|
Decius posted:Unfortunately Slott then invents a incredibly complicated explanation for the Juggernaut thing, which was a bit of a ho-hum arc in the otherwise very funny and entertaining series. Did Slott ever explain why he seemed to hate the Juggernaut thing so much?
|
# ? Apr 2, 2015 10:36 |
|
|
# ? May 25, 2024 14:48 |
|
People wouldnt stop sending him 'I'm the Juggernaut, bitch!'
|
# ? Apr 2, 2015 11:13 |
|
General Bort posted:Did Slott ever explain why he seemed to hate the Juggernaut thing so much? I think a lot of nerds thought it was out of character for Jen to sleep with a 'bad guy'. (I don't remember if that scene happened during a period when Juggy was an X-Man or not)
|
# ? Apr 2, 2015 13:41 |
|
Gaz-L posted:I think a lot of nerds thought it was out of character for Jen to sleep with a 'bad guy'. (I don't remember if that scene happened during a period when Juggy was an X-Man or not) He was, but she was also his client. On the list of stupid poo poo during Austen's run it is really really low.
|
# ? Apr 2, 2015 15:15 |
|
It was real stupid. Not as bad as taking away his invulnerability, but worse than making him a good guy. EDIT: Didn't know this was the funny panels thread. Sorry for posting.
|
# ? Apr 2, 2015 19:02 |
|
Dolash posted:Can I ask about the Ryan Reynolds thing real quick? I don't really know much about Deadpool but I'm vaguely aware that people have been after a Ryan-Reynolds-as-Deadpool movie for ages for some reason and I don't know why. Did it start before the X-Men: Origins thing, or was it because of it? What was so great about his performance that everyone decided they needed to get him back? I don't get it. Wolverine: Origins' Deadpool wasn't Deadpool, but Ryan Reynolds as Wade Wilson worked really well in the beginning of the movie. He was funny, likable, badass, and a little bit of an rear end in a top hat. If you only watch those scenes, you can get pretty hyped for Reynolds-Deadpool.
|
# ? Apr 2, 2015 19:38 |
|
Dolash posted:Can I ask about the Ryan Reynolds thing real quick? I don't really know much about Deadpool but I'm vaguely aware that people have been after a Ryan-Reynolds-as-Deadpool movie for ages for some reason and I don't know why. Did it start before the X-Men: Origins thing, or was it because of it? What was so great about his performance that everyone decided they needed to get him back? I don't get it. In Blade 3 he plays a non-powered fast talking wisecracker who is similar to Deadpool. This lines him up for the Wade Wilson in X:Men Origins (which was pretty good as a Deadpool). He's also a huge fan of the character and a general comic book nerd so he is familiar with the character in all his various implementations.
|
# ? Apr 2, 2015 23:07 |
|
More Deadpool. http://imgur.com/gallery/4lP2g
|
# ? Apr 3, 2015 07:53 |
|
The entire issue of Wolverines this week belongs in here. Deadpool decides he's going to take Wolverine's place and Wolverine started out by fighting Hulk so he goes to challenge She-Hulk. It doesn't quite work out for him, as is per usual for Deadpool.
|
# ? Apr 3, 2015 12:37 |
|
Source unknown, found it on Matt Fraction's tumblr.
|
# ? Apr 3, 2015 15:16 |
|
Evil Mastermind posted:Source unknown, found it on Matt Fraction's tumblr. "Parent Trap" comic book adaptation, starring Patty Duke as Pussyface. Never gets old.
|
# ? Apr 3, 2015 17:16 |
|
Sigma-X posted:In Blade 3 he plays a non-powered fast talking wisecracker who is similar to Deadpool. This lines him up for the Wade Wilson in X:Men Origins (which was pretty good as a Deadpool). Also see Van Wilder. He's got the quick-witted, fast talking kind of an rear end in a top hat but you like him thing going on there too.
|
# ? Apr 3, 2015 21:29 |
|
Van Wilder is basically the reason Reynolds has a career and he has largely been doing that character in every one of his movies.
|
# ? Apr 3, 2015 21:31 |
I didn't find his character in Van Wilder particularly likeable.
|
|
# ? Apr 3, 2015 21:37 |
|
Isn't that also just basically his character from Two Guys and a Girl?
|
# ? Apr 3, 2015 21:41 |
|
Buried proved that Reynolds has hella serious acting chops, too. I think he (or his agent) just has a tendency to play it safe and stick to the wise-cracking rear end in a top hat roles.
