|
Ol' Billy Redface! Tomorrow should be a good one.
|
#
?
Nov 24, 2015 04:35
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 4, 2024 14:07 |
|
|
Rhesus Pieces posted:Ol' Billy Redface! Tomorrow should be a good one. Nice! Will definitely be listening to that one.
|
|
#
?
Nov 24, 2015 16:08
|
|
|
It will be nice to listen to him on a podcast where he's not talking about sports (not including UFC) for the majority of it.
|
|
#
?
Nov 24, 2015 16:26
|
|
|
since when did Burr stop being funny?
|
|
#
?
Nov 26, 2015 19:37
|
|
|
Haven't listened to it yet except for the monkey story on YouTube and it was pretty drat funny. He did seem not himself though. Maybe he did ayahuasca
|
|
#
?
Nov 26, 2015 20:06
|
|
|
Hate on haters. I enjoyed it.
|
|
#
?
Nov 26, 2015 22:56
|
|
|
XIII posted:Hate on haters. I enjoyed it.
|
|
#
?
Nov 26, 2015 23:31
|
|
|
diesiel posted:since when did Burr stop being funny? That episode was good, sorry.
|
|
#
?
Nov 26, 2015 23:50
|
|
|
diesiel posted:since when did Burr stop being funny? Since never!
|
|
#
?
Dec 1, 2015 19:15
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Dec 11, 2015 00:00
|
|
|
I'm feeling it. 2017 is the year.
|
|
#
?
Dec 11, 2015 02:30
|
|
|
Dang, Lance Armstrong.
|
|
#
?
Dec 15, 2015 22:15
|
|
|
I really hope it's a good episode
|
|
#
?
Dec 15, 2015 23:05
|
|
|
Joe really taking "having people on that take drugs" to a whole new level.
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2015 02:53
|
|
|
The Lance Armstrong episode is interesting as hell.
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2015 05:43
|
|
|
Keg posted:The Lance Armstrong episode is interesting as hell. It's really weird to see how he views himself. He's still absolutely a huge dick about the whole situation, but I think when you win the tour 7 consecutive times your ego gets more than a little inflated. And he completely glosses over the lawsuits he filed that ruined peoples lives in order to cover his lying. Still a VERY interesting interview that you would never get on a mainstream show.
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2015 07:00
|
|
|
Viper_3000 posted:And he completely glosses over the lawsuits he filed that ruined peoples lives in order to cover his lying. I do wish Joe would have quizzed him a little more on this.
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2015 08:53
|
|
|
Sootie posted:I do wish Joe would have quizzed him a little more on this. Yeah, that's my main problem with Joe. I want him to do a tiny bit more research on his high profile guests, but he's completely uninterested in that. And I get it, the conversational nature of the podcast is what's great and makes it different from someone like Maron who does extensive research and basically interviews people. But I really really wish he would put the smallest bit of effort into finding those nuggets of a person's story that most people have questions about and then ask them in his disarming Joe Rogan-ey way to try and pull a straight answer out of folks. Honestly though? I doubt he'd even get a guy like Lance if they knew he was going to do more than just lob up softballs and spout his own opinions about his situation and let him comment on them. Anyway, yeah. Really interesting show. Y'all should go out of your way to listen if you have any interest in the guy and how he views his story.
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2015 11:31
|
|
|
Interesting episode, I never really paid much attention to this story beyond knowing that he was doping.Viper_3000 posted:And he completely glosses over the lawsuits he filed that ruined peoples lives in order to cover his lying. Still a VERY interesting interview that you would never get on a mainstream show. Who did he file lawsuits against?
