|
A friend of mine just sent me this on Facebook, so this story is definitely picking up steam. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bbhNJkRnXUo I forgot about this video. gently caress that slimey fucker.
|
# ¿ Oct 11, 2013 04:50 |
|
|
# ¿ May 13, 2024 04:34 |
|
Pron on VHS posted:Just gonna leave this here........ quote:The suspect in the beating murder of Peterson’s 2-year-old is the boyfriend of Peterson’s “baby mama” — now the casual, flippant, detestable and common buzz-phrase for absentee, wham-bam fatherhood.
|
# ¿ Oct 14, 2013 02:07 |
|
El Gallinero Gros posted:Let's all be sure to tell the American Indian Movement they've got things all wrong. NAACP has "colored" in it, but I still don't call black men colored.
|
# ¿ Oct 21, 2013 18:06 |
|
Mr. Funny Pants posted:Oh for gently caress sake, I wasn't trying to say anything profound. I was referring to prominent people saying that some words shouldn't be used because they are so offensive. The point is that the word isn't offensive, it's the context, yet we still have seemingly intelligent people actually proposing that there isn't any context for them. I'm still trying to parse exactly what you're saying, because you cant honestly be saying that "if 'friend of the family' didn't offend people it wouldn't be a bad word."
|
# ¿ Oct 22, 2013 02:56 |
|
Mel Mudkiper posted:It's not necessarily a dumb argument in hindsight maybe, just a weird combination of A. irrelevant B. obvious C. meaningless. Irrelevant+obvious+meaningless=dumb argument
|
# ¿ Oct 22, 2013 03:09 |
|
Febreeze posted:TFF, we've traced the bad posts...The bad football writing is coming from inside the thread! YOu know, if everyone liked and appreciated those posts then they would be good posts. Makes you think, doesn't it?
|
# ¿ Oct 22, 2013 03:23 |
|
sweet thursday posted:I'm sure it keeps you up at night Don't accuse my posts of having thought behind them.
|
# ¿ Oct 22, 2013 03:25 |
|
Mr. Funny Pants posted:Not even close. And I'm not sure how I can better explain, honestly, but I'll try one more time and then wave the white flag and let the thread get back to more interesting stuff. Call a black person a friend of the family? Then you are a horrid piece of poo poo. Use it as a tool to ridicule the horrid pieces of poo poo or make broader points about racism? That's fine. When Cleavon Little popped up from behind that rock in Blazing Saddles and said, "Where the white women at," he wasn't celebrating a godawful racist stereotype, he was ridiculing the idiots that believe such poo poo. Alright, that does make sense. But I'm not sure why you even felt the need to argue it. I'm sure all of us here in TFF recognized that the Onion was using a slur for the purpose of satire.
|
# ¿ Oct 22, 2013 03:31 |
|
Declan MacManus posted:They're not ready for the gospel I've tried delivering it a bunch of times If you really love basketball why is your avatar always football related?
|
# ¿ Oct 25, 2013 20:19 |
|
Good Will Hrunting posted:Not only should impressionable youngsters be taught that taunting is "cool" but also that violence is the best response when you or your peer is the target! If youngsters are so impressionable that Golden Tate waving will scar them for life, they probably shouldn't be allowed to watch a sport where a man could die on the field.
|
# ¿ Oct 30, 2013 21:35 |
|
Mr. Funny Pants posted:I won't pretend that I can give an objective argument against it, I've just always found it classless. That's the problem for me. It seems like the people against taunting don't have an argument besides "we don't like it", while those of us who support it can only say "we do like it". You might as well argue about what type of music is the worst, because it is dumb and subjective. p.s. country sucks
|
# ¿ Oct 31, 2013 02:09 |
|
Mr. Funny Pants posted:And it sure as poo poo isn't worth the hand-wringing in either direction. Also, I'd be more amenable to it if it was creative or funny. It's so rare to see that. It could definitely be more creative, but I think a key pillar of country music is being tragic and not comic. Is it still country if it is funny?
|
# ¿ Oct 31, 2013 02:29 |
|
Mel Mudkiper posted:The problem though is that we are not debating two positive arguments. quote:EDIT: Also you idiots need to quit responding to Chiv's joke like he was serious You hate fun or something?
|
# ¿ Oct 31, 2013 02:44 |
|
Sash! posted:If you allow guys that are aggressive and seem to have pretty poor impulse control to overly berate each other, someone's going to get neck punched on the field. It's easier to just make it against the rules than to constantly pull guys off of each other. Somehow making it against the rules does seem to mitigate a lot of the shoving and worse that would be happening. I feel like you're going to have to provide some evidence that the amount of fights would increase. These players are already fighting during games as it is.
