|
user ansel autism helped me develop my first roll of 35mm ilford delta 100 the other day, also scanned them because he's the best hallway by mydoski, on Flickrnothin' too interesting photo wise, just nice to experience the whole life cycle of negatives for once
|
#
¿
Jan 16, 2015 22:09
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 17, 2024 00:40 |
|
|
BANME.sh posted:Afaik, x-rays show up as waves on your negatives - http://www.kodak.com/global/en/service/tib/tib5201.shtml  I mean I always assumed there was some kind of effect but I wasn't sure what it was exactly. I recently took my backpack full of HP5 through a trip and back, thereby getting xrayed twice, will this have a visible effect?
|
|
#
¿
Jan 27, 2015 04:02
|
|
|
Spedman posted:Nope, even if you stuck it in your checked baggage you should be okay I expected as much but the confirmation will help me rest easy knowing my lovely photos haven't been molested by the barely penetrating rays of a bag scanner
|
|
#
¿
Jan 27, 2015 04:18
|
|
|
Pukestain Pal posted:In case anyone hates money, KEH is doing 10% bodies, 15% lenses, 20% everything else sale with the code SITEWIDE today.  just shook on a deal to get a mamiya c3 from a dorkroom goon and have ordered some hp5 120 and a 80mm f/2.8 lens for it (ontop of the 105mm it's coming with
|
|
#
¿
Jan 29, 2015 02:12
|
|
|
atomicthumbs posted:The most irritating part of working in recycling is dealing with all the worthless junk people recycle. had to look this up because i dont know things but 
|
|
#
¿
Jan 30, 2015 21:52
|
|
|
LooksLikeABabyRat posted:gently caress, I just destroyed an entire roll of film. 
|
|
#
¿
Feb 27, 2015 03:10
|
|
|
nielsm posted:I really like those tones. the names of the photos also say "Delta400"
|
|
#
¿
Mar 2, 2015 08:50
|
|
|
i vaguely name folders by month/year and subject or some sort of sentence that describes where it was because normally im thinking about photos/rolls less in time scales and more areas or content "~/Document/scans/2015 may yurt trip/" "~/Documents/scans/2015 april lovely street shots lol gently caress poo poo drat im so bad at this lmao/"
|
|
#
¿
Jun 10, 2015 07:39
|
|
|
smug little poo poo i'm glad it's dead
|
|
#
¿
Jun 10, 2015 23:31
|
|
|
Megabound posted:I
|
|
#
¿
Feb 12, 2019 00:44
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 17, 2024 00:40 |
|
|
Yond Cassius posted:I'd argue that playtime is valuable, and you can learn a lot if you let yourself gently caress around just for the sheer fun of it. If having cheap and serviceable film lets you shoot more in general (for either financial or psychological reasons), then I'm all for it. Fujiroids do this for me in large format, and if nothing else the sheer impulsive freedom of "Sure, why not? I'm carrying 50 exposures and I bought them cheap." has let me develop a lot faster ( I disagree. In other creative mediums, like painting, an early habit that’s hard to break is repeating brush strokes mindlessly, or dabbing in an area without thinking enough about your goals. This isn’t an issue of wasting paint and affects digital painters as well. Pre-visualizing what you want to see is an important skill to build and if you don’t limit yourself and act with intention you end up with muddy results and it can be difficult to say how you should improve. I think it’s less important to take lots of photos and more important to develop intention. Take lots of photos if you want, but if you can’t remember why you took any of them and most of your results are aimless and boring (whether or not there was a technical problem), you’re dabbing your brush. I think 35 or DSLR users end up in this trap a lot. Feels good to press the shutter, feels bad to only be able to take dentist waiting room landscapes. E: shoot portra 400
|
|
#
¿
Sep 20, 2019 17:55
|
|
) than if I were only doing things where I was sure I wanted to commit.