|
Mr. Devereaux, it's "betta" fish Also having worked animal control, they do throw them in the trash afterwards. Live or dead doesn't matter. Also who eats stringy roosters? I can see the new southern delicacy now, Losing Gamecoq au Vin.
|
# ¿ Apr 3, 2014 19:24 |
|
|
# ¿ May 12, 2024 05:18 |
|
Shbobdb posted:Re: Cockfighting beaten like a losing chickenboxer
|
# ¿ Apr 3, 2014 20:15 |
|
Gyges posted:Who wants to read about 19th century presidents drinking poo poo? There's no reinforcement of parental nagging there. Wear a coat saves lives, don't drink poo poo is just common sense in this day and age.
|
# ¿ Apr 4, 2014 15:48 |
|
Nessus posted:So by #1 are you talking about eminent domain or are you being more generic and including things like environmental restrictions? As for #2, ah yes, I recall this coming up-- though I'd ask, how do you expect to defend the 2nd Amendment if the billionaires ever decide they don't like it?
|
# ¿ Apr 5, 2014 00:22 |
|
zoux posted:Ughhhh We are so going to have open carry in this state soon. I watched a bit of this hearing, these people are loving nuts. I don't get how goddamn gunrights are peoples' #1 political issue, and they are completely ignorant of economic, education and other huge issues that affect their day to day lives more than the fantasy that some dude is going to kick down their suburban door in the middle of the night to murder their families for no reason.
|
# ¿ Apr 8, 2014 17:21 |
|
SumYungGui posted:I'm continually amazed by how no amount of cynicism can prepare me for reality. Hearing other Republican sound bites earlier today was absolute proof to me. Allowing people to talk about their pay (only not really because they'd be fired anyway but let's forget reality and run with this) would have placed an 'undue burden' on businesses and 'inhibit their freedoms'. People talking is an undue burden? How does someone even manage that with a straight face? The freedom for businesses to do what, rear end in a top hat? Say it. Just say it you god drat empty suits, the freedom to gently caress over the 99% for a buck then flee the country once everything is burnt to ashes.
|
# ¿ Apr 9, 2014 00:23 |
|
Whiskey Sours posted:Why do so many Americans worship the constitution without even knowing what's in it? That line is from the Declaration of Independence and has no legal standing, this man was a goddamn senator. Because reading is hard. edited because formatting fuckup edit 2: Man, the new Dark Souls really sucks. SubponticatePoster fucked around with this message at 20:33 on Apr 9, 2014 |
# ¿ Apr 9, 2014 20:26 |
|
Joementum posted:Don't worry, they thought of that too, which is why we have H.R. 4137: the Preserving Welfare for Needs Not Weed Act of 2014.
|
# ¿ Apr 10, 2014 19:48 |
|
Swan Oat posted:White people should be disenfranchised.
|
# ¿ Apr 17, 2014 15:31 |
|
Captain_Maclaine posted:Now who can argue with that? I think we're all indebted to Gabby Johnson for clearly stating what needed to be said. I'm particularly glad that these lovely children were here today to hear that speech. Not only was it authentic frontier gibberish, it expressed a courage little seen in this day and age.
|
# ¿ Apr 21, 2014 17:00 |
|
Tempest_56 posted:I'm not sure you could have posted up a worse idea, barring the suggestion that we somehow make Dick Cheney her VP. Bonus points if she sends him to a country where he gets arrested for war crimes.
|
# ¿ Apr 22, 2014 17:10 |
|
Three words for you: unpaid poli-sci interns.
|
# ¿ Apr 23, 2014 00:59 |
|
Stultus Maximus posted:What a dick. It's one thing to attack your opponent, it's another thing to attack your opponent for giving you a ham for Christmas.
|
# ¿ Apr 25, 2014 23:50 |
|
Fried Chicken posted:There was a breakthrough in preventing bacteria from adapting to antibiotics and becoming superbugs, identifying a property of Manuka honey that will have huge impacts for medicine and synthetic biology quote:Remember, it is 3 parts bourbon, 2 parts lemon, 1 part syrup.
|
# ¿ Apr 26, 2014 18:15 |
|
Fried Chicken posted:http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/03/140316132801.htm
|
# ¿ Apr 27, 2014 00:00 |
|
BUSH 2112 posted:I think the GOP is, depressingly, going to do an okay job of keeping the crazies down. Let's say, worst case scenario for the GOP, no one enters the race who hasn't already telegraphed that they would. The field would probably be something like Walker, Ryan, Paul, Cruz, and Perry. I don't believe that Rubio or Santorum are going to run, but they also have no chance of winning the nom, so whatever. The people who have been living in the Fox News/Breitbart/Drudge bubble have breathed too much methane and no amount of establishment oxygen is going to get let in. And there's enough of them that if the establishment doesn't at least give their guys lip service then they'll stay home at best and sabotage the convention at worst. All the loonies will do their own debates, their own appearances and if the establishment tries to punish them for it then there'll be hell to pay. What I'm saying is that you should buy a crate of whiskey, stock in the Betty Ford clinic, and because unless the tea party completely implodes and disappears in the next year and a half things are going to be way worse (or better depending on your point of view) than 2012.