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2015 15:38
|
|
|
To be fair I'm pretty sure Joe mentioned the lawsuits and Lance didn't protest. "You were accusing people of lying about your drug use, you were filing all those lawsuits against people", something like that. Anyways, it was a really interesting episode. Maybe not the most entertaining but certainly interesting. The weirdest thing to me was how beaten down Lance was. Like he had been such a defiant rear end in a top hat for so long and then non-apologetic that now he feels he just has to shut up and eat poo poo in all aspects of his case (which is too extreme a reaction in my opinion). It's a bit annoying because I think of lot of what has went on in his case is hosed up and I agreed with a lot of what Joe said, but it was only met with "you can say that, I can't" and no further elaboration which I would've liked. Lance only hinted slightly he might agree. A key example was when Rogan brought up Novitsky and Lance got really animated because he wanted to talk about him but Lance never actually said what he really wanted. He said something like "Was he serious that he wanted to do the podcast with me, really? He can't see why that might be a bad idea". I'm assuming what he wanted to say is "The guy who's ruining my life by dragging out a decades long case on doping in cycling to the year 2016 can't understand why I wouldn't want to be in a room with him?". Lance's whole refusal to stand up for himself was weird because in a lot of cases I think the things Joe was saying (that Lance wanted to agree to) are right and not controversial. The fact that his wins are removed from the tour and no one elses have been is stupid, the fact his case is still going on and the government is still involved and spending money is stupid, the fact he can't say "everyone was doing it, it's ridiculous I've been singled out in this manner" is stupid.
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2015 16:52
|
|
|
hot sauce posted:Who did he file lawsuits against? I can't remember everyone, but suffice to say if you accused Armstrong of doping, especially in print where the public could read it, and it could be misconstrued to think you implied guilt, he was filing a lawsuit against you. Off the top of my head I think it was a former masseuse, a couple of former teammates, I know the Times in London got hit with a suit they had to settle out of court. Dude went on a litigious rampage to cover the lie back in the day and didn't give a gently caress about anyone in his way. Seltzer posted:To be fair I'm pretty sure Joe mentioned the lawsuits and Lance didn't protest. "You were accusing people of lying about your drug use, you were filing all those lawsuits against people", something like that. Yeah but to be fair he completely glossed over this whole thing. Those lawsuits ruined a lot of peoples lives and he seems to come off thinking of them as "just part of the crossfire" of his past, which is why a lot of people (like me) still think he's an unremorseful dick at times. I agree with the rest of your post though and yeah...really interesting episode for sure.
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2015 17:07
|
|
|
Armstrong did address it though. He said specifically that he hosed over a lot of people and that he's attempted to make amends and personally apologised to every one of them, and even mentioned it was that aspect, the going after people as opposed to the actual doping, that most people took great exception to and wrote him off because of. Maybe I bought his bullshit hook, line and sinker, but that seemed to be the aspect of his behaviour which he regretted the most.
|
|
#
?
Dec 17, 2015 21:40
|
|
|
Viper_3000 posted:Anyway, yeah. Really interesting show. Y'all should go out of your way to listen if you have any interest in the guy and how he views his story. https://youtu.be/RfutD4H8peQ?t=13
|
|
#
?
Dec 18, 2015 21:47
|
|
|
Lance is a legit psycho Duncan and Chris Ryan on tomorrow (tues) and Joey with Redban on thur happy holy daze
|
|
#
?
Dec 22, 2015 02:31
|
|
|
Armstrong interview was fascinating and I feel like I understand him a lot better now. I feel badly for him mostly. While his lies hurt a lot of people and he definitely went full aggro to keep his secret secret, it seems to me that doping wasn't really a choice for his team--it was either dope up or go home, and if that's the reality of the sport, he's much more of a scapegoat than anything else. He deserved the poo poo that happened to him, but I think our hate for him overshadowed the bigger picture, which is that doping is not going away and a real conversation on whether doping really equates to cheating needs to happen.
|
|
#
?
Dec 29, 2015 21:52
|
|
|
BottledBodhisvata posted:he's much more of a scapegoat than anything else. Nah. What happened was more or less in proportion to his fame and profile in America. A lot of cyclists have been banned for doping, it's just that no one in America knows who they are or have worn their yellow wristbands.
|
|
#
?
