EDIT: ↓↓ Sorry, I'm stupid. I was directed towards the NAS thread, saw this and thought "Oh hey, that's probably it!", not realizing that enterprise is a bit outside my requirements (and price, I suspect).
BlankSystemDaemon fucked around with this message at 17:42 on Mar 4, 2011 |
|
# ¿ Mar 4, 2011 17:22 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 27, 2024 15:06 |
Pile Of Garbage posted:I'd say the biggest issue with top-load is that you have to pull the chassis out of the rack to replace a HDD. Yes I'm sure that if it is properly installed with the right rails and a suitable cable arm fitted you could do the procedure without powering-off the chassis. However compared to front-load the chance of something going wrong is much higher.
|
|
# ¿ Oct 4, 2021 13:50 |
Thanks Ants posted:They'll still do that by paywalling the files you need
|
|
# ¿ Dec 14, 2022 15:31 |
I've been out of the enterprise storage industry for a while, which I haven't been posting much ITT - but this 30TB 2.5" U.2 Kioxia drive did catch my attention, because 40PB/rack does sound pretty good, even if the 4KB QD64 and 16KB QD32 random IOPS aren't very good, the NVMe interface still offers 2^16 queues with 2^16B each, and the sequential IOPS is pretty alright. Only real downside is that it's got a DWPD of only 1.
|
|
# ¿ Oct 20, 2023 18:41 |
in a well actually posted:I think the PB/1RU density is for the ruler drives; I think supermicro u.2 servers top out at like 24 per U which leaves you at a paltry 30PB per rack.
|
|
# ¿ Oct 21, 2023 01:30 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 27, 2024 15:06 |
Zorak of Michigan posted:Isn't TrueNAS still server-class hardware, such that OS updates require a brief downtime? BlankSystemDaemon fucked around with this message at 10:41 on Dec 7, 2023 |
|
# ¿ Dec 7, 2023 10:37 |