Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
DrPlump
Oct 5, 2004

by Jeffrey of YOSPOS

Vladimir Putin posted:

The ban is stupid because (among other reasons) its unenforceable. You can't tell who is a Muslim or not just by looking at them.

The “virtue signaling” process works the same way in the US and this is the reason you will find so many white people in the US who seem eager to believe in things that don’t make sense and are completely inconsistent.

A very good example is Black Lives Matter and the white people who support it. The “narrative” includes the idea that black people are victims oppressed by racist white police and killed with immunity. The facts, however, are that even though blacks are responsible for most violent crime, they are killed by police at a LOWER rate than whites.

So, how can you accept this narrative knowing that it doesn’t fit the facts?

Because accepting this narrative is virtue signaling. They believe they will be rewarded with higher social status by showing their allegiance to the Jesus and Mother Mary of the Social Justice religion. This is the purpose. And this is why it is not possible to argue with them. Because they are not attempting to evaluate facts – they are, functionally, proclaiming how much they love God just so that the rest of the congregation can hear them.

Remember the “you’re a loving white male” guy, from the Trump protest? The most telling part of this video was this:

AIDS Skrillex: Let’s talk about all the black people killed by police [he is surrounded by black people]

Trump supporter: Okay, let’s talk about all the WHITE people who are killed by police!

AIDS Skrillex: gently caress YOU

Most conversations with SJW’s will follow this format to some extent because they aren’t debating, they are displaying the strength of their faith in their religion. You can’t argue with that. And that's why they are comfortable breaking the rules, violating free speech, silencing people, shaming them, and using violence. Because it's not a conversation for them. You can't question God, and when you think you have God on your side you can make up your own rules.

If you’ve paid attention, you’ve noticed that any attempt to regulate illegal immigration is viewed as racism. Now, any reasonable person can see this is insane – it is racist to enforce your own laws? How can that be? How does that make any sense? How can “didn’t obey the law” be a race? How can any person really think that it is?

Bu the word “racist” is to the Social Justice religion as the word “heretical” was to Christianity in the old days. It doesn’t have anything to do with race. It simply means that you are not allowed to talk about this. Which means that illegal immigration is something the establishment has found profitable. So they have used their information machinery to add to the SJW narrative that "criticizing illegal immigration is racism" and those who accept this narrative do so because they believe it signals virtue to do so. They believe they will be rewarded with social status and viewed as being "good."

They don't actually care about immigrants. If you did, you would WANT to enforce the law so that those most deserving could come. Have a conversation with a person who tried to immigrate to the US legally. It's a horrible, hellish, expensive procedure. People who are against regulating illegal immigration are, by the converse of this, in favor of loving over all the honest, hard-working immigrants who try to favor the law. Would you want to gently caress over the honest and law-abiding immigrants and reward the law-breaking ones, if your main desire was to help immigrants? Of course not. Because, as in all cases with the SJW religion, their goal isn't to help people it's to "signal virtue."

One very useful thing to note about the logic of the SJW religion is that it is now illegal to "generalize." If you've ever attempted to have a conversation about a group of people and their behavior (and this group isn't white men), you will be met with the comment "You can't generalize." Or, "Not all __ are ___ !" This really is a very clever strategy. It gives useful idiots the chance to feel morally superior and intelligent when what they're really saying is that "it's forbidden to observe the behavior of this group." These people are the self-appointed "morality police" of the Social Justice religion, telling you who you are, and are not allowed to observe. Pay attention to this - notice which groups of people you are not allowed to observe.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Epic High Five
Jun 5, 2004



Pence is an evangelical who refused to endorse Trump, but just may hitch onto the bandwagon now that his career-defining legislation just got poo poo all over publicly.

If he goes whole hog with Trump, I'd love to see what his internals are looking like for re-election here.

Lemming
Apr 21, 2008

DrPlump posted:

The “virtue signaling” process works the same way in the US and this is the reason you will find so many white people in the US who seem eager to believe in things that don’t make sense and are completely inconsistent.

A very good example is Black Lives Matter and the white people who support it. The “narrative” includes the idea that black people are victims oppressed by racist white police and killed with immunity. The facts, however, are that even though blacks are responsible for most violent crime, they are killed by police at a LOWER rate than whites.

