- Adbot
-
ADBOT LOVES YOU
|
|
#
?
Jun 5, 2024 22:47
|
|
- I.N.R.I
- May 26, 2011
-
|
Oh you have no idea, buddy. My many jowls quiver under my beard.
I tell ya what; I'll take another look at Guzzler's post. I admit, I skimmed over it, cuz it looked like a weak-rear end troll that wasn't really funny, but I am defending the concept of looking at and thinking about entertainment, even children's entertainment, so I suppose I should try to be fair.
I laughed when you had to assert this twice. Grr it's so humorless to think about what Goof Troop could be saying about society! drat you, English Literature majors
Any Disney product is packed to the brim with meaning, and it can be fun/interesting to puzzle out. sorry but that's just how I feel, th1nk.
Ok let's take a peek at this infamous warlock:
Good start, the simple language creates a sense that "of course it's so obvious!", made me laugh, for reals, even though I'm pretty sure the coming explanation of How It Is Bad is gonna be weak as poo poo
Cool dichotomy bro. No doubt it's accurate, although it would require some counter-examples to be certain. Perhaps they will be forthcoming.
More of the same.
Triticum Guzzler does not like the taste of these nerds
They're gross!
Ha ha ha, no kidding! poo poo's getting downright meta here - I'll give Guzzler the benefit of the doubt that he/she/porpoise possesses self-awareness.
Don't forget, they're gross!
Holy hell, finally an actual criticism. It was hidden under all those appeals to human bodies (they're gross!) and children (they're dumb!). Unfortunately, it's a pretty weak complaint: why is "basic analysis" bad? Should they go . . deeper? And I've never got the impression of CR as "obsessed with id politics", although that could be possible, and wouldn't ya know, we're gonna get an actual example! Singular, so "obsessed" is a bit of a stretch, but still, this section of the post is showing some sincere effort!
Even if one disagrees with the review's reasons, you'd have to be borderline illiterate to miss them. Remember, this is "basic analysis". Sir Kodiak's (who reads comic books! gross and dumb!) post already covered it, as did a cursory re-read of BigBudgetSequel's (who's fat and reviews kids movies! gross and dumb!) review, but we've already come this far so here it is again:
- the movie is bad because it focuses on the least interesting character (a good criticism imo)
- the villain is a mockery of drag queens, and that's bad because cross-dressers/queers are often portrayed negatively in children's media (this is kinda weak criticism*. but the reviewer does tell you why he thinks it's bad)
*It's weak cuz the review doesn't really dig into the villain and how his cross-dressing is portrayed. Sounds like his slavish devotion to social-climbing has warped his body and mind, literately hosed his gender. In a movie where the main character is raised by sub-humans. There could be something interesting here, the review doesn't really explore it, but it doesn't sound like the film does either. Anyways, if the cross-dressing is really portrayed as a bad thing, it needs to be compared to similar stuff, like Bugs Bunny.
Like, in the Jungle Book, when Baloo the bear dresses up as a girl-orangutan to seduce King louie. On the surface, it's just played for silly laughs. Yet the film is showing a hero disguise himself as a black transsexual to successfully subvert the power of a monarchy, while singing I wanna be like you-u-u and it's awesome as hell and where was I?
Right. In conclusion: Triticum Guzzler's post has one good point buried under countless appeals to the dumbness of children, a weird amount of emotion over the bodies of strangers, vague assertions that serious/real movie discussion happens elsewhere, etc. In essence, it is not good. It is bad.
Scrooge prob owns the transport system, so they ride for free!
are you okay homo.
(USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2014 14:03
|
|
- I.N.R.I
- May 26, 2011
-
|
the things u people do with the english language are horrifying.
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2014 14:04
|
|
- COBRARocky
- Jul 28, 2013
-
|
that gone girl review reads like an angry tumblr blog.
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2014 14:11
|
|
- Plutonis
- Mar 25, 2011
-
|
Oh you have no idea, buddy. My many jowls quiver under my beard.
I tell ya what; I'll take another look at Guzzler's post. I admit, I skimmed over it, cuz it looked like a weak-rear end troll that wasn't really funny, but I am defending the concept of looking at and thinking about entertainment, even children's entertainment, so I suppose I should try to be fair.
I laughed when you had to assert this twice. Grr it's so humorless to think about what Goof Troop could be saying about society! drat you, English Literature majors
Any Disney product is packed to the brim with meaning, and it can be fun/interesting to puzzle out. sorry but that's just how I feel, th1nk.
