Right Wing Media: congratulations Rush Limbaugh on three full years of sobriety!

The Something Awful Forums > Discussion > Debate & Discussion > Right Wing Media: congratulations Rush Limbaugh on three full years of sobriety!

«‹›6 »

Xand_Man: Mar 2, 2004; If what you say is true
Wutang might be dangerous

And certainly not more than one successful franchise.

# ¿ Feb 9, 2014 09:52

Adbot: ADBOT LOVES YOU

# ¿ May 5, 2024 11:11

Xand_Man: Mar 2, 2004; If what you say is true
Wutang might be dangerous

PeterWeller posted:

Yeah, I love that part. It conjures up such an incongruous mental image of some poindexterous dude in a lab coat giving Hannity (because he is the ultimate fat, old, wannabe jock) a swirly.

Two guys in lab coats; the other one is recording data.

# ¿ May 9, 2014 17:20

Xand_Man: Mar 2, 2004; If what you say is true
Wutang might be dangerous

Those gay people are speaking in code! They must be up to something!

# ¿ May 12, 2014 01:11

Xand_Man: Mar 2, 2004; If what you say is true
Wutang might be dangerous

"Welp, those arguments are airtight. Guess we gotta start liking vaginas now."

# ¿ May 23, 2014 19:56

Xand_Man: Mar 2, 2004; If what you say is true
Wutang might be dangerous

Mr Ice Cream Glove posted:

Matt Walsh on Plastic Surgery

Dear Matt Walsh,

Google Reconstructive surgery. Then go gently caress yourself.

# ¿ Feb 3, 2015 02:26

Xand_Man: Mar 2, 2004; If what you say is true
Wutang might be dangerous

MaxxBot posted:

I know UFC tickets are like $200 or something dumb like that but I'd pay that multiple times over if they had a Ronda Rousey vs Morbidly obese misogynist comments section conservatives bout.

Please do this. You know there's at least one rear end in a top hat that thinks their set of testicles will give them fiat victory over a trained female fighter and a lot of people who would gladly pay to see him proven wrong.

# ¿ Feb 20, 2015 00:37

Xand_Man: Mar 2, 2004; If what you say is true
Wutang might be dangerous

Parachute posted:

How to rock a scraggly goatee:
1) Learn how explode someone's heart at will.
2) ...

# ¿ Feb 20, 2015 00:39

Xand_Man: Mar 2, 2004; If what you say is true
Wutang might be dangerous

Ichabod Sexbeast posted:

Yes

For those who didn't click on the link: She was 7 and her sister was 1 when the 'molestation' happened.

I'm all for punishing child molesters but seriously, kids do stuff like this.

# ¿ May 22, 2015 15:33

Xand_Man: Mar 2, 2004; If what you say is true
Wutang might be dangerous

What the gently caress does that quote mean? Is the cover coated with glue?

# ¿ Aug 20, 2015 08:56

Xand_Man: Mar 2, 2004; If what you say is true
Wutang might be dangerous

Tarezax posted:

Probably unsourced quotes.

Or a Markov chain generator.

Edit: Or Wernicke's Aphasia?

Xand_Man fucked around with this message at 07:31 on Sep 4, 2015

# ¿ Sep 4, 2015 07:26

Xand_Man: Mar 2, 2004; If what you say is true
Wutang might be dangerous

The wiki article makes it look like the shooter wasn't explicitly anti-Muslim; he may have picked targets based on the paper-bag test.

Also it makes me sad that the Hammerskins aren't a dwarven LARP group.

# ¿ Sep 10, 2015 19:16

Xand_Man: Mar 2, 2004; If what you say is true
Wutang might be dangerous

Epic High Five posted:

Remind me again why they don't protest in front of fertility clinics? Not only do they destroy embryos but they are playing God in a very real sense, it seems like that kind of double whammy would be irresistible

It would look really loving bad. The fact that fertility clinics toss out embryos isn't as obvious, the demographic that goes to fertility clinics has more overlap with the protestors, and there would be a lot more backlash against "those assholes who don't want us to have a kid."

BABIES GOOD. KILLING BABIES BAD.

Xand_Man fucked around with this message at 01:54 on Oct 11, 2015

# ¿ Oct 11, 2015 01:00

Xand_Man: Mar 2, 2004; If what you say is true
Wutang might be dangerous

ErIog posted:

I AM THE PRODUCT OF CONCEPTION!

I really want to know what the person who made that sign thinks pro-choice believe.

I feel really bad for the kid in that picture once they hit their teenage years.

# ¿ Oct 11, 2015 01:55

Xand_Man: Mar 2, 2004; If what you say is true
Wutang might be dangerous

It always needs posting.

