|
Egan Yardley posted:my fav is when they blur out animal faces my fav is when they blur out the numbers on buildings, defeating the entire purpose of having a maps integrated 360 virtual view of a location.
|
# ¿ Apr 29, 2014 15:27 |
|
|
# ¿ May 7, 2024 17:55 |
|
Install Windows posted:I hate when things are set so link colors don't chat after clicking my link colours never chat, weird. maybe i'm using really unsociable css
|
# ¿ May 4, 2014 05:25 |
|
Broken Machine posted:I actually like Google okay, they have good services if you're a small business. It does suck how they abruptly drop things or modify interfaces, often with little input from the outside. microsoft has better services for small business too. actual exchange, for one, so you're not stuck using some POS sync connector with outlook. and they have an actual product support lifecycle, so you know they're not just going to one day drop support for imap/caldav/activesync/whatever without telling anyone. i used google apps for business for a couple years, i moved everything to office 365 as part of the beta program a few years ago and it is so much better it's not even funny. google is poo poo for business because products and features live or die at the whims of the ballpit spergs. you literally don't know if a business critical feature will exist in a week
|
# ¿ May 6, 2014 20:08 |
|
i'm actually warming up to the idea of exchange as SaaS. but gently caress migrating mailboxes to smb accounts. exchange online supports direct migration from exchange server, office 365, which is identical feature wise, does not. you can only migrate mailboxes by exporting to PST, then importing to the new account. the new server essentials role does native azure ad integration and office 365/exchange integration out of the box. it's ridiculously simple to set up.
|
# ¿ May 6, 2014 21:23 |
|
Caged posted:office 365 has a full exchange online console. you can do proper migrations with it. afik the exchange server integration is only available with the Ex plans, not the Px small business plans. you can't mix the plans within a domain and the per license cost of the Px plans is lower so it tends to be what businesses with les than 25 licenses are using.
|
# ¿ May 6, 2014 22:18 |
|
Cocoa Crispies posted:i just think "what if you only had one plan that was $5 per seat-month or $50 per seat-year" why do that when you can have 15 plans covering every price point with every level of feature and product availability spread amongst them. some of the features may or may not be listed on the license comparison page, because those features are specific to types of licenses, and are enumerated elsewhere in a document you won't find unless you know the specific name this week to search for. it's like a secret menu for your SaaS
|
# ¿ May 6, 2014 22:30 |
|
uncurable mlady posted:also azure is more expensive than aws, although you can really easily accuse aws of being cryptic as gently caress about pricing models azure also has separate pricing for storage based on the intended use. backup storage cost several times more per gb than standard storage, because reasons.
|
# ¿ May 6, 2014 22:33 |
|
Caged posted:right, you need enterprise to federate with ad to be able to extend your onsite exchange to *~the cloud~*, but you definitely can migrate from onsite exchange into any office 365 plan using native exchange poo poo (e.g. the way outlook connects to exchange, whatever the one that isnt activesync is). just make an account with full access to all the mailboxes on your on-prem exchange, and feed those details into the migration wizard and it goes off and does the rest. nice. last i looked the ms technet article and the support group said the MAPI migration tool wasn't supported with the SMB plans.
|
# ¿ May 6, 2014 22:37 |
|
AtomD posted:did u try going in to powershell and typing "export-" and pressing tab a lot? i did not, i rtfm'd. that was my mistake. e. i just looked, there is a difference between the small business and "midsize" business plans Caged posted:or that they have to pick between push email on their iphone or being able to flag messages. google apps looks very much like a project thats been abandoned because something a bit shinier came along and all the staff got bored. google_products.odf infernal machines fucked around with this message at 22:58 on May 6, 2014 |
# ¿ May 6, 2014 22:55 |
|
yup. there is no exchange admin interface in the small business plans. the instructions here don't work because this "Click Admin, and then click Exchange" doesn't exist in the P1 and P2 plans. gooo microsoft. and yet it's still better than google apps for business by a country mile
|
# ¿ May 6, 2014 23:04 |
|
article comments posted:This does not work for Partners who have delegated Admin access for their clients. The old interface was easier, why is it hidden even from the Admin. Is there another hidden avenue for this for Partners who resell and support several clients? lol
|
# ¿ May 6, 2014 23:37 |
|
Smythe posted:Most Pro Gamers are forced by the sponsor overlords to max out their gains and get cut or swole depending on their nation of origin. e.g. Koreans like their men lean and cut but Russians like their men hulked out and huge. Some little insights I've picked up throughout my fandom. how do you like your men Smythe?