Ok let's take a peek at this infamous warlock:
Good start, the simple language creates a sense that "of course it's so obvious!", made me laugh, for reals, even though I'm pretty sure the coming explanation of How It Is Bad is gonna be weak as poo poo
Cool dichotomy bro. No doubt it's accurate, although it would require some counter-examples to be certain. Perhaps they will be forthcoming.
More of the same.
Triticum Guzzler does not like the taste of these nerds
They're gross!
Ha ha ha, no kidding! poo poo's getting downright meta here - I'll give Guzzler the benefit of the doubt that he/she/porpoise possesses self-awareness.
Don't forget, they're gross!
Holy hell, finally an actual criticism. It was hidden under all those appeals to human bodies (they're gross!) and children (they're dumb!). Unfortunately, it's a pretty weak complaint: why is "basic analysis" bad? Should they go . . deeper? And I've never got the impression of CR as "obsessed with id politics", although that could be possible, and wouldn't ya know, we're gonna get an actual example! Singular, so "obsessed" is a bit of a stretch, but still, this section of the post is showing some sincere effort!
Even if one disagrees with the review's reasons, you'd have to be borderline illiterate to miss them. Remember, this is "basic analysis". Sir Kodiak's (who reads comic books! gross and dumb!) post already covered it, as did a cursory re-read of BigBudgetSequel's (who's fat and reviews kids movies! gross and dumb!) review, but we've already come this far so here it is again:
- the movie is bad because it focuses on the least interesting character (a good criticism imo)
- the villain is a mockery of drag queens, and that's bad because cross-dressers/queers are often portrayed negatively in children's media (this is kinda weak criticism*. but the reviewer does tell you why he thinks it's bad)
*It's weak cuz the review doesn't really dig into the villain and how his cross-dressing is portrayed. Sounds like his slavish devotion to social-climbing has warped his body and mind, literately hosed his gender. In a movie where the main character is raised by sub-humans. There could be something interesting here, the review doesn't really explore it, but it doesn't sound like the film does either. Anyways, if the cross-dressing is really portrayed as a bad thing, it needs to be compared to similar stuff, like Bugs Bunny.
Like, in the Jungle Book, when Baloo the bear dresses up as a girl-orangutan to seduce King louie. On the surface, it's just played for silly laughs. Yet the film is showing a hero disguise himself as a black transsexual to successfully subvert the power of a monarchy, while singing I wanna be like you-u-u and it's awesome as hell and where was I?
Right. In conclusion: Triticum Guzzler's post has one good point buried under countless appeals to the dumbness of children, a weird amount of emotion over the bodies of strangers, vague assertions that serious/real movie discussion happens elsewhere, etc. In essence, it is not good. It is bad.
Scrooge prob owns the transport system, so they ride for free!
You seem to be an imbecile
(USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2014 14:24
|
|
- client
- Aug 19, 2010
-
|
that gone girl review reads like an angry tumblr blog.
its really cool that the same weird dudes who were undoubtedly brutally owned by women at every stage of their life are now outraged at a movie girl being mean
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2014 14:29
|
|
- a Loving Dog
- May 12, 2001
-
more like a Barking Dog, woof!
|
Oh you have no idea, buddy. My many jowls quiver under my beard.
I tell ya what; I'll take another look at Guzzler's post. I admit, I skimmed over it, cuz it looked like a weak-rear end troll that wasn't really funny, but I am defending the concept of looking at and thinking about entertainment, even children's entertainment, so I suppose I should try to be fair.
I laughed when you had to assert this twice. Grr it's so humorless to think about what Goof Troop could be saying about society! drat you, English Literature majors
Any Disney product is packed to the brim with meaning, and it can be fun/interesting to puzzle out. sorry but that's just how I feel, th1nk.
Ok let's take a peek at this infamous warlock:
Good start, the simple language creates a sense that "of course it's so obvious!", made me laugh, for reals, even though I'm pretty sure the coming explanation of How It Is Bad is gonna be weak as poo poo
Cool dichotomy bro. No doubt it's accurate, although it would require some counter-examples to be certain. Perhaps they will be forthcoming.
More of the same.
Triticum Guzzler does not like the taste of these nerds
They're gross!
Ha ha ha, no kidding! poo poo's getting downright meta here - I'll give Guzzler the benefit of the doubt that he/she/porpoise possesses self-awareness.
