|
i got so many babes
|
# ¿ Apr 30, 2012 23:55 |
|
|
# ¿ May 13, 2024 14:12 |
|
rotor posted:pascal never caught on because it was designed as a teaching language. Scheme never caught on either. lua has those and it makes zero difference at all unless you're a big baby
|
# ¿ May 1, 2012 00:06 |
|
tef posted:lua has 1.0 based arrays big deal
|
# ¿ May 1, 2012 00:12 |
|
homercles posted:in perl you can configure the base index to be any positive number who cares
|
# ¿ May 1, 2012 00:27 |
|
tef posted:actually in lua parlance, they're called tablesand they're part hash, part array (in 5.0+) this is cool thanks
|
# ¿ May 1, 2012 02:21 |
|
lua owns
|
# ¿ May 1, 2012 18:22 |
|
have you tried actually problem solving instead of expecting a language to save you
|
# ¿ May 1, 2012 18:36 |
|
trex eaterofcadrs posted:having the language prevent concurrency issues from even being valid is p sweet wow! a real live silver bullet!
|
# ¿ May 1, 2012 18:42 |
|
Janin posted:any time you can offload some sort of annoying mechanical process to the compiler, it's a huge win. what you just said makes no sense. then again, you're Janin
|
# ¿ May 1, 2012 19:11 |
|
Internaut! posted:I know this may be hard to comprehend as a 20 something android developer but once upon a time programmers had to manage their own memory, and it was such a clusterfuck for the average code walloper that languages like java/c#/vb/ruby/python/etc were invented and became massively successful in part because they delivered the silver bullet of not needing manage your own memory lol you're such a condescending moron
|
# ¿ May 1, 2012 19:22 |
|
seriously loving kill yourself
|
# ¿ May 1, 2012 19:24 |
|
another worthless post from Internaut
|
# ¿ May 1, 2012 19:27 |
|
lmao you thought that kickstarter was an investment website
|
# ¿ May 1, 2012 19:30 |
|
as far as i can tell your posting consists entirely of tipping your hand on just how out of touch you are, while condescending to people younger than you about things they already knew. please die of old age
|
# ¿ May 1, 2012 19:31 |
|
Tiny Bug Child posted:ahh spiders: get out you're tiny bug child
|
# ¿ May 1, 2012 19:33 |
|
Tiny Bug Child posted:why look, another three-post combo of shrill, histrionic bullshit tangentially related to the post it was replying to. that's our ah spiders the only reason anyone pays any attention to you is because 90% of the people in here are morons and can't detect really lazy trolls
|
# ¿ May 1, 2012 19:36 |
|
Tiny Bug Child posted:the only reason anyone pays attention to you is because once you decide to poo poo up a thread you start making half of the posts in it because the amount of truth i need to communicate doesn't fit within a single post
|
# ¿ May 1, 2012 19:43 |
|
Janin posted:tiny bug child vs ahhh spiders cripplefight please pay attention to me i'm janin
|
# ¿ May 1, 2012 19:52 |
|
wins32767 posted:I wish I was young again. The older you get the harder it is to get that awesome feeling from solving a really awesome problem. Unless you work at an awesome job you spend more and more time solving problems you've solved over and over and over while you watch other people keep getting that rush from stuff you figured out a decade ago because you have to give something to the junior guy and why not give them something boring? Eventually your life outside of work takes up more and more of your time that you'd spend learning new tools or technologies and you get more and more political responsibilities so your ability to code starts with wither a little bit. Then some kid who has a tenth of your experience comes and (with some justification) starts spouting off about how you're out of touch so you just sadly smile and go back to fixing your bugs that originated from not paying enough attention because you were juggling ten different balls so that none of the other developers had to deal with all the bullshit and hope that the kid doesn't end up in the same place as you in a few short years. WOw dad i didnt know you posted on something awful grampa
|
# ¿ May 1, 2012 19:58 |
|
that makes sense though. im sorry you're so bitter Internaut
|
# ¿ May 1, 2012 20:00 |
|
Werthog posted:all that talk about two degrees vs. no degrees reminds me of this one supervisor i had when i worked a lovely computer lab job in college. spent 6 years in school his first time around because he started out in comp. eng. and couldn't hack it, switched to a dual major in japanese and east asian studies because anime. graduated, worked a call center job for a year, took two years off for "mental health," then came back to get another bachelor's in IST. what a winner lmao at getting a degree in japanese because you like anime
|
# ¿ May 1, 2012 20:05 |
|
asm
|
# ¿ May 1, 2012 20:18 |
|
Werthog posted:the answer is c++ what's the ambiguity in C++?