|
# ¿ Oct 31, 2013 03:03 |
|
Cruel and Unusual posted:Players always try to get away with as much as the referee will let them. The 2010 World Cup Final happened because the referee was too lax. If players are fighting during games, legalizing taunting would most definitely increase the amount of fighting. I don't see why this should result in punishments for taunting. It seems that the penalties for fighting aren't harsh enough and the referees are not doing a good enough job enforcing them (Personal fouls offset, nothing changes.) It seems to me the correct thing to do is crack down on fighting and eject players when they do it, so that there is actually an incentive to not do something that is dangerous, as opposed to banning taunting which harms no one while fights still happen.
|
# ¿ Oct 31, 2013 03:23 |
|
swickles posted:Last year when Alex Smith lost his job to Kaepernick, the narrative was "You shouldn't lose your job to injury!" with the Bledsoe/Brady thing being painted as the exception to the rule. Now its like the exact opposite with Cutler and McCown. What exactly happened to change up a "hard rule" in the NFL over the course of a single season. The Niners made it to a Super Bowl with a usurper.
|
# ¿ Dec 13, 2013 22:43 |
|
Sometimes Mike Tanier can crawl up his own rear end a little bit and be insufferable, but every once in a while he strikes gold and I remember why he is my favorite journalist. Here's something to wash the taste of your mouths.Mike Tanier posted:Saints at Rams Chichevache fucked around with this message at 02:32 on Dec 14, 2013 |
# ¿ Dec 14, 2013 02:28 |
|
Chris Gaines posted:I knew it'd be terrible so no! It is so much easier to be lovely and jaded than it is to actually look at what was written . quote:So, just for fun, I pulled a whole bunch of anonymously sourced sentences, and attempted to make one coherent-ish story, in which every sentence was anonymously sourced. I'm pretty sure this was not intended as serious journalism, but instead as a commentary on the nature of sports journalism itself. Meta-journalism if you will.
|
# ¿ Dec 17, 2013 21:30 |
|
Rasczak posted:As soon as I saw those tattoos I was like "yep he's probably going to kill at least a few people" Finally we have proof that Cam Newton is an objectively better human being than Drew Brees. Cam is ink free.
|
# ¿ Dec 20, 2013 22:48 |
|
Ehud posted:i'm dying I can not parse this sentence. Help me, y'all. " Dolphins fans must find a way to await negativity with the franchise's first playoff bid on the line Sunday against the Jets " Does he mean abate instead of await?
|
# ¿ Dec 27, 2013 00:32 |
|
swickles posted:I would watch it but only if every question took the form "What if [player name] was [race other than the one the player is]? What if Sebastian Janikowski was Japanese? he wouldn't have a drinking problem.
|
# ¿ Dec 28, 2013 23:39 |
|
swickles posted:Hey guys, torturing dogs is bad. Intentionally harming another human permanently while playing a game is ok though. Dr. Doom over here, y'all.
|
# ¿ Jan 7, 2014 04:33 |
|
Kalli posted:I think it's a holdover from newspaper column writing where they weree so thin that stylistically they ended up writing in these short bullet point sentences. Oh my god I read that entire article in the voice and style of William Shatner. My brain hurts now.
|
# ¿ Feb 4, 2014 00:45 |
|
Not technically a football article, but I'm sure you will all enjoy this crap. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/stuart-muszynski/the-12th-man-can-transfor_b_4761246.html quote:Forgive me, but I don't believe that the Seattle Seahawks really won the Superbowl. It was the "12th man" that won it. How else can we explain how an underdog team that was "too young," with a quarterback who was "too short" decimated the Denver Broncos? It gets worse from there.
|
# ¿ Feb 13, 2014 19:02 |
|
Chris Gaines posted:What else do you expect from a HuffPo article? Also it annoys me to no end when "Superbowl" is spelt as one word. I sure didn't expect them to somehow felate the entire 12th man.
|
# ¿ Feb 14, 2014 09:57 |
|
swickles posted:This thread makes me remember that its time for the Douche of the Year Tournament. I'm nominating Darren Sharper.
|
# ¿ Feb 28, 2014 22:07 |
|
Kalli posted:vs Richie Incognito and Aaron Hernandez. Well Haslam might make the final 4. Plus a bunch of people won't vote for Sharper or Hernandez because " they're evil not douches ".