Don't forget, they're gross!
Holy hell, finally an actual criticism. It was hidden under all those appeals to human bodies (they're gross!) and children (they're dumb!). Unfortunately, it's a pretty weak complaint: why is "basic analysis" bad? Should they go . . deeper? And I've never got the impression of CR as "obsessed with id politics", although that could be possible, and wouldn't ya know, we're gonna get an actual example! Singular, so "obsessed" is a bit of a stretch, but still, this section of the post is showing some sincere effort!
Even if one disagrees with the review's reasons, you'd have to be borderline illiterate to miss them. Remember, this is "basic analysis". Sir Kodiak's (who reads comic books! gross and dumb!) post already covered it, as did a cursory re-read of BigBudgetSequel's (who's fat and reviews kids movies! gross and dumb!) review, but we've already come this far so here it is again:
- the movie is bad because it focuses on the least interesting character (a good criticism imo)
- the villain is a mockery of drag queens, and that's bad because cross-dressers/queers are often portrayed negatively in children's media (this is kinda weak criticism*. but the reviewer does tell you why he thinks it's bad)
*It's weak cuz the review doesn't really dig into the villain and how his cross-dressing is portrayed. Sounds like his slavish devotion to social-climbing has warped his body and mind, literately hosed his gender. In a movie where the main character is raised by sub-humans. There could be something interesting here, the review doesn't really explore it, but it doesn't sound like the film does either. Anyways, if the cross-dressing is really portrayed as a bad thing, it needs to be compared to similar stuff, like Bugs Bunny.
Like, in the Jungle Book, when Baloo the bear dresses up as a girl-orangutan to seduce King louie. On the surface, it's just played for silly laughs. Yet the film is showing a hero disguise himself as a black transsexual to successfully subvert the power of a monarchy, while singing I wanna be like you-u-u and it's awesome as hell and where was I?
Right. In conclusion: Triticum Guzzler's post has one good point buried under countless appeals to the dumbness of children, a weird amount of emotion over the bodies of strangers, vague assertions that serious/real movie discussion happens elsewhere, etc. In essence, it is not good. It is bad.
Scrooge prob owns the transport system, so they ride for free!
you are a fag dude
(USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2014 14:43
|
|
- Skip My Posts
- Aug 15, 2005
-
by FactsAreUseless
|
Oh you have no idea, buddy. My many jowls quiver under my beard.
I tell ya what; I'll take another look at Guzzler's post. I admit, I skimmed over it, cuz it looked like a weak-rear end troll that wasn't really funny, but I am defending the concept of looking at and thinking about entertainment, even children's entertainment, so I suppose I should try to be fair.
I laughed when you had to assert this twice. Grr it's so humorless to think about what Goof Troop could be saying about society! drat you, English Literature majors
Any Disney product is packed to the brim with meaning, and it can be fun/interesting to puzzle out. sorry but that's just how I feel, th1nk.
Ok let's take a peek at this infamous warlock:
Good start, the simple language creates a sense that "of course it's so obvious!", made me laugh, for reals, even though I'm pretty sure the coming explanation of How It Is Bad is gonna be weak as poo poo
Cool dichotomy bro. No doubt it's accurate, although it would require some counter-examples to be certain. Perhaps they will be forthcoming.
More of the same.
Triticum Guzzler does not like the taste of these nerds
They're gross!
Ha ha ha, no kidding! poo poo's getting downright meta here - I'll give Guzzler the benefit of the doubt that he/she/porpoise possesses self-awareness.
Don't forget, they're gross!
Holy hell, finally an actual criticism. It was hidden under all those appeals to human bodies (they're gross!) and children (they're dumb!). Unfortunately, it's a pretty weak complaint: why is "basic analysis" bad? Should they go . . deeper? And I've never got the impression of CR as "obsessed with id politics", although that could be possible, and wouldn't ya know, we're gonna get an actual example! Singular, so "obsessed" is a bit of a stretch, but still, this section of the post is showing some sincere effort!