|
# ? Apr 3, 2015 21:41 |
Skwirl posted:Isn't that also just basically his character from Two Guys and a Girl? It's exactly the same character, except Van Wilder is a popular guy instead of a weird friend that people only kind of put up with. The Pizza Place was the best character on that show.
|
|
# ? Apr 3, 2015 21:42 |
|
Skwirl posted:Isn't that also just basically his character from Two Guys and a Girl?
|
# ? Apr 3, 2015 21:54 |
|
Pussyface sounds like the name of a Dick Tracy villain.
|
# ? Apr 3, 2015 23:59 |
|
Phylodox posted:Buried proved that Reynolds has hella serious acting chops, too. I think he (or his agent) just has a tendency to play it safe and stick to the wise-cracking rear end in a top hat roles. Unfortunately Woman in Gold is getting really bad reviews, so those 'hella serious acting chops' might take a hit. And Reynolds at maximum snark is his performance in Waiting.... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sFZevrHkWVE BIG HEADLINE fucked around with this message at 00:38 on Apr 4, 2015 |
# ? Apr 4, 2015 00:20 |
|
Gnome de plume posted:Pussyface sounds like the name of a Dick Tracy villain. No, you're thinking of Putty Puss.
|
# ? Apr 4, 2015 01:05 |
BIG HEADLINE posted:Unfortunately Woman in Gold is getting really bad reviews, so those 'hella serious acting chops' might take a hit. And Reynolds at maximum snark is his performance in Waiting.... Waiting is an underrated classic.
|
|
# ? Apr 4, 2015 05:11 |
|
The sequel was hot garbage, though. Hot, smelly garbage.
|
# ? Apr 4, 2015 05:17 |
|
TheJoker138 posted:Waiting is an underrated classic. I wouldn't say classic but it's definitely aged and endured far far better than the reception it got on release suggested. Sometimes well-executed formula works. And yes the sequel is impressively bad even by the levels you'd expect from a bro-level comedy flick. mind the walrus fucked around with this message at 05:44 on Apr 4, 2015 |
# ? Apr 4, 2015 05:26 |
There was never a sequel and I will not entertain the notion that there was.
|
|
# ? Apr 4, 2015 05:32 |
|
The sequel is so bad I'm surprised Reynolds wasn't in it.
|
# ? Apr 4, 2015 05:55 |
|
I dunno, I thought the sequel was alright. I never did figure out the 'Exhale' subtitle though.
|
# ? Apr 4, 2015 05:58 |
|
Cabbit posted:I dunno, I thought the sequel was alright. I never did figure out the 'Exhale' subtitle though. I think you're thinking of the prequel.
|
# ? Apr 4, 2015 06:03 |
|
Rhyno posted:I think you're thinking of the prequel. Hahahahaha, nice avatar.
|
# ? Apr 4, 2015 06:47 |
|
Small Frozen Thing posted:Hahahahaha, nice avatar. It's what I get for viciously mocking a perverted pedophile in BSS. It's the avatar he himself chose. I figure I post enough and IOC will get rid of it for me.
|
# ? Apr 4, 2015 06:49 |
|
I don't remember ever being as angry at a movie as I was with Van Wilder. It's offensively bad. I'm aware how incredibly dumb this is, but that's just how bad Van Wilder was.
|
# ? Apr 4, 2015 09:18 |
|
TheJoker138 posted:There was never a sequel and I will not entertain the notion that there was. This guy is the most correct person in this thread. And I'm not just saying that because I've been compared to Ryan Reynolds in the movie Waiting.
|
# ? Apr 4, 2015 09:30 |
|
Found a few good random panels on the Robot's Pajamas. No Deadpool tho.
|
# ? Apr 6, 2015 22:41 |
|
Ryan Reynolds' best work was on the Canadian teen soap opera Fifteen. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GSUv2xldR4g
|
# ? Apr 7, 2015 15:22 |
|
|
# ? Apr 7, 2015 16:45 |
|
We are in good hands.
|
# ? Apr 7, 2015 16:58 |
|
Yes yes, there's an action figure thread but everyone needs to see Money was invented for the sole purpose of possessing this.
|
# ? Apr 7, 2015 22:42 |
|
EXCELSIOR, BITCHES!
|
# ? Apr 7, 2015 23:23 |
|
False advertising! His ego is clearly only 1:2 scale!
|
# ? Apr 7, 2015 23:48 |
|
|
# ? May 25, 2024 14:48 |
|
Does it come with a soapbox accessory?
|
# ? Apr 8, 2015 15:06 |