So, how can you accept this narrative knowing that it doesn’t fit the facts?

Because accepting this narrative is virtue signaling. They believe they will be rewarded with higher social status by showing their allegiance to the Jesus and Mother Mary of the Social Justice religion. This is the purpose. And this is why it is not possible to argue with them. Because they are not attempting to evaluate facts – they are, functionally, proclaiming how much they love God just so that the rest of the congregation can hear them.

Remember the “you’re a loving white male” guy, from the Trump protest? The most telling part of this video was this:

AIDS Skrillex: Let’s talk about all the black people killed by police [he is surrounded by black people]

Trump supporter: Okay, let’s talk about all the WHITE people who are killed by police!

AIDS Skrillex: gently caress YOU

Most conversations with SJW’s will follow this format to some extent because they aren’t debating, they are displaying the strength of their faith in their religion. You can’t argue with that. And that's why they are comfortable breaking the rules, violating free speech, silencing people, shaming them, and using violence. Because it's not a conversation for them. You can't question God, and when you think you have God on your side you can make up your own rules.

If you’ve paid attention, you’ve noticed that any attempt to regulate illegal immigration is viewed as racism. Now, any reasonable person can see this is insane – it is racist to enforce your own laws? How can that be? How does that make any sense? How can “didn’t obey the law” be a race? How can any person really think that it is?

Bu the word “racist” is to the Social Justice religion as the word “heretical” was to Christianity in the old days. It doesn’t have anything to do with race. It simply means that you are not allowed to talk about this. Which means that illegal immigration is something the establishment has found profitable. So they have used their information machinery to add to the SJW narrative that "criticizing illegal immigration is racism" and those who accept this narrative do so because they believe it signals virtue to do so. They believe they will be rewarded with social status and viewed as being "good."

They don't actually care about immigrants. If you did, you would WANT to enforce the law so that those most deserving could come. Have a conversation with a person who tried to immigrate to the US legally. It's a horrible, hellish, expensive procedure. People who are against regulating illegal immigration are, by the converse of this, in favor of loving over all the honest, hard-working immigrants who try to favor the law. Would you want to gently caress over the honest and law-abiding immigrants and reward the law-breaking ones, if your main desire was to help immigrants? Of course not. Because, as in all cases with the SJW religion, their goal isn't to help people it's to "signal virtue."

One very useful thing to note about the logic of the SJW religion is that it is now illegal to "generalize." If you've ever attempted to have a conversation about a group of people and their behavior (and this group isn't white men), you will be met with the comment "You can't generalize." Or, "Not all __ are ___ !" This really is a very clever strategy. It gives useful idiots the chance to feel morally superior and intelligent when what they're really saying is that "it's forbidden to observe the behavior of this group." These people are the self-appointed "morality police" of the Social Justice religion, telling you who you are, and are not allowed to observe. Pay attention to this - notice which groups of people you are not allowed to observe.

Did you actually write all this? Jesus christ lmao

Epic High Five
Jun 5, 2004



That's a lot of words to justify attempts to box blacks out of their own movement aimed at crazy controversial stuff like, "please notice that we're being straight up murdered by the police in a lot of areas"

StandardVC10
Feb 6, 2007

This avatar now 50% more dark mode compliant
Source your quotes DrPlump

Jewel Repetition
Dec 24, 2012

Ask me about Briar Rose and Chicken Chaser.

DrPlump posted:

The thing to understand about the people who support Hillary is that their intention is not really to help the needy. How could it be? It’s been proven a hundred different ways that most of the people coming in this crisis aren’t the ones in need, and that money spent on them would benefit far more people if it were spent in other ways. If your goal was to be a moral utilitarian and help as many people as possible, building camps in Germany to house unemployed twenty-somethings from Africa is not effective at helping those dying in Syria, how could it be? No one is dumb enough to think it is.