Even if one disagrees with the review's reasons, you'd have to be borderline illiterate to miss them. Remember, this is "basic analysis". Sir Kodiak's (who reads comic books! gross and dumb!) post already covered it, as did a cursory re-read of BigBudgetSequel's (who's fat and reviews kids movies! gross and dumb!) review, but we've already come this far so here it is again:
- the movie is bad because it focuses on the least interesting character (a good criticism imo)
- the villain is a mockery of drag queens, and that's bad because cross-dressers/queers are often portrayed negatively in children's media (this is kinda weak criticism*. but the reviewer does tell you why he thinks it's bad)
*It's weak cuz the review doesn't really dig into the villain and how his cross-dressing is portrayed. Sounds like his slavish devotion to social-climbing has warped his body and mind, literately hosed his gender. In a movie where the main character is raised by sub-humans. There could be something interesting here, the review doesn't really explore it, but it doesn't sound like the film does either. Anyways, if the cross-dressing is really portrayed as a bad thing, it needs to be compared to similar stuff, like Bugs Bunny.
Like, in the Jungle Book, when Baloo the bear dresses up as a girl-orangutan to seduce King louie. On the surface, it's just played for silly laughs. Yet the film is showing a hero disguise himself as a black transsexual to successfully subvert the power of a monarchy, while singing I wanna be like you-u-u and it's awesome as hell and where was I?
Right. In conclusion: Triticum Guzzler's post has one good point buried under countless appeals to the dumbness of children, a weird amount of emotion over the bodies of strangers, vague assertions that serious/real movie discussion happens elsewhere, etc. In essence, it is not good. It is bad.
Scrooge prob owns the transport system, so they ride for free!
Lmao
(USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2014 16:30
|
|
- Ruddha
- Jan 21, 2006
-
when you realize how cool and retarded everything is you will tilt your head back and laugh at the sky
|
Oh you have no idea, buddy. My many jowls quiver under my beard.
I tell ya what; I'll take another look at Guzzler's post. I admit, I skimmed over it, cuz it looked like a weak-rear end troll that wasn't really funny, but I am defending the concept of looking at and thinking about entertainment, even children's entertainment, so I suppose I should try to be fair.
I laughed when you had to assert this twice. Grr it's so humorless to think about what Goof Troop could be saying about society! drat you, English Literature majors
Any Disney product is packed to the brim with meaning, and it can be fun/interesting to puzzle out. sorry but that's just how I feel, th1nk.
Ok let's take a peek at this infamous warlock:
Good start, the simple language creates a sense that "of course it's so obvious!", made me laugh, for reals, even though I'm pretty sure the coming explanation of How It Is Bad is gonna be weak as poo poo
Cool dichotomy bro. No doubt it's accurate, although it would require some counter-examples to be certain. Perhaps they will be forthcoming.
More of the same.
Triticum Guzzler does not like the taste of these nerds
They're gross!
Ha ha ha, no kidding! poo poo's getting downright meta here - I'll give Guzzler the benefit of the doubt that he/she/porpoise possesses self-awareness.
Don't forget, they're gross!
Holy hell, finally an actual criticism. It was hidden under all those appeals to human bodies (they're gross!) and children (they're dumb!). Unfortunately, it's a pretty weak complaint: why is "basic analysis" bad? Should they go . . deeper? And I've never got the impression of CR as "obsessed with id politics", although that could be possible, and wouldn't ya know, we're gonna get an actual example! Singular, so "obsessed" is a bit of a stretch, but still, this section of the post is showing some sincere effort!
Even if one disagrees with the review's reasons, you'd have to be borderline illiterate to miss them. Remember, this is "basic analysis". Sir Kodiak's (who reads comic books! gross and dumb!) post already covered it, as did a cursory re-read of BigBudgetSequel's (who's fat and reviews kids movies! gross and dumb!) review, but we've already come this far so here it is again:
- the movie is bad because it focuses on the least interesting character (a good criticism imo)
- the villain is a mockery of drag queens, and that's bad because cross-dressers/queers are often portrayed negatively in children's media (this is kinda weak criticism*. but the reviewer does tell you why he thinks it's bad)
*It's weak cuz the review doesn't really dig into the villain and how his cross-dressing is portrayed. Sounds like his slavish devotion to social-climbing has warped his body and mind, literately hosed his gender. In a movie where the main character is raised by sub-humans. There could be something interesting here, the review doesn't really explore it, but it doesn't sound like the film does either. Anyways, if the cross-dressing is really portrayed as a bad thing, it needs to be compared to similar stuff, like Bugs Bunny.
