Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
Bip Roberts
Mar 29, 2005
Californian here, I'm just going to move into this thread.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Bip Roberts
Mar 29, 2005
Does Sheriff John Bunnell still hold a job in Oregon law enforcement?

Bip Roberts
Mar 29, 2005

Thanatosian posted:

Oregon should just build that bridge themselves, then stick a $20 toll on it to fund it.

It sure as gently caress isn't a bunch of Portlanders heading up to Vancouver three times a week who are using it. And I wouldn't give a poo poo about a $20 toll the handful of times I go to Portland a year.

What would the federal restrictions on this be with regards to interstate commerce?

Bip Roberts
Mar 29, 2005

etalian posted:

It could be worse like driving to a Oregon gas station with CA plates.

Are the people in Oregon honestly that big of babies?

Bip Roberts
Mar 29, 2005

Solkanar512 posted:

I don't get it, because supporting mass transit is the most FYGM position you can take as a car driver - fewer people in cars means my commute is better. No construction delays, no wait, just add buses and bus routes in my area and suddenly I'm saving time all over the loving place.

What is so difficult about this? Is it really nothing more than "Waah waah waah my precious bodily fluids tax money"?

The poors will literally take the light rail to your home, steal your tv and xbox, and take those home with them on light rail.

  • Locked thread