|
whole lot of private landlords whining, is there a social housing thread for comparison? what are your 5, 10, 30, 50 year plans for your stock anyway? what statutory standards do your houses have to hit in those timeframes for you to be allowed to house a tenant in there? what regulator do you respond to and what's your interpretation of a necessary repair vs just inconvenient for you to arrange?
|
# ¿ Mar 26, 2019 22:36 |
|
|
# ¿ May 10, 2024 21:23 |
|
the answer is to hand those abandoned homes over to your local council/housing association (note: not homeowners association) and give them appropriate financing to bring up to standards fit for people to live in
|
# ¿ Mar 26, 2019 23:12 |
|
sounds abandoned to me, i've seen no evidence of occupancy. if we don't get a reply and proof of tenancy in the next 60 days we're changing the locks
|
# ¿ Mar 26, 2019 23:23 |
|
it'd depend where you live, over here (scotland) there's far higher standards for social housing to the point that owners in blocks are the main cause of abeyances for shqs (which is still a hilariously low bar and due for a revamp) couple that with rolling energy efficiency minimums up to 2050 (eessh2) where social housing sets the standard for decades to come and i hope i've gave a good enough example?
|
# ¿ Mar 26, 2019 23:36 |
|
baquerd posted:I think you're confusing the economies of scale that come with building denser housing and the competitive forces that actually reduce rents. You can go full socialism and try to give everyone affordable rent, but then you start down the road of having to pay for that poo poo when there is no incentive for anyone to work harder just to pay more and extensive corruption where those who "know" the "land lord" in this case get extremely preferential treatment. That way lies actual socialism and societal collapse, as compared to capitalist countries that have strong social safety nets. That way is why monopolies are illegal. oh and yearly regulatory returns with auditors everywhere
|
# ¿ Mar 26, 2019 23:47 |
|
baquerd posted:It's the classic problem with any giant bureaucracy - who watches the watchers and how much does it cost? Either you get corruption or massive inefficiencies and cost overruns. Sometimes both! If you think rent is bad now, wait until you need to also pay the salaries of 4 overseers to audit the poo poo out of everything that's going on between you and your landlord, and if it's not you specifically paying, someone is. we can talk numbers but you don't seem to care about anything but your wallet, but someone willing to argue with good intentions take me up on this another day
|
# ¿ Mar 27, 2019 00:06 |
|
still awaiting anyone willing to entertain my points earlier, it's terrible that private landlords set such poor posting standards
|
# ¿ Mar 27, 2019 14:21 |
|
Simpsons Reference posted:Alright, I'm reopening it without handing out probations, but with a word of caution: ThatBasqueGuy posted:Does collective ownership count for the purposes of the thread topic? Wiggly Wayne DDS posted:whole lot of private landlords whining, is there a social housing thread for comparison?
|
# ¿ Mar 29, 2019 13:57 |
|
OwlFancier posted:Are there any examples of successful efforts to build cooperative structures that work to keep rents down and pool excess capital into acquiring stock out of the hands of usurers and making it more social? Like a sort of cooperative social housing intitiave? Obviously the UK has/had good state run social housing but given its propensity for being flogged off at the drop of a hat by poo poo governments it'd be nice if there were some sort of model that saw success without needing to be government backed, as insurance. as far as tenant involvement as a rule the board overseeing an org will be a mix of tenants (service users), homeowners (due to factoring), and some professionals in housing. the bleeding's stemmed from the right-to-buy scheme being abolished in scotland, but its still a dangerous thorn elsewhere where it's selling off assets at well below market-value.
|
# ¿ Mar 29, 2019 14:45 |
|
i can't really speak to how it would compare to a government initiative. obviously that'd be the ideal scenario, but HAs aren't too different. LAs are still covered by the regulators, so think of them as bigger HAs with more in-house services. as far as financial margin it'd vary based on HA, but all of the regulatory returns are public with full datasets available: https://www.scottishhousingregulator.gov.uk/find-and-compare-landlords/statistical-information rent increases are aligned with inflation with some opting to increase every couple of years but a larger amount, and some every year. this would be decided by the board and a set of options given to the tenants with, say, 3% or 3.5% where 3.5% would bring additional money in to improve x, y and z. you'd think everyone would always go for the lowest option, but uh, that isn't always the case. the biggest hurdle is dealing with private landlords who don't want to do anything but the absolute minimum to maintain their properties and keep their tenants safe. mortgage-to-rent does exist for existing homeowners to join, but the houses aren't fully upgraded until the existing tenant leaves outside of the planned programmes so they're of a mixed quality (but what the original owner wanted so...)
