Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Wiggly Wayne DDS
Sep 11, 2010



whole lot of private landlords whining, is there a social housing thread for comparison?

what are your 5, 10, 30, 50 year plans for your stock anyway?

what statutory standards do your houses have to hit in those timeframes for you to be allowed to house a tenant in there?

what regulator do you respond to and what's your interpretation of a necessary repair vs just inconvenient for you to arrange?

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Wiggly Wayne DDS
Sep 11, 2010



the answer is to hand those abandoned homes over to your local council/housing association (note: not homeowners association) and give them appropriate financing to bring up to standards fit for people to live in

Wiggly Wayne DDS
Sep 11, 2010



sounds abandoned to me, i've seen no evidence of occupancy. if we don't get a reply and proof of tenancy in the next 60 days we're changing the locks

Wiggly Wayne DDS
Sep 11, 2010



it'd depend where you live, over here (scotland) there's far higher standards for social housing to the point that owners in blocks are the main cause of abeyances for shqs (which is still a hilariously low bar and due for a revamp)

couple that with rolling energy efficiency minimums up to 2050 (eessh2) where social housing sets the standard for decades to come and i hope i've gave a good enough example?

Wiggly Wayne DDS
Sep 11, 2010



baquerd posted:

I think you're confusing the economies of scale that come with building denser housing and the competitive forces that actually reduce rents. You can go full socialism and try to give everyone affordable rent, but then you start down the road of having to pay for that poo poo when there is no incentive for anyone to work harder just to pay more and extensive corruption where those who "know" the "land lord" in this case get extremely preferential treatment. That way lies actual socialism and societal collapse, as compared to capitalist countries that have strong social safety nets. That way is why monopolies are illegal.
perhaps make it a regulated industry with an ombudsman for complaints and have transparency down to average rent/unit size all viewable online

oh and yearly regulatory returns with auditors everywhere

Wiggly Wayne DDS
Sep 11, 2010



baquerd posted:

It's the classic problem with any giant bureaucracy - who watches the watchers and how much does it cost? Either you get corruption or massive inefficiencies and cost overruns. Sometimes both! If you think rent is bad now, wait until you need to also pay the salaries of 4 overseers to audit the poo poo out of everything that's going on between you and your landlord, and if it's not you specifically paying, someone is.

Regulations need to be in the housing market, but over-regulation can be just as damaging as under-regulating.
cry me a river. i'm talking about an existing system in reality and i'm willing to bet this thread's combined stock has far bigger overhead

we can talk numbers but you don't seem to care about anything but your wallet, but someone willing to argue with good intentions take me up on this another day

Wiggly Wayne DDS
Sep 11, 2010



still awaiting anyone willing to entertain my points earlier, it's terrible that private landlords set such poor posting standards

Wiggly Wayne DDS
Sep 11, 2010



Simpsons Reference posted:

Alright, I'm reopening it without handing out probations, but with a word of caution:

The thread is for discussing owning rental property and its issues. Occasionally the non-financial aspects as well. Sending the wealthy to the guillotine is a funny running gag that I imagine even the thread regulars enjoy.... in moderation. When it begins to prevent actual discussion about the thread topic, that's where I have to step in.

So if you're just here to brigade from C-SPAM, stop. No one goes to your place of business and knocks the hammer and sickle out of your hands.
as someone who has lurked this thread before it started getting any real activity i don't see the surge of interest in the topic as preventing discussion. on the contrary, the recent surge drove discussion on rental property and its issues. compare with the long-term posters in this thread who refused to discuss in good faith on long-term decision-making that they should be making as responsible landlords. the responsible part means making sure people don't die on the streets because you're too focused about making profit, and shutting down discussion on that front is against the central point of responsible landlords existing.

