|
Protesting in countries that have dictators and police who will fire automatic weapons at citizens without a second thought is just so incredibly badass compared to protesting here.
|
# ¿ Feb 18, 2011 19:16 |
|
|
# ¿ May 1, 2024 04:11 |
|
Rosscifer posted:There's only a few countries that are not members of the UN. Perhaps they'll form a committee to study whether people are upset. Then they'll recommend that a committee be formed to look into whether the government should stop shooting people from helicopters.
|
# ¿ Feb 18, 2011 19:21 |
|
Back when cellphone cameras appeared on the scene, the very first application I thought of for them was recording atrocities committed by governments against average people. I was not let down, these videos are damning as hell.
|
# ¿ Feb 19, 2011 03:09 |
|
YouTuber posted:One of the very first major use of cameras were for taking pictures of massive amounts of the dead on American Civil War battlefields. Congratulations coming up with this stunning revelation 140 years later that cameras would be used for taking pictures of dead people!
|
# ¿ Feb 19, 2011 03:47 |
|
Xandu posted:Here you go, but again, it's pretty awful. XausF1 posted:
|
# ¿ Feb 19, 2011 20:04 |
|
One thing I want to know is, how many police officers will refuse to fire on unarmed civilians if they are ordered to? Surely a whole lot of them can look at that crowd and not see a faceless crowd, but rather a bunch of people who could easily be their family and friends. It's a small country after all.
|
# ¿ Feb 19, 2011 20:58 |
|
Patter Song posted:Which is why the Bahraini government has been trying so hard to make this into a sectarian struggle between the supermajority Shia ordinary population and the mostly Sunni security/government forces. It's a lot easier to tell the soldiers that the people on the street are heretical splittists in the pocket of Iran who will compromise Bahrain's independence and frame it as a struggle that way than to have the security forces think of the people they're shooting as "Bahraini."
|
# ¿ Feb 19, 2011 21:43 |
|
Cacatua posted:That's what I hope too but very few world leaders have had much to say about this.
|
# ¿ Feb 19, 2011 23:03 |
|
Peripheral posted:"Our movement is peaceful; our demands are legitimate."
|
# ¿ Feb 20, 2011 01:30 |
|
Xandu posted:Even the King and Crown Prince admit it was disproportionate and claim that it will be investigated. This guy is ridiculous.
|
# ¿ Feb 20, 2011 01:58 |
|
ganglysumbia posted:Aljazeera just reported protesters have captured tanks and are driving them through the city.... edit: How easy is it to drive a tank without training anyway? I just realized I have no idea how they operate. Samurai Sanders fucked around with this message at 19:45 on Feb 20, 2011 |
# ¿ Feb 20, 2011 19:22 |
|
Astrolite posted:Driving them is pretty easy. Firing the main gun would be a bit more difficult, unless it's a very old model. edit: vvv yeah, that's exactly what I was thinking.
|
# ¿ Feb 20, 2011 20:03 |
|
I must have missed it, but was there some one event that put all this in motion? Something that happened in Egypt two weeks ago or so that was the straw that broke the camel's back?
|
# ¿ Feb 21, 2011 07:45 |
|
Xandu posted:The OP is actually pretty good, albeit out of order.
|
# ¿ Feb 21, 2011 08:21 |
|
Nenonen posted:What I'm concerned with is that even if the Libyan regular army decides to join the protestors side, the Colonel would still have his elite all-virgin bodyguard unit to protect him. They're extremely well trained and might turn any attempts at Gaddafi into a bloodshed. WHY IS AMERICAN MEDIA NOT DISCUSSING THIS???
|
# ¿ Feb 21, 2011 19:27 |
|
I've only been glancing at this thread and the news from time to time, but I can't understand why these governments aren't saying "but....but Israel!" to try and regain order. Isn't that what they normally do when faced with hard domestic problems? Would it not work somehow, or do they have some other plan?
|
# ¿ Feb 21, 2011 21:35 |
|
Nonsense posted:That stuff doesn't work, because people aren't stupid. They might not like Israel for other reasons, but they're not going to fall for bad propaganda from the power structure they're trying to destroy.
|
# ¿ Feb 21, 2011 21:42 |
|
Patter Song posted:"The boy that cried ." Over the past half-century, the people of the Middle East have discovered that their regimes have no interest in actually helping the Palestinians, and are using the plight of the Palestinians for their own benefit. The Arabs are sick of "but Israel!" They want a government that actually worries about their interests and maybe cares about the Palestinians enough to treat the Palestinians' suffering as more than a PR campaign.
|
# ¿ Feb 21, 2011 22:00 |
|
Cjones posted:Guy on AJE just said they're using anti-aircraft weapons on protesters
|
# ¿ Feb 21, 2011 22:13 |
|
Boner Slam posted:Look at the video earlier itt. Or rather don't. And I don't think I will be watching that video. edit: Oh, are they not shells that are meant to explode at a certain range? that was the image of an anti-aircraft gun I had in my head. Samurai Sanders fucked around with this message at 22:20 on Feb 21, 2011 |
# ¿ Feb 21, 2011 22:17 |
|
Just to confirm, there's no chance that he will volunteer to step down, right?
|
# ¿ Feb 21, 2011 22:47 |
|
Sivias posted:Then again, Mubarak said the same thing.
|
# ¿ Feb 21, 2011 22:50 |
|
Doccers posted:This. We've lost utterly the ability to meddle or get involved in affairs, without causing even MORE problems.
|
# ¿ Feb 21, 2011 23:20 |
|
Why does Gaddafi still call himself "colonel" anyway? Wouldn't he have taken the rank of general or whatever when he took over the country?
|
# ¿ Feb 21, 2011 23:33 |
|
Brown Moses posted:Obama about to give a worthless speech in about 20 minutes.
|
# ¿ Feb 23, 2011 19:59 |
|
Slantedfloors posted:"We fully support the status quo, until such time as we cannot do so expediently. At that point we don't support it, and never have"
|
# ¿ Feb 23, 2011 20:04 |
|
Patter Song posted:That is a gross exaggeration and twisting of the facts of what 1950s Iran was like.
|
# ¿ Feb 25, 2011 07:56 |
|
Maybe I don't understand mercenaries very well, but why would they take a side that will almost certainly get slaughtered indiscriminately by an angry mob, heavily armed and fed up with 40 years of oppression? What money is worth that?
|
# ¿ Feb 25, 2011 19:46 |
|
SauceNinja posted:I'm betting the vast majority of them have taken the money and are convinced they'll A) win because they have guns or B) blend into the crowd when poo poo gets chaotic and try to make their escape. Element B is going to have a significantly terrible effect on the the number of people in group A because people are sheep, even if they have guns.
|
# ¿ Feb 25, 2011 19:53 |
|
SauceNinja posted:Desperate people are pretty opportunistic. "So this guy wants to give me money to kill these people. These people want to kill this guy and celebrate. Why don't I....take the money, let them kill him, and celebrate!!"
|
# ¿ Feb 25, 2011 20:03 |
|
|
# ¿ May 1, 2024 04:11 |
|
Not give up on hosting the World Cup though?
|
# ¿ Jun 7, 2017 03:28 |