But the “REFUGEES WELCOME” types have a different motivation, known as “virtue signaling.” Social Justice is the new religion, and diversity and multiculturalism are now Jesus and Mother Mary. Refugees welcome posters are the new rosary beads. They are showing what upstanding citizens they are by displaying their loyalty to their new Jesus. It actually has nothing to do with a desire to help the refugees because if this was the desire, they would want to take measures to make sure that resources are used effectively and on people who are in real need. They don’t want that.

But this “narrative” that the establishment has constructed, to which the left has sworn its allegiance, is extremely useful to the establishment. Because it’s got people arguing about islamophobia, white privilege, and other fake bullshit instead of talking about the real question – which is why the gently caress do the governments of Europe want to fill the continent with hostile Islamic ghettos?

Wow that didn't end quite how I was expecting.

Oiled and Ready
Oct 11, 2004

He wished it could be as respectable and orthodox as spying. But somehow in his hands the traditional tools and attitudes were always employed toward mean ends: cloak for a laundry sack, dagger to peel potatoes, dossiers to fill up dead Sunday afternoons ...

Three Olives posted:

I couldn't give a poo poo about the "Press 1" stuff but it drives me crazy that when I call my city it says "For information in Spanish press 2. Para obtener información en la prensa española 2"

I don't understand this, what could possibly be the subset of people that need instructions to request Spanish in English?

The racists press 1 before the Spanish language part of the press 2 and it calms them

No seriously

paranoid randroid
Mar 4, 2007
post your own, original crazy thoughts or go to jail, you slacker incel bastard

Flavahbeast
Jul 21, 2001


hillary is gonna make america press 2 for english

Piquai Souban
Mar 21, 2007

Manque du respect: toujours.
Triple bas cinq: toujours.

Trump considers Mount Rushmore a monument to weakness. Sad!

Tayter Swift
Nov 18, 2002

Pillbug

DrPlump posted:

The “virtue signaling” process works the same way in the US and this is the reason you will find so many white people in the US who seem eager to believe in things that don’t make sense and are completely inconsistent.

A very good example is Black Lives Matter and the white people who support it. The “narrative” includes the idea that black people are victims oppressed by racist white police and killed with immunity. The facts, however, are that even though blacks are responsible for most violent crime, they are killed by police at a LOWER rate than whites.

So, how can you accept this narrative knowing that it doesn’t fit the facts?

Because accepting this narrative is virtue signaling. They believe they will be rewarded with higher social status by showing their allegiance to the Jesus and Mother Mary of the Social Justice religion. This is the purpose. And this is why it is not possible to argue with them. Because they are not attempting to evaluate facts – they are, functionally, proclaiming how much they love God just so that the rest of the congregation can hear them.

Remember the “you’re a loving white male” guy, from the Trump protest? The most telling part of this video was this:

AIDS Skrillex: Let’s talk about all the black people killed by police [he is surrounded by black people]

Trump supporter: Okay, let’s talk about all the WHITE people who are killed by police!

AIDS Skrillex: gently caress YOU

Most conversations with SJW’s will follow this format to some extent because they aren’t debating, they are displaying the strength of their faith in their religion. You can’t argue with that. And that's why they are comfortable breaking the rules, violating free speech, silencing people, shaming them, and using violence. Because it's not a conversation for them. You can't question God, and when you think you have God on your side you can make up your own rules.

If you’ve paid attention, you’ve noticed that any attempt to regulate illegal immigration is viewed as racism. Now, any reasonable person can see this is insane – it is racist to enforce your own laws? How can that be? How does that make any sense? How can “didn’t obey the law” be a race? How can any person really think that it is?

Bu the word “racist” is to the Social Justice religion as the word “heretical” was to Christianity in the old days. It doesn’t have anything to do with race. It simply means that you are not allowed to talk about this. Which means that illegal immigration is something the establishment has found profitable. So they have used their information machinery to add to the SJW narrative that "criticizing illegal immigration is racism" and those who accept this narrative do so because they believe it signals virtue to do so. They believe they will be rewarded with social status and viewed as being "good."

They don't actually care about immigrants. If you did, you would WANT to enforce the law so that those most deserving could come. Have a conversation with a person who tried to immigrate to the US legally. It's a horrible, hellish, expensive procedure. People who are against regulating illegal immigration are, by the converse of this, in favor of loving over all the honest, hard-working immigrants who try to favor the law. Would you want to gently caress over the honest and law-abiding immigrants and reward the law-breaking ones, if your main desire was to help immigrants? Of course not. Because, as in all cases with the SJW religion, their goal isn't to help people it's to "signal virtue."