|
# ¿ May 20, 2014 22:42 |
|
oh poo poo. looks like that pastebin thing was real after all. wow! oh wow!
|
# ¿ May 21, 2014 03:35 |
|
Forums Terrorist posted:greenpos hurts my eyes after years of drug abuse i get weird persistence of vision with that colour of green. them amber does it too but not nearly as badly. thanks yospos. thospos
|
# ¿ Jul 6, 2014 17:33 |
|
that sure is a goddamn wall of text up there
|
# ¿ Jul 6, 2014 17:45 |
|
could you imagine what would happen to google if we had that mid-90s hunger for antitrust enforcement in the states again?
|
# ¿ Jul 6, 2014 18:36 |
|
Nintendo Kid posted:A slap on the wrist like Microsoft got. that happened because everyone had lost interest by the time the case was half over. no one cared any more. they were out for blood when they started though
|
# ¿ Jul 6, 2014 20:13 |
|
Nintendo Kid posted:yes because truly Google also would be unable to afford the lawyers to drag stuff out long enough. get real. are you this obnoxious irl or is it just a posting gimmick?
|
# ¿ Jul 6, 2014 20:22 |
|
fishmech manages to fishmech himself into an argument with someone who isn't even disagreeing with him you must be a real hit at parties
|
# ¿ Jul 6, 2014 20:29 |
|
the original ruling was they they were guilty as all hell and the company was to be broken up, that was in mid-2000. by mid-2001, on appeal, they decided that the original judge was a loving retard and couldn't really do most of what he had ruled. also that he had basically made huge ethical lapses by commenting publicly on the case while judging it. i don't know that the republicans really had a lot to do with that
|
# ¿ Jul 6, 2014 22:26 |
|
rotor posted:bush was elected in 2000 FYI and gutted the doj prosecution team it's suspicious alright, but the case didn't really collapse. the appeals court decided they couldn't actually break up microsoft, just force them to open the platform. i dunno, maybe ol' GW phoned up kollar-kotelly and told her not to allow the breakup, but it seems more likely that they just decided they couldn't justify the breakup of the company within the framework of the law. they did just steamroll all the objections to the settlement when approving it though, so who knows.
|
# ¿ Jul 6, 2014 23:16 |
|
Fuzzy Mammal posted:well they got 1 years worth of profits out of pnb paribas for sidestepping the sanctions on sudan over darfur just this month. in one sense getting record sums out of these assholes is nice, but in the other its turned in to this extortion racket. the companies can't conceivably go to trial and are under absolute duress of complete revocation of business. no judicial review, no legislation applies, no public policy debate as to whether its better to do this or go after executives/boardmembers personally. it reeks of political ambition by ny prosecutors and tying all this to personal prosecutorial discretion is unseemly. now that it's all just fines, they're considered part of the cost of doing business. obviously they'll fight to minimize the fines, but as long as they're still making money who gives a poo poo? at least google learned one important lesson from microsoft, buy the legislators off before anyone starts rumbling about antitrust. they've been lobbying hardore for at least a decade now.
|
# ¿ Jul 7, 2014 03:01 |
|
gmail fucks mail headers sideways. i moved a client to office 365 from google apps, none of the replies worked after the move because google doesn't actually use smtp (or any other kind of standard headers) for internally routed mail
|
# ¿ Jul 7, 2014 07:05 |
|
PleasureKevin posted:so has google dropped that one lawyer that is evicting school teachers. why would they do that when they can just stop indexing the articles that mention him? internet memory hole
|
# ¿ Jul 8, 2014 05:19 |
|
hey cool, it's the idealism of the 50s without the social contract maybe those poors will just quietly die off so all us world striding techno gods can enjoy our ten hour work weeks in peace, drinking our roboto-lattes while the roomba manicures our palatial gardens
|
# ¿ Jul 8, 2014 06:17 |
|
tractor fanatic posted:idg why it's part of the social contract to provide people with work instead of just "housing, security, opportunity for your kids" "housing, security, opportunity for your kids" should be the social contract, it's not, and neither is providing people with work that pays a living wage. there is no social contract in the dark enlightenment their plan isn't mincome or something, it's just automating the poors out of a job and outsourcing the rest.
