|
Just-In-Timeberlake posted:wtf did they think was going to happen
|
#
?
Feb 8, 2016 15:24
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 9, 2024 14:11 |
|
|
|
|
#
?
Feb 8, 2016 16:40
|
|
|
Athletic Footjob posted:show me those master beef curtains, whoretana
|
|
#
?
Feb 8, 2016 20:51
|
|
|
Just-In-Timeberlake posted:wtf did they think- let me stop you there if anything this is coming across as Microsoft's company-wide mid-life crisis
|
|
#
?
Feb 8, 2016 22:34
|
|
|
Pinterest Mom posted:
you need the full progression to really understand imo 
|
|
#
?
Feb 8, 2016 22:44
|
|
|
Stux posted:you need the full progression to really understand imo followed by the panic braking when they realized the name was on every win10 pc now 
|
|
#
?
Feb 8, 2016 23:30
|
|
|
i just decided to try the windows 10 netflix application instead of the browser, first to share it with anyone there is no way to copy a link to it except to put it on onenote and then copy paste from there , then to change the play quality you have to actually open the netflix settings on the web because the settings on the app itself just show netflix irl address, then finally movie playing! the audio was for some weird reason defaulted to 5.1 even though i have a stereo headset and stereo speakers, if you get a notification or anything that covers the full screen player it pauses, and there is no way to disable that. this is why microsoft is cool now
|
|
#
?
Feb 8, 2016 23:30
|
|
|
Stux posted:you need the full progression to really understand imo this image never gets old
|
|
#
?
Feb 8, 2016 23:42
|
|
|
im waiting for the bill gates style ms email leak where the head of windows emails the halo people re: cortanas tits.
|
|
#
?
Feb 8, 2016 23:46
|
|
|
carry on then posted:followed by the panic braking when they realized the name was on every win10 pc now but has paul-san defended this yet
|
|
#
?
Feb 8, 2016 23:47
|
|
|
Just-In-Timeberlake posted:but has paul-san defended this yet https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q-t4AwmqpMs
|
|
#
?
Feb 8, 2016 23:48
|
|
|
carry on then posted:followed by the panic braking when they realized the name was on every win10 pc now prude rear end hologram. get ur 64 bit tits out
|
|
#
?
Feb 8, 2016 23:49
|
|
|
Firstly, she's not actually nude, because she has neither clothes nor private parts. She's effectively just wearing a kind of holographic body stocking. That's the conceit. However, like you said, that's what it makes you think of. We've backed into the canon and had this conversation even before we ever showed pictures of Cortana. Why is she doing that? Why would an AI pick that? Well, we have other AIs. We have one who dresses like a wizard. We have one who dresses like a World War 2 pilot. They do it because they feel like it's a part of their personality. In Cortana's case, because she's illegally cloned from a real human brain, she's a little bit different than other AIs. One of the reasons she does it is to attract and demand attention. And she does it to put people off so they're on their guard when they're talking to her and that she has the upper hand in those conversations. It's kind of almost like the opposite of that nightmare you have where you go to school in the nude, and you're terrified and embarrassed. She's kind of projecting that back out to her audience and winning intellectual points as a result.
|
|
#
?
Feb 8, 2016 23:51
|
|
|
no, dig up!
|
|
#
?
Feb 8, 2016 23:53
|
|
|
Pinterest Mom posted:It's kind of almost like the opposite of that nightmare you have where you go to school in the nude, and you're terrified and embarrassed. She's kind of projecting that back out to her audience and winning intellectual points as a result.
|
|
#
?
Feb 8, 2016 23:59
|
|
|
inTITlectual more like that TITS
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2016 00:15
|
|
|
Athletic Footjob posted:prude rear end hologram. get ur 64 bit tits out
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2016 00:18
|
|
|
This woman with lovingly rendered tits, hips, rear end, toes, and pussy mound is definitely not nude,
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2016 00:36
|
|
|
Athletic Footjob posted:prude rear end hologram. get ur 64 bit tits out me to her: where have your tits polygon? haha
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2016 00:42
|
|
|
holy poo poo is that really cortana never played a halo, might now tho 
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2016 01:51
|
|
|
Internaut! posted:holy poo poo is that really cortana but this time im makin an exception!!!!
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2016 02:04
|
|
|
I think Microsoft is not releasing a lot of phones (they only released the current ones to make the fans happy) to bring the Mobile OS on par with Android and iOS. Once they finish up OneCore (Redstone?) they'll start to market it again. By then the Desktop OS will have enough market share (lets say 500 million by the end of the year) that developers can't really get around the store and with the UWP model it will be very easy for developers to bring those apps to Mobile, HoloLens and other spaces. Microsoft is laying low for now, taking a beating in market share to try and come back with a unified platform that will work the same across all devices. It is the only way to get back into mobile because any other way just wont cut it against Androids massive (its a worldwide security nightmare waiting to happen) user base and Apple's image. Money-wise they can fund the platform for years to come to build their dream.
