|
plaguedoctor posted:I get ya. I think my main thing was that it seems like a modern photograph, even though it's almost 30 years old. It is a really cool photo. I'm guessing a high saturation/contrast slide film with lots of strobe and the shutter speed high enough to underexpose the ambient by 2+ stops. Neat technique. I use it on the occasional out door wedding shoot, works just as well with a DSLR.
|
# ¿ Dec 14, 2009 10:37 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 28, 2024 21:14 |
|
Maybe a strip light over head and some black cards on the side?
|
# ¿ Apr 27, 2010 03:58 |
|
Suicide Watch posted:I don't know if you guys have seen this before. Appropriate username.
|
# ¿ Nov 22, 2011 02:54 |
|
Run, the empire is breaking our tables with AT-AT walkers and they are pink.
|
# ¿ Feb 11, 2012 13:55 |
|
Bottom Liner posted:I think the subject matter is very interesting, and technically they're fine, but the style is just like every art school portfolio I've seen in the past X years. So what?
|
# ¿ Apr 27, 2012 03:30 |
|
Bottom Liner posted:Haha, ok? Just saying, it's good work, just that that style has been done a million times over. The look and feel of the photos just seems unoriginal to me because of what I've seen a lot of. No need to get hostile. Yes, insult an entire school of aesthetic thought because you don't like it. No need to be hostile.
|
# ¿ Apr 27, 2012 04:18 |
|
Crazy Goat posted:Holy hell, the guy tastefully said he didn't care for them and expressed his opinion. What opinion? He said it's unoriginal but well done technically. He missed the point entirely. Maybe you should read up on the word banal before posting.
|
# ¿ Apr 27, 2012 16:34 |
|
Bottom Liner posted:I don't think those are banal at all. Gursky is banal. A photo of a random wall is banal. Those are well executed landscapes of an exotic location. That is not banal. Don't assume, and don't tell people not to post based on those assumptions. Okay, don't post because you don't know what you are talking about. "Exotic locations" = stuff white people say about SE Asia.
|
# ¿ Apr 27, 2012 17:52 |
|
Bottom Liner posted:I love how you guys just post snide remarks instead of putting effort into coversation and a good discussion environment here. Why not contribute instead of being assholes about it? Get off your high horses. Oh yeah, because we are the ones randomly talking poo poo about stuff we don't understand. Why don't you go make a whiny QCS thread about it? (USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)
|
# ¿ Apr 27, 2012 18:01 |
|
http://www.americanelegy.com/an-interview-with-tom-wik/ This guys work owns.
|
# ¿ Apr 28, 2012 08:21 |
|
More sweet lanscape stuff. I like the clean minimalist lines in "white noise" and "tunnels". http://www.sandermeisner.nl/
|
# ¿ Apr 29, 2012 23:40 |
|
Eh, that stuff is 6x6 Dukeku is a 6x7ist.
|
# ¿ May 1, 2012 06:53 |
|
Paragon8 posted:Time to upgrade to a 5d3! Or any edition of Photoshop with layers. Seriously, in camera multiexposures are hard. Those ones are done in post.
|
# ¿ May 1, 2012 20:27 |
|
Santa is strapped posted:These are not double exposures. They're reflections on a window. I remember reading about the photographer and I'm pretty sure he said they were reflections. Makes sense.
|
# ¿ May 2, 2012 01:00 |
|
aliencowboy posted:If you haven't seen it yet, check out the documentary on him, "Visual Acoustics". Try expired Reala and overexpose it a bit, I get similar colors out of it shot in my Rolleiflex.
|
# ¿ Jun 2, 2012 06:53 |
|
Look at how awesome this dude http://www.flickr.com/photos/henriantoine/ I found on Flickr is: Zugspitze, Wetterstein Mountains, looking East. March 2012 by Henri-Antoine, on Flickr Sylvenstein Dam, Isartal, looking East. July 2011. by Henri-Antoine, on Flickr Lauwersoog, de Marne, looking Northwest. July 2012 by Henri-Antoine, on Flickr Schiermonnikoog, Wadden Sea, looking Southwest. July 2012 by Henri-Antoine, on Flickr Amerongen, Utrecht Hill Ridge, looking East. September 2011 by Henri-Antoine, on Flickr
|
# ¿ Aug 23, 2012 13:03 |
|
Montalvo posted:gently caress me, how do you even do that?! With awesome.
|
# ¿ Aug 23, 2012 18:10 |
|
Look at this loving photo. It owns. 8th-snype fucked around with this message at 08:19 on Nov 1, 2012 |
# ¿ Nov 1, 2012 08:14 |
|
InternetJunky posted:If you're into wildlife photography you should check out this guy's site, especially the bird section: You know they are good photos because they have two watermarks and drop shadow borders.
|
# ¿ Dec 18, 2012 17:18 |
|
I mean who would steal a photo with qeocites border on it? Seriously
|
# ¿ Dec 18, 2012 18:08 |
|
Well, that owns.
