|
Rufo posted:*upwards nod* how u doin? gj ur hired
|
# ¿ May 8, 2012 22:04 |
|
|
# ¿ May 9, 2024 13:14 |
|
Internaut! posted:wait til you crack a history book someday and discover people were successfully developing software all the way back in the 20th century before stuff like git and svn were invented lol and what's the deal with these "compilers"? like ones that are a computer program?? idgi, we have Jerry to tranlsate our fortran idk, at any rate i dont think a machine could write better machine code than a human
|
# ¿ May 9, 2012 14:59 |
|
Internaut! posted:and not because we can literally measure the impact to our profits when our trade data falls out of byte alignment in memory for example you know how advanced we are? we detected a %50+ degradation in perf ur move pythonistas
|
# ¿ May 9, 2012 16:34 |
|
tf
|
# ¿ May 9, 2012 17:09 |
|
Internaut! posted:Dear Stack Overflow, i dont even understand ur mockings
|
# ¿ May 9, 2012 17:30 |
|
whats on bay street
|
# ¿ May 9, 2012 17:47 |
|
btw guys, pro-tip here, unaligned memory accesses can be slow i mite get in srs trouble for mentioning such under-the-hood details
|
# ¿ May 9, 2012 17:47 |
|
like aren't u embarassed it took all the way until profits to detect such a srs issue? do you have any semblance of pride in ur craft?
|
# ¿ May 9, 2012 17:52 |
|
dont talk to it
|
# ¿ May 11, 2012 00:08 |
|
lamentable dustman posted:didn't read much of this but learn java because there literally isn't enough java programers in the world XY problem
|
# ¿ May 11, 2012 19:53 |
|
I am sorry that, instead of educating you, the leaders in this language community have given you lies and fear. That was shameful. I recommend learning how statements in JS are actually terminated (and in which cases they are not terminated), so that you can write code that you find beautiful.
|
# ¿ May 12, 2012 20:52 |
|
rotor posted:the unicorn doesn't work! u'd be pretty lucky then
|
# ¿ May 13, 2012 08:14 |
|
Internaut! posted:eh I understand how it works, to me a compiler that doesn't catch type errors oh cool is that what we're talking about? that doesn't seem to be, but you're being a pretty disingenuous poo poo so idk
|
# ¿ May 14, 2012 15:55 |
|
holy poo poo holy poo poo they found a point of contention they're pointed at each other omg omg
|
# ¿ May 14, 2012 16:03 |
|
Panic! At The cisco posted:im a troll
|
# ¿ May 14, 2012 17:55 |
|
haskool e: hascool?
|
# ¿ May 14, 2012 18:03 |
|
i actually read zimbardo's book, thx 4 assumin im a dumb tho
|
# ¿ May 14, 2012 18:52 |
|
careful you don't hurt urself with a stretch that far
|
# ¿ May 14, 2012 18:54 |
|
recumbent posting machine
|
# ¿ May 14, 2012 18:59 |
|
yeah string-heavy programthat relies on a perl library SOUND LIKE FUN HASKELLIN
|
# ¿ May 14, 2012 19:35 |
|
oh, did you not understand this either?
|
# ¿ May 15, 2012 18:22 |
|
right, exactly, that's totes wat i said gj man, i rly enjoy ur posting
|
# ¿ May 15, 2012 18:41 |
|
Internaut! posted:cool tell your friends in reddit you spoke with a member of the patriarchy without wetting your pants im no liar
|
# ¿ May 15, 2012 18:48 |
|
that spans like 3-4 disciplines and i doubt theres a single "accessible" ref that covers the entire thing, but H&P qualitative and the dragon book cover most of it
|
# ¿ May 15, 2012 19:10 |
|
Otto Skorzeny posted:in an unrelated story, three people died in sunnyvale today from being scowled at lol "three"? as if the universe is discrete, get a clue moran!!!
|
# ¿ May 16, 2012 15:32 |
|
Internaut! posted:thanks I remember h&p but didn't know they had an intro book, chapter 1 of the one I had was on pipelines and caches iirc yeah that's quant, should be for the first grad arch class ch1 of qual is "benchmarks are all lies"
|
# ¿ May 16, 2012 17:16 |
|
Rufo posted:"people" are a construct so good luck counting them i can count on u tho....
|
# ¿ May 16, 2012 17:16 |
|
i haven't had that feeling of six hours of debug coming back to the slow realization of "Ohhh... THAT'S what that warning meant.." biting me in the rear end in quite some time
|
# ¿ May 17, 2012 17:25 |
|
i think single threaded, isn't the entire world also like that!??!?
|
# ¿ May 17, 2012 18:42 |
|
check() use() is seriously begging for your code to break
|
# ¿ May 17, 2012 18:48 |
|
i fully expect these multiple statements in my high level language, possibly separated by control flow, to be atomic
|
# ¿ May 17, 2012 22:06 |
|
lock bt[rs]l ought to be enough for anyone
|
# ¿ May 17, 2012 22:45 |
|
at the circus for a clown to use
|
# ¿ May 17, 2012 23:00 |
|
but then you get the movies and janeway is an admiral!?!?!? makes no sense
|
# ¿ May 18, 2012 15:47 |
|
Otto Skorzeny posted:i like this nomenclature of just directly calling them quantitative and qualitative btw. the common custom of calling one h&p and the other p&h is annoying finally found my copy of quant to confirm this, but im old and used quant 3rd edition when they were still listed as "H&P" and i assume there's been some big academic because hennessy went into "management" while patterson stayed technical but idk if thats true
|
# ¿ May 18, 2012 22:40 |
|
Werthog posted:how the gently caress is CS an "art" :(){:|:;};: fin
|
# ¿ May 22, 2012 20:11 |
|
asm's not that bad, gets a bad rap tedious more than anything
|
# ¿ May 24, 2012 17:15 |
|
eh, when i want things to happen within ns it's not like i can toss it through an OS or w/e
|
# ¿ May 24, 2012 17:23 |
|
Markov Chain Chomp posted:so wait, is this code running in ring 0 or? Nomnom Cookie posted:this post would make sense if mov was a privileged instruction
|
# ¿ May 24, 2012 18:10 |
|
|
# ¿ May 9, 2024 13:14 |
|
Gazpacho posted:haha i think u mean hoHA HA HA HA HA HA HAHA AHHAHAHAHA BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
|
# ¿ May 24, 2012 18:29 |