|
Liska posted:I like that comments are already disabled for the video. Either it was done preemptively, or things got out of hand that quickly. Friends Are Evil posted:It's as if millions of neckbeards cried out in terror, and were suddenly silenced.
|
# ¿ Mar 8, 2013 02:42 |
|
|
# ¿ May 8, 2024 05:04 |
|
PHIZ KALIFA posted:Is there a collective word for awful internet bullshit, like "grognard" is to gamers? I mean stuff like libertarian bitcoin-having fedora-wearing athiest MRAs on reddit. Either way, http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/569272765/the-ron-paul-bust-project?ref=search Orzo posted:I don't follow libertarian politics and know very little about bitcoins but what on earth does being an atheist have to do with associating with awful MRAs or having no fashion sense? quote:The creepy thought that the reason a lot of outspoken, committed, passionate atheists are choosing this as their arena is because they’re too selfish, too entitled, or too sheltered, to allow any other issues to really matter to them. That they choose this ONE civil rights issue to dedicate themselves to, because it’s the ONLY legitimate civil rights issue that actually affects them, secure in their absence of ovaries, melanin, exogenous hormones, medical devices/supports, welfare checks, track scars and rainbow flags. edit: vvvvvv I skim-read that as "other than they don't wash or go to church anymore". That fits some of the awful youtube atheists. Guavanaut has a new favorite as of 01:17 on Mar 13, 2013 |
# ¿ Mar 13, 2013 00:45 |
|
SovietSpyGuy posted:^^^ What he said.
|
# ¿ Apr 7, 2013 00:02 |
|
Waffleman_ posted:You know, this got me wondering if anybody owned a patent for the wheel. If you did, I don't know how you'd resist the temptation to be the biggest patent troll of all time.
|
# ¿ Apr 19, 2013 18:19 |
|
...of SCIENCE! posted:I would totally pledge for a real Uli kickstarter, but how gross do you have to be to exploit one of the internet's most lovable mentally ill people for cash? He'd probably get more revenue Kickstarting it for half that amount. Unless I'm seriously underestimating the number of people prepared to drop $40 on a 2D platformer (admittedly one with a ridiculous amount of attention to detail on the parallax).
|
# ¿ May 10, 2013 17:06 |
|
Alan Smithee posted:The guide to getting chicks for creepy motherfuckers: There is a book for that too! http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1481852795/
|
# ¿ May 20, 2013 14:20 |
|
OldMemes posted:According to wikipedia, she seems to still get acting gigs and other work, so that just screams "vanity project".
|
# ¿ May 21, 2013 11:58 |
|
eithedog posted:While indeed it's pretty great from the technological point of view, I feel queasy about the application. What is the purpose of this, what kind of sense does it have - why would you order something like that? If you'll indeed need it, as you're delving into world of neurology, and yes, if it actually serves a purpose I might be fine with it. Otherwise, no, not really - and I guess the problem I've got here mostly is that people will use these things for fun. Unless I'm missing something, there is nothing left for this kickstarter to prove other than selling the same equipment as a home hobby kit. edit: The people running the kickstarter are the same people who published the kit instructions for the homebrew version a while back.
|
# ¿ Jun 22, 2013 03:22 |
|
Cyril Sneer posted:The thing I mostly don't get about this roach thing is how many people could realistically use it? You're pretty much restricted to places where those bigass roaches live, and on top of that, how does the attachment procedure work? I'm assuming you'd need tiny tweezers, scalpels and a magnifying glass or something. I don't see how this kit is practical outside of a laboratory. I'm not sure if this kit is supposed to encourage independent neuroscience discovery or if it's just the modern version of:
|
# ¿ Jun 24, 2013 09:22 |
|
If they're standard metric weights it would be 2x 1.25kg and 2x 2.5kg, so 7.5kg and not 8kg. Which doesn't detract from the fact that it's a stupid way to prove the durability of a wallet hinge.
|
# ¿ Jul 3, 2013 03:33 |
|
Ultraklystron posted:Finally, something more cringe worthy and dated than the adult male sized My Little Pony/Jose Cuervo-meme crossover shirts in the window of my local comic shop!
|
# ¿ Jul 13, 2013 16:06 |
|
theflyingexecutive posted:Mmmm yes a festival for people obsessed with technology in a place that has none of it and few ways to use it. Giant neon Carl Sagan would approve.
|
# ¿ Aug 9, 2013 02:48 |
|
Fatkraken posted:None of these clever wallets would be much use in Europe (at least on their own), because we actually use coins in day to day transactions. The smallest paper bill in the UK is worth $7.50, and the largest coin about $3. The Bank of England should bring those back too, they're a lot more convenient for nights out (and microwallets ) e: Also a lot harder to counterfeit. A ridiculous percentage of pound coins are fake.
|
# ¿ Aug 30, 2013 16:08 |
|
Jedit posted:I live in Scotland and I haven't seen a pound note in close to ten years. For all intents and purposes, they're gone.