|
# ¿ Mar 29, 2019 15:08 |
|
you're overlooking the risk that you don't actually know how to maintain multiple properties over the long-term and are being convinced of your capabilities by the lack of short-term failures when are you replacing the roofs? windows? heating systems? wall render? steel frame inspected? renting a home isn't just patching up emergency repairs as necessary, you need a long-term plan and reselling is admitting you're incapable of doing the job
|
# ¿ Mar 30, 2019 13:24 |
|
over a year what are you doing for your tenants, as opposed to handing off to a property dev company due to your ineptitude?
|
# ¿ Mar 30, 2019 16:26 |
|
that's the property, so you're doing nothing for the tenant at all? how many times do you talk to a tenant across their entire tenancy? what is your involvement beyond looking at the money coming in?
|
# ¿ Mar 30, 2019 16:33 |
|
well regale us on your key decisions and how you're a vital part of the equation property management is incapable of?
|
# ¿ Mar 30, 2019 16:40 |
|
so your experience in rental property is buying it, handing it off to the property management company and that's it? how often is buying it down to the management company or another third-party? what's the biggest task you've handled?
|
# ¿ Mar 30, 2019 17:03 |
|
Simpsons Reference posted:Alright, I tried. Going to have to handle this the way we handle derails that just keep coming up in another thread I'm not even mentioning so that it doesn't get ruined too.
|
# ¿ Mar 30, 2019 17:31 |
|
so discussing the state of the industry and driving forces behind it is off-topic at this stage? what are the whitelisted topics left?
|
# ¿ Mar 30, 2019 17:57 |
|
Speleothing posted:How much should I raise the rent on a family that's lived in the same place for 8 years? 100 or 300 per month? Keep in mind that I have never and will never meet them, as they live four states away. is there an equivalent to an energy performance certificate anywhere in the US? it's a pretty useful consumer look at how much money they're losing a month over building issues that the landlord should improve. the carbon sections are in need of improvement tbf e: well it looks like this thread isn't intended for any landlord discussion at all. until the moderation policy changes i'll be keeping my knowledge away from here
|
# ¿ Mar 30, 2019 18:57 |
|
We have been made aware that the named tenant of this thread, TouchyMcFeely, has not lived here for at least 1 year. THIS THREAD SHALL BE DEEMED ABANDONED UNLESS WE RECEIVE WRITTEN PROOF OF OCCUPANCY BY THE NAMED TENANT FOR THIS THREAD WITHIN 7 DAYS. Additionally, we have been made aware of an attempt to sublet following an extension to this thread where no alterations request has been submitted It is the intent of this organisation to rehouse the tenants from the sublet to this thread unless written proof noted above is provided by the deadline. If written proof is provided it shall be the named tenant's responsibility to rehouse each tenant within a reasonable timeframe. (USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)
|
# ¿ Apr 3, 2019 17:15 |
|
what's the plan for the new op and what will the new limits on discussion be? i gather that the new thread won't be about how to evict people with pesky laws getting in the way?TheLizard posted:I'm moving soon and don't want to sell my place, so I'm going to be a landlord soon enough. DC area; my realtor takes the first month rent and 7% commission each month. This seems to be standard in the area. Authentic You posted:Raise the rent. My friend's parents own a rental duplex not far from me, and were renting it for what was a pretty drat good deal for the nice neighborhood it's in. When they were looking for new tenants, they'd get a shitton of inquiries about whether they accepted Section 8 (not sure about how Section 8 discrimination works in PA) and lots of low-quality applicants in general, so they just arbitrarily raised the rent by a few hundred a month. After that, only folks inquiring were quiet grad students, young professionals, and well-to-do young families. in the past few months all the relevant questions were kept to the home sperging/haunted house ownership threads without a real need to have a landlord thread per-say. if there was a need in the past couple of months, wouldn't a poster have just made a thread?
|
# ¿ Jun 23, 2019 15:22 |
|
Simpsons Reference posted:Correct. There's a line between shady slumlords and people renting out a duplex. I don't want the actions of the former to get the thread shut down for the latter. quote:There was some concerns about doxxing if someone posted the new OP with their account, so I asked around to crowd source it. If other threads have been filling in the gaps, maybe we can go with that.
|
# ¿ Jun 23, 2019 15:43 |
|
Simpsons Reference posted:There was some concerns about doxxing if someone posted the new OP with their account, so I asked around to crowd source it. If other threads have been filling in the gaps, maybe we can go with that. IrvingWashington posted:I'm a great tenant.
|
# ¿ Jun 23, 2019 16:42 |
|
Something Offal posted:I'm a supporter of housing assistance in general, but Wiggly Wayne DDS you seem a bit insufferable. Landlords discriminating applications based on Section 8 status or criminal records is legal in some states and I don't think you should get to decide what is or is not 'acceptable discussion' on this here gay comedy forum. Sure if it's illegal I agree it should not be allowed in the thread, and there shouldn't be content that denigrates or attacks anybody, but other than that I don't see a need to censor people's opinions.