ThatBasqueGuy posted:

Does collective ownership count for the purposes of the thread topic?
i raised that question before and didn't get an answer, in fact none of the posters could answer a question other than acting like social housing was non-existant

Wiggly Wayne DDS posted:

whole lot of private landlords whining, is there a social housing thread for comparison?

what are your 5, 10, 30, 50 year plans for your stock anyway?

what statutory standards do your houses have to hit in those timeframes for you to be allowed to house a tenant in there?

what regulator do you respond to and what's your interpretation of a necessary repair vs just inconvenient for you to arrange?

Wiggly Wayne DDS
Sep 11, 2010



OwlFancier posted:

Are there any examples of successful efforts to build cooperative structures that work to keep rents down and pool excess capital into acquiring stock out of the hands of usurers and making it more social? Like a sort of cooperative social housing intitiave? Obviously the UK has/had good state run social housing but given its propensity for being flogged off at the drop of a hat by poo poo governments it'd be nice if there were some sort of model that saw success without needing to be government backed, as insurance.
housing associations fit that bubble imo. the only government money is in housing benefits via rent (, some gov-backed interest-free loans when they're pushing particular upgrades to the stock (similar to private homeowners), and the biggest chunk would be if you're building new houses as it's mutually beneficial. that's where most of the new stock for a HA will come from, unless a property's going up for sale in a partially-owned block at a reasonable price

as far as tenant involvement as a rule the board overseeing an org will be a mix of tenants (service users), homeowners (due to factoring), and some professionals in housing.

the bleeding's stemmed from the right-to-buy scheme being abolished in scotland, but its still a dangerous thorn elsewhere where it's selling off assets at well below market-value.

Wiggly Wayne DDS
Sep 11, 2010



i can't really speak to how it would compare to a government initiative. obviously that'd be the ideal scenario, but HAs aren't too different. LAs are still covered by the regulators, so think of them as bigger HAs with more in-house services.

as far as financial margin it'd vary based on HA, but all of the regulatory returns are public with full datasets available: https://www.scottishhousingregulator.gov.uk/find-and-compare-landlords/statistical-information

rent increases are aligned with inflation with some opting to increase every couple of years but a larger amount, and some every year. this would be decided by the board and a set of options given to the tenants with, say, 3% or 3.5% where 3.5% would bring additional money in to improve x, y and z. you'd think everyone would always go for the lowest option, but uh, that isn't always the case.

the biggest hurdle is dealing with private landlords who don't want to do anything but the absolute minimum to maintain their properties and keep their tenants safe. mortgage-to-rent does exist for existing homeowners to join, but the houses aren't fully upgraded until the existing tenant leaves outside of the planned programmes so they're of a mixed quality (but what the original owner wanted so...)

Wiggly Wayne DDS
Sep 11, 2010



you're overlooking the risk that you don't actually know how to maintain multiple properties over the long-term and are being convinced of your capabilities by the lack of short-term failures

when are you replacing the roofs? windows? heating systems? wall render? steel frame inspected?

renting a home isn't just patching up emergency repairs as necessary, you need a long-term plan and reselling is admitting you're incapable of doing the job

Wiggly Wayne DDS
Sep 11, 2010



over a year what are you doing for your tenants, as opposed to handing off to a property dev company due to your ineptitude?

Wiggly Wayne DDS
Sep 11, 2010



that's the property, so you're doing nothing for the tenant at all? how many times do you talk to a tenant across their entire tenancy? what is your involvement beyond looking at the money coming in?

Wiggly Wayne DDS
Sep 11, 2010



well regale us on your key decisions and how you're a vital part of the equation property management is incapable of?

Wiggly Wayne DDS
Sep 11, 2010



so your experience in rental property is buying it, handing it off to the property management company and that's it? how often is buying it down to the management company or another third-party? what's the biggest task you've handled?

Wiggly Wayne DDS
Sep 11, 2010



Simpsons Reference posted:

Alright, I tried. Going to have to handle this the way we handle derails that just keep coming up in another thread I'm not even mentioning so that it doesn't get ruined too.

