|
cineform or prores so that premiere or fcp or whatever wont gag on the previews and timeline while you're scrubbing through them. anything else is for scrubs. be prepared for the prores transcoded files to take about 10x the space of the original files out of the camera, so your 5 gig project can quickly turn into a 50gig project. transcode with something that can take advantage of CUDA because gently caress waiting for even an i7 to do that poo poo by hand. oh, your talking anime codecs? who cares, whatever vlc will play is fine.
|
#
¿
Dec 31, 2012 17:53
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 21, 2024 18:59 |
|
|
ultimateforce posted:MY DSLR does this really bad when shooting video and it drives me crazy. shoot in raw snipe
|
|
#
¿
Dec 31, 2012 18:03
|
|
|
canon does. the changes needed to make their DSLRs shoot raw would make the t2i cost like 9 grand tho.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 31, 2012 20:34
|
|
|
pagancow posted:lol what is this? 5 years ago? edit native in all three big NLEs or yo good luck not having any of the big 3 not cough up a lung when you scrub through more than a minute or two of 1080p. that mercury hardware playback engine in premiere took care of a lot of that, but it still gets choppy on me every once in a while if im not using prores or cineform.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 31, 2012 21:27
|
|
|
pagancow posted:disk i/o deficiency on a solid state drive?
|
|
#
¿
Dec 31, 2012 21:57
|
|
|
pagancow posted:The adobe engineers told me that AVCHD and other non all-i frame codecs need more disk IO becuase it has to read ahead and create all the iframes you want to seek in the middle. i do premiere on a windows box precisely becasue adobe hates apple now. i also have a GTS450 fermi whatever, which makes it render HD video faster than realtime, so I dont think its the card. either way, it only stutters erry once ina while, so its nbd.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 31, 2012 22:36
|
|
|
because an i-frame didnt get broadcast and the video decoder doesnt know to change something onscreen here is some nerd poo poo http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Video_compression_picture_types Beve Stuscemi fucked around with this message at 16:04 on Jan 2, 2013 |
|
#
¿
Jan 2, 2013 16:01
|
|
|
peepsalot posted:what ever happened to jpeg2000. wasn't there some provision for video what that too, or am I making that up. it became motionjpeg and was equally shameful
|
|
#
¿
Jan 2, 2013 21:22
|
|
|
Suspicious Dish posted:no ur wrong that's frame blending from an ntsc source p. sure thats not it broseph
|
|
#
¿
Jan 2, 2013 21:24
|
|
|
pagancow posted:i asked the woman what she thought of high frame rate, and she said she couldn't tell a difference. i mean come on, the GOPRO shoots in 4k for chrissakes! Petre Jackson you need to shoot in 100K or better!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
|
#
¿
Jan 4, 2013 20:15
|
|
|
i was in a theatre in florida and it had a digital projector where the brightness was turned up way too high and it was possibly zoomed in way far, as I could see the individual projector pixels. my sperginess would not allow me to enjoy the movie after that.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 4, 2013 20:58
|
|
|
pagancow posted:qua qua qua quad post!!! looks cool, anyone tried it? also dam snips u a babby
|
|
#
¿
Jan 11, 2013 23:00
|
|
|
similar realtalk, keep shooting on your iphone and make good-rear end content. so many dudes have 5DMKII's and make total poo poo all day. content is king, gear is secondary.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 13, 2013 03:55
|
|
|
Suspicious Dish posted:i'm mostly impressed at how long some of those macroblocks stay on screen cool concept wasted on a terrible song
|
|
#
¿
Jan 15, 2013 17:50
|
|
|
VectorSigma posted:i have a use for M-JPEG who can guess why you have a disorder on a certain spectrum
|
|
#
¿
Jan 17, 2013 05:25
|
|
|
longview posted:These are the same people who want to stretch 4:3 to 16:9 so they can get their money's worth. the most rage inducing thing
|
|
#
¿
Jan 17, 2013 20:20
|
|
|
ahmeni posted:maybe your autism about other peoples media enjoyment would be a little better tempered by thinking of it as stretching 12:9 to 16:9 maybe if stretching 12:9 to 16:9 didnt cut off 4:9 of the video, then yeah
|
|
#
¿
Jan 17, 2013 23:52
|
|
|
much like twixtor artifacts, your brain becomes permanently wired to notice them
|
|
#
¿
Feb 28, 2013 17:29
|
|
|
ahmeni posted:is this the anti shake video thing like YouTube does? because I cannot unsee it and it makes me nauseous when watching things with it https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JQokTc8D0P8 Watch the wheels and the sand when it goes to slowmo. Thats a really bad example, but even in really good examples, Twixtor generally gives itself away. ive seen it in production television even. the youtube antishake thing is a visual representation of dubstep
|
|
#
¿
Feb 28, 2013 22:59
|
|
|
"heh lemme just take this 15fps .3gp file and twixtor it out to 10,000fps" -everyone on youtube
|
|
#
¿
Mar 1, 2013 20:04
|
|
|
pagancow posted:
this is the dumbest thing and pre-CS6 versions of premiere puke their guts out when they encounter an iphone video with variable frame rate. apple, just loving film at one frame rate, jeeze
|
|
#
¿
Mar 4, 2013 15:32
|
|
|
hey are there any tv providers that dont compress the poo poo out of everything and turn it into macroblock hell? i just dumped uverse and have just been watching ota tv and apple tv lately, and holy poo poo are both waaaaaaaayyyyyyyy better than uverses blocky lovely mess. any fast motion was rendered unwatchable mess because of the compression. are there any tv providers (either cable/dsl/satellite) that arent complete trash with regards to compression?
