|
GnarlyCharlie4u posted:It's a miracle. I somehow managed to talk sense into my CIO, and got him to take a look at oVirt. Thank you all so much for your help and links. What size are you?
|
# ¿ Dec 30, 2014 13:02 |
|
|
# ¿ May 9, 2024 14:02 |
|
I am so glad I have a boss who trusts my judgement. Not to say I always get it right but some of the stuff on this thread, hell just this one page, is just so hosed up words fail me. The bit I'm curious about with all these hair-brained antics is do management (by which I mean business management) actually know what these idiots are doing and that they're putting the business at (varying levels of) risk with some of the insanity over either weird irrational prejudices or to save a few $$$?
|
# ¿ Dec 31, 2014 21:00 |
|
AD in a virtual environment is simple so long as you don't do anything dumb. Run your DCs on different hosts and make sure your hosts and your PDC Emulator are pulling time from an external NTP source (unless you're on of those shops who have an internal switch do it or something). Time is the thing that seems to (still) catch people out with virtual and AD - get the time right and the rest looks after itself.
|
# ¿ Dec 31, 2014 21:23 |
|
socialsecurity posted:So we are trying to do an absolute 0 downtime failover system, they really want VMware so we are looking at doing array level syncing with 2 MSA 2040s, I can't get a non bullshit sales guy answer on exactly how synced it is and what the failover time is like at all, some have told us instant others say 15 minutes to 4 hours its all over the place. How can you say "absolute 0 downtime failover system" and "MSA 2040" in the same sentence? For "absolute 0 downtime" you need to be spending a shitload more than an MSA 2040 costs (or than two of them cost) and you need to be doing your resilience at the app level as well as counting on the array. At the very minimum you're looking at stuff like the (proper) EMC, 3PAR, Hitachi and the likes on the storage side in my view.
|
# ¿ May 1, 2016 14:04 |