Discussion about the social impact or morality or whatever about renting gets its own thread, and this one is for, well, what it's always been- landlords and potential landlords asking questions, etc. Direct all your societal concerns to the other thread, and continuing to post about it in here or coming here from other subforums to troll will lead to probes. Probes for proles.

Here, for your slapfights: https://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?threadid=3885970
if this is a landlord thread shouldn't it be for people who deal with the properties rather than investors mistaking themselves as such? the thread's been on-topic and very productive compared to over the past week, why are you shutting down discussion when it touches on subjects you're uncomfortable with?

Wiggly Wayne DDS
Sep 11, 2010



so discussing the state of the industry and driving forces behind it is off-topic at this stage? what are the whitelisted topics left?

Wiggly Wayne DDS
Sep 11, 2010



Speleothing posted:

How much should I raise the rent on a family that's lived in the same place for 8 years? 100 or 300 per month? Keep in mind that I have never and will never meet them, as they live four states away.
in-line with inflation since it sounds like you've set the rent to a level to maintain the property going forward and ensure the rest of the profits are set aside for any major renewals outside of the intended lifecycle

is there an equivalent to an energy performance certificate anywhere in the US? it's a pretty useful consumer look at how much money they're losing a month over building issues that the landlord should improve. the carbon sections are in need of improvement tbf

e: well it looks like this thread isn't intended for any landlord discussion at all. until the moderation policy changes i'll be keeping my knowledge away from here

Wiggly Wayne DDS
Sep 11, 2010



We have been made aware that the named tenant of this thread, TouchyMcFeely, has not lived here for at least 1 year.

THIS THREAD SHALL BE DEEMED ABANDONED UNLESS WE RECEIVE WRITTEN PROOF OF OCCUPANCY BY THE NAMED TENANT FOR THIS THREAD WITHIN 7 DAYS.

Additionally, we have been made aware of an attempt to sublet following an extension to this thread where no alterations request has been submitted

It is the intent of this organisation to rehouse the tenants from the sublet to this thread unless written proof noted above is provided by the deadline. If written proof is provided it shall be the named tenant's responsibility to rehouse each tenant within a reasonable timeframe.

(USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)

Wiggly Wayne DDS
Sep 11, 2010



what's the plan for the new op and what will the new limits on discussion be? i gather that the new thread won't be about how to evict people with pesky laws getting in the way?

TheLizard posted:

I'm moving soon and don't want to sell my place, so I'm going to be a landlord soon enough. DC area; my realtor takes the first month rent and 7% commission each month. This seems to be standard in the area.

My biggest concern is that in MD you can't discriminate on criminal history or section 8 status. I do NOT want section 8 renters in here; this is my first house, I've owned it for 9 years and put a bunch of work into it, so I don't want trashy people destroying it. I'm sure I'll get heat for that, but I don't care. Every place I've lived that has had section 8 renters in the community you could tell which house was theirs.

Authentic You posted:

Raise the rent. My friend's parents own a rental duplex not far from me, and were renting it for what was a pretty drat good deal for the nice neighborhood it's in. When they were looking for new tenants, they'd get a shitton of inquiries about whether they accepted Section 8 (not sure about how Section 8 discrimination works in PA) and lots of low-quality applicants in general, so they just arbitrarily raised the rent by a few hundred a month. After that, only folks inquiring were quiet grad students, young professionals, and well-to-do young families.

Also, don't ever rent to undergrads. Ever. My downstairs neighbor is one of my landlord's maintenance guys, and oh god the stories he tells.
is the discussion going to be focused on long-term leases, keeping the property in good shape, and keeping a good relationship with the tenants? is there going to be any concern for the regulatory bodies that landlords operate under, and how they're going to hit energy efficiency milestones without putting tenants into further fuel poverty? what's the mechanism going to be when a poster comes in with the same opinions as above and how can we trust that this won't just be a repeat of the last attempt to keep this thread active?

in the past few months all the relevant questions were kept to the home sperging/haunted house ownership threads without a real need to have a landlord thread per-say. if there was a need in the past couple of months, wouldn't a poster have just made a thread?