|
# ¿ Jul 8, 2014 06:53 |
|
Ludwig van Halen posted:but why would you want any of that lf alert! lf alert!
|
# ¿ Jul 8, 2014 07:35 |
|
are you now or have you ever been a member of a posting organization? name names!
|
# ¿ Jul 8, 2014 18:43 |
|
Nintendo Kid posted:OH NO HOW HORRIBLE TO WORK FOR A MASSIVELY PROFITABLE COMPANY THAT WILL BE AROUND FOREVER you are actually autistic aren't you? you don't see how employees who style themselves as innovators and "disruptors" and base their identities around being googlers would have a problem with working for a company that's become the poster child for institutional computing? here, lets start with these and work our way from there
|
# ¿ Jul 11, 2014 05:44 |
|
Nintendo Kid posted:i actually don't, because most of them don't give a poo poo about anything as long as they have their free cafeterias and ballpits. google stopped being about "disruption" a good decade ago. tell that to justine tunney
|
# ¿ Jul 11, 2014 06:08 |
|
Nintendo Kid posted:justine tunney is a certifiably insane fascist here we agree
|
# ¿ Jul 11, 2014 06:27 |
|
JumpinJackFlash posted:the problem with email is that it uses open standards i'm reasonably certain that gmail doesn't internally. they do some weird, nonstandard message header fuckery that ensure that mail sent or received within gmail will completely loving break if exported and hosted elsewhere
|
# ¿ Jul 15, 2014 04:15 |
|
Shaggar posted:everyone does that though. email isn't very good without custom fuckery and you can only do that inside your own network yeah, but even exchange uses semi-standard x.400/x.500 and straight smtp to AD mapping for their internal fuckery. gmail makes it look like an smtp header but with a completely invalid address
|
# ¿ Jul 15, 2014 04:21 |
|
Notorious b.s.d. posted:and exchange documents their fuckery. yes, this is the point
|
# ¿ Jul 15, 2014 04:57 |
|
they also don't take a know standards compliant header format and silently break it in a way that looks right but completely fails to work
|
# ¿ Jul 15, 2014 04:58 |
|
Shaggar posted:activesync did more no poo poo. it's actually a well documented standard implemented by multiple vendors, basically the first choice for anyone who wants multi-platform mail calendar and contact sync in an integrated system. so of course google dropped it
|
# ¿ Jul 15, 2014 18:30 |
|
Smythe posted:call me by my hacker handle pls okay "cockgargler69"
|
# ¿ Jul 15, 2014 22:20 |
|
Busta Chimes.wav posted:who cares. they made the best search engine and the best maps, gmail is good, self driving cars are cool. that any of these do not make money doesn't matter at all to me. search is buggered beyond recognition now, trying to get google to search for what you've actually typed requires going through two hidden menus and selecting "verbatim", as opposed to say, searching for what the gently caress you typed by default. they've completely hosed the maps interface over the last couple years, for no obvious reason, and hidden or removed every useful feature it had. gmail is only good compared to webmail pre-gmail. and even then as long as you never plan to go anywhere else, because they do some awful things to their message headers. apps for business is a joke in every sense. google makes a lot of bad products now, and the few products that were good, even if only by comparison to their competition are being shitted up on the regular now because bored ballpit spergs can't leave well enough alone
|
# ¿ Jul 30, 2014 21:55 |
|
cremnob posted:Google’s latest innovation is not computerized eyeglasses or self-driving cars. Its major selling points are the more old-fashioned pleasures of sand, sun and schmoozing. sounds like the setup for a tom clancy novel. now all we need is a good 'ol fashioned terrorist attack on the resort
|
# ¿ Aug 4, 2014 23:50 |
|
|
# ¿ May 7, 2024 17:55 |
|
pagancow posted:i like how it's cool for the tech crowd to hate on google, but normals love it please forums poster pagancow, tell us more about this fascinating world of "normals" you know so much about.
|
# ¿ Aug 5, 2014 14:18 |