|
|
|
General Dog posted:People are turned on by forbidden sex, and incest is the only forbidden sex left. Gay sex, adultery, transsexuals, interracial, all that stuff is passe now. myDad posted:The ‘teen’ porn that purposely uses short, flat-chested women and tall men is really creepy I'm sure you can see where things are going next...
|
|
#
?
Jan 15, 2018 19:02
|
|
|
OXBALLS DOT COM posted:I'm sure you can see where things are going next... I would be surprised if there aren’t people being groomed & convinced to take hormone blockers in order to fuel fetish porn
|
|
#
?
Jan 15, 2018 19:03
|
|
|
hopefully the human race ends as even the slightest deficiency in one's sexual partner becomes a deal breaker
|
|
#
?
Jan 15, 2018 19:11
|
|
|
myDad posted:I would be surprised if there aren’t people being groomed & convinced to take hormone blockers in order to fuel fetish porn lol there was a thread about a guy who did that in ask/tell over a decade ago any given fetish scene has existed completely independent of the internet, even furries. now its just easily accessible.
|
|
#
?
Jan 15, 2018 19:14
|
|
|
davidofmk771 posted:lol there was a thread about a guy who did that in ask/tell over a decade ago That and also now activists will line up to defend it no matter how gross it is
|
|
#
?
Jan 15, 2018 19:15
|
|
|
normalcy is an interesting and maybe impossible standard to establish within a larger historical frame of reference. like if you were to comopare sexuality today, with 1800-1950 'sexual respectability,' with pre-1800s sexuality. you have to condition the contemporary idea of the over-exposure of kids to sexuality with a larger sense of how most people related to sex for most of history. we have a very addled perspective bcz our frame of reference is that we live in a period of almost total collapse of bourgeois respectability. but before the nineteenth century there was no bourgeois respectability at all. most people were peasants. and peasants lived in single room houses, slept in one or two beds, and didn't really understand concepts of privacy, dignity, shame, etc., like we do now. there aren't very good records for most of pre-modern peasant existence, but there was no doubt that a whole lot of public sex, underaged sex, incest sex, etc., etc., went around in the village, that no one was very concerned about. it was only the romanticism of the 1830s that explicitly created the idea that kids were innocents who needed to be protected from the world. before that kids after 12 years old were considered to be adults for most intents and purposes. so there is no 'natural' state of affairs that is being corrupted--at least no 'nature' we would want to get back to--by the 'artifice' of a pornified market economy in any straightforward kind of way. in some ways we are probably returning to the more natural state of affairs--promiscuity, exposure, craziness--that reigned for much of history.
Zane fucked around with this message at 19:38 on Jan 15, 2018 |
|
#
?
Jan 15, 2018 19:16
|
|
|
Well, this is just depressing. We should probably teach the difference between entertainment and reality in schools so that people can discern when they are being sold to and what should be realistic expectations.
|
|
#
?
Jan 15, 2018 19:16
|
|
|
Zane posted:normalcy is an interesting and maybe impossible standard to establish within a larger historical frame of reference. like if you were comopare sexuality today, with 1800-1950 'sexual respectability,' with pre-1800s sexuality. you have to condition the contemporary idea of the over-exposure of kids to sexuality with a larger sense of how most people related to sex for most of history. we have a very addled perspective bcz our frame of reference is that we live in a period of almost total collapse of bourgeois respectability. but before the nineteenth century there was no bourgeois respectability at all. most people were peasants. and peasants lived in single room houses, slept in one or two beds, and didn't really understand concepts of privacy, dignity, shame, etc., like we do now. there aren't very good records for most of pre-modern peasant life, but there was no doubt that a whole lot of public sex, underaged sex, incest sex, etc., etc., went around in the village, that no one was very concerned about. it was only the romanticism of the 1830s that explicitly created the idea that kids were innocents who needed to be protected from the world. before that kids after 12 years old were considered to be adults for most intents and purposes. so there is no 'natural' state of affairs that is being corrupted--at least no 'nature' we would want to get back to--by the 'artifice' of a pornified market economy in any straightforward way. in some ways we are probably returning to the more natural state of affairs--promiscuity, exposure, craziness--that reigned for much of history. Aaand here comes the pedo apologism, just as predicted
|
|
#
?
Jan 15, 2018 19:18
|
|
|
Porn is absolutely disgusting, someone needs to turn these teens onto hentai!
|
|
#
?
Jan 15, 2018 19:19
|
|
|
OXBALLS DOT COM posted:Aaand here comes the pedo apologism, just as predicted
|
|
#
?
Jan 15, 2018 19:20
|
|
|
Zane posted:you got me. gotta have me them delicious children. Quote for subsequent prosecution
|
|
#
?