Wiggly Wayne DDS
Sep 11, 2010



Simpsons Reference posted:

Correct. There's a line between shady slumlords and people renting out a duplex. I don't want the actions of the former to get the thread shut down for the latter.
well the big issue is it didn't cause this thread to get shutdown in the first place, but i digress

quote:

There was some concerns about doxxing if someone posted the new OP with their account, so I asked around to crowd source it. If other threads have been filling in the gaps, maybe we can go with that.
there aren't many topics that aren't covered by those threads really. the legalities and business plans of landlording are about the only points left, and those are extremely regional so good luck avoiding a fear of doxxing and getting any relevant information

Wiggly Wayne DDS
Sep 11, 2010



Simpsons Reference posted:

There was some concerns about doxxing if someone posted the new OP with their account, so I asked around to crowd source it. If other threads have been filling in the gaps, maybe we can go with that.
is this going to be part of the new thread? i'm liking the approach already.

IrvingWashington posted:

I'm a great tenant.

My landlords all love me until I've moved out because I make sure the place is spotless, get them to sign off on it, and then I check if they've protected my deposit. Then I let them know I'll be seeking compensation, because literally none of them have done so far.

There's a lot of students around here so I presume they break the law in the hope their mostly first-time renters won't be familiar with the law, maybe? The only thing that's clear is the desire for a quick buck now outweighs any other idea.

When I moved back to the UK I was on my own while my family took care of things on their end, and I found myself in one of those 'rooms above a shop' places where it turned out they made a habit of it. 3x deposit in compensation plus the original deposit for every contract in that place. There are now student-focused online resources for anyone thinking of, or possibly already renting from that company.

I thought they were unique, but it turns out there's a lot of landlords at it.

I'm lucky enough to have a good job, so what I make goes to a homelessness charity. Last time was Centrepoint, next time probably Shelter.org.uk, or maybe one of the shelters in the local area - nowhere near enough to balance the scales at all, but it's something to do in the meantime, isn't it?

That's some free advice for any UK landlords here, you're welcome.

Don't have too many sleepless nights over a 3x penalty plus forfeiture of the deposit in full, though. What you should be losing sleep over is that if you failed to protect the deposit in time you also now can't serve a Section 21 (reposession) notice until you've settled with the tenant :)
ya the new rent deposit schemes have been a great addition to giving tenants protection from landlords

Wiggly Wayne DDS
Sep 11, 2010



Something Offal posted:

I'm a supporter of housing assistance in general, but Wiggly Wayne DDS you seem a bit insufferable. Landlords discriminating applications based on Section 8 status or criminal records is legal in some states and I don't think you should get to decide what is or is not 'acceptable discussion' on this here gay comedy forum. Sure if it's illegal I agree it should not be allowed in the thread, and there shouldn't be content that denigrates or attacks anybody, but other than that I don't see a need to censor people's opinions.
looking forward to the new thread if this is the level of discourse. what is your definition of housing assistance, and why do you believe a landlord should have a say in who is allowed a roof over their head?

Wiggly Wayne DDS
Sep 11, 2010



Something Offal posted:

This is slightly out of scope for this thread but I'll answer because I think it's a discussion worth having. My definition of housing assistance would be whatever the current version is provided by fed, state, local govts. I'm not well-read enough on it to have, like, an ideal state or alternative definition that the current status quo doesn't hit.

I think a landlord should have some say in determining which applicants they'd like to offer a lease. The world is a big complex place so the decision on whether to offer a lease can have myriad factors. Obviously, one should not be able to use 'protected classes' to influence that decision, unfortunately there will always be bad actors who will find ways around even protected class laws to be assholes.

