|
love to get 150% more performances per performance
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2024 19:06
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 3, 2024 10:04 |
|
|
number go up always makes everyone happy
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2024 19:07
|
|
|
steam decks should just use windows instead of jumping through all these hoops
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2024 19:32
|
|
|
Sapozhnik posted:love to get 150% more performances per performance
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2024 19:51
|
|
|
Some games heavily depend on those primitives in their render loop and emulation is very slow, so the numbers are pretty realistic. However, the actual impact varies a lot depending on the game.
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2024 19:52
|
|
|
spankmeister posted:i think firewalld allows plain iptables rules if it really comes down to it? idk about that specifically but its effectively an nftables generator/manager and i assume you could in theory add your own tables alongside it?
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2024 20:20
|
|
|
akadajet posted:steam decks should just use windows instead of jumping through all these hoops the tablet OS with the bad phone games? gross.
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2024 21:24
|
|
|
akadajet posted:steam decks should just use windows instead of jumping through all these hoops if steam decks used windows they wouldn't be able to run most of the games at an acceptable fps
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2024 21:34
|
|
|
akadajet posted:steam decks should just use windows instead of jumping through all these hoops hmm yes, let's leave control of our device to some third-party company who doesn't care if they randomly break it (it could even be in their interest to do so) there are steam deck knockoffs from the usual makers of janky-rear end hardware if you really want to janitor windows on a handheld while simultaneously burning your hands during the 45 minutes it takes the battery to die
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2024 22:53
|
|
|
There's a Republic of Gamers handheld you can use if you want Windows.
|
|
#
?
Apr 15, 2024 12:58
|
|
|
yeah but that also means giving money to people who willingly call themselves the "republic of gamers"
|
|
#
?
Apr 15, 2024 13:01
|
|
|
Progressive JPEG posted:idk about that specifically but its effectively an nftables generator/manager and i assume you could in theory add your own tables alongside it? but my abstraction!!!
|
|
#
?
Apr 15, 2024 14:56
|
|
|
to be serious, adding logging to iptables is par for the course for me when I’m trying to twist firewalld to do what I want it to do the alternative being, of course, to keep adding rules and crossing my fingers
|
|
#
?
Apr 15, 2024 14:59
|
|
|
Sapozhnik posted:I like firewalld but I can't get it to work with a wireguard server for the life of me. Traffic comes in over the tunnel but then fails to forward. firewalld works best for servers, I think. Routers tend to require a bit more work and the abstractions break down if you try to do anything complex. Good thing someone else already posted a solution because I’d have to post my terrible configuration for the internet to see Progressive JPEG posted:i just have a blanket ACCEPT zone config against the wireguard interface like this and it seems to work: I do something similar for my ipsec tunnel.
|
|
#
?
Apr 15, 2024 15:06
|
|
|
carve your iptables rules from the clay like god intended
|
|
#
?
Apr 15, 2024 16:15
|
|
|
Which old release of rhel are you using where the firewalld backend is still iptables?
|
|
#
?
Apr 15, 2024 17:09
|
|
Associate Christ
|
all rhel releases are old if you think about it
|
|
#
?
Apr 15, 2024 17:12
|
|
|
spankmeister posted:all rhel releases are old if you think about it red hat elderly linux
|
|
#
?
Apr 15, 2024 17:39
|
|
|
Centennial OS
|
|
#
?
Apr 15, 2024 21:05
|
|
|
other people posted:Which old release of rhel are you using where the firewalld backend is still iptables? rhel6, every kernel release after 2.6.32 has been unnecessary bloatware
|
|
#
?
Apr 16, 2024 05:42
|
|
|
i spent half the weekend installing fedora over and over trying to figure out why I was running into this known issue even though i had deleted the old efi partition and gone through the workarounds, fukkin' linux i swear turns out the flash drive had gone bad. installed same iso from a different one and everything was fine everything went fine, that is, except of course bluetooth. which had worked perfectly well with the previous 5+ year long rawhide install. so i spent another day or two rebasing back and forth between different versions to figure out which kernel version had broken the bt drivers, fukkin' linux i swear turns out it was a hardware issue. following a stackoverflow suggestion from 2008, i shut the computer down and unplugged it for 5 minutes, bt chip gave signs of life. unplugged it for 1 hour and now it works idk if there is a lesson there
|
|
#
?
Apr 16, 2024 15:56
|
|
|
got Fedora 40 up and running. native HDR is cool but I’m still trying to janitor steam to run poo poo in HDR. gently caress
|
|
#
?
Apr 16, 2024 15:59
|
|
|
NihilCredo posted:idk if there is a lesson there The lesson is that hardware sucks.
|
|
#
?
Apr 16, 2024 16:37
|
|
|
NihilCredo posted:
bluetooth sucks, go back to usb flash sucks, go back to
|
|
#
?
Apr 16, 2024 17:47
|
|
|
serious answer is to always test flash after writing a new image to make sure it was done correctly although I had half expected fedora to actually test the disk before installing it, I guess it only checks a subset of the data.
|
|
#
?