|
|
#
¿
Mar 4, 2013 17:10
|
|
|
*pays extra for HD channels* *gets super compressed blocky tv that looks like realmedia from the 90's* "Heh, yeah, this HD is great"
|
|
#
¿
Mar 4, 2013 17:17
|
|
|
dur posted:more like -Every person over 50 ever
|
|
#
¿
Mar 4, 2013 17:25
|
|
|
then you fix it for them and put them on the HD channel and stop the stretching and one of two things happens: 1) "This looks great, thanks!" *is back to the SD channel literally 10 minutes later and calling you on the phone because they cant get rid of the black bars* 2) "Looks the same to me  "
|
|
#
¿
Mar 4, 2013 17:27
|
|
|
that could be, our uverse still had like 500 analog channels
|
|
#
¿
Mar 4, 2013 17:40
|
|
|
ah, yeah, i meant digital sd, nevermind
|
|
#
¿
Mar 4, 2013 17:46
|
|
|
yeah cell companies did the same thing. my old roomate got an offer from ATT or us cellular or whoever offering him their most baller (at the time) phone for free just so they could get his 10 year old analog phone off the network. his options were take the baller phone, take any other phone he wanted, or be dropped.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 4, 2013 18:32
|
|
|
no just one of those technophobes who hated using a cell phone for anything but phone calls and his laughably huge old nokia was "good enough", he was like early 20s at the time.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 4, 2013 18:35
|
|
|
MY SPECIAL EYES
|
|
#
¿
Mar 4, 2013 23:12
|
|
|
pagancow posted:I prefer DLP technology as they update 240 times a second with a black frame insertion for 1/240th of a second each 10 cycles on 24P material dlp does own except when the color wheel gets a cat hair in the air bearing and you have to replace it. ~the yosposters burden~
|
|
#
¿
Mar 5, 2013 04:24
|
|
|
my dlp is from the mid 2000s and is 720p
|
|
#
¿
Mar 5, 2013 04:33
|
|
|
Detroit Q. Spider posted:how bad is ur input lag oddly enough the tv has a game mode where it all but eliminates it. i just set all inputs to use game mode
|
|
#
¿
Mar 5, 2013 04:52
|
|
|
i dont "get" vine
|
|
#
¿
Mar 5, 2013 22:11
|
|
|
its that im really dumb
|
|
#
¿
Mar 5, 2013 22:17
|
|
|
yep just got the vine app, will sasso has helped me understand vine now
|
|
#
¿
Mar 5, 2013 22:22
|
|
|
Jim Silly-Balls posted:i dont "get" vine now that i get vine, im still not sure if it will stick around for long. it is like twitter for videos, but mashing out 140 characters is easy, vine requires effort, and we all know how the twitter world likes effort
|
|
#
¿
Mar 6, 2013 15:32
|
|
|
Apple: We're designed for the creatives *doesnt do poo poo with poo poo re: video*
|
|
#
¿
Mar 12, 2013 20:37
|
|
|
 get ur cuda on
|
|
#
¿
Mar 14, 2013 22:10
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 21, 2024 18:59 |
|
|
longview posted:lol @ non-square pixels
|
|
#
¿
Mar 16, 2013 01:20
|
|