Like, in the Jungle Book, when Baloo the bear dresses up as a girl-orangutan to seduce King louie. On the surface, it's just played for silly laughs. Yet the film is showing a hero disguise himself as a black transsexual to successfully subvert the power of a monarchy, while singing I wanna be like you-u-u and it's awesome as hell and where was I?
Right. In conclusion: Triticum Guzzler's post has one good point buried under countless appeals to the dumbness of children, a weird amount of emotion over the bodies of strangers, vague assertions that serious/real movie discussion happens elsewhere, etc. In essence, it is not good. It is bad.
Scrooge prob owns the transport system, so they ride for free!
People quote Duncan's long post to laugh with him and tell him he's good, but peopl quote your long post to call you a homo, a fag word, to call you dumb etc which is a form of review itself and quite beautiful
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2014 16:41
|
|
- discount cathouse
- Mar 25, 2009
-
|
The gone girl reviewer this week seems very obsessed with Rape.
I am concerned about your mental health, Movie review guy.
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2014 16:48
|
|
- Plutonis
- Mar 25, 2011
-
|
Saying that a bear disguising as a female urang-utan is equal to a black transsexual sounds like the sort of thing i'd read from Stormfront.
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2014 16:54
|
|
- Lightanchor
- Nov 2, 2012
-
|
"if a book and a head smash together and it sounds hollow, it's not always the books fault" - Martin Heidegger, Member of NSDAP
That's Lichtenberg
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2014 17:21
|
|
- African AIDS cum
- Feb 29, 2012
-
Welcome back, welcome back, welcome baaaack
|
that gone girl review reads like an angry tumblr blog.
They are de-tumblrfying the forums
(USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2014 17:29
|
|
- Ralp
- Aug 19, 2004
-
by Jeffrey of YOSPOS
|
Triticum Guzzler made a legit good post. I can cop to that. But when all the rest of you guys can do is emptyquote Triticum Guzzler without actually adding anything to the conversation, all you're doing is making it really obvious that you don't spend any time on the subforums where people have to make actual arguments if they want to be taken seriously.
Like, if you think their movie comprehension is wrong, try explaining why. If you think their jokes aren't funny, try explaining why. poo poo, dude, I liked the g0m review too. But I didn't come to the thread to post that because what's the loving point of echoing the exact same thing a dozen other people already said.
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2014 17:53
|
|
- halleys comet
- Feb 29, 2012
-
|
You are gay.
(USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2014 17:56
|
|
- Machinegunboyo
- Apr 26, 2010
-
life is good
|
They are de-tumblrfying the forums
(USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)
Are they?
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2014 18:05
|
|
- A Keg
- Jan 7, 2014
-
by Ralp
|
quote:
(USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)
Go gently caress yourself ralp
(USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST)
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2014 18:34
|
|
- ArfJason
- Sep 5, 2011
-
|
I was at Macy's thanksgiving parade and it was time for the balloons to pass by my street. I looked out my window and saw all those classic icons of cartoons, like spongebob, mickey mouse and he-man. Then came movie characters, and there was this loving massive balloon of the dragon from the neverending story (falcor?), and those creatures from Gremlins, among other things. After that came corporate mascots, you know stuff like Coca Cola's Santa Claus, Chester Cheetah and Tony Tiger.
But what caught my attention, was what the Camel cigarette company brought. It was an insanely gigantic Camel, seems they wanted to bring him back and make him relevant again. He stood taller than some buildings, and had a cigarette on his mouth that was thicker than a subway train.
That was the very first time I saw a bigger fag than ralp.
(USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST)
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2014 18:37
|
|
- ArfJason
- Sep 5, 2011
-
|
also applies to the jungle book transsexual guy
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2014 18:39
|
|
- Butt Frosted Cake
- Dec 27, 2010
-
|
I like watching people get upset over stupid trivial things so I'm alright with the current releases. Like I won't read them but sometimes I'll skim one and laugh a bit. I don't think that's the comedy you guys should be striving for but I guess that works too.
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2014 18:41
|
|
- dionysian
- Dec 30, 2012
-
|
you're a retard ralp
(USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST)
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2014 18:42
|
|
- bonestructure
- Sep 25, 2008
-
by Ralp
|
I was at Macy's thanksgiving parade and it was time for the balloons to pass by my street. I looked out my window and saw all those classic icons of cartoons, like spongebob, mickey mouse and he-man. Then came movie characters, and there was this loving massive balloon of the dragon from the neverending story (falcor?), and those creatures from Gremlins, among other things. After that came corporate mascots, you know stuff like Coca Cola's Santa Claus, Chester Cheetah and Tony Tiger.