Whether you agree or disagree, those with Section 8 or criminal records aren't a protected class in many states and localities, so I think a landlord should be allowed to use anything they want outside of protected classes or anything else that would be illegal to consider. Now, you might think it's in bad taste or being a jerk, and I may too, but there's a very important difference between objectionable and illegal.

Not only is censorship of ideas a slippery slope but I also wouldn't want to legislate a million protected classes, like student status for example. I think a landlord should probably be allowed to target maybe non-undergrads if that's how they feel -- hopefully they aren't jerks about it and make it clear in the ad. Nothing stopping the applicant from lying about it, though.
i don't see why it is out of scope of the thread - if you're a landlord you need to know the regulations that exist to protect everyone in the business relationship. to that end it is interesting that you don't talk about the assistance in practice but vaguely point at it, without defining if you mean statutory protections, direct government financial aid, or third-sector help. sure there are regions where no formal protections exist - but that's a failing of that locale, and not an example that everyone should strive towards and encourage just because it's technically legal in that jurisdiction. if you want that to be the mantra of a potential new thread, think through the culture it'd foster.

if you believe that regulations are a slippery slope then get involved in the open consultations when government formalise these decisions. they aren't all made behind closed doors, for example in my country here are previous consultations that would impact a landlord:

Consultation on the Law of Succession 2019
Delivering improved transparency in land ownership in Scotland: Consultation on draft regulations
Building Standards Compliance and Fire Safety – a consultation on making Scotland’s buildings safer for people
Scottish Building Regulations: Review of Energy Standards: ‘Call for Evidence’

in each you can view publicised responses by individuals, or organisations on how they perceive each problem. if you're so concerned over slippery slopes then join in the formal conversations, everyone will enjoy you making a case for landlords having an absolute say on not having those people living in their area.

DaveSauce posted:

Is this the place to discuss vacation rentals?

My wife's family has frequented a vacation spot for basically the last 30 years, and since I've joined the family I've been a part of that now and I quite like the area.

The idea here is to see what sort of costs we'd be looking at to own a place in a reasonably popular vacation spot and rent it out, with the perk of having a place to stay (yes, I know there are tax implications to using a vacation property for personal use).

I guess the two biggest questions are: what costs do we need to consider, and where do you even begin to put numbers on things like insurance, maintenance, occupancy rates, etc. for a general area without having a specific property in mind? Obviously there's going to be property taxes, probably HOA fees, and all the other normal stuff that goes in to a house, but I don't know all the things that go in to a rental property.

This wouldn't be a get rich quick scheme, or even a get rich slowly scheme. Just trying to see where to start the calculations to find out where the costs end up being.
when you say rent it out, i presume you mean for holidays and not a longer-term tenant? either way you'd be looking at the financials as a homeowner and then adding in the landlord requirements on top, the best case would be solely family/friends using it as a vacation spot and you knowing someone who lives nearby to keep a vague eye on it. if you're talking a longer-term tenant then would you be happy with someone telling you to move out for 2 weeks once/twice a year so they could use it for their holiday? it'd factor into the price a lot and you have to account for vetting tenants given the unsupervised nature of you being in a different country and how you'd react to emergency repairs of all nature

Wiggly Wayne DDS
Sep 11, 2010



Gumball Gumption posted:

Hey, my friend lost their job due to a panic attack. They gave their landlord a heads up so they would work out how to pay rent while they're job searching and the landlord is just evicting them instead. Anyone got good advice on how to keep them from becoming homeless and peg that leech to the wall? They live in Maine.
have they missed a rent payment already, and are they likely to miss the next one? presumably they have a written lease with termination clauses - would they be happy sharing them? glancing around with maine they have to specify the termination reason, but if they've already missed a payment and the landlord isn't complying with good faith repayment plans the situation doesn't look good

Wiggly Wayne DDS
Sep 11, 2010



looking at maine's model landlord-tenant lease the eviction process has strict guidelines that should help: https://www.maine.gov/ag/consumer/law_guide_article.shtml?id=27935

there's a breakdown further into the document outlying the intent of each section and how it reflects the legal framework.