|
# ¿ Aug 30, 2013 23:54 |
|
Dogdoo 8 posted:I'd think that paper bills are way easier to fake if anything. Were these polymer or is US currency not worth enough to merit metal counterfeits? Most UK bills have multiple anti-counterfeiting measures, such as watermarks, metal strips, UV markings, microprinting, etc. Overall about 0.0047% of banknotes are assumed to be fakes, as opposed to 3% of pound coins, so that's quite a difference. Also when the print technology exists to implement anti-counterfeiting, the cost of applying it to a new bill is low, whereas if a counterfeiter manages to work around that, chances are they'll go for the higher (but not too high) value ones, so the £20 makes up most of that 0.0047%. In comparison the technology needed to fake comparatively high value coins like the one pound or one euro is not anywhere close. It doesn't help that the Swazi lilangeni coin is minted from the exact same planchets as the British pound coin, so it has the same metal, diameter, and mass at a fraction of the cost.
|
# ¿ Aug 31, 2013 02:02 |
|
Alan Smithee posted:Can I buy a pair of assless chaps and use its picture as a concept for my new "wallet?" Contains a concealed storage compartment for storing your USB stick of bitcoins.
|
# ¿ Aug 31, 2013 12:42 |
|
Well Manicured Man posted:How do you use the phone at all if there's no way for your fingers to reach the touchscreen?
|
# ¿ Aug 31, 2013 16:10 |
|
PepperSinclaire posted:In other dumb culinary Kickstarter news, local to me is this gimmicky nonsense. Environmentally friendly, you say? I would have thought not adding frivolous electronic components into a mug would be pretty environmentally sound, but hey, I'm not a design student, so...
|
# ¿ Nov 3, 2013 19:22 |
|
theflyingorc posted:I am legit surprised that the restaurant is opening. I can't decide if it's more awesome for it to succeed or fail spectacularly. And by something I mean http://tindeck.com/listen/nmbc
|
# ¿ Apr 3, 2014 18:44 |
|
BattleMaster posted:I wonder if anyone in the 15th century told people that they were relying too much on movable type http://www.slate.com/articles/health_and_science/science/2010/02/dont_touch_that_dial.html
|
# ¿ Jan 19, 2015 11:02 |
|
I like how the adjustable tube is guaranteed to trap piss. And how it saves you having to lift a lid, but you have to flush it with a glass of water or something. Or more likely leave it stinking of piss. And how it's already been solved in a (marginally) less ridiculous way. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yGghQkeUfnk e: What the gently caress is this? quote:Designed to adjust to any angle - works great in the “morning” Guavanaut has a new favorite as of 18:38 on Feb 2, 2015 |
# ¿ Feb 2, 2015 18:36 |
|
|
# ¿ Feb 2, 2015 18:59 |
|
Don't waste your cashew.
|
# ¿ Mar 2, 2015 13:29 |
|
He should try finding the end of the 2 times table first.
|
# ¿ Mar 2, 2015 14:15 |
|
Noyemi K posted:Right, so what constitutes a "2" because a circuit is either on, or it's off. It gives you a marginal advantage when working with negative numbers, and is exactly nothing to do with whatever this guy is thinking. e: quote hosed up Guavanaut has a new favorite as of 20:01 on Mar 2, 2015 |
# ¿ Mar 2, 2015 19:37 |
|
Zaphod42 posted:How exactly? I mean you can only represent 0 or 1 with a single bit; having polarity on all your bits is kinda worthless for working with negatives, and you'd have to store the number as.... I guess balanced ternary might make it faster to calculate pi using the Leibniz formula, if he was in the 60s and building a computer from the ground up. He is going to do none of these things though.
|
# ¿ Mar 2, 2015 23:06 |
|
DoctorTristan posted:Pi was proved to be transcendental over 100 years ago you dummies
|
# ¿ Mar 9, 2015 10:48 |
|
theflyingexecutive posted:I thought Bible days had a value of 22/7 for pi.
|
# ¿ Mar 12, 2015 02:53 |
|
Yaos posted:Time to dust off your fire extinguishers for this "life hack" reversible USB plug adapter
|
# ¿ Mar 16, 2015 16:26 |
|
TetsuoTW posted:do you wipe your cut/uncut dick back-to-front or front-to-back, or does that depend on whether the toilet paper is hung over or under while women in video games? https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/gramovox/floating-recordtm-vertical-turntable loving belt drive, seriously. Direct drive has been better since the late 70s.
|
# ¿ Jun 30, 2015 16:48 |
|
Phanatic posted:Belts are better isolation from the motor's vibration. But you can't DJ with a belt-drive. High-end stuff that's supposed to sound really good (Where "really good" involves vinyl, go figure) frequently uses belt drives, DJs buy Technics with direct-drive platters. AlmightyBob posted:Yeah but all the hipster turntables use belts for some reason. Also I got a lot of PMs from people saying changing the speed by manually moving the belt is common for some reason.
|
# ¿ Jul 1, 2015 09:42 |
|
|
# ¿ May 8, 2024 05:04 |
|
bvoid posted:I'm surprised how polished this kickstarter is considering what it is. Also, what exactly is it?
|
# ¿ Jul 2, 2015 13:42 |