One very useful thing to note about the logic of the SJW religion is that it is now illegal to "generalize." If you've ever attempted to have a conversation about a group of people and their behavior (and this group isn't white men), you will be met with the comment "You can't generalize." Or, "Not all __ are ___ !" This really is a very clever strategy. It gives useful idiots the chance to feel morally superior and intelligent when what they're really saying is that "it's forbidden to observe the behavior of this group." These people are the self-appointed "morality police" of the Social Justice religion, telling you who you are, and are not allowed to observe. Pay attention to this - notice which groups of people you are not allowed to observe.

How did you type all this in three minutes you are a fast typer!

BrutalistMcDonalds
Oct 4, 2012


Lipstick Apathy

DrPlump posted:

The “virtue signaling” process works the same way in the US and this is the reason you will find so many white people in the US who seem eager to believe in things that don’t make sense and are completely inconsistent.

A very good example is Black Lives Matter and the white people who support it. The “narrative” includes the idea that black people are victims oppressed by racist white police and killed with immunity. The facts, however, are that even though blacks are responsible for most violent crime, they are killed by police at a LOWER rate than whites.

So, how can you accept this narrative knowing that it doesn’t fit the facts?

Because accepting this narrative is virtue signaling. They believe they will be rewarded with higher social status by showing their allegiance to the Jesus and Mother Mary of the Social Justice religion. This is the purpose. And this is why it is not possible to argue with them. Because they are not attempting to evaluate facts – they are, functionally, proclaiming how much they love God just so that the rest of the congregation can hear them.

Remember the “you’re a loving white male” guy, from the Trump protest? The most telling part of this video was this:

AIDS Skrillex: Let’s talk about all the black people killed by police [he is surrounded by black people]

Trump supporter: Okay, let’s talk about all the WHITE people who are killed by police!

AIDS Skrillex: gently caress YOU

Most conversations with SJW’s will follow this format to some extent because they aren’t debating, they are displaying the strength of their faith in their religion. You can’t argue with that. And that's why they are comfortable breaking the rules, violating free speech, silencing people, shaming them, and using violence. Because it's not a conversation for them. You can't question God, and when you think you have God on your side you can make up your own rules.

If you’ve paid attention, you’ve noticed that any attempt to regulate illegal immigration is viewed as racism. Now, any reasonable person can see this is insane – it is racist to enforce your own laws? How can that be? How does that make any sense? How can “didn’t obey the law” be a race? How can any person really think that it is?

Bu the word “racist” is to the Social Justice religion as the word “heretical” was to Christianity in the old days. It doesn’t have anything to do with race. It simply means that you are not allowed to talk about this. Which means that illegal immigration is something the establishment has found profitable. So they have used their information machinery to add to the SJW narrative that "criticizing illegal immigration is racism" and those who accept this narrative do so because they believe it signals virtue to do so. They believe they will be rewarded with social status and viewed as being "good."

They don't actually care about immigrants. If you did, you would WANT to enforce the law so that those most deserving could come. Have a conversation with a person who tried to immigrate to the US legally. It's a horrible, hellish, expensive procedure. People who are against regulating illegal immigration are, by the converse of this, in favor of loving over all the honest, hard-working immigrants who try to favor the law. Would you want to gently caress over the honest and law-abiding immigrants and reward the law-breaking ones, if your main desire was to help immigrants? Of course not. Because, as in all cases with the SJW religion, their goal isn't to help people it's to "signal virtue."

One very useful thing to note about the logic of the SJW religion is that it is now illegal to "generalize." If you've ever attempted to have a conversation about a group of people and their behavior (and this group isn't white men), you will be met with the comment "You can't generalize." Or, "Not all __ are ___ !" This really is a very clever strategy. It gives useful idiots the chance to feel morally superior and intelligent when what they're really saying is that "it's forbidden to observe the behavior of this group." These people are the self-appointed "morality police" of the Social Justice religion, telling you who you are, and are not allowed to observe. Pay attention to this - notice which groups of people you are not allowed to observe.
It's really because of Zionist Jews in charge of the banking system! :derp:

Harald
Jul 10, 2009

by Fluffdaddy
can anyone explain what a heeby jobby is?

