|
rcman50166 posted:Well I live in CT, United States. So, by the map, it looks like I'm out. Doesn't look like good weather anyways. I think you're also a day late on the storm.
|
# ¿ Aug 4, 2010 22:02 |
|
|
# ¿ May 2, 2024 11:16 |
|
Ringo R posted:Rebel film camera with a CMOS sensor Sporting the 2.5-inch LCD display, the EOS REBEL X lets you view the captured photos clearly.
|
# ¿ Nov 3, 2010 18:39 |
|
Reichstag posted:e: Also, I much prefer his non-reflected shot. You're a cold man, Reichstag.
|
# ¿ Oct 8, 2011 03:12 |
|
You should have that camera cast in bronze.
|
# ¿ Dec 20, 2011 19:22 |
|
You could always just pay for some film and shoot it. Instant preset.
|
# ¿ Jan 24, 2012 21:48 |
|
Paragon8 posted:These aren't that great imo. I like how the Portra ones actually crank up the saturation. So accurate!
|
# ¿ Jan 24, 2012 22:17 |
|
xzzy posted:It is nice in that it has a command line interface so batch processing is super easy, but in my experience it takes a bunch of fiddling to get all the arguments set just how you want them.. it has a habit of dicking around with color tables and doing a terrible job with jpeg compression. Lossless image formats work a lot better.. but will require you to use yet another batch tool to convert them for web use. Yes, and ImageMagick has a handy "convert" tool provided to do that.
|
# ¿ Mar 2, 2012 18:10 |
|
PDF is actually a great document format. It's a shame people always equate it with slow/clunky software.
|
# ¿ Mar 7, 2012 18:05 |
|
Reichstag posted:As opposed to getting all artsy with a leica in Afghanistan, which is obviously much more acceptable. Come on. A Leica means you're rich, which also means you're allowed to gawk at those poor brown people
|
# ¿ Mar 16, 2012 23:35 |
|
spog posted:Well paint me yellow and call me Susan: I'd obviously blanked those out of my mind and forgotten they existed. The problem with that kind of scenario is the lack of lenses for MF that would be considered "wide" on 135. You'd be pretty pigeonholed into using teles.
|
# ¿ Jun 19, 2012 20:33 |
|
Clayton Bigsby posted:Unless by "wide" you mean "ultrawide", there are plenty of decent wideangles for MF. Show me an affordable 35mm lens for 645 and beyond and maybe we can start talking.
|
# ¿ Jun 19, 2012 21:27 |
|
Clayton Bigsby posted:Medium format is not cheap. You said that you would basically be restricted to teles, but on say a P1 P45+ back a 28mm would be equivalent to about a 19mm on a 35mm body. That is pretty drat wide to me. A 35mm would be equivalent to about 23mm. And so on. I'm not talking about a setup comparative to 35mm, I'm talking about the viability of a medium format body with a 35mm-sized sensor in it - which would severely restrict your lens choices on the wide end, unless you want to start recessing lenses into the body housing. If we're talking about 645 sized digital backs, it's clearly not an issue. edit: I'm not crazy for thinking along this train of thought: spog posted:I'd love it if someone made a digital sensor back for medium format bodies using a DSLR sensor.
|
# ¿ Jun 19, 2012 21:50 |
|
Send them an invoice for their use. You don't have to feel it necessary to enable their dickery.
|
# ¿ Dec 11, 2012 18:25 |
|
If you don't like glitter awards, delete them and stop joining groups that encourage posting them. Not a difficult problem to solve.
|
# ¿ Dec 18, 2012 21:00 |
|
I think you're reaching for a comparison that's not really there.
|
# ¿ Mar 5, 2013 20:20 |
|
You need to turn in your "cool kids club" card, thanks.
|
# ¿ Mar 29, 2013 23:07 |
|
Re-film 2 girls 1 cup but with Paula Deen's Whipped Butter instead.