Gumball Gumption posted:

Nope, they have not missed one yet. I don't know the lease terms but my understanding is that they warned ahead of time that they wouldn't be able to make rent for July and the landlord said he was going to start drafting the eviction notice instead of any sort of repayment plan. I don't believe it's rent controlled.
they'll have at least 30 days from the date of the formal eviction letter, check the doc. the landlord could just be bluffing at the moment and trying to pressure the tenant into proving they have income sooner - not a healthy relationship

Wiggly Wayne DDS
Sep 11, 2010



there's a lot more useful advice in here: https://www.maine.gov/ag/dynld/documents/clg14.pdf

src: https://www.courts.maine.gov/maine_courts/district/evictions.html

Wiggly Wayne DDS
Sep 11, 2010



i've only seen examples involving having friends/family staying, and even then it was break-even. bringing in a third party to manage it all and add in unknown tenants if you've never done it before sounds eventful

Wiggly Wayne DDS
Sep 11, 2010



where's the line between posters expressing a shared opinion and a brigade? is it the assumption that they're all collaborating behind the scenes?

Wiggly Wayne DDS
Sep 11, 2010



that's the part i don't get though, you're singling out 4 posters and acting like everyone was a part of a group. as a rundown on the probs since the thread was resurrected:

Crazycryodude is a poster in that thread
Johnny Truant... isn't
Pibur... isn't
Source4Leko... isn't
Syndlig... isn't
Tollymain... isn't
WampaLord is a poster in that thread
World War Mammories is a poster in that thread
Magnusth... isn't
Moridin920 is a poster in that thread

so minority were part of the 'brigade', and the last one was a couple of minutes ago over giving critique and nothing to do with yesterday. either way there hasn't been an attempt to improve the situation since last time, just rehash and hope to prob away any dissenting opinions. there was a lot of discussion leading up to this thread getting closed last time, but it doesn't look like any of it was listened to. there's plenty of behind the scene discussion amongst mods, but none of that seems to reach the users and the reaction now shows no attempt to come to reasonable moderation grounds.

with the 'only explicitly discussed illegal activity matters' line, you've just thrown more salt on the wound and are provoking the rest of the posters at this point. what is the long-term plan for this thread over than reopening old wounds?

Wiggly Wayne DDS
Sep 11, 2010



Pibur posted:

For real though having a conversation about the abuse inherent in the landlord-tenant relationship is important. There seems to be this disconnect between the societal violence that landlords inflict on their tenants, especially when they're advocating for and participating in institutions and structures that are quasi-legal, and highly immoral, and the plucky Ur-Landlord that this thread tries to create. That one of the first posts after re-opening this falls perfectly in that category tells me that nothing good for humanity could come from this thread unless it explicitly becomes a "how do I gently caress over my landlord for being the amoral scumbag we all knew they truly were" thread.
absolutely it's a conversation worth having, likewise defining the types of landlords and how they operate in different countries.

Ruzihm posted:

Hello fellow landlords, got a landlording question here.

Hypothetically if a monthly $1000 ubi were established tomorrow, how would you change the rent for your next leases? What if you knew your competitors were raising theirs by $900 with no loss of occupancy?

Thanks for answering my landlording question landlord buddies :)

*a gigantic wire & antenna is obviously bulging from the back of my collar*
the same as rent increases always go: choices to the committee, and options put to a poll of the tenants for next financial year. generally in-line with inflation with an option to fund services for the vulnerable. regulators get very interested if you start fleecing tenants

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Wiggly Wayne DDS
Sep 11, 2010



Ruzihm posted:

committee huh? :ussr:
social housing are still landlords, they're just run by tenants and kept in check by regulators

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply