|
Wilcox any good? https://twitter.com/gregauman/status/840580289009205249
|
# ? Mar 11, 2017 16:20 |
|
|
# ? Jun 9, 2024 07:23 |
|
tarbrush posted:What've you got against peppers? Versatile super athlete seems to be the in thing at the moment Jabrill Peppers is an awkward pairing with Reshad Jones. I don't trust Peppers to play that much single-high, so you're ultimately in a position where you're asking your $12m a year ultra-safety to cover for him... all so he can fill a role that your $12m a year safety is one of the best in the league at. Dolphins I think are better off looking for a single-high safety. It sucks that the Patriots re-signed Duron Harmon because that would have worked out well.
|
# ? Mar 11, 2017 16:29 |
|
Marshall Newhouse and Alan Barbre still being in the league and actually solid players. This timeline is really hosed up.
|
# ? Mar 11, 2017 16:48 |
|
Lazerbeam posted:About Mike Glennon's contract: The only problem is he's still Mike Glennon.
|
# ? Mar 11, 2017 17:03 |
|
Catfish Noodlin posted:Jabrill Peppers is an awkward pairing with Reshad Jones. I don't trust Peppers to play that much single-high, so you're ultimately in a position where you're asking your $12m a year ultra-safety to cover for him... all so he can fill a role that your $12m a year safety is one of the best in the league at. Fair enough. I assumed they'd draft him if they felt he was bpa and figure out where to play him after that. I can't imagine he'd end up as a conventional FS, more a wierd nickel guy.
|
# ? Mar 11, 2017 17:06 |
|
Ches Neckbeard posted:CB at 5 and I doubt Mike survives till their next pick which is after the Ravens. It just seems odd to be that far in on a WR that isn't top 5. they are drafting mike williams at 5
|
# ? Mar 11, 2017 17:06 |
|
Numbers on Beachum contract. https://twitter.com/RapSheet/status/840571315232878593 Also, Geno Smith is visiting the Giants since Nassib is poo poo.
|
# ? Mar 11, 2017 17:07 |
|
i love in all the talk about how the glennon deal is a savvy front-loaded contract that doesn't really hamstring them they forget about the fact that glennon completely sucks and will probably at most like 10% better than whatever vet min scrap heap guy they could pick up.
|
# ? Mar 11, 2017 17:13 |
R.D. Mangles posted:i love in all the talk about how the glennon deal is a savvy front-loaded contract that doesn't really hamstring them they forget about the fact that glennon completely sucks and will probably at most like 10% better than whatever vet min scrap heap guy they could pick up. Draft like 3 QBs in the middle rounds and just let them battle it out over the season. Maybe you hit on something.
|
|
# ? Mar 11, 2017 17:41 |
|
GaussianCopula posted:Draft like 3 QBs in the middle rounds and just let them battle it out over the season. Maybe you hit on something. the bears will never have a competent quarterback
|
# ? Mar 11, 2017 17:43 |
|
Neat that we were able to hold onto him, even though he'll never have a season like that again in his life. https://twitter.com/RapSheet/status/840604753977581568
|
# ? Mar 11, 2017 17:49 |
|
Pryor wanted $13m per year to sign a 4 year deal with Cleveland lol
|
# ? Mar 11, 2017 17:53 |
|
Thread title is accurate
|
# ? Mar 11, 2017 18:07 |
|
wandler20 posted:Wilcox any good? I dont remember him doing anything remarkable one way or another but i wouldnt get excited about a former dallas defender.
|
# ? Mar 11, 2017 18:17 |
|
beejay posted:The only problem is he's still Mike Glennon. 18.5 million for one year of Glennon? I think I would have taken my chances with Jimmy Clausen for 2 million.
|
# ? Mar 11, 2017 18:29 |
|
sportsgenius86 posted:Pryor wanted $13m per year to sign a 4 year deal with Cleveland lol That's a lot, but they DID give almost that to two guards.
|
# ? Mar 11, 2017 18:31 |
|
sportsgenius86 posted:Pryor wanted $13m per year to sign a 4 year deal with Cleveland lol So he took 8 million for in year, good math there.
|
# ? Mar 11, 2017 18:54 |
|
Elephanthead posted:18.5 million for one year of Glennon? I think I would have taken my chances with Jimmy Clausen for 2 million. Of course it really doesn't matter because they aren't spending any other money and are still way under cap so gently caress it. Just a garbage fire of a franchise.