|
# ¿ Jan 20, 2013 05:36 |
|
I'm sick of these dentist foxes buying expensive photo equipment and not having any clue how to use it. I mean, that isn't even the right end to look through.
|
# ¿ Feb 7, 2013 10:08 |
|
Mr. Despair posted:This, but ironically. This and unironically.
|
# ¿ Feb 16, 2013 04:38 |
|
That is a rad as hell concept.
|
# ¿ Mar 15, 2013 00:46 |
|
xzzy posted:Guess he should have packed a light meter. Charlie don't use no meter son. (Man it must have sucked to be a GI named Charlie)
|
# ¿ Apr 2, 2013 15:13 |
|
Syrinxx posted:Holy crap I just... how do I do this I will sell my soul A guess would be Portra 400 on a 6x7 (probably a Mamiya 7) in good light, then a bit of post.
|
# ¿ Apr 12, 2013 05:36 |
|
Look at how god drat good this series is http://davidbarryphoto.com/catskill
|
# ¿ Apr 13, 2013 13:27 |
|
Anyone looking for some sweet landscapes should check out this blog, http://newlandscapephotography.com/ . I swear I'm not just saying that because I was featured in his last update.
|
# ¿ May 14, 2013 07:18 |
|
Whether you think artist statements are pretentious or not they are a thing that happens. Write one about your work and try to come up with something that isn't "me like pretty pictures". It's harder than it looks.
|
# ¿ May 14, 2013 22:11 |
|
Bottom Liner posted:That's a pretty dickhole assumption, especially since I actually do a lot of fine art and show in galleries and festivals in between paid jobs. Artist statements are usually bullshit and everyone knows it. Get over yourself. I like a lot of those photos and enjoy hearing the story behind the work, but a lot of that is wordy fluff. I think you mean everyone in whatever tiny galleries and festivals you show stuff in thinks they are bullshit. The dude that runs that blog specifically asks for an artist statement pertaining to the project he is showing photos from. He actually rejected my first more general statement.
|
# ¿ May 14, 2013 22:22 |
|
Bottom Liner posted:I like how two others mocked the same thing and when I joke about it I get attacked specifically. What the gently caress dork room? The other two aren't smug idiots that "do a lot of fine art" and "show in galleries"? I hope this statement was informative and and devoid of any flowery words that you don't understand.
|
# ¿ May 14, 2013 22:27 |
|
dukeku posted:Bottom Liner, can I read a statement about your art? I'd like to hear something written by someone free of pretention. These own.
|
# ¿ May 14, 2013 22:45 |
|
xzzy posted:I could never make it as an artist, because my blurbs would be all "uh, I was walking around and I had a camera with me. I saw this cool thing so I took a picture of it. Then I pushed some sliders around in lightroom until it looked awesome and finally I uploaded it." Start small. Write a few sentences about the thought process that led you to make a particular photo. Spending some time thinking about your work can only improve it. EDIT: I need to delete entire sentences not try to rewrite them in place when I post. 8th-snype fucked around with this message at 23:15 on May 14, 2013 |
# ¿ May 14, 2013 22:58 |
|
Spime Wrangler posted:At the same time if you can't explain it in language your mom can understand then you probably don't understand it well enough. Sorry your mom isn't as literate as our moms bro.
|
# ¿ May 14, 2013 23:21 |
|
Musket posted:"Because of the great zeal and devotion which I experienced in executing well the two pictures which His Highness commissioned me to make — the one being Christ's dead body being laid in the tomb, and the other Christ arising from the dead to the consternation of the guards — these same two pictures are now finished through studious application, so that I am now disposed to deliver the same and so to afford to His Highness. For in these two paintings the greatest and most natural movement has been expressed, which is also the main reason why they have taken so long to execute." gently caress bitches, smoke trees, paint shadows.
|
# ¿ May 15, 2013 02:32 |
|
Hey nerds, Gregory Crewdson: Brief Encounters is available for instant watch on Netflix and it owns.
|
# ¿ Jun 9, 2013 16:03 |
|
Spedman posted:I figure this is good place to ask this question. Was going to suggest this http://www.amazon.com/New-Topographics-Brit-ed-Salvesen/dp/386521827X/ref=pd_sim_b_1 but saw it was out of print and $220. I'm just gonna go ahead and stop using my copy to hold a mouse pad when I edit on the couch now.
|
# ¿ Jul 30, 2013 12:12 |
|
Not that I am aware of, maybe try a library?
|
# ¿ Jul 30, 2013 18:05 |
|
dukeku posted:
Unnff
|
# ¿ Sep 14, 2013 08:31 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 28, 2024 21:14 |
|
Musket posted:http://scotthocking.com/detroitnights.html Cure by Scott Hocking, on Flickr I used to park my ambulance in the lot behind the brick church on the left side of this photo.
|
# ¿ Sep 20, 2013 13:25 |