Alan Moore posted:

So actually, sort of, Rorschach became the most popular character in Watchmen. I meant him to be a bad example, but I have people come up to me in the street saying, �I am Rorschach! That is my story!� And I�ll be thinking, �Yeah, great, can you just keep away from me and never come anywhere near me again for as long as I live?��

# ¿ Dec 28, 2015 04:56

Xand_Man: Mar 2, 2004; If what you say is true
Wutang might be dangerous

CommieGIR posted:

Its not supposed to be funny. Its supposed to be ironic.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_KTsywB6GNQ

# ¿ Jan 2, 2016 03:42

Xand_Man: Mar 2, 2004; If what you say is true
Wutang might be dangerous

Yes, nothing says "Fascist strongman" like weeping.

# ¿ Jan 6, 2016 00:44

Xand_Man: Mar 2, 2004; If what you say is true
Wutang might be dangerous

Rhesus Pieces posted:

jizzed-on pictures of his daughter.

Someone implied I am a loner with poor social skills. How shall I respond?

This. This will show them.

# ¿ Jan 20, 2016 19:25

Xand_Man: Mar 2, 2004; If what you say is true
Wutang might be dangerous

Dr. Killjoy posted:

Yeah gotta say that taking money from the pockets of wingnuts and giving it to people who need it is a worthy venture. It's a shame that the well will run dry when they remember that they don't actually care about poor people and that this was all a contrarian exercise.

DONATE HERE TO ELIMINATE POOR MINORITIES*

_{*because they won't be poor after we give them your money.}

# ¿ Jan 22, 2016 09:33

Xand_Man: Mar 2, 2004; If what you say is true
Wutang might be dangerous

Noam Chomsky posted:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gmxeoh69G4o

This dude's channel keeps popping up on YouTube recommendations for me - for some weird/stupid/unknown reason - and he's very upset about Tomorrowland.

Anyone else familiar with him?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sj27jlq2Qo8
Watched a little. The way his eyes dart off to the side constantly makes me think he is doing this against his will.

# ¿ Jan 23, 2016 12:13

Xand_Man: Mar 2, 2004; If what you say is true
Wutang might be dangerous

ToastyPotato posted:

Trump said he could shoot someone and still not lose voters:

http://www.cnn.com/2016/01/23/politics/donald-trump-shoot-somebody-support/

Motherfucker's putting up a trial balloon.

# ¿ Jan 24, 2016 07:52

Xand_Man: Mar 2, 2004; If what you say is true
Wutang might be dangerous

To some degree I was always a Democrat since my parents both were, but I can think of two things that cemented it.

The first was that I had friends from a variety of socio-economic backgrounds, and it seemed pretty arbitrary to me as a kid that some people had so much relative to others. Every time I went over to hang out in the back room of the drycleaner's I saw my friend's parents busting their asses. So why didn't he have the same opportunities as the kids whose parents were both lawyers?

The other is that I have some close family members who were born with severe developmental delays. It has impacted our family in a thousand different ways and it ultimately came down to chance. As a teen, whenever I saw a attractive person on the street a tiny voice in my head would chide "Sometimes you roll sixes and sometimes you roll ones." and I'd get a little sad.

# ¿ Feb 3, 2016 18:14

Xand_Man: Mar 2, 2004; If what you say is true
Wutang might be dangerous

I was listening to NPR today and they reported as a news item that the presiding doctor declined to do an autopsy, because it was clearly a heart attack.

:what:

Why would you even say that? That's the complete opposite of news! That's a thing that happens every day!

# ¿ Feb 16, 2016 07:14

Xand_Man: Mar 2, 2004; If what you say is true
Wutang might be dangerous

Spun Dog posted:

Fun fact, Tea Partiers down here originally called themselves Tea Baggers. They get mad when you call them that now.

A fitting name, since they are the angry ethnic slur shouting 12-year-olds of our democracy.

# ¿ Mar 10, 2016 02:11

Xand_Man: Mar 2, 2004; If what you say is true
Wutang might be dangerous

Rush Limbaugh posted:

I'm not gonna be hypocrite here. The Republican Party has in its own way, by not opposing Obama, set the stage for a Drumpf. I've said that. I'm not gonna back off of that. There's absolutely truth to that.

There has to be some German word for the feeling when you see someone being a complete and total rear end in a top hat so competently that your rage and disgust get sublimated and you're mostly just impressed.

Xand_Man fucked around with this message at 12:24 on Mar 11, 2016

# ¿ Mar 11, 2016 07:56

Xand_Man: Mar 2, 2004; If what you say is true
Wutang might be dangerous

The one about the Canada raids had me laughing so hard I couldn't breath. Pro listen.

# ¿ Mar 21, 2016 23:37

Xand_Man: Mar 2, 2004; If what you say is true
Wutang might be dangerous

One way I could see a political party shift is if the Chamber of Commerce types within the GOPe get sick of the bullshit they are getting in exchange for low taxes and start to defect. We're already seeing it now with companies having trouble getting qualified workers thanks to cuts in education and hostile social policies.