|
# ¿ Apr 28, 2014 18:57 |
|
Fried Chicken posted:Even if you are ethically OK with the death penalty in theory, I don't see how you can sign off on it in practice given how messed up our justice system is. kaxman posted:What has always struck me is that a (more) humane method of execution exists, yet we don't use it. This suggests to me that execution is more about vengeance than justice, which is pretty hosed up.
|
# ¿ Apr 30, 2014 02:42 |
|
The Warszawa posted:I can't speak to these cases specifically but just because they don't appeal on actual innocence doesn't mean they're accepting their guilt in fact, it's just that getting an appellate court to overturn a sentence on issues of fact is much more difficult than getting it on an issue of law, if you have both of them. I'm aware of the DuPont case and if we actually had a *justice* system and not just a penal system he'd be in the same place as Warner.
|
# ¿ Apr 30, 2014 03:24 |
|
Fried Chicken posted:Which is exactly what is happening. Today Charles pierce reported about the militias and oath keepers splintering because the oath keepers ran like hell after getting a "tip from a credible high ranking DoJ source" that Holder was sending an armed drone to strike their group. The militias are not pleases that they ran, and their leader said he has "swear by the white skin on my rear end" that the oath keepers won't be allowed back Magres posted:Also the moment they run out of whatever saved cash they're burning through to do this instead of working jobs they'll bounce. Rather, they'll ask Cliven Bundy for money and he will go 'hahahahaha no you moochers' because he's a hateful old sack of poo poo.
|
# ¿ Apr 30, 2014 20:44 |
|
The Warszawa posted:I've always been intrigued by expats or would-be expats (or those who expatriate because of their feelings about the country's future), especially given how feelings about the future break down on racial lines, with white people feeling more pessimistic about the future and black and Hispanic people feeling more optimistic.
|
# ¿ May 1, 2014 03:45 |
|
Hieronymous Alloy posted:Maybe this is old news, but looks like the Cliven Bundy situation is breaking down:
|
# ¿ May 1, 2014 17:54 |
|
Carrasco posted:Don't forget to mention Enzi's rationale for it:
|
# ¿ May 1, 2014 18:42 |
|
I also have a hard time believing that in today's job climate an employer would put up with an employee who ignored customers to gently caress around on their phone when there are a hundred behind them waiting for a job of any stripe at all. It's not like unemployment is at 3%. Also somebody should ask Mr. Enzi how much he got paid to work at those jobs and how much his college tuition and healthcare costs were.
|
# ¿ May 1, 2014 19:30 |
|
zoux posted:Here's your first look at the monument the Satanic Church is going to request be installed at the Oklahoma State Capitol under their new religious freedom law:
|
# ¿ May 1, 2014 22:21 |
|
DemeaninDemon posted:I imagine there'd be a GOP senator or two that would say "You fuckers are idiots" and vote no as well. Taerkar posted:
|
# ¿ May 2, 2014 22:00 |
|
Oh no, somebody didn't know what was happening half a world away 20 minutes after the fact! CONSPIRACY! Ask these guys if they know what's going on in their offices right at this very moment and I bet they can't answer.
|
# ¿ May 2, 2014 23:07 |
|
fits my needs posted:Former Presidents get Secret Service protection for life, right? I wonder if the SS has foiled attempts on his life or if the left is really just a bunch of blowhards who wanted him to be tried in the ICJ for war crimes which would/will never happen.
|
# ¿ May 3, 2014 03:59 |
|
WhiskeyJuvenile posted:Congress reinstated lifetime coverage in 2012.
|
# ¿ May 3, 2014 09:35 |
|
Syjefroi posted:Here's a fun slow news day piece:
|
# ¿ May 3, 2014 18:57 |
|
Paul MaudDib posted:The "in a 5-4 decision..." thing for sure, especially on the basis that this is a core change to the firearm that could result in the firearm failing to function at a critical moment. I doubt the Supreme Court is going to allow a requirement that guns sold be of a type that is less likely to function reliably.
|
# ¿ May 3, 2014 20:06 |
|
The Feds will (and should) keep waiting them out. Because summer is coming and when it gets to be 115 out there many of them will find someplace else to be. Nevada scrub desert is miserable poo poo in the heat.
|
# ¿ May 4, 2014 19:31 |
|
|
# ¿ May 12, 2024 05:18 |
|
I live in Utah. I could vote for a ham sandwich and it wouldn't matter unless said sandwich has an -R after its name, in which case it will be elected. Also here Democrats are third party, after "absolutely loving crazy tea party Republican" aka Mike Lee, and "really right wing but less goddamn crazy Republican" aka Jon Huntsman.
|
# ¿ May 6, 2014 05:02 |