|
T. Mascis posted:It wasn't a riot it was a calculated & pre-planned mass murder Yes. I really don't know how to feel about this, because on one hand I'm absolutely, positively against the death penalty in any shape or form and for any reason whatsoever, including treason and war crimes. On the other, I am surprised that (some of) the people responsible are actually held accountable for their actions surrounding what was clearly not just another riot. I wish they'd gotten prison sentences instead.
|
#
¿
Jan 27, 2013 10:04
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 3, 2024 20:36 |
|
|
jyrka posted:Just for the record, I am against death penalty too. This is good to know jyrka. Do you think perhaps we should form some sort of group advocating against it? Or maybe start with a weekly group forum where people can discuss how they feel about the subject.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 27, 2013 11:51
|
|
|
sticksy posted:hahaha seriously - what other kind is there? Casual pimping? Implied Pimping..? Well there's big pimpin' for one
|
|
#
¿
Feb 14, 2013 08:29
|
|
|
euroboy posted:Yeah I'm just gonna leave this here something something jailhouse rock
|
|
#
¿
Aug 12, 2013 20:41
|
|
|
pointsofdata posted:In order for the bookies to be offering these spot bets in the first place there must be loads of legitimate punters. Who are they? Why is anyone betting on "Number of throw ins before ten minute mark" or w/e? For a lot of people, especially gambling addicts, some of these become essentially a form of lottery. Putting a quid on X throwins in a game you know nothing about is not much different from playing a slot machine with 80-85% payout. Imagine all the people you see playing slot machines for hours at a time. Then imagine them with internet connections and basic computer knowledge. Now they can sit in their home and do basically the same thing.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 9, 2013 14:48
|
|
|
DickEmery posted:Either you send the kids to boarding school or one of you spends less effort on your career in order to raise them. This is spot on. You can debate about the actual numbers, but the financial loss a person (99% of the time the woman) suffers from staying at home with the children instead of working and furthering their career does not end when the children leave home or when the marriage ends. The argument is that they will forever be ten years behind in their career relative to the husband who worked in the same period.
|
|
#
¿
May 17, 2014 11:47
|
|
|
TwoDogs1Cup posted:So why is it future earnings and not the x amount of years that they had to stay at home? Because it's not a compensation for the years she worked at home (she gets that directly in the divorce) but a compensation for her salary in the years after the divorce that will be lower than it otherwise would have been. Her salary will be lower for the rest of her life because she was taking care of the children. Again, I'm not arguing numbers now, but there's nothing wrong with the general principle, especially not when one gender suffers from this like 98% of the time.
|
|
#
¿
May 18, 2014 14:52
|
|
|
Lol his name is "Ched" of course he loving raped her But yeah let's blame the victim instead, because gently caress women #redpill4life
|
|
#
¿
Nov 18, 2014 11:05
|
|
|
A sheep tied to a lamppost in Cardiff, my friend, a sheep tied to a lamppost in Cardiff.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 18, 2014 11:54
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 3, 2024 20:36 |
|
|
Blue Star Error posted:Glad thats been put to bed. I think certain posters round here owe an apology to all the footballers they've slandered. I think I will take the opposite action and slander them further. The entire Spanish national team have been doped up to their eyeballs for every major triumph they've had recently and so have FC Barcelona. Furthermore, Rafael Nadal deserves to have all of his titles stripped and handed to Roger Federer, regardless of whether Federer was his opponent in those winning finals, or in fact played in the tournament at all.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 24, 2015 10:53
|
|