|
I agree. Hence why I posted it
|
# ? Mar 24, 2016 00:36 |
|
|
# ? May 31, 2024 02:09 |
|
Helsing posted:It's a nice thought if you ignore all his domestic incidents and drunk driving antics.
|
# ? Mar 24, 2016 00:54 |
|
ZShakespeare posted:The worst thing to happen to unions was getting legitimized and regulated. It removed all their teeth by controlling what they are allowed to do. See: every high profile strike in the last 5 years where they just got legislated back to work.
|
# ? Mar 24, 2016 01:28 |
|
ZShakespeare posted:The worst thing to happen to unions was getting legitimized and regulated. It removed all their teeth by controlling what they are allowed to do. See: every high profile strike in the last 5 years where they just got legislated back to work. No meaningful change will occur from within the legal framework because it is designed very specifically to prevent that. The meaningful change would have to be unions willing to break the law on behalf of their members, just like the old days. Of course, in that case, they would not be as profitable for the ringleaders. They would have to go underground and operate like mobsters. Doesn't figure into a successful political career as well.
|
# ? Mar 24, 2016 01:47 |
|
I was away from the city for most of the Ford years, did he really read the paper while driving?
|
# ? Mar 24, 2016 02:00 |
|
Frosted Flake posted:I was away from the city for most of the Ford years, did he really read the paper while driving? http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/busy-rob-ford-admits-to-reading-while-driving-1.1278580 "he's a good mayor because he's just as awful as I am " -average canadian BattleMaster fucked around with this message at 02:05 on Mar 24, 2016 |
# ? Mar 24, 2016 02:02 |
|
At what point is this country beyond saving
|
# ? Mar 24, 2016 02:08 |
|
quote:the mayor denied accusations that he gave the middle finger to Ottilie Mason and her six-year-old daughter Now we'll never know if he actually flipped off that little girl or not.
|
# ? Mar 24, 2016 02:24 |
|
Helsing posted:In particular, many of today's most powerful unions (or at least their elected leaders) have every incentive to accommodate themselves to the system. The Ontario Liberals have been really good at picking the strongest unions, giving them very narrowly targeted concessions, and then shutting out the rest of the labour movement. I could make a larger effort post later on how the double whammy of Bob Rae and Mike Harris really destroyed any solidarity in the labour movement if anyone is interested in hearing more about this. You keep talking about limitations, defeat and accommodations but you're not saying why this is unique to organized labour. Pointing out that a worker's leadership can be coopted is no different than pointing out a non-union workforce is basically powerless.. so what? It's still the best tool people have in their daily life. It's the only option for advocating for yourself if you are working a vulnerable, poorly paid job. What other option is there? Voting? Think that's going to change income inequality and improve people's working conditions? I've participated in militant shop floor action that has gotten serious results for myself and others. Just because it wasn't "sanctioned" by the union doesn't mean it wasn't organized job action. Direct action on the floor by workers is effective and it's why unions exist in the first place. They're a natural progression from that first action. Problem is you put your job on the line every time you do that. Do you think the average person is desperate enough to do that? Things being imperfect doesn't mean they're not working. The destruction of unions is complicated and something that can't be argued in a single post. But I'm sure we can agree it isn't because of an inherent flaw in industrial organizing and action. There are global forces and structural shifts in the nature of labour that have allowed multinational conglomerates to destroy workers ability to withdraw their labour.
|
# ? Mar 24, 2016 02:30 |
|
Would sympathy strikes or a general strike help university unions or is that just not going to happen in today's climate?
|
# ? Mar 24, 2016 02:54 |
|
RBC posted:You keep talking about limitations, defeat and accommodations but you're not saying why this is unique to organized labour. Pointing out that a worker's leadership can be coopted is no different than pointing out a non-union workforce is basically powerless.. so what? It's still the best tool people have in their daily life. It's the only option for advocating for yourself if you are working a vulnerable, poorly paid job. What other option is there? Voting? Think that's going to change income inequality and improve people's working conditions? I've participated in militant shop floor action that has gotten serious results for myself and others. Just because it wasn't "sanctioned" by the union doesn't mean it wasn't organized job action. Direct action on the floor by workers is effective and it's why unions exist in the first place. They're a natural progression from that first action. Problem is you put your job on the line every time you do that. Do you think the average person is desperate enough to do that? Nothing I've said is unique to organized labour, in fact my exact words were that "without some kind of socialist or social democratic orientation, labour unions are just another interest group fighting for their piece of pie". Unions have a big role to play in any realistic left wing strategy and obviously in many individual workplaces they are crucial but that doesn't mean we shouldn't be candid about the flaws many unions have, and it doesn't mean unions or their members are beyond reproach. quote:Things being imperfect doesn't mean they're not working. The destruction of unions is complicated and something that can't be argued in a single post. But I'm sure we can agree it isn't because of an inherent flaw in industrial organizing and action. There are global forces and structural shifts in the nature of labour that have allowed multinational conglomerates to destroy workers ability to withdraw their labour. I think that ZShakespeare has a point when he says that the legitimization and regulation of labour unions was also, in many ways, contributed to their eventual downfall. Legalization and regulation left the labour movement dependent on the state rather than it's own membership. In the short term that provided some protection and stability, but in the long term it created complacency and left labour vulnerable to government legislation. Frosted Flake posted:Would sympathy strikes or a general strike help university unions or is that just not going to happen in today's climate? In many cases it would be illegal to strike because of grievances at another workplace, especially if you're in-between the agreed upon contract negotiation periods. The legal regulation of unions is largely set up to let employers have stable and predictable planning regarding the possibility of job actions.