# ¿ Apr 1, 2016 23:24

Xand_Man: Mar 2, 2004; If what you say is true
Wutang might be dangerous

Not sure if it's what's going on with that bug but some animation techniques use keyframes and let the computer draw a smooth transition between them. If one of the keyframes had the old model and the other didn't you get the incredible inflating rear end.

# ¿ Apr 8, 2016 16:35

Xand_Man: Mar 2, 2004; If what you say is true
Wutang might be dangerous

That's not really a problem with science though.

# ¿ Apr 14, 2016 20:34

Xand_Man: Mar 2, 2004; If what you say is true
Wutang might be dangerous

To head off another lovely derail: What's with the Baud Dudes tag? It looks pretty baller.

# ¿ Apr 14, 2016 20:41

Xand_Man: Mar 2, 2004; If what you say is true
Wutang might be dangerous

Mister Macys posted:

So uh, what is "second hand smoke" in this analogy?

Nice try; everyone knows the dangers of getting some gay on you :gay:

# ¿ Apr 14, 2016 21:33

Xand_Man: Mar 2, 2004; If what you say is true
Wutang might be dangerous

Obama's legacy: health care reform, killing an infamous terrorist, and burning the Republican party to the ground and salting the ashes.

# ¿ May 9, 2016 09:20

Xand_Man: Mar 2, 2004; If what you say is true
Wutang might be dangerous

One of my buddies commonly exchanges Butthead as a term of affection with his father. Different strokes for different families.

# ¿ May 11, 2016 17:27

Xand_Man: Mar 2, 2004; If what you say is true
Wutang might be dangerous

Rip_Van_Winkle posted:

Honestly we might be better off if she had called it a religion. Weird culty religions get way more scrutiny and marginalization than weird culty philosophies. Plus, it would cut down on the numbers of "christians" who would've gotten on the objectivism train.

She describes a scenario where the pure, faithful elect will gain access to an invisible utopia that only functions through ~~magic~~ Free Energy and leave behind the unclean masses to suffer.

That sounds pretty religious.

# ¿ May 12, 2016 19:36

Xand_Man: Mar 2, 2004; If what you say is true
Wutang might be dangerous

Mr Ice Cream Glove posted:

And Walsh is having another kid...

Hopefully the opposite gender from the first kid. Let's see how that stance plays when you're shopping alone with both kids and the younger one needs to go.

# ¿ May 14, 2016 00:42

Xand_Man: Mar 2, 2004; If what you say is true
Wutang might be dangerous

This is all moot anyway because that chart is probably time-bounded because Charles Whitman would absolutely be on that list otherwise.

Xand_Man fucked around with this message at 13:28 on Jun 15, 2016

# ¿ Jun 14, 2016 07:39

Xand_Man: Mar 2, 2004; If what you say is true
Wutang might be dangerous

Is... is Hillary Clinton a necromancer? :ohdear:

# ¿ Jun 22, 2016 09:56

Xand_Man: Mar 2, 2004; If what you say is true
Wutang might be dangerous

Mel Mudkiper posted:

God that show was a masterpiece

Reno was amazing.

I'm surprised by your King of the HIll opinions; I remember that episode and it seemed kinda bittersweet: Hank was there for his friend (sorta) by telling him to bottle up his emotions. Which he did, but it was obvious that wasn't doing him any favors: Bill always seemed like one bad moment away from a total meltdown.

And LOL, Peggy had "damages the people around her to justify her shittiness" as pretty big character trait.

# ¿ Jul 14, 2016 13:12

Xand_Man: Mar 2, 2004; If what you say is true
Wutang might be dangerous

Dammit_Carl! posted:

Or maybe famous biblical personages!

"Yay! I just got Nebuchadnezzar!"

Unironically hope someone makes this because interacting with dead Babylonian kings that no one else can see at a Starbucks will definitely strike a blow agains the occult.

# ¿ Jul 14, 2016 22:22

Xand_Man: Mar 2, 2004; If what you say is true
Wutang might be dangerous

Chilichimp posted:

This has been my Rush Limbaugh segment story.

Man, for a guy who's been running a radio show as long as he has you'd expect him to be... a person who runs things in a efficient and effortless manner.

Xand_Man fucked around with this message at 23:50 on Jul 27, 2016

# ¿ Jul 27, 2016 23:47

Adbot: ADBOT LOVES YOU

# ¿ May 5, 2024 11:11

Xand_Man: Mar 2, 2004; If what you say is true
Wutang might be dangerous

The real story is nobody talking about how tiny his lobes are :sad:

# ¿ Jul 30, 2016 21:26

The Something Awful Forums > Discussion > Debate & Discussion > Right Wing Media: congratulations Rush Limbaugh on three full years of sobriety!

«‹›6 »