DrPlump
Oct 5, 2004

by Jeffrey of YOSPOS

Wikkheiser posted:

It's really because of Zionist Jews in charge of the banking system! :derp:

This is not a political diatribe. It is just my brief reflection of the actual substantive differences between Trump and Obama and how these reflect the inherent differences we face within our culture as a whole. They tie directly to TRP principles and the broader national outcome will determine if the United States is to be an alpha or a beta nation.

The largest difference between Obama and Trump is not racism. Instead, it deals basically in the value and role of nationalism in guiding American policy: in terms of foreign, economic, and domestic policy.

I can say that the American political establishment is a post-nationalist elite. They see the United States as a vehicle for world governance, for the control and management of the world economy to fit the interest of specific corporate and banking structures. This logic is the heart of the neoliberal free trade policies that are put in place. The neoliberal economic vision looks at economics from the perspective of efficiency and wealth creation in the macro sense. To the neoliberal economist, the fact that a trade policy might empoverish the nation is a secondary consideration. In actual fact, it is beneficial because it simply shows that 'labor costs' are too high.

Obama's administration is a continuation of this trend but it also highlights just how far away from the pursuit of American interests the government has drifted. For example, the Obama administration lifted a restriction that prevented people with HIV from entering the US as tourist or residents. (And to be perfectly clear, the policy was set in motion by the Bush administration). http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/8438865.stm

It is perfectly obvious and logical that such actions will actually expose and infect American's to HIV/AIDS. But protecting American's does not matter.

Obama would not impose travel restrictions on West Africa after the Ebola outbreak because they would 'hurt' West African economies. Many European countries had restrictions, but Obama was happy to simply play the odds and would rather not hurt West African economies then further secure the lives of American citizens from potential exposure to a deadly disease.

To add to this, the Obama administration lifted restrictions on a number of additional STD restrictions in the past few months for people who wish to immigrate to the United States.

At no point are the interest of the United States taken as paramount. At no point are the interest of the American people held above those of the rest of the world. Instead, the American people are simply to provide a service to others, the nation to be reduced as a unique moral and political republic with its own traditions and values that require preservation.

There is absolutely no interest in actually going after illegal immigration because the very idea of being American and having particular, distinct, and inalienable rights stands against what the elites want. To treat American citizens and illegals as the same only reduces the true rights of Americans, lowering the moral and legal rights that we should expect and demand of our government.

Without even considering what motives might be behind this wider movement, we can examine Obama as a kind of intellectual with no sense of community or history. Obama is not a great man and will never be a great man, because he is a man who could never build a great country. Obama inherited the vestige of a great nation, but only use it to further its decline in a sea of empty 'moral gestures' at the same time that he serves corporate and inherently anti-American interests.

So what's the issue with Trump. Trump is a man who is highly competitive, who exhausts himself and his family above others. Trump asks: what can I do for myself and by extension, what can I do for my family.

Trump views the world in sharp boundaries. There is a difference between an American and a non-American. American lives are worth more than those of non-Americans. American's have no duty to the rest of the world. They have a duty to themselves, their families, their wealth, and their future. The fact that building a wall might 'disrupt' the economic well being of illegal immigrants or the economy of Mexico is MEXICO'S problem. If it hurts, suck it up. You've hurt us for long enough.

Nationalism is the greatest danger to the elites, because it forces the popultion to examine how government policies are serving them. It builds an expectation that the government is to engage in treaties for the benefit of the people and not the corporations. So, for instance, we find that the US government often lobbies governments of behave of corporations but never on behalf of labor unions. That's a choice, and one that has cost the American people dearly.

The elites want to create a weak state. And make no mistake, America is a very weak state. A state that can't even stand up to China, to Saudi Arabia, to Israel. A state that has basically surrendered its foreign policy to foreign and often private interests.

