|
The scene was certainly intended to imply a recent regeneration but I suppose you could argue that it was just the first time he'd had the opportunity to look in a mirror.
|
#
¿
May 20, 2013 04:30
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 28, 2024 01:28 |
|
|
moths posted:We all know Paul McGann filmed a regeneration scene... But what if it was Matt Smith's regeneration? I would be perfectly happy with this. He could give a completely different performance and at least we'd know in advance that he was going to be good.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 4, 2013 19:30
|
|
|
What exactly is the problem people are having with John Hurt as the 9th Doctor? It seems pretty obvious that is the intention.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 5, 2013 00:11
|
|
|
The issue seems to be that some people don't want to accept that Paul McGann regenerated into John Hurt and John Hurt regenerated into Christopher Eccleston. It seems to me that the intention is that John Hurt was a full and proper Doctor. What's the problem with that?
|
|
#
¿
Jun 5, 2013 00:25
|
|
|
^ Why? Republican Vampire posted:The only real complaints I've seen are that it'd invalidate a big chunk of the EU stuff that people are fond of, and that there've been a lot of Eleven references since Smith started. You see, this is a proper answer. Thank you.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 5, 2013 00:29
|
|
|
jivjov posted:I still like the idea of "Matt Smith is playing the 11th Doctor but he's the 12's incarnation of that Time Lord" theory, harkening back to the whole "not in the Name of the Doctor" thing. Very much so. The Doctor doesn't include him as a proper Doctor because of the terrible things he did. That doesn't mean that he wasn't a full incarnation of the character, though.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 5, 2013 00:38
|
|
|
Royal W posted:Couldn't it be safe to assume this is the Oswin version of Clara, presumably some time before she goes to the Asylum? Timey-wimey and all that. I think it's more likely to be the Time Lady version. She's wearing red and it would explain how she got there - in her own TARDIS.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 7, 2013 23:12
|
|
|
Pizdec posted:This I've got to see. Anyone got any idea which episode this is? I've never heard of it before and I seriously doubt it exists.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 11, 2013 20:25
|
|
|
Crusader posted:Another synopsis: Run time 86 minutes?
|
|
#
¿
Nov 5, 2013 16:38
|
|
|
I've frozen the video a dozen times and dammit that looks like Paul McGann.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 9, 2013 22:55
|
|
|
PriorMarcus posted:It's not. It's Kate Stewart. I know its not him but even on full screen it does look like the TV movie Doctor.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 9, 2013 23:08
|
|
|
I like the green tinge to his regeneration, just like the Master. 
|
|
#
¿
Nov 14, 2013 19:37
|
|
|
Plucky Brit posted:As far as I'm concerned, there were only three Star Wars films and nothing else. As soon as I decided that, I felt a lot better thinking about that franchise. Which three? As far as continuity / canon goes I like to think everything is canon if you want it to be but time is being constantly rewritten now that the Time Lords have gone and although the Doctor remembers everything a lot of it did not happen in the "current universe."
|
|
#
¿
Nov 15, 2013 23:43
|
|
|
Night of the Doctor has 1.6m views already.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 16, 2013 12:44
|
|
|
Metal Loaf posted:The Sontaran two-parter in season four also mentioned that the Sontarans wanted to fight in the war but either weren't allowed or weren't able to (which is odd, because you'd think either side would've liked to enlist the so-called "perfect soldiers"). Or made them their first target. Twisted Perspective fucked around with this message at 18:37 on Nov 19, 2013 |
|
#
¿
Nov 19, 2013 15:57
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 28, 2024 01:28 |
|
|
BrooklynBruiser posted:I keep seeing this floating around as a joke - what's the basis of it? A joke spoiler from a thread title many moons ago.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 29, 2013 02:31
|
|