|
# ? Mar 24, 2016 03:34 |
|
Ikantski posted:Now we'll never know if he actually flipped off that little girl or not. We know.
|
# ? Mar 24, 2016 03:55 |
|
CLAM DOWN posted:I'm guessing Not Guilty too. Even though that piece of poo poo is guilty as gently caress, the crown completely botched their case. It probably will be Not Guilty because although he's unquestionably a serial creep the particular cases he's being charged on have not been prosecuted well. I'm curious to see, assuming he gets his symbolic 'not guilty', if he manages to actually get another media job somewhere and attempt a comeback. It won't be at the CBC obviously, but I wouldn't be surprised if he makes a shot at hosting something more commercial in the US market and it'll be interesting to see if it works.
|
# ? Mar 24, 2016 04:14 |
|
Hal_2005 posted:So, how many of you continue to identify as Liberal voters now that every single one of Justins promises made in October 2015 is now broken ? I didn't vote Liberal, but we got the census back and Trudeau has otherwise been has exactly terrible as I expected, so I'm not really disappointed with the election results. a++, would open a good bottle of wine to celebrate harper being kicked out again
|
# ? Mar 24, 2016 04:17 |
|
Brandon Proust posted:I didn't vote Liberal, but we got the census back and Trudeau has otherwise been has exactly terrible as I expected, so I'm not really disappointed with the election results. a++, would open a good bottle of wine to celebrate harper being kicked out again No no the Liberals outflanked the NDP from the left this time. Didn't you hear the media narrative?
|
# ? Mar 24, 2016 04:20 |
|
PK loving SUBBAN posted:No no the Liberals outflanked the NDP from the left this time. Didn't you hear the media narrative? I love this narrative. It really has no truth to it since the Liberals hardly budged from their "We will think about possibly maybe setting up a committee that would consider thinking about issues on the left" and was all about Mulcair being a doofus and shooting himself in the foot, but that doesnt make a good front page tag for Macleans or CBC show.
|
# ? Mar 24, 2016 04:25 |
|
flakeloaf posted:The student union at Carleton voted to stop supporting cystic fibrosis charities because that's a disease of white men. lol isn't the CF fundraiser thing what all of Carleton frosh week is based around? At least that's what I remember.
|
# ? Mar 24, 2016 04:27 |
|
.
Legit Businessman fucked around with this message at 16:53 on Sep 9, 2022 |
# ? Mar 24, 2016 05:56 |
|
the bad decision only lasted a week. http://www.ottawacitizen.com/health/carleton+backtracks+shinerama+decision/1018761/story.html Somebody fucked around with this message at 17:10 on Sep 9, 2022 |
# ? Mar 24, 2016 06:27 |
|
The Crown seems to have really dropped the ball, so Not Guilty wouldn't shock me. Having said that, with the witnesses they had I don't know how they could have done better.
|
# ? Mar 24, 2016 12:09 |
|
Yes, though you wouldn't know it these days because it's mostly about being obnoxious on street corners and mugging people in exchange for stickers. PWC released a report today suggesting that SSC ought to outsource 1700 jobs. I can't help but think that this was Harper's plan all along: Take over a big thing, do it so badly that the organization hums with discontent, then get a corporate crony to step up and save us from those inefficient, fat sucking public servants. Somebody fucked around with this message at 17:10 on Sep 9, 2022 |
# ? Mar 24, 2016 12:50 |
|
Job of the Crown is to present relevant evidence to the court, not to ensure he's convicted at all costs. They didn't "drop the ball" and thinking that they did misapprehends the purpose of the prosecution service. Also it's difficult to call a case when you weren't there for the evidence, it usually sounds a lot different in the room than it does when told afterwards. Not guilty is not a bad guess because that's how like 50% of sex assault trials end anyways but it's not for certain
|
# ? Mar 24, 2016 13:11 |
|
quote:Good Thursday morning to you.