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2016 06:18
|
|
|
Pinterest Mom posted:please don't harass my blue naked big titty lady So what you're saying is, maybe she should stop asking for it? Always... asking... for it!
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2016 08:40
|
|
|
mishaq posted:I think Microsoft is not releasing a lot of phones (they only released the current ones to make the fans happy) to bring the Mobile OS on par with Android and iOS. Once they finish up OneCore (Redstone?) they'll start to market it again. By then the Desktop OS will have enough market share (lets say 500 million by the end of the year) that developers can't really get around the store and with the UWP model it will be very easy for developers to bring those apps to Mobile, HoloLens and other spaces. looking forward to Windows universal developers learning the same lessons that other platforms learned about cross platform development being a nightmare of mediocrity
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2016 10:32
|
|
|
developers (developers! developers!!) are just waiting with baited breath to develop for a microsoft platform, after having never been bitten in the rear end repatedly before, so this sounds like a good strategy
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2016 16:32
|
|
|
it boggles my mind that people are still using/buying the idea that making a thing compile on several different platforms easy means it's really any less work to build appropriate software for a computer, phone, tablet and game console
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2016 16:59
|
|
|
qirex posted:it boggles my mind that people are still using/buying the idea that making a thing compile on several different platforms easy means it's really any less work to build appropriate software for a computer, phone, tablet and game console whenever i make hobby apps i get the data structures & logic and all the internals up in no time, and then i always lose interest when i get to the UI and it takes forever to get my rear end in gear. doing it for multiple platforms would be the worst.
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2016 17:04
|
|
|
actually, you see, xaml blah blah blah blah
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2016 17:05
|
|
|
qirex posted:it boggles my mind that people are still using/buying the idea that making a thing compile on several different platforms easy means it's really any less work to build appropriate software for a computer, phone, tablet and game console and these devs can just qa their own code too
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2016 18:02
|
|
|
graph posted:and these devs can just qa their own code too of course they can, microsoft got rid of half their qa and it's going great!
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2016 18:09
|
|
|
Clockwerk posted:developers (developers! developers!!) are just waiting with baited breath to develop for a microsoft platform, after having never been bitten in the rear end repatedly before, so this sounds like a good strategy .net is the newest thing developed by microsoft that they still support everything that was developed after that has already been abandoned.
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2016 18:46
|
|
|
qirex posted:it boggles my mind that people are still using/buying the idea that making a thing compile on several different platforms easy means it's really any less work to build appropriate software for a computer, phone, tablet and game console it absolutely saves time for the developers and depending on which platforms you're targeting you can save design time too.
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2016 18:50
|
|
|
The problem w/ windows universal apps is every app everyone wants is already on windows outside of the store so theres no reason for those developers to move it into the store and convert them to universal apps
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2016 18:53
|
|
|
Shaggar posted:The problem w/ windows universal apps is every app everyone wants is already on windows outside of the store so theres no reason for those developers to move it into the store and convert them to universal apps And that's why Microsoft is cool again
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2016 18:54
|
|
|
Shaggar posted:The problem w/ windows universal apps is every app everyone wants is already on windows outside of the store so theres no reason for those developers to move it into the store and convert them to universal apps microsoft should've supported "desktop apps" in the app store and incentivized it so that devs preferred it instead of hosting their poo poo on sourceforge, in 2016 that's probably like the 20th time i've posted that.
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2016 19:10
|
|
|
the app store should be something people actually want to use instead of avoiding because it contains 2,000,000 apps (95% malware)
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2016 19:12
|
|
|
Snapchat A Titty posted:whenever i make hobby apps i get the data structures & logic and all the internals up in no time, and then i always lose interest when i get to the UI and it takes forever to get my rear end in gear. doing it for multiple platforms would be the worst. This. I hate doing UI work.
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2016 19:14
|
|
|
Wheany posted:microsoft should've supported "desktop apps" in the app store and incentivized it so that devs preferred it instead of hosting their poo poo on sourceforge, in 2016 yeah and the store should have been added to windows 7 in an sp3
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2016 19:21
|
|
|
Wheany posted:the app store should be something people actually want to use instead of avoiding because it contains 2,000,000 apps (95% malware)
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2016 19:57
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 9, 2024 14:11 |
|
|
has anyone done an App Store well on the desktop because Apple certainly hasn't
|
|
#
?
Feb 9, 2016 20:07
|
|