Trump wants to restore America to its foundation: one that simply seeks to always focus on increasing the power, wealth, and security of American citizens above all else.

Mark my words, the leadership of China and Russia, Israel, and Saudi Arabia ruthlessly pursue what they consider to be their interest. Unapologetically.

Obama goes to Japan, who still have a shinto shrine for the Japanese war criminals, and tries to apologize for the nuking of two Japanese cities. He goes to the Middle East and apologizes for American foreign policy. He wants to do what is 'right' in some abstract sense.

In a very real sense, the entire dynamic of the beta in the sexual market place is the result of a beta accepting a false and socially constructed view of morality. Morality teaches us about the duties we have to others but ignores the primordial duty we have to ourselves. We must always ask: how does this person, job, or relationship address my needs and goals.

Alpha men put their needs above those of others. Alpha leaders put the needs of their people above others. In each case, they recognize the inherently unjust and competitive nature of the world and the need to act with ruthlessness in securing ones interest. For men to true will, this is not a situation to morn but to actively welcome. The world belongs to those tho dare, to those who demand, to those who pound the table for MORE.

The anti-Trump rhetoric is the exact echo that is used to beta shamme a man who places his own interest first. Who should go ahead and wife up the slut with two kids. To take in useless immigrants who will contribute nothing positive to the society. Who might hold standards and say: only people with an education. Or who will dare to call out people who have values that are antithetical to those of our own society.

Now Trump might act as president, if elected, is a secondary matter. At this point, I just wanted to highlight what I see as the true and most salient differences between the two candidates and what aspect of American society they resonate with.

paranoid randroid
Mar 4, 2007
PYF Failson Manifesto

DrPlump
Oct 5, 2004

by Jeffrey of YOSPOS
Guys people caught on that globalist means jew so we need to change up the word again now its post-nationalist elite.

Lemming
Apr 21, 2008
Oh, it's just a copy paste. Boring.

Badger of Basra
Jul 26, 2007

i'm still confused as to why there is no wordfilter from globalist to (((globalist)))

DaveWoo
Aug 14, 2004

Fun Shoe

Piquai Souban posted:

Trump considers Mount Rushmore a monument to weakness. Sad!

Nah, it just needs a snappier name. Like Mount Trump!

Badger of Basra posted:

i'm still confused as to why there is no wordfilter from globalist to (((globalist)))

:agreed:

Joementum
May 23, 2004

jesus christ

Harald posted:

can anyone explain what a heeby jobby is?

A hijab.

babypolis
Nov 4, 2009

Flavahbeast posted:

another classic meme from the folks at rapeable.com

Da motha loving rape z0ne

DrPlump
Oct 5, 2004

by Jeffrey of YOSPOS
It seems likes there is 3 groups supporting Trump and it is the same 3 who supported gamer gate.
1. People who are red pill or alt right as gently caress.
2. Trolls who mainly are after rustled jimmies.
3. Clueless normies drawn in by one of the top layer arguments.


The regular old GOP farts are supporting Trump based on him saying what they have been thinking for years. The trolls are being as controversial as possible. The red pill and alt right actually believe much worse poo poo but are just going along with these "watered down" positions as a springboard to full (white) patriarchy.

StandardVC10
Feb 6, 2007

This avatar now 50% more dark mode compliant

Badger of Basra posted:

i'm still confused as to why there is no wordfilter from globalist to (((globalist)))

Globalist --> Illuminatus

Globalism --> ZOG

Phobophilia
Apr 26, 2008

by Hand Knit

DrPlump posted:

Guys people caught on that globalist means jew so we need to change up the word again now its post-nationalist elite.

as a world traveller who fucks daily, i

Al!
Apr 2, 2010

:coolspot::coolspot::coolspot::coolspot::coolspot:

DrPlump posted:

The thing to understand about the people who support Hillary is that their intention is not really to help the needy. How could it be? It’s been proven a hundred different ways that most of the people coming in this crisis aren’t the ones in need, and that money spent on them would benefit far more people if it were spent in other ways. If your goal was to be a moral utilitarian and help as many people as possible, building camps in Germany to house unemployed twenty-somethings from Africa is not effective at helping those dying in Syria, how could it be? No one is dumb enough to think it is.