But what caught my attention, was what the Camel cigarette company brought. It was an insanely gigantic Camel, seems they wanted to bring him back and make him relevant again. He stood taller than some buildings, and had a cigarette on his mouth that was thicker than a subway train.
That was the very first time I saw a bigger fag than ralp.
that is loving funny
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2014 19:06
|
|
- daft
- Oct 16, 2012
-
|
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2014 19:06
|
|
- A FUCKIN BONG BOMB
- Apr 6, 2006
-
|
I would argue that children's movies are of lesser cultural value than movies made to engage adults, and that as a result reviews of children's movies by adults are of even less cultural value.
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2014 19:13
|
|
- That DICK!
- Sep 28, 2010
-
|
The critic... has become the critiqued
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2014 19:13
|
|
- Daikatana Ritsu
- Aug 1, 2008
-
|
Ignoring the whole "this is a comedy website and the writers should be funny" thing for a moment, wouldn't you agree they should at least be accurate in their snide hatred of everything that falls out of their narrow, idealistic world view?
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2014 19:48
|
|
- Mean Bean Machine
- May 9, 2008
-
Only when I breathe.
|
Why are people getting probated and banned for offering their feedback on a movie review? And who exactly wrote this review that I did not read but has apparently been the source of such hatred? These are the questions on this poster's mind.
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2014 19:49
|
|
- Daikatana Ritsu
- Aug 1, 2008
-
|
I'm not sure if you're agreeing with the post or if you're just retarded, but I'm going to assume you're retarded and tell you that's the name of the character in the movie.
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2014 19:56
|
|
- Ralp
- Aug 19, 2004
-
by Jeffrey of YOSPOS
|
Why was this person probated for posting the truth?
Calling the writers "a bunch of pathetic idiots" is not what this forum is for. You can post that in FYAD.
This isn't the place to discuss bans and probations either; don't post about it again here.
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2014 20:02
|
|
- Daikatana Ritsu
- Aug 1, 2008
-
|
Calling the writers "a bunch of pathetic idiots" is not what this forum is for.
Sure, but what about the valid criticism that went ignored?
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2014 20:36
|
|
- I AM THE MOON
- Dec 21, 2012
-
|
Valid criticism is not what this forum is for.
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2014 20:39
|
|
- Lumpy the Cook
- Feb 4, 2011
-
Drippy-goo-yay, mother-gunker!
|
Holy hell, finally an actual criticism. It was hidden under all those appeals to human bodies (they're gross!) and children (they're dumb!). Unfortunately, it's a pretty weak complaint: why is "basic analysis" bad? Should they go . . deeper? And I've never got the impression of CR as "obsessed with id politics", although that could be possible, and wouldn't ya know, we're gonna get an actual example! Singular, so "obsessed" is a bit of a stretch, but still, this section of the post is showing some sincere effort!
http://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?threadid=3637888#post430183295
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2014 21:10
|
|
- HoAssHo
- Mar 10, 2005
-
|
I was at Macy's thanksgiving parade and it was time for the balloons to pass by my street. I looked out my window and saw all those classic icons of cartoons, like spongebob, mickey mouse and he-man. Then came movie characters, and there was this loving massive balloon of the dragon from the neverending story (falcor?), and those creatures from Gremlins, among other things. After that came corporate mascots, you know stuff like Coca Cola's Santa Claus, Chester Cheetah and Tony Tiger.
But what caught my attention, was what the Camel cigarette company brought. It was an insanely gigantic Camel, seems they wanted to bring him back and make him relevant again. He stood taller than some buildings, and had a cigarette on his mouth that was thicker than a subway train.
That was the very first time I saw a bigger fag than ralp.
(USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST)
This has become one of my all-time favorite posts. You're a really good poster.
edit: had to delete part of this because it's recently become an illegal topic
HoAssHo fucked around with this message at 21:18 on Oct 5, 2014
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2014 21:15
|
|
- Adbot
-
ADBOT LOVES YOU
|
|
#
?
Jun 5, 2024 22:47
|
|
- Chilled Cactus
- Nov 15, 2011
-
-
College Slice
|
After reading today's review of Gone Girl, I would like to adjust my position: the BoxTrolls review was excellent.
|
#
?
Oct 5, 2014 21:21
|
|