Dec 30, 2015 15:21
|
|
|
jyrka posted:Nah. What happened was more or less in proportion to his fame and profile in America. A lot of cyclists have been banned for doping, it's just that no one in America knows who they are or have worn their yellow wristbands. That's true, I'll grant, I know literally no other cyclists besides Armstrong.
|
|
#
?
Dec 30, 2015 17:15
|
|
|
The Amazing Atheist ffs
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2016 08:05
|
|
|
Pocket Billiards posted:The Amazing Atheist ffs Oh god. More bigfoot hunters. Less of that.
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2016 17:23
|
|
|
Diaz episode on Christmas was great, as was last weeks Tom Segura. The Aubrey episode, I lasted about 2 min, had to shut it off when Joe said, " have you tried hemp paper? It's so much.... Better...than regular paper. "
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2016 17:25
|
|
|
always be closing posted:Diaz episode on Christmas was great, as was last weeks Tom Segura. The Aubrey episode, I lasted about 2 min, had to shut it off when Joe said, " have you tried hemp paper? It's so much.... Better...than regular paper. " The amazing thing about Diaz is that I've listened to him like 20 different times now and he never runs out of amazing stories. His throwaway stories would be certain guests best stories. I wish he was on more because no matter how much I like him I just can't get into his podcast that much. He doesn't have on good guests that much and I don't like his sidekick.
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2016 17:57
|
|
|
Pocket Billiards posted:The Amazing Atheist ffs Did the banana incident or the hot oil incident or his beliefs around thin privilege get brought up?
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2016 18:06
|
|
|
Pocket Billiards posted:The Amazing Atheist ffs ha, no loving way
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2016 18:41
|
|
|
The Amazing Atheist episode wasn't nearly as bad as I was expecting, but even so having at least an hour of SOCIAL JUSTICE WORRRIORSS every. loving. time is getting really grating. Especially as its essentially the same conversation every time. I've been listening for 18 months or so now think I'm reaching the stage where the 'dumbass stoner' shtick Joe does has stopped being funny and kinda endearing and tipped into 'guy who talks a lot/gets real mad about things he doesn't understand/found out 30 seconds ago'.
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2016 19:04
|
|
|
Keg posted:Did the banana incident or the hot oil incident or his beliefs around thin privilege get brought up? Care to explain this cause I do not know who he is and he looks like he is the type to be deep into MENS RIGHTS e: a-yup CortezFantastic fucked around with this message at 20:22 on Jan 13, 2016 |
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2016 20:02
|
|
|
CortezFantastic posted:Care to explain this cause I do not know who he is and he looks like he is the type to be deep into MENS RIGHTS I saw someone mention it in the youtube comments so I looked it up and uhh, well... click at your own risk.  
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2016 21:54
|
|
|
Tony Hinchcliffe today. Maybe that one won't devolve into two hours of SJW chat. Joe really needs some new material to rant about. Literally the only time I ever hear anyone talk about the evil SJW menace is on this podcast. I'm so tired of hearing about it.
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2016 21:54
|
|
|
Since I literally only listen to guests i know and like at this point, what exactly is his issue? I thought he was all for being cool to each other and other stoner/hippie talk, unless he is mocking the more bizarre tumblresque parts of it
|
|
#
?
Jan 13, 2016 22:58
|
|
|
CortezFantastic posted:Care to explain this cause I do not know who he is and he looks like he is the type to be deep into MENS RIGHTS He shoved a banana up his rear end on webcam because somebody pretending to be a girl told him to. And he poured hot oil on his dick on webcam too. And he whines about SJWs and simultaneously believes in thin privilege.
|
|
#
?
Jan 14, 2016 00:24
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 4, 2024 14:07 |
|
|
CortezFantastic posted:Since I literally only listen to guests i know and like at this point, what exactly is his issue? I thought he was all for being cool to each other and other stoner/hippie talk, unless he is mocking the more bizarre tumblresque parts of it He thinks he's mocking the 'bizarre tumblresque' parts except he has very limited information and insight. It's his new 30 minute transgender mma fighter/wolves/gluten bit that he runs.
|
|
#
?
Jan 14, 2016 23:37
|
|
