Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
The Something Awful Forums > The Finer Arts > Creative Convention > The Dorkroom > Instant Photography: Documenting the Burning of Money in Real Time
 
  • Locked thread
Cacator
Aug 6, 2005

You're quite good at turning me on.

 This may be a dumb question but is there any major difference between instax mini and wide beyond the size of the picture like there is between 35mm and 120mm (like depth of field, etc.) or are the typical instant cameras not capable of taking advantage of such things??

* # ¿ Sep 26, 2016 20:30
  • Quote
Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

# ¿ May 21, 2024 11:07
  • Quote
Cacator
Aug 6, 2005

You're quite good at turning me on.

BANME.sh posted:

The apertures on those cameras are so small (f12 for the mini and f14 for the wide) that format size would make any differences in DOF completely negligible.

Ah but the Lomos are all f8 and the Mint Instaflex TL70 is 5.6. Both at a price premium over the Fujis of course.

* # ¿ Sep 26, 2016 20:59
  • Quote
  • Locked thread
The Something Awful Forums > The Finer Arts > Creative Convention > The Dorkroom > Instant Photography: Documenting the Burning of Money in Real Time