|
# ¿ Feb 28, 2014 23:17 |
|
AAA DOLFAN posted:Hmmm yes straight up murdering several people not nearly as bad as being a shithead bully. Don't blame me. When we did the Douche awards last year multiple posters wouldn't vote for certain people because they felt evil acts didn't qualify as douchey.
|
# ¿ Mar 1, 2014 04:51 |
|
AAA DOLFAN posted:Then I dont even know what to think then. A guy who likely went around raping multiple women across the US or a guy who likely MURDERED multiple people... not douches I'm phone posting, so I can't find the old thread, but that discussion came up nearly every single round of voting. If you can find it it's worth reading just to see some really bizarre rationales.
|
# ¿ Mar 1, 2014 04:56 |
|
Febreeze posted:I remember distinctly arguing against those people too, saying you have to be a douche to be evil therefore evil=douche but it was to no avail Well I can kind of understand it if they immediately think of a tank top wearing frat bro when they hear the word 'douche'. I mean yes, I dislike them too, but I'm not sure I'd consider them evil. That said I still would vote Sharper or Hernandez as douche of the year. Maybe when we do the contest again we should change it to "Shithead of the Year" or "Football Associated Individual Who We Really Dislike On A Personal Level", so that the pedants don't derail the contest.
|
# ¿ Mar 1, 2014 05:01 |
|
Ehud posted:@OmarKelly: I achieved my childhood dream at the age of 30. How many people can say that. My biggest challenge now is figuring out what's next. And yet somehow this is even more obnoxious.
|
# ¿ Mar 13, 2014 15:34 |
|
Booblord Zagats posted:Someone at work just said it shows a lack of integrity in today's NFL that Russel Wilson is getting divorced I believe Kate *edit* wrong Kate
|
# ¿ Apr 24, 2014 18:31 |
|
Benne posted:Su'a-Filo isn't falling to No. 32 but I'd be pretty stoked if that happened I just want a guard who actually knows how to play the position.
|
# ¿ May 6, 2014 18:50 |
|
Ehud posted:He's bad, but Omar Kelly still exists. Maybe there is some context to those posts that I'm missing, but presented in that order in such a short time frame it just screams "maybe not mental illness but certainly in need of some therapy" to me. Like, dude has some real issues with narcissism.
|
# ¿ Aug 12, 2014 18:41 |
|
Ehud posted:@OmarKelly: Today has probably been my most productive day as a journalist this whole year, & I haven't written a word. Relationships run this business "I made a career for myself on my knees and not with a pen"
|
# ¿ Aug 13, 2014 00:25 |
|
MonsterWalk posted:That Bro_Pair article is fantastic. I'm pretty sure I read about this before, but can you link it?
|
# ¿ Aug 13, 2014 02:22 |
|
Its Miller Time posted:I was musing about today about how bad football commentary is. Can you name a single commentator or writer who actually discusses the strategy that goes on in a a game? What schemes the teams generally run, how they appear to have schemed for the game, how they countered each other and adjusted within the game, what plays they ran, why they ran them, how things are evolving or changed. FO gets there with some play-by-play analysis but it's exceedingly rare for how large the sport is. Mike Tanier occasionally does some, but if I actually start looking for breakdowns I usually go all the way to someone like Muth, who probably doesn't even get 10 grand a year to write what he does, which is a shame. (Salary pulled completely out of my rear end because I assume he does it for fun and not profit) Gruden is honestly the only big name guy I can think of who discusses that, and he usually saves it for things like the QB camp videos and not the games, which is a tragedy. I also don't like lumping Gruden in with the media because to me he still feels like a coach, just one who is out of work.
|
# ¿ Aug 14, 2014 08:53 |
|
Real Name Grover posted:Drew Magary went to town on King: Man, as terrible as guys like Omar Kelly are with their bombastic self-adulation about "keeping people accountable", it is still infinitely more appealing to read than the bullshit bootlicking obsequiosness of King.
|
# ¿ Sep 24, 2014 21:13 |
|
Kibner posted:http://nflfilms.nfl.com/2014/09/24/sean-taylor-a-football-life-sneak-preview/ DONT KEEP US WAITING, MAN! WHO? TELL US WHO!
|
# ¿ Sep 24, 2014 22:18 |
|
|
# ¿ May 13, 2024 04:34 |
|
AAA DOLFAN posted:Did you people think this was fake? Because this is an actual message from Omar to me when he banned my fake Brandon Marshall account I thought it was fake. That's hilarious that it isn't.
|
# ¿ Sep 30, 2014 18:28 |