chumpchous posted:

i'll start this off with a question about preventing code from getting executed asynchronously. when does code get executed asynchronously? i always kinda figured that most code gets executed in a line, but it seems like when i call other functions, or espescially when i call some shell command, it won't actually block the thread and i'll end up with things happening at the same time when they really shouldn't be. i think they call this a race condition??

gucci void main posted:

nothing you learn in college involving c++ is actually of use hth

PleasingFungus posted:

MononcQc posted:

http://www.dangermouse.net/esoteric/piet.html

uses images as a programming language.

FamDav posted:

c++ is the lisp of imperative programming languages, and that makes it awesome

OBAMA BIN LinkedIn posted:

unambiguous

OBAMA BIN LinkedIn posted:

the correct brace style, the brace style handed down to us by The Lord Your God, is:

C++ code:

if (...){
  ...
}

while (...){
  ...
}

for (...){
  ...
}

int func (...)
{
  ...
}

class myClass 
{
};

gucci void main posted:

they just said that multiple user editing was a most requested feature, if they can get that built into it then there will never be a singular reason to not be able to work from home and pair program if you need to

there's some ok options out there but that poo poo should be built into something by now, it's 2013

OBAMA BIN LinkedIn posted:

use vim if ur serious about your text editing

OBAMA BIN LinkedIn posted:

just use gvim idiots

FamDav posted:

oh then lol.

i was put in charge of the default vimrc for work and it amounts to

the syntax highlighting/indenting/stuff on
tabs to spaces so you dont gently caress up our bespoke codebase
comma leader
double-j for exiting insert mode
semicolon to colon
unmap arrows

and if people get bored and want help then i show them how to set up vundle and go hog wild.

FamDav posted:

tabstop=3

Shaggar posted:

If someone asks me how to sort a list my answer would be

Java code:

Collections.sort(list);

bobbilljim posted:

y do u bother with getter and setter methods if there's no logic in them u could just use the public field directly

Malcolm XML posted:

ghetto raii just use cpp