|
Vintersorg posted:As someone not in the know, what the hell is the Hunger Games? It's being advertised as if I should.
|
#
¿
Jan 23, 2012 20:59
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 5, 2024 19:15 |
|
|
Just saw a trailer for this thing during 30 Rock.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 27, 2012 03:33
|
|
|
He's very good with the right script (High Fidelity, School of Rock, Orange County) but horrible in too many things. He seems to mostly be after easy paycheques these days what with all the animated work he's done.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 29, 2012 07:12
|
|
|
21Jump Street was an action thing?
|
|
#
¿
Jan 31, 2012 06:37
|
|
|
Rageaholic Monkey posted:Two cops walking through an explosion. How does that in ANY way shape or form tell me that they go undercover as high school students to find the supplier of a new drug? 
|
|
#
¿
Jan 31, 2012 06:44
|
|
|
If Jump Street turns out to be good Jonah Hill will be on an amazing roll. Pretty good from the guy who used to just be "shorter, fatter Seth Rogan".
|
|
#
¿
Jan 31, 2012 08:54
|
|
|
Ong Bak was really well choreographed so it should be fun to watch at least.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 13, 2012 15:24
|
|
|
GonSmithe posted:(considering I was born in '92 that makes sense)  Also never heard of that movie, though I recognise the poster from threads like this. Maybe it didn't get a wide European release.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 14, 2012 15:54
|
|
|
TheJoker138 posted:Go watch the Rocketeer, right now. Well I'm at work but maybe this weekend. No chance its on Netflix, Hulu or Crackle?
|
|
#
¿
Feb 14, 2012 20:33
|
|
|
Desperado Bones posted:Go and rent the VHS dammit!
|
|
#
¿
Feb 14, 2012 21:07
|
|
|
Madkal posted:It's Hebrew with a transliteration of the title.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 15, 2012 05:55
|
|
|
Robert Denby posted:Here's his breakout role in "9". Did he have some work done? He looks like he might have had some tweaking done which while I can understand it, Hollywood is beauty obsessed after all, he's just too young to start making those kind of radical changes to himself. I'm worried he'll end up like Jennifer Grey where nobody recognises him anymore.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 15, 2012 16:26
|
|
|
Dissapointed Owl posted:I saw him a while ago in an Adam Sandler movie called Bedtime Stories. Even in that Pearce is fun to watch. Also that movie was surprisingly enjoyable.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 17, 2012 18:07
|
|
|
Madkal posted:I better see some face eating action in this film otherwise I will be very disappointed. I'm hoping it'll be an alternate view of LOTR where the oppressed Orcs have been marginalised and exiled just for the way they look and they're just minding their own business when this loving invisible midget starts loving poo poo up with his jock friends and the Orcs don't even know what they did to deserve it.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 17, 2012 20:35
|
|
|
Mister Chief posted:That film was shot in 2008 and still isn't out.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 21, 2012 08:45
|
|
|
Aatrek posted:The new Avengers one-sheet. Is the Hulk really supposed to be three stories tall? So are they ordered by how well their individual movies did? Because I'd have thought Captain America would be placed more prominently than Thor.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 28, 2012 18:50
|
|
|
itrorev posted:Perhaps I am naive when it comes to film marketing, but do they really have to photoshop in the pictures from other sources? With the gazillion dollars spent on marketing, would it really be that difficult to get all the actors to take a bunch of photo for sole purpose of making decent film posters? How often does this question come up in this thread? I think it's every twenty pages or so, I'm not sure. I'd have to go through the old one to get a clearer picture.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 28, 2012 19:25
|
|
|
Ez posted:It's a fair question though. I know it would be difficult to get all the actors together with hectic schedules and all, but why cant they just take an hour on one of the days where they're shooting a group scene and take a picture? IIRC it's because actors have specific headshots that they like that they want to be used for posters. You could do a group pic but if anyone or their agent is unhappy it all has to be changed. I'd imagine when it comes to this many stars it'd be almost impossible to please everyone so they just settle for photoshop wankery on pre-approved headshots. FoneBone posted:Thor made significantly more money.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 28, 2012 19:49
|
|
|
Dissapointed Owl posted:Guess I'll give the b/w version another shot, just to see if I hate it less. (it had its good points though) Those sunglasses are a worse photoshop job than when Goons do "Deal With It" gifs. How the hell does anyone go "yep, finished product, send it to print"?
|
|
#
¿
Feb 29, 2012 17:00
|
|
|
Black Lighter posted:Stop hating on "Deal With It" gifs. Don't get me wrong, I loves me some Deal With It.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 29, 2012 21:36
|
|
|
Aatrek posted:I'm trying to figure out why the van is being driven by the bastard child of Adam Sandler and Henry Winkler. Thanks, now that's all I can see. 