Apr 16, 2024 17:50
|
|
|
sb hermit posted:serious answer is to always test flash after writing a new image to make sure it was done correctly there's a separate "test this media then install Fedora" option when you boot the ISO that of course I didn't choose
|
|
#
?
Apr 16, 2024 18:07
|
|
|
Isn't the default boot option for the installer to check the media? I sort of remember always having to arrow up to avoid it. edit: yeah that ^
|
|
#
?
Apr 16, 2024 18:07
|
|
|
speaking of which i ran into some efi secure boot revocation thing recently because it turns out that silverblue/ostree/whatever doesn't update the actual bootloader in the efi partition like, ever, so i had to do it manually. only ended up at a grub command prompt one time even, not bad. they've had an action item to fix this for like three releases now although something like that can render your system unbootable if it fucks up so i do understand their trepidation edit: u gotta copy the contents of /usr/lib/ostree-boot/efi/ into your efi system partition, but you also have to make sure you preserve EFI\fedora\grub.cfg which is where i messed up like an absolute noob Sapozhnik fucked around with this message at 18:15 on Apr 16, 2024 |
|
#
?
Apr 16, 2024 18:11
|
|
|
pretty sure it's the task of fwupd to update those uefi dbx files
|
|
#
?
Apr 16, 2024 21:56
|
|
|
NihilCredo posted:i spent half the weekend installing fedora over and over trying to figure out why I was running into this known issue even though i had deleted the old efi partition and gone through the workarounds, fukkin' linux i swear god I love america
|
|
#
?
Apr 16, 2024 22:07
|
|
|
Tankakern posted:pretty sure it's the task of fwupd to update those uefi dbx files it is, but it is but it is not the task of fwupd to update the efi shim, because the efi shim is not firmware.
|
|
#
?
Apr 16, 2024 22:10
|
|
|
Tankakern posted:pretty sure it's the task of fwupd to update those uefi dbx files I hate that I understand all those words Sapozhnik posted:it is, but it is but it is not the task of fwupd to update the efi shim, because the efi shim is not firmware. it’s gotta be someone’s job because I’m not going to have my users update their own efi partitions (no I would never let my parents use Linux either, not even a chromebook)
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2024 06:17
|
|
|
it's the shim package. the shim boot loader is shipped in the shim package. well, shim-signed since someone has to pay microsoft to sign it.code:
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2024 06:35
|
|
|
Sapozhnik posted:speaking of which i ran into some efi secure boot revocation thing recently because it turns out that silverblue/ostree/whatever doesn't update the actual bootloader in the efi partition like, ever, so i had to do it manually. only ended up at a grub command prompt one time even, not bad. the only thing one should do with EFI or UEFI is install an Open Firmware implementation atop it if only IEEE-1275 hadn’t been allowed to lapse and had been written into procurement contracts the world would be a better place
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2024 06:56
|
|
|
Antigravitas posted:The problem with Word, Libreoffice et al. is that people don't know how to typeset, so they manually format until they have a document that looks fine on first glance. Then you look at it wrong and it explodes into a cloud of glyphs. Using latex means installing latex and I don't want another package manager with 1000+ packages on my system
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2024 15:21
|
|
|
in any case i'm pretty pleased with bazzite. it's not really a distro (as the guys say themselves), it's just a bunch of gaming-related fixes applied to fedora that most people can't be arsed to apply on their own. for example, i didn't have fully working fan/temp controls on fedora because the controller for my amd board is weird and requires a specific package from github - bazzite adds that. and i never got sunshine/moonlight to work reliably on base fedora, but the installation ootb in bazzite ran on the first try most importantly, i can confirm that switching back and forth between base fedora and bazzite works perfectly i'd be curious to try bluefin (same deal but for developers) but tbf nowadays i do a lot more gaming than coding on this machine anyway i'll try rebasing to it on my laptop next, which has the nightmare scenario for linux (relatively old, but still has nvidia/intel split graphics) and see if it works better NihilCredo fucked around with this message at 15:27 on Apr 17, 2024 |
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2024 15:24
|
|
|
NihilCredo posted:in any case i'm pretty please with bazzite. it's not really a distro (as the guys say themselves), it's just a bunch of gaming-related fixes applied to fedora that most people can't be arsed to apply on their own. for example, i didn't have fully working fan/temp controls on fedora because the controller for my amd board is weird and requires a specific package from github - bazzite adds that I also use Bazzite and have been very happy with it. I've only had to overlay three packages: btrfs-assistant, snapper, and sunshine. Everything else is flatpaks or in a distrobox assemble file that can be redeployed with one command.
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2024 15:29
|
|
|
bazzite is now blongo (deprecating bazumbo, forked from quazble)
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2024 18:07
|
|
|
Woolie Wool posted:Using latex means installing latex and I don't want another package manager with 1000+ packages on my system See that's the cool thing about modern LaTeX usage: you can ignore the package manager aspect, because you just install every single loving LaTeX package up front through your normal system-level package manager.
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2024 18:32
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 3, 2024 10:04 |
|
|
I just install the entirety of Texlive, yup.
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2024 18:47
|
|