|
I dont know posted:
It was breach twins too. That's taking all sorts of risk.
|
# ¿ Mar 25, 2014 23:42 |
|
|
# ¿ May 11, 2024 07:03 |
|
ToxicSlurpee posted:Complaining about that vaccine is also particularly stupid. The reason it comes under fire is because some people believe that promiscuity of any level should be severely punished so HPV is just God's way of punishing women who bone more than one dude over the course of their lives. While, you know, totally ignoring the fact that things like rape happen and humans have a long history of being really, really lovely at being monogamous. Or that not every religion is against sleeping around a bit. In JAMA published on 2/9/2015 quote:Conclusion:
|
# ¿ Feb 24, 2015 22:04 |
|
Discendo Vox posted:Please don't make me chase down citations. The source is here. The research comes with a large set of caveats that should be included in its citation, particularly for policy purposes. I just picked that paper because it was the most recent one. There have been other papers in other journals. I can pull up the citations if you want. The papers out there right now show that there is a small percentage of parents concerned about sexual disinhibition and then several papers trying to show no increase in risky sexual behavior after vaccination. The quality of those studies are meh, either retrospective or cohort with "experimental" statistical analysis. I don't think that you'll get any prospective well-run studies for this question due to cost. There hasn't been a paper that affirms this concern about increase in risky sexual behavior.
|
# ¿ Feb 24, 2015 23:43 |
|
Habibi posted:Every time someone drags this out, or the idea that XX illness was already dying out due to better hygiene/nutrition/etc... when the vaccine was introduced, and that we could easily do without said vaccine because of our comparatively improved health, I wonder how a disease that was almost dead in pre-vaccine, 1950s-hygiene-and-nutrition-and-medicine-level America, manages to roar back to life so dramatically among a tiny unvaccinated population, not to mention one which often prides itself on how well it takes care of itself, in 21st century hygiene-nutrition-medicine America. It is so weird. A good counter-example would be syphilis. It's incredibly treatable but we have no vaccine. The bacteria is highly susceptible to the same penicillin used in the 1940s with a 100% cure rate if given antibiotics. There is also no treatment besides antibiotics and our immune systems aren't getting better to defeat the bacteria. We now have cheap reliable testing to test for the disease. Despite these effective tests and treatments, we have not even come close to eliminating the disease. Compare the incidence per year of syphilis, a disease that we could treat exactly how you mentioned, versus any other disease that has a vaccine. We've eliminated small pox. We almost eliminated polio. Syphilis isn't going away.
|
# ¿ Feb 25, 2015 01:55 |
|
ToxicSlurpee posted:Probably. That's like $67 per American so in the grand scheme of things it isn't a huge sum of money. It's really really easy to make people freak out about anything with "billion" in it though. The cost of a hospitalization if you land in the ICU is $1000+ a day. Medication alone will cost a few hundred. Where the vaccines "make" money is in preventing the serious complications or death. For every 1 person that dies of measles, about 10 have to go to the ICU (~1%) for example.
|
# ¿ Apr 29, 2015 12:40 |
|
ToxicSlurpee posted:An ounce of prevention equals a pound of cure, as they say. Clearly, we also don't need fire codes anymore because who dies in fires anymore?
|
# ¿ May 1, 2015 02:21 |
|
|
# ¿ May 11, 2024 07:03 |
|
So what you're saying is that if my child gets measles, it will erase the effect of all the other harmful vaccines I've given my child?
|
# ¿ May 10, 2015 07:41 |