|
# ¿ Jun 21, 2013 20:59 |
|
|
# ¿ Jul 3, 2013 23:19 |
|
linkbaitquote:Romantic writers expressed a preference for sublimity over attractiveness in the late 18th and 19th centuries. Edmund Burke wrote, “For sublime objects are vast in their dimensions, beautiful ones comparatively small: beauty should be smooth and polished; the great, rugged and negligent … beauty should not be obscure; the great ought to be dark and gloomy: beauty should be light and delicate; the great ought to be solid, and even massive.” The experience of watching a sunset usually counts as sublime. The scene unfolds on a grand scale, loud with color and radiance; you get a shivery feeling of time passing as you sip your G&T; death draws just a bit nearer. Sunset pictures, though, reduce and tame that sublimity. Instead of your mortality rising to meet you, you see pretty colors, locked in a small and tidy moment. It’s as if putting sunsets on film magically relegates them to the same cloying aesthetic category as wildflowers and blonde children—other people’s.
|
# ¿ Aug 16, 2013 17:08 |
|
helmacron you're loving disgusting
|
# ¿ Nov 20, 2013 19:07 |
|
I think his point is that he doesn't like the Photographer's Gallery.
|
# ¿ Dec 20, 2013 01:47 |
|
I hope you're all aware "wilderness area" doesn't mean "national forest" in this context. You can't even bike inside of them. My rights!!!
|
# ¿ Sep 26, 2014 22:02 |
|
For some strange reason the restriction of commercial photography in conservation spaces doesn't particularly bother me. Does it bother you that you can't walk into national parks for free?
|
# ¿ Sep 26, 2014 22:21 |
|
I love going all out on lots of things related to photography but organizing my catalog is at the absolute bottom of my list
|
# ¿ Feb 9, 2015 16:28 |
|
I'm not entirely sure you know what MLM means
|
# ¿ Feb 25, 2015 22:06 |
|
Ask $500
|
# ¿ May 18, 2015 19:28 |
|
Geektox posted:Are the members of portland photo squad also all programmers too? Either developers or development managers
|
# ¿ Jul 16, 2015 20:15 |
|
Your art is nothing if it's not SOOC
|
# ¿ Nov 9, 2015 21:18 |
|
Wild EEPROM posted:i shot a roll of cinestill 800t outdoors and everything is so drat blue No poo poo, it's tungsten film. What did you expect?
|
# ¿ Jan 3, 2016 18:05 |
|
Couldn't you accomplish that with some imagemagick fuckery?
|
# ¿ Feb 24, 2016 22:31 |
|
burzum karaoke posted:Personally, I wouldn't be caught dead without my new balances and cargo pants. They just make more sense. Comfortable and functional
|
# ¿ Mar 8, 2016 00:08 |
|
A Saucy Bratwurst posted:Calling that art is like calling a 16 year olds imitation of autosalon art. Something you could study and learn from, then
|
# ¿ May 11, 2016 01:05 |
|
I've met lots of photogoons in Portland (where I'm based) and Albuquerque.
|
# ¿ May 24, 2016 17:13 |
|
8th-snype posted:I karaoke with several goons irl weekly. Once I had beers with mrblandaverage. Musket drunk texts me semi regularly. Come to portland on tuesday for musket shenanigans
|
# ¿ May 24, 2016 22:06 |
|
xzzy posted:Anyone significantly older than us doesn't get this whole internet thingamajig, and anyone under 18 isn't going to have a credit card to pay the .
|
# ¿ May 25, 2016 00:53 |
|
Why does Apple have you worried?
|
# ¿ Nov 15, 2016 18:04 |
|
Unless you want to keep up on gaming an iMac will work just fine for years and years
|
# ¿ Nov 15, 2016 19:18 |
|
One thing you can't get with a build-your-own PC is the iMac form factor. If you're cramped for space it's pretty incredible.
|
# ¿ Nov 16, 2016 17:32 |
|
Dren posted:think again I mean an iMac is literally one cable into a monitor, it's pretty hard to beat until you get display + desktop all in one.
|
# ¿ Nov 16, 2016 20:09 |
|
|
# ¿ May 2, 2024 11:16 |
|
http://www.cnn.com/2016/02/29/us/bh-photo-lawsuit/
|
# ¿ Jan 20, 2017 02:31 |