|
# ¿ Jun 24, 2019 07:31 |
|
Something Offal posted:This is slightly out of scope for this thread but I'll answer because I think it's a discussion worth having. My definition of housing assistance would be whatever the current version is provided by fed, state, local govts. I'm not well-read enough on it to have, like, an ideal state or alternative definition that the current status quo doesn't hit. if you believe that regulations are a slippery slope then get involved in the open consultations when government formalise these decisions. they aren't all made behind closed doors, for example in my country here are previous consultations that would impact a landlord: Consultation on the Law of Succession 2019 Delivering improved transparency in land ownership in Scotland: Consultation on draft regulations Building Standards Compliance and Fire Safety – a consultation on making Scotland’s buildings safer for people Scottish Building Regulations: Review of Energy Standards: ‘Call for Evidence’ in each you can view publicised responses by individuals, or organisations on how they perceive each problem. if you're so concerned over slippery slopes then join in the formal conversations, everyone will enjoy you making a case for landlords having an absolute say on not having those people living in their area. DaveSauce posted:Is this the place to discuss vacation rentals?
|
# ¿ Jun 24, 2019 17:01 |
|
Gumball Gumption posted:Hey, my friend lost their job due to a panic attack. They gave their landlord a heads up so they would work out how to pay rent while they're job searching and the landlord is just evicting them instead. Anyone got good advice on how to keep them from becoming homeless and peg that leech to the wall? They live in Maine.
|
# ¿ Jun 24, 2019 18:06 |
|
looking at maine's model landlord-tenant lease the eviction process has strict guidelines that should help: https://www.maine.gov/ag/consumer/law_guide_article.shtml?id=27935 there's a breakdown further into the document outlying the intent of each section and how it reflects the legal framework. Gumball Gumption posted:Nope, they have not missed one yet. I don't know the lease terms but my understanding is that they warned ahead of time that they wouldn't be able to make rent for July and the landlord said he was going to start drafting the eviction notice instead of any sort of repayment plan. I don't believe it's rent controlled.
|
# ¿ Jun 24, 2019 18:14 |
|
there's a lot more useful advice in here: https://www.maine.gov/ag/dynld/documents/clg14.pdf src: https://www.courts.maine.gov/maine_courts/district/evictions.html
|
# ¿ Jun 24, 2019 18:17 |
|
i've only seen examples involving having friends/family staying, and even then it was break-even. bringing in a third party to manage it all and add in unknown tenants if you've never done it before sounds eventful
|
# ¿ Jun 24, 2019 18:57 |
|
where's the line between posters expressing a shared opinion and a brigade? is it the assumption that they're all collaborating behind the scenes?
|
# ¿ Jun 24, 2019 19:47 |
|
that's the part i don't get though, you're singling out 4 posters and acting like everyone was a part of a group. as a rundown on the probs since the thread was resurrected: Crazycryodude is a poster in that thread Johnny Truant... isn't Pibur... isn't Source4Leko... isn't Syndlig... isn't Tollymain... isn't WampaLord is a poster in that thread World War Mammories is a poster in that thread Magnusth... isn't Moridin920 is a poster in that thread so minority were part of the 'brigade', and the last one was a couple of minutes ago over giving critique and nothing to do with yesterday. either way there hasn't been an attempt to improve the situation since last time, just rehash and hope to prob away any dissenting opinions. there was a lot of discussion leading up to this thread getting closed last time, but it doesn't look like any of it was listened to. there's plenty of behind the scene discussion amongst mods, but none of that seems to reach the users and the reaction now shows no attempt to come to reasonable moderation grounds. with the 'only explicitly discussed illegal activity matters' line, you've just thrown more salt on the wound and are provoking the rest of the posters at this point. what is the long-term plan for this thread over than reopening old wounds?
|
# ¿ Jun 24, 2019 20:08 |
|
Pibur posted:For real though having a conversation about the abuse inherent in the landlord-tenant relationship is important. There seems to be this disconnect between the societal violence that landlords inflict on their tenants, especially when they're advocating for and participating in institutions and structures that are quasi-legal, and highly immoral, and the plucky Ur-Landlord that this thread tries to create. That one of the first posts after re-opening this falls perfectly in that category tells me that nothing good for humanity could come from this thread unless it explicitly becomes a "how do I gently caress over my landlord for being the amoral scumbag we all knew they truly were" thread. Ruzihm posted:Hello fellow landlords, got a landlording question here.
|
# ¿ Jun 24, 2019 20:54 |
|
|
# ¿ May 10, 2024 21:23 |
|
Ruzihm posted:committee huh?
|
# ¿ Jun 24, 2019 21:58 |