|
# ¿ May 1, 2012 20:28 |
|
Werthog posted:ambiguity's probably the wrong word for it (this is why i'm taking the class, i want to ~learn~) but the example he used was that for a long time compilers saw the closing >s in a nested template declaration (e.g. list<vector<int>>) as the stream operator and you had to put whitespace in there to make it work don't they still do that
|
# ¿ May 1, 2012 20:43 |
|
i don't have anything newer than gcc 4.2 which still gives me an error
|
# ¿ May 1, 2012 20:47 |
|
it actually knows what the problem is, though error: `>>' should be `> >' within a nested template argument list
|
# ¿ May 1, 2012 20:49 |
|
excellent, no rebuttal from confirmed old crank Internaut. as usual
|
# ¿ May 1, 2012 20:56 |
|
Werthog posted:having trouble understanding why this would possibly be the correct behavior unless there was a valid way of using the stream operator within a nested template argument list, apart from spergy "when in doubt, fail" attitudes there is A<int, 1024>>2> a;
|
# ¿ May 1, 2012 21:01 |
|
Internaut! posted:you're an android developer i develop for ios and in the past i developed C++. you're an old gently caress who's quickly becoming irrelevant
|
# ¿ May 1, 2012 21:02 |
|
JawnV6 posted:"hm, im off track and might not have a goddamn clue what context im in, BETTER CHAREG AHEAD" ambiguity has the potential to add a fun, wacky dimension to programming that i think future generations will really appreciate
|
# ¿ May 1, 2012 21:05 |
|
Internaut! posted:cool I have many iOS devices link your apps gently caress you
|
# ¿ May 1, 2012 21:05 |
|
Tiny Bug Child posted:unironically this nice troll
|
# ¿ May 1, 2012 21:06 |
|
Sock on a Fish posted:going from python to ruby sucks because reference counting garbage collection takes care of a lot of poo poo for you is garbage collection guaranteed to be immediate when an object goes out of scope in ruby?
|
# ¿ May 1, 2012 21:11 |
|
Werthog posted:ohshit kind of contrived, sure, but it exists
|
# ¿ May 1, 2012 21:11 |
|
Internaut! posted:I was honestly expecting a list of commercially successful well-reviewed apps i'm working on an ios app but my android app is already well-reviewed
|
# ¿ May 1, 2012 21:15 |
|
Werthog posted:but wait, there's no opening < to match those >s, couldn't the lexer still figure it out i dunno, you can construct that scenario though A<B<int, 1024>>2>> ab;
|
# ¿ May 1, 2012 21:16 |
|
jooky posted:world of warcraft addons are written in lua a lot of games use lua. grim fandango used lua. lua is old as heck
|
# ¿ May 1, 2012 21:18 |
|
why wouldn't you run into that problem in ruby then
|
# ¿ May 1, 2012 21:24 |
|
Werthog posted:so if i'm understanding correctly, it's not that it's impossible to parse, just that it's a pain in the rear end i guess my example wasn't technically ambiguous unless you only read it left to right and didn't use any kind of contextual inference but yeah the stream operator is loving stupid
|
# ¿ May 1, 2012 21:29 |
|
|
# ¿ May 13, 2024 14:12 |
|
also technically i didn't use the stream operator in my example
|
# ¿ May 1, 2012 21:30 |