|
Berke Negri posted:Yes taking out ISIS oil revenue infrastructure sure shines light on Obama's lie that the objective of this is to degrade and destroy ISIS. Yes. I'm glad we agree?
|
# ¿ Sep 25, 2014 00:54 |
|
|
# ¿ May 21, 2024 21:00 |
|
I mean it's basic terrorism which primarily helps the USA's allies economically. There is no humanitarian goal here it is basic imperialist might makes right. The humanitarian goal is revealed as a sham from the beginning.
|
# ¿ Sep 25, 2014 01:28 |
|
My Imaginary GF posted:"Stopping ISIS is worse than terrorism; its sham humanitarianism, its imperialism" - an idiot. From the PoV of the USA this correct though.
|
# ¿ Sep 25, 2014 01:38 |
|
How is bombing civilian oil infrastructure of a non USA threat imperialism. Hum, a tough question!
|
# ¿ Sep 25, 2014 01:41 |
|
If you think IS are terrorist inhuman dogs then I guess no action against them is immoral. Instead of a superman we have become a superstate unbound by the inconvenient tackle of morality. Raskolnikov is ascendant. IS is the unscrupulous pawner. They cut off someone's head!
|
# ¿ Sep 25, 2014 01:47 |
|
The Protagonist posted:What are you advocating, exactly? What is the moral response to IS, in your opinion? Honest question. From the USA? Political pressure on regional states.
|
# ¿ Sep 25, 2014 02:20 |
|
You goon say me fine, I accept it, but I really meant that, the morality of 21 century imperialism reminds me a lot of Napoleonic morality which of course was the substantial if not complete thrust of Raskolnikov.
|
# ¿ Sep 25, 2014 02:23 |
|
My Imaginary GF posted:provide objective classification criteria under which one can know to what degree a policy is driven by 'imperialism.' If USA military action in Asia then
|
# ¿ Sep 25, 2014 02:27 |
|
My Imaginary GF posted:'Tsunami relief efforts were imperialism with Napoleonic morality' You are not arguing in good faith my friend. The only reason those trivial encounters happen is because of overwhelming imperialism.
|
# ¿ Sep 25, 2014 02:31 |
|
Whoa why isn't IS a government. Like I said if you think they are terrorist dogs then go nuts. Napoleon says you should not feel guilty. You can't feel guilty! Huh
|
# ¿ Sep 25, 2014 03:44 |
|
You can't take a strict theory of state recoginotion when you are gung ho on intervening on nominal civil wars.
|
# ¿ Sep 25, 2014 03:58 |
|
Oops insignicant militia when over a nominal line. Better immediately destroy some oil facilities.
|
# ¿ Sep 25, 2014 04:04 |
|
The commonwealth of Pennsylvania.
|
# ¿ Sep 25, 2014 04:08 |
|
KSA already has nuclear protection through its alliance with Israel/US.
|
# ¿ Apr 2, 2015 22:21 |
|
It's about nuclear power anyway. The bomb stuff seems to be a pr sideshow to me.
|
# ¿ Apr 2, 2015 22:52 |
|
Kaal posted:D&D's recipe for peace in the Middle East: Nukes for everyone. Yes and also nuclear power for everyone. Oh and also dismantling the current Israeli state.
|
# ¿ Apr 3, 2015 14:41 |
|
I assume he meant "right to exist as a Jewish state".
|
# ¿ Apr 3, 2015 14:44 |
|
I have not been paying attention much sorry but is the Mosul offensive the first time American and Iranian forces have worked in concert like this.
|
# ¿ Oct 19, 2016 14:23 |
|
Volkerball posted:The US has been indirectly aiding Iranian backed Shia militias for pretty much the duration of the fighting in Iraq since Mosul fell. Was it part of he nuke truce or separate. Probably all wrapped up together ?
|
# ¿ Oct 19, 2016 15:07 |
|
rear end struggle posted:It's not my fault that Russia is the greatest threat to world peace right now. Hahahah Anyway what is going on in Mosul? Is it recaptured
|
# ¿ Oct 28, 2016 01:29 |
|
|
# ¿ May 21, 2024 21:00 |
|
rear end struggle posted:The ethnic cleansers we support are gonna ethic cleanse rear end struggle posted:The ethnic cleansers we support are gonna ethic cleanse freedom and democracy
|
# ¿ Oct 28, 2016 03:11 |