|
Somebody mock up a Carolina Backpanthers logo
|
#
¿
Jan 31, 2012 10:43
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 30, 2024 07:34 |
|
|
The panthers' uni would look awesome if you just changes all the black to chocolate brown. I don't give a gently caress that panthers aren't brown, I don't see any silver and honolulu blue lions either
|
|
#
¿
Feb 1, 2012 12:33
|
|
|
SolidPolonium posted:Brown doesn't go well with anything. It's case in point and that's one of three things you're wrong about in this post
|
|
#
¿
Feb 1, 2012 23:05
|
|
|
Professor Funk posted:I respect your opinion and kind of see where you're coming from, but I think you're probably thinking about it a bit too much. It's a pretty apt and harmless marketing campaign, and it's not as if Nike is marketing products in pre-World War I Germany, so I probably wouldn't worry too much about the "militarism" of football fans. The militarism of football fans is a massive loving deal because it's a huge part of manufacturing consent for contemporary wars in the middle east. That said there are far more egregious examples than 'pro combat', so I accept that much
|
|
#
¿
Feb 2, 2012 16:03
|
|
|
SolidPolonium posted:Day 2: Riots in the streets, underground football begins. Admit it, this would be loving cool
|
|
#
¿
Feb 2, 2012 18:09
|
|
|
smackfu posted:Fake as in not made by Nike, or fake as in proposals to get the contract? Because those look like professional quality work. A professional Dickhead, perhaps
|
|
#
¿
Mar 29, 2012 15:44
|
|
|
Look it's very simple Never allow dark jersey with same colour dark pants (doubly true if pants do not have a stripe) Saints' Lions', Patriots' and Vikings' throwbacks become regular unis again Don't gently caress with the current 9ers, Packers, Raiders, other classics Bears would look cool with a white helmet but still, best not to gently caress with that one Make Seattle your creative destruction capitalism team and give them something new every week Really if you follow rule 1 everything else will fall into line
|
|
#
¿
Mar 29, 2012 21:07
|
|
|
Hockles posted:If teams aren't allowed to have matching colors for jerseys and pants, then the Browns would have to wear the brown pants again. I hated that jersey. gently caress that. Matching white is A-ok. Matching dark makes you look like a fat man in a leotard
|
|
#
¿
Mar 30, 2012 18:57
|
|
|
Lol Reebok released a bunch of Jets Tebow jerseys to try and make some cash in their last week with the license and Nike sued them http://www.chicagotribune.com/business/breaking/chi-nike-sues-reebok-over-tebow-apparel-20120328,0,2985722.story
|
|
#
¿
Mar 31, 2012 07:59
|
|
|
Farchanter posted:Jeremy Maclin just tweeted that he has no clue what the new uniforms look like, so maybe Vick was just excited earlier. Or maybe that tweet was drafted by some copywriter. Who the gently caress else says "innovation at its finest!"?
|
|
#
¿
Apr 3, 2012 16:20
|
|
|
Isaac Bruce Bowen posted:I am probably the only person in this forum who thinks the new Seahawks unis own. No I like them
|
|
#
¿
Apr 3, 2012 16:34
|
|
|
windshipper posted:They'd just have to make the legs entirely red, in that case. This would incidentally look pretty cool
|
|
#
¿
Apr 3, 2012 16:44
|
|
|
I for one am glad Jerry Jones decided to insist that the pants remain a sliiiiiiightly different kind of grey to the helmets. Because it looks loving terrible 
|
|
#
¿
Apr 3, 2012 18:10
|
|
|
Jelq Swagger posted:I disagree. Everyone knows that the Rays became a good baseball team by changing their name and look. It surely had nothing to do with building a good young team. Ah, the Bucs/Pats effect (May not apply to falcons)
|
|
#
¿
Apr 4, 2012 18:29
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 30, 2024 07:34 |
|
|
Peanut President posted:
Those are all awesome places 
|
|
#
¿
Apr 14, 2012 16:22
|
|