|
# ? Mar 24, 2016 13:32 |
|
Outsourcing that many SSC jobs would be such a disaster, way worse than it is now
|
# ? Mar 24, 2016 14:08 |
|
Dreylad posted:Mayor Tory aims to lure U.S. tech talent with mention of ‘divisive’ politics (Toronto Star) This article is hilariously stupid. Yeah, I'm sure all of the SF software engineers pulling in $150,000+ are just dying to move to Toronto. quote:The mayor said that on his April 4 to 6 trip to San Francisco and Silicon Valley he will make the case for U.S. companies and venture capital to invest in the Toronto area, especially given the low Canadian dollar.
|
# ? Mar 24, 2016 14:10 |
|
Trees and Squids posted:This article is hilariously stupid. Yeah, I'm sure all of the SF software engineers pulling in $150,000+ are just dying to move to Toronto. $150 is an entry salary in SV, I doubt expats would point to politics as the reasoning to leave their golden goose and come back home.
|
# ? Mar 24, 2016 14:13 |
|
terrorist ambulance posted:Job of the Crown is to present relevant evidence to the court, not to ensure he's convicted at all costs. They didn't "drop the ball" and thinking that they did misapprehends the purpose of the prosecution service. Yeah there's really no way of knowing what's going to happen even if you were in the room. I've seen (well, read) judges convict on the flimsiest of evidence and acquit defendants in cases that looked like slam dunks. One think I'm sure of, if Ghomeshi is found guilty he'll appeal.
|
# ? Mar 24, 2016 14:13 |
|
BattleMaster posted:http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/busy-rob-ford-admits-to-reading-while-driving-1.1278580 From the article: quote:And last July, the mayor denied accusations that he gave the middle finger to Ottilie Mason and her six-year-old daughter after the mother accosted him for talking on his cellphone while driving. Rob Ford's death is sad because we don't get comedy gems like this any more.
|
# ? Mar 24, 2016 14:14 |
|
PK loving SUBBAN posted:
That's like saying if the sun doesn't rise tomorrow you'll toxx yourself.
|
# ? Mar 24, 2016 14:15 |
|
PK loving SUBBAN posted:Yeah there's really no way of knowing what's going to happen even if you were in the room. I've seen (well, read) judges convict on the flimsiest of evidence and acquit defendants in cases that looked like slam dunks. El Scotch posted:That's like saying if the sun doesn't rise tomorrow you'll toxx yourself.
|
# ? Mar 24, 2016 14:18 |
|
Well alright then brainiacs, if he's found not guilty do you think the crown appeals? I want to see some toxxes and no you don't get to read the judgment first...
|
# ? Mar 24, 2016 14:23 |
|
I think a decision will be made
|
# ? Mar 24, 2016 14:28 |
|
PK loving SUBBAN posted:
Yeah but appealing credibility assessments / findings of fact. If it comes to that, good luck Ghomer
|
# ? Mar 24, 2016 14:28 |
|
PK loving SUBBAN posted:Well alright then brainiacs, if he's found not guilty do you think the crown appeals? I want to see some toxxes and no you don't get to read the judgment first... Crown right to appeal is limited in criminal cases, so it really depends on how the judgment comes out
|
# ? Mar 24, 2016 14:30 |
|
Perhaps a curve ball, NOT GUILTY of Sexual Assault, but GUILTY of Choking to Overcome Resistance. I think Ghomeshi will blink within 120 seconds following the verdict
|
# ? Mar 24, 2016 14:32 |
|
brucio posted:Outsourcing that many SSC jobs would be such a disaster, way worse than it is now Is that even possible? Shared services is very very very bad. I'm sure if those jobs were outsourced it would continue to be very very very bad. My understanding was that its entire raison d'être was to facilitate outsourcing of government services anyway.
|
# ? Mar 24, 2016 14:32 |
|
You guys are cowards, let's see some commitment. Take my money Lowtax. guilty verdict on sexual assault charges.
|
# ? Mar 24, 2016 14:33 |
|
We're mocking PK not toxxing ourselves on the Q kings sexual encounters gone awry.
|
# ? Mar 24, 2016 14:36 |
|
PK loving SUBBAN posted:Well alright then brainiacs, if he's found not guilty do you think the crown appeals? I want to see some toxxes and no you don't get to read the judgment first... I feel lucky to live in a society where the quality of evidence in the ghomeshi trial results in a not guilty. : Ghomeshi will be moving out of his mom's house shortly.
|
# ? Mar 24, 2016 14:38 |
|
|
# ? May 31, 2024 02:09 |
|
.nevermind not funny
Reince Penis fucked around with this message at 14:45 on Mar 24, 2016 |
# ? Mar 24, 2016 14:42 |