Jan 15, 2018 19:22
|
|
|
fyi I believe in trying to keep sex away from kids. but it is a constructed idea that already is sort of weird and difficult when your 'kid' is 13 and already fascinated with porn and sex. and i'm not sure what some of our ideas will look like in 100 yrs given how schizophrenically footloose and uptight our culture is about sex these days.
|
|
#
?
Jan 15, 2018 19:26
|
|
|
Zane posted:fyi I believe in trying to keep sex away from kids. but it is a constructed idea that already is sort of weird and difficult when your 'kid' is 13 and already fascinated with porn and sex. and i'm not sure what some of our ideas will look like in 100 yrs given how schizophrenically footloose and uptight our culture is about sex these days. 
|
|
#
?
Jan 15, 2018 19:28
|
|
|
Brakes applied. I follow these types of threads with interest because I remember before the internet so clearly. Seeing all this porn including super weird and violent poo poo while your sexuality is developing, during adolescence, has got to have a major impact. Young boys are going to be coming over and over while looking at truly wild stuff. Of course its not always going to gently caress them up but overall----who knows. My comment about now guys won't know how to please a woman was quoted by multiple posters thoughtfully saying "Well we never do anyway, or wouldn't have known." I hear you. But there is a big difference between it all being a mystery and watching the wrong stuff work because actors over and over.
|
|
#
?
Jan 15, 2018 19:31
|
|
|
I keep forgetting i'm posting on sa where advocacy of pedophilia is actually a literal possibility. I'm just regurgitating historical monographs like mary ryan's the cradle of the middle class because I'm a big stupid dork.
Zane fucked around with this message at 19:36 on Jan 15, 2018 |
|
#
?
Jan 15, 2018 19:34
|
|
|
Zane posted:I keep forgetting i'm posting on sa where advocacy of pedophilia is actually a literal possibility. I'm just regurgitating historical monographs like mary ryan's the cradle of the middle class because I'm a big stupid dork. Saying that the bourgeous didn't exist before the 19th century is also a pretty weird way to characterize the historical record. The whole interpretation is pretty much meant to justify a certain stance... the stance that many elites are already starting to push
|
|
#
?
Jan 15, 2018 19:38
|
|
|
Spinster posted:Seeing all this porn including super weird and violent poo poo while your sexuality is developing, during adolescence, has got to have a major impact. Young boys are going to be coming over and over while looking at truly wild stuff. *hacky Johnny Carson impression* "It's weird, wild stuff"
|
|
#
?
Jan 15, 2018 19:38
|
|
|
Spinster posted:Brakes applied. Imo communication is the most reliable path to pleasure
|
|
#
?
Jan 15, 2018 19:39
|
|
|
OXBALLS DOT COM posted:Saying that the bourgeous didn't exist before the 19th century is also a pretty weird way to characterize the historical record.
|
|
#
?
Jan 15, 2018 19:42
|
|
|
Zane posted:lmao the semantics of 'bourgeois' is an enormous area of historiographical contention. and the early and pre modern historical study of popular culture is not just a complicated ploy by a ring of international pedophiles. these issues would be interesting to discuss in a set of entirely different circumstances but i sometimes forget where i'm posting. please IGNORE me if at all possible. It doesn't really sound like you're very interested in any kind of discussion at all, or indeed are capable of one
|
|
#
?
Jan 15, 2018 19:44
|
|
|
I had to jerk it to the fashion channel cause they’d have tittys showing sometimes, and you didn’t know when they were coming so you had to be ready to bust in the 30 seconds it’d take her to do her runway walk. Also if a male model came on you’d shut your eyes and jerk off to your imagination as you count to thirty and then peek with one eye to see if a chick was back on stage. kids these days will never know these struggles
|
|
#
?
Jan 15, 2018 19:45
|
|
|
Hehe let me drop some more historiography bombs on these plebs *long article on ephebophilia*
|
|
#
?
Jan 15, 2018 19:46
|
|
|
myDad posted:Imo communication is the most reliable path to pleasure You're correct that affirmative advocating for sexual needs by women would be preferable and would go a long way toward closing the sexual gratification divide, you whore, slutty, slutty, whore, asking for more oral.
|
|
#
?
Jan 15, 2018 19:49
|
|
|
People pre-Victorian era really wouldn't have thought much of having sex with a 13 year old, or of drinking poo poo water and dying.
|
|
#
?
Jan 15, 2018 19:52
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 26, 2024 02:57 |
|
|
General Dog posted:People pre-Victorian era really wouldn't have thought much of having sex with a 13 year old, or of drinking poo poo water and dying. They wouldn't have in the Victorian era, either, if they were peasants. And still don't.
|
|
#
?
Jan 15, 2018 19:54
|
|