|
i watch my hd porn with a lowpass filter and then guassian blur to get that sweet 2002 streamin vid look
|
#
¿
Jan 11, 2013 19:49
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 21, 2024 11:49 |
|
|
pagancow posted:As you increase the cameras resolution you get more high frequency detail (Assuming optics can handle it) Pretty sure the optics can handle it, 65mm is closer to 8K than 4
|
|
#
¿
Jan 12, 2013 08:41
|
|
|
ahmeni posted:Isn't it more about sensors and noise since nobody uses film Yeah the SNR is more the limit now than anything but 65/70mm is still in use for a lot of bigger productions (The Dark Knight)
|
|
#
¿
Jan 12, 2013 08:54
|
|
|
I am a horrible luddite who still shoots MF film because of that very effect
|
|
#
¿
Jan 12, 2013 21:03
|
|
|
24fps is p nice especially in old movies, Jackson should learn to make a something that isn't a blurry loving mess before upping framerates.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 13, 2013 09:34
|
|
|
Yeah, sadly CUDA h.264 encoders aren't quite there yet, the video tends to look kinda flat.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 14, 2013 23:31
|
|
|
Mister Snips posted:the TV I have literally does not display individual pixels and even tho it displays at 1080p there's a dumb glow to everything. 1080p is a marginal improvement over 720 because of this. the sharpness is just blurred out by the panel Wondering this too, tvs are expensive as hell and look like rear end.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 17, 2013 07:42
|
|
|
Silver Alicorn posted:whatever aspect ratio 70mm film is supremacy it's about 20:9 and yeah owns
|
|
#
¿
Jan 18, 2013 23:13
|
|
|
Detroit Q. Spider posted:i thought unmatted 70mm was still academy ratio It seems to be 2.20:1 I don't know if that's academy ratio or not. 
|
|
#
¿
Jan 19, 2013 05:57
|
|
|
H.264 was pretty good, if H.265 does 4K even better
|
|
#
¿
Jan 26, 2013 11:02
|
|
|
Shaggar posted:yeah but that's like, Canadian tv, right? excuse me maybe you've heard of a little canadian production called little mosque on the prairie checkmate 
|
|
#
¿
Jan 28, 2013 18:21
|
|
|
peepsalot posted:ugh spare me the vulcan nerd pitch Vulcan BizDev
|
|
#
¿
Feb 14, 2013 09:49
|
|
|
what is bink and why do i have an instinctual loathing for it
|
|
#
¿
Feb 20, 2013 12:10
|
|
|
Shaggar posted:theres no need for subtitles if its English audio and if its not English audio it should have hard subs. let's just increase the filesize by 2% by hardcoding some subs instead of embedding a 200kb text file
|
|
#
¿
Feb 28, 2013 09:57
|
|
|
Sudo Echo posted:we can all agree that anyone who encodes black bars should be shot, right agreed
|
|
#
¿
Feb 28, 2013 10:10
|
|
|
ahmeni posted:though I will gladly listen to Carmack sperg about 3d for hours on end stop enabling him
|
|
#
¿
Mar 2, 2013 09:53
|
|
|
So it's a glorified TV tuner?
|
|
#
¿
Mar 3, 2013 07:31
|
|
|
pagancow posted:
my poo poo monitor isn't banding but my u2410 is 
|
|
#
¿
Mar 4, 2013 10:09
|
|
|
graph posted:i have a bunch of undeveloped film rolls from 2006 where can i get that poo poo taken care of if it's 135 then most drugstores will still do them. if there isn't one in your town look into a send away service like dwayne's
|
|
#
¿
Mar 21, 2013 09:58
|
|
|
echinopsis posted:i found that blurring one of the two a/b channels didnt result in a very obvious difference. this is weird to me because i assumed it should have. loving around with this is fun but idk why photoshop makes it much harder to do than normal fuckery? is it because im trying to use one channel and not all, or is this a limitation of LAB photoshop is weird with channels, once you get used to it it's not half bad but there's some weird UI differences that take getting used to
|
|
#
¿
Mar 23, 2013 05:32
|
|
|
Doc Block posted:So it's a plain old 3D model...? Storing the color information at each vertex instead of texture coordinates isn't exactly a big deal. technically yeah but it is an interesting and unusual example
|
|
#
¿
Mar 24, 2013 10:37
|
|
|
nigga crab pollock posted:this must be what the 3ds uses to stretch ds games to its screen cause they look weird and sharpened and its only obvious to my eyes apparantly yeah there's like a weird contrast thing it does but it's also still jagged
|
|
#
¿
Mar 26, 2013 08:25
|
|
|
pagancow posted:Not sure but 5mbps stream in america is just fine here for everybody else who thinks 5megabits/s is enough lol shouldn't 4K be more like 50mbps?