|
|
#
¿
Mar 7, 2012 05:49
|
|
|
The Triumphant posted:What's really damning is that it looks like their movie might honestly be worse than Mirror's Edge. Are we talking about the same Mirrors Edge, the highly enjoyable and critically acclaimed game?
|
|
#
¿
Mar 18, 2012 23:25
|
|
|
Forgot to refresh and now I just look like a dick. Nevermind.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 19, 2012 04:18
|
|
|
Wow, that sounds kinda good actually.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 19, 2012 15:13
|
|
|
ClydeUmney posted:One of the better jokes in Life's Too Short (the new Ricky Gervais show) came when Gervais and Johnny Depp were arguing. So Johnny Depp is kinda dense I guess? You'd think he'd notice after a while that every time he's doing a movie with Tim he ends up talking to Helena for a few months.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 21, 2012 15:41
|
|
|
Jesus Christ, I haven't seen the show. Sorry. Although I do believe that about Patrick Stewart and don't dare tell me otherwise. 
|
|
#
¿
Mar 21, 2012 15:47
|
|
|
Its alright, I know the protocol for missing an obvious joke here. I have to run down stairs naked while goons whip me with getout frogs, right?
|
|
#
¿
Mar 21, 2012 16:07
|
|
|
Fayez Butts posted:Yes I don't know what its meant to be about, but all I noticed was "interesting suit, five cuff buttons and pick stitching on the lapels". I do like that it appears to be an actual shot that he posed for.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 22, 2012 16:52
|
|
|
The Triumphant posted:It's basically a modern Ulysses-- one guy with too much money having an insane and self-destructive odyssey through Manhattan to get a haircut.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 22, 2012 17:18
|
|
|
Desperado Bones posted:Are they hiring people from Tumblr now? Nah, just kidding. I think we will seeing this style of posters for a long time. Yeah I'm pretty sure in a few decades this style will be associated with the 2010s and we'll have some period movie that brings it back as a joke.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 22, 2012 18:39
|
|
|
I've never seen the Fly or heard of Videodrome. Wasn't allowed to watch movies rated more than a soft PG13 growing up.  I saw History of Violence and remember disliking it because it wasn't conventional and sort of ended abruptly with no closure (its been years, I could be remembering it wrong). I did enjoy Eastern Promises though, although Viggo Mortensens penis in blu-ray definition on a 65" TV was... something. Totally gonna check out Videodrome on Netflix though.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 23, 2012 15:20
|
|
|
Vagabundo posted:The one reflected in the eye piece is the Empire State Building, the one behind him is the Chrysler building. That poster has plenty of problems without needing you guys to start making poo poo up about what's in it. I was about to ask why is the building behind him reflected in his glasses. I thought maybe the idea is he's facing a glass building so the reflection in the glass is reflecting over his eyes. But then of course he should be seeing himself there. Anyways glad I saw your post first. 
|
|
#
¿
Apr 17, 2012 15:59
|
|
|
Bugblatter posted:So many of the advertisers in that film either no longer exist or have changed their logos so drastically that I wonder if younger generations would still read most of the signs as product placement. I think Coca-Cola is likely the only logo a lot of new viewers would be familiar with.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 19, 2012 15:05
|
|
|
bobkatt013 posted:Or the Smallville episode Hero. STRIDE GUM
|
|
#
¿
Apr 20, 2012 21:40
|
|
|
I like New Girl well enough that I catch it on Hulu if I miss it, and I had no idea that was Zoey Deschanel there. I guess she had a different thing going on ten years ago.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 23, 2012 18:20
|
|
|
I didn't realise it was the radiation symbol for a while, I just looked at it and saw a warped skull, which made sense to me as it is a radiation-themed horror movie. I guess it wasn't until the word radiation popped into my head I realised it wasn't a skull at all, or at least not intentionally. Edit: Looking it over again, it's actually the shape of the cloud that form a skull shape, and my mind filled in the eyes and nose hole automatically based on that. Also, looking at the thumbnail it's immediately obvious its the radiation symbol, but bringing the full size on my screen like how I originally saw it makes me see the skull first because my eyes are drawn to the white space. jojoinnit fucked around with this message at 04:56 on Apr 24, 2012 |
|
#
¿
Apr 24, 2012 04:54
|
|
|
Vagabundo posted:Mel Gibson's latest. Apparently he spends the holidays shooting everyone and being all crazy. Are you sure this isn't a documentary?
|
|
#
¿
Apr 24, 2012 13:50
|
|
|
I like how they managed to stick Stieg Larsson's name on there.
|
|
#
¿
May 2, 2012 01:05
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 5, 2024 19:15 |
|
|
The title is a metaphor. Edit: Not too sure about that hand.  Maybe because he's a giant loving dog?  jojoinnit fucked around with this message at 06:02 on May 27, 2013 |
|
#
¿
May 27, 2013 05:57
|
|