|
# ? Mar 11, 2017 18:54 |
http://www.cleveland.com/pluto/index.ssf/2017/03/cleveland_browns_have_terry_ta_106.htmlquote:The Browns offered Pryor a $32 million deal over four years, $17 million guaranteed. I'm told Pryor wanted a four-year deal averaging $13 million -- or $52 million total. Not sure how much guaranteed.
|
|
# ? Mar 11, 2017 18:57 |
If I had to stay in Cleveland I'd want stupid money too...not sure why you would chose Washington though. That situation is a whole other level of hosed Also can someone explain why they didn't franchise tag him?
|
|
# ? Mar 11, 2017 19:07 |
CyberPingu posted:If I had to stay in Cleveland I'd want stupid money too...not sure why you would chose Washington though. That situation is a whole other level of hosed Because Cleveland is rebuilding, which means they would be stupid to give him a 15,6m one-year contract.
|
|
# ? Mar 11, 2017 19:16 |
|
R.D. Mangles posted:the bears will never have a competent quarterback It owns.
|
# ? Mar 11, 2017 19:21 |
|
R.D. Mangles posted:i love in all the talk about how the glennon deal is a savvy front-loaded contract that doesn't really hamstring them they forget about the fact that glennon completely sucks and will probably at most like 10% better than whatever vet min scrap heap guy they could pick up.
|
# ? Mar 11, 2017 19:29 |
|
Pryor is also 27 years old so chances are he'd only be able to sign 1 maybeeeeee 2 long term deals left.
|
# ? Mar 11, 2017 19:29 |
|
GaussianCopula posted:Because Cleveland is rebuilding, which means they would be stupid to give him a 15,6m one-year contract. They need to put people in seats next season and they still have like 60 million to spend AFTER signing a shitload of free agents. Why not?
|
# ? Mar 11, 2017 19:39 |
|
Leon Einstein posted:Did Glennon even have the starting job at the end of the season? I thought he got yanked at some point last season. Glennon hasn't started a game since 2014 and only has 11 pass attempts since then.
|
# ? Mar 11, 2017 19:52 |
|
code:
|
# ? Mar 11, 2017 19:57 |
|
https://twitter.com/MikeGarafolo/status/840621965270478848
|
# ? Mar 11, 2017 20:01 |
|
wandler20 posted:Wilcox any good? He started playing safety after his freshman year, so he has understandably been raw. Extremely athletic guy. Last year was his best. He can hit the gently caress outta dudes but has been known to take poor angles at times. He can succeed but shouldn't be the last line of defense
|
# ? Mar 11, 2017 20:09 |
|
wow that's cheap. really huge dude, can chip in in the passing game
|
# ? Mar 11, 2017 20:09 |
|
Tom Sellout posted:He started playing safety after his freshman year, so he has understandably been raw. Extremely athletic guy. Last year was his best. He can hit the gently caress outta dudes but has been known to take poor angles at times. He can succeed but shouldn't be the last line of defense Sounds like an upgrade over Conte. That's not a high bar to cross tho.
|
# ? Mar 11, 2017 21:14 |
|
Patriots sign DE/DT Lawrence Guy from the Ravens, 4 years $20m
|
# ? Mar 11, 2017 21:15 |
|
The Chiefs extended 3rd safety/guy with a nickname Daniel Sorensen. https://twitter.com/MikeGarafolo/status/840548503352967169 Not that they were really in it but this ought to put them out of the safety market for the next couple of years with Berry and Ron Parker locked up.
|
# ? Mar 11, 2017 21:25 |
|
|
# ? Mar 11, 2017 21:29 |
|
|
# ? Mar 11, 2017 21:32 |
|
Ahahahaha
|
# ? Mar 11, 2017 22:34 |
|
https://twitter.com/AdamSchefter/status/840678389509939201 Guess it was an "any tight end _except_ Jared Cook" type of free agency.
|
# ? Mar 11, 2017 22:44 |
Shrimpy posted:https://twitter.com/AdamSchefter/status/840678389509939201 Oh hey I remember this guy from Wisconsin. Did he do anything worthwhile with the Rams?
|
|
# ? Mar 11, 2017 22:47 |
|
Two TE sets all day baby!!!!
|
# ? Mar 11, 2017 22:58 |
|
|
# ? Jun 9, 2024 07:23 |
|
Gumbel2Gumbel posted:I'm assuming Gronkowski is dead and this is how they're going to cover for it. He's not dead, but the percentage of players that come back and last after the amount of injuries and surgeries that Gronk has had is not very high. I think it's just insurance because he's very liable to re-injure from now on.
|
# ? Mar 11, 2017 23:01 |