But the “REFUGEES WELCOME” types have a different motivation, known as “virtue signaling.” Social Justice is the new religion, and diversity and multiculturalism are now Jesus and Mother Mary. Refugees welcome posters are the new rosary beads. They are showing what upstanding citizens they are by displaying their loyalty to their new Jesus. It actually has nothing to do with a desire to help the refugees because if this was the desire, they would want to take measures to make sure that resources are used effectively and on people who are in real need. They don’t want that.

But this “narrative” that the establishment has constructed, to which the left has sworn its allegiance, is extremely useful to the establishment. Because it’s got people arguing about islamophobia, white privilege, and other fake bullshit instead of talking about the real question – which is why the gently caress do the governments of Europe want to fill the continent with hostile Islamic ghettos?

holy moly this post

i say swears online
Mar 4, 2005

StandardVC10 posted:


Globalism --> ZOG

oh man that brings me back to 2009

Lemming
Apr 21, 2008

Al! posted:

holy moly this post



Pretty sure he's copying these from somewhere, but that itself still suggest high levels of brain damage

Al!
Apr 2, 2010

:coolspot::coolspot::coolspot::coolspot::coolspot:

Lemming posted:

Pretty sure he's copying these from somewhere, but that itself still suggest high levels of brain damage

yeah i know, that was just a hypnotrump of appreciation

DrPlump
Oct 5, 2004

by Jeffrey of YOSPOS

Lemming posted:

Pretty sure he's copying these from somewhere, but that itself still suggest high levels of brain damage

Why the gently caress do the governments of Europe want to fill the continent with hostile Islamic ghettos?

Al!
Apr 2, 2010

:coolspot::coolspot::coolspot::coolspot::coolspot:
what the gently caress is thit poo poo

DrPlump
Oct 5, 2004

by Jeffrey of YOSPOS
Seriously why I don't think he even answered that question.

Powered Descent
Jul 13, 2008

We haven't had that spirit here since 1969.


If it's Pence, we all get to make really cheesy Mary Poppins references for the rest of the election about the part where the bankers take the kid's tuppence.

Trumppence, prudently, fruitfully frugally invested...

Thump!
Nov 25, 2007

Look, fat, here's the fact, Kulak!



Harald posted:

can anyone explain what a heeby jobby is?

You know how you get the heebie jeebies when you see Ted Cruz's face? It's kinda like that, an almost primal, instinctual revulsion that causes the hairs on the back of the neck to stand and your fight or flight instinct to kick in.

Except, you know, for Muslims.

DrPlump
Oct 5, 2004

by Jeffrey of YOSPOS

Al! posted:

what the gently caress is thit poo poo



Virtue Signaling :bahgawd:

Deteriorata
Feb 6, 2005

Lemming posted:

Pretty sure he's copying these from somewhere, but that itself still suggest high levels of brain damage

Select some of the text and Google it. It's from reddit.

Phobophilia
Apr 26, 2008

by Hand Knit
is it from a subreddit or a DOMREDDIT

Lemming
Apr 21, 2008

Deteriorata posted:

Select some of the text and Google it. It's from reddit.

I didn't even read the post, let alone let it into my clipboard!

BEAR GRYLLZ
Jul 30, 2006

I have strong erections for Israel.
Strong, pathetic erections.

Al! posted:

what the gently caress is thit poo poo



why the gently caress would you ever probate baloogan, that's dumb

he's surely built up at least one threat on the president's life in mod immunity this is an outrage

RedQueen
Apr 21, 2007

It takes all the running you can do just to stay in the same place.
I will never get tired of reading all the Trump mini-transcripts that get posted (copious highlighting or no). I guess that means I'm a broken human being

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Mr. Pumroy
May 20, 2001

RedQueen posted:

I will never get tired of reading all the Trump mini-transcripts that get posted (copious highlighting or no). I guess that means I'm a broken human being

back in the old days, people had to travel from miles around and pay money to a carnival barker to see a man in a straw hat who would speak in a strange tongue while sitting in a cage the size of a phone booth. now we just log on and push refresh on the donald trump twitter account

  • Locked thread