|
|
#
¿
Mar 27, 2013 06:51
|
|
|
i would be surprised if the human eye had a 'framerate' at all there's probably some crazy jazz going in the brain there
|
|
#
¿
Mar 29, 2013 01:03
|
|
|
yeah I don't mean that you can't see the difference between 60 and 120fps I just mean trying to figure out what framerate is 'seamless' based on the human eye probably won't work out because of how human vision works.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 29, 2013 05:27
|
|
|
Nomnom Cookie posted:how does human vision work moist von lipwig. the neuroscience community awaits your wisdom the eye is like this but the optic nerve is like this
|
|
#
¿
Mar 29, 2013 08:40
|
|
|
Nomnom Cookie posted:how does human vision work moist von lipwig. the neuroscience community awaits your wisdom seriously though i'm pretty sure it's well established that the eye rapidly scans the field of vision and cobbles together the scene from many smaller samples meaning that it probably doesn't have a discrete 'framerate'
|
|
#
¿
Mar 29, 2013 08:44
|
|
|
pagancow posted:Yeah but this still doesn't explain why ~teh ScEnE~ insists on delivering 7.1 DTS-HD mixes in video files for people without money or sound systems to play them back. if my computer has 7.1 speakers and this little thing can I decode 7.1 DTS-HD? 
|
|
#
¿
Mar 29, 2013 18:05
|
|
|
i love hd vid but playing blu rays on my computer makes me want to cry. it's such a pain in the rear end i end up downloading movies i own thanks sorny
|
|
#
¿
Apr 4, 2013 10:02
|
|
|
Wheany posted:if you have a blu-ray drive and the disk space, you might as well rip the movie. with makemkv it only takes a few clicks and an hour of time. i have a few hundred gigs but honestly the only advantage of ~physical media~ is that i can play it now and get special features and stuff not "haha hey girl wanna watch a movie? okay lemme just rip it to my hard drive for an hour haha" pagancow posted:lol if you dont even calibrate your display to rec.709 so you can have correct colors the way the colorist saw it. nothing is firetruck red in rec.709 i have a dell u2410 how do i do this tell me pagancow
|
|
#
¿
Apr 4, 2013 18:18
|
|
|
why were interlaced images a thing at all to begin with? no matter how you do the math 60fps interlaced and 30fps progressive are the same bandwidth.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 7, 2013 04:15
|
|
|
what the hell is happening in hereSudo Echo posted:what kind if fool argues with fishmech about NTSC
|
|
#
¿
Apr 7, 2013 07:19
|
|
|
secam seems like the better standard tbh
|
|
#
¿
Apr 8, 2013 02:07
|
|
|
being a sperg is spergin' over poo poo that doesn't matter spergin' over your job is smart and probably a good way to make money
|
|
#
¿
Apr 10, 2013 20:22
|
|
|
does anything really matter? codecs are everything the standard model is basically the codec for the universe more codec chat
|
|
#
¿
Apr 10, 2013 20:29
|
|
|
has anyone actually come up with a good decomb filter yet I should probably just upgrade my old dvds with interlacing to bluray but some still haven't and probably never will come out in hd (big lebowski  )
|
|
#
¿
Apr 10, 2013 20:42
|
|
|
Install Gentoo posted:purchase a giant trinitron sorry no room too much vinyl
|
|
#
¿
Apr 10, 2013 20:58
|
|
|
probably belongs in computing confessions but albums from the 70's sound better on the original vinyl 99% of the time. i think the only good 'remastered' album I've heard is deep purples machine head.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 10, 2013 21:00
|
|
|
Install Gentoo posted:its because older people have been trained to expect the flaws of vinyl as a normal thing, meanwhile younger people never put up with it and besides they aren't getting cds in the first place because its 2013. i'm 25, i first heard vinyl at 24.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 10, 2013 21:46
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 21, 2024 11:49 |
|
|
lol 0:16 almost sounds like it's going to turn into the windows 98 startup sound
|
|
#
¿
